-
1.
Etelcalcetide versus placebo for secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving hemodialysis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhu, Y, Ou, J, Liu, X, Xie, Z
Clinical nephrology. 2020;(4):173-180
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etelcalcetide for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients receiving hemodialysis, and a meta-analysis was performed using randomized controlled trials (RCTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched studies published on PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase to collect RCTs comparing etelcalcetide with placebo for the treatment of SHPT. Unpublished studies and information were also searched in ClinicalTrials. RESULTS Five RCTs involving 1,268 participants were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, etelcalcetide contributed to more participants who achieved ≥ 30% reduction in parathyroid hormone (PTH) (relative risk (RR) 8.64; 95% CI, 6.66 to 11.19; p < 0.00001) and a PTH level of ≤ 300 pg/mL (RR 11.80; 95% CI, 8.15 to 17.08; p < 0.00001) as well as an increase in the incidence of hypocalcemia (RR 18.76; 95% CI, 4.55 to 77.26, p < 0.0001), nausea (RR 1.79; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.70; p = 0.006), or vomiting (RR 1.82; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.85; p = 0.008). Etelcalcetide reduced serum phosphate (mean difference (MD) -7.28; 95% CI, -8.82 to -5.74; p < 0.00001), calcium phosphorus product (MD -14.48; 95% CI, -15.07 to -13.88; p < 0.00001), and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (MD -24.80; 95% CI, -28.91 to -20.68) levels compared with the placebo. CONCLUSION Etelcalcetide can effectively control serum PTH and disorder of mineral metabolism but with more side effects than placebo. Further studies comparing etelcalcetide with other medication treatments for SHPT will be needed to evaluate if etelcalcetide might be a valuable choice with less pill burden for patients with SHPT receiving hemodialysis.
-
2.
Subtotal parathyroidectomy versus total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation for secondary hyperparathyroidism: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yuan, Q, Liao, Y, Zhou, R, Liu, J, Tang, J, Wu, G
Langenbeck's archives of surgery. 2019;(6):669-679
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal surgical approach of parathyroidectomy for patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) has been controversial. The updated meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of subtotal parathyroidectomy (SPTX) versus total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation (TPTX + AT). METHODS A thorough systematic search was performed on the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library to identify eligible studies. Data were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were the symptomatic improvement, radiological changes, hypocalcemia rate, the requirement for vitamin D analogues, time to recurrence, recurrence, persistence, and reoperation rates of SPTX versus TPTX + AT. RESULTS A total of 18 studies with 3656 patients (1864 patients in SPTX and 1792 patients in TPTX + AT group) were included, and 15 studies were included in quantitative synthesis. No significant difference was observed in symptomatic improvement (93.3%, 89.0%; P = 0.99), radiological changes (85.4%, 85.3%; P = 0.91), hypocalcemia rate (16.6%, 18.1%; P = 0.29), persistence rate (6.1%, 2.0%; P = 0.16), time to recurrence (mean difference 1.46; P = 0.87), recurrence rate (9.2%, 7.1%; P = 0.76), and reoperation rate (5.3%, 5.8%; P = 0.66) between SPTX and TPTX + AT groups. Longer operative time (150 vs. 120 min), prolonged in-hospital stay (5.0 vs. 4.1 days), lower 1-month serum calcium level, and higher requirement for vitamin D analogues at 12 months were significantly observed in patients who underwent TPTX + AT compared to SPTX. CONCLUSIONS The two surgical approaches were both effective at controlling SHPT in clinical and laboratory terms. However, most of the data shown were not statistically significant. It was acceptable that surgeons chose either SPTX or TPTX + AT for SHPT.
-
3.
Cinacalcet plus vitamin D versus vitamin D alone for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients undergoing dialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Xu, J, Yang, Y, Ma, L, Fu, P, Peng, H
International urology and nephrology. 2019;(11):2027-2036
Abstract
BACKGROUND Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common and serious complication of chronic kidney disease, particularly in end-stage renal disease. Currently, both cinacalcet and vitamin D are used to treat SHPT via two different mechanisms, but it is still unclear whether the combination use of these two drugs can be a safe and effective alternative to vitamin D alone. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of cinacalcet plus vitamin D in the treatment of SHPT. METHODS Four electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science, were searched for eligible publications. All randomized-controlled trials comparing cinacalcet plus vitamin D with vitamin D alone in SHPT patients undergoing dialysis were included. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model or fixed-effects model. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by removing any one study successively to estimate the stability of the pooled results, and subgroup analysis was carried out to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, and funnel plots were used to test publication bias. RESULTS A total of 8 randomized-controlled trials involving 1480 patients were included in the study. Compared with vitamin D treatment, the combination use of cinacalcet and vitamin D significantly lowered serum calcium (MD - 0.82, 95% CI - 1.02 to - 0.61, P < 0.001), phosphorus (MD - 0.57, 95% CI - 0.97 to - 0.18, P = 0.005), and calcium × phosphorus product (MD - 9.41, 95% CI - 10.00 to - 8.82, P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in serum parathyroid hormone (PTH, MD 43.99, 95% CI - 49.22 to 137.20, P = 0.35), ≥ 30% reduction in PTH (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.69-1.52, P = 0.91), and PTH achieve 150-300 pg/ml (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.68-1.15, P = 0.35). Moreover, the combination therapy did not increase the risk of all adverse events, all-cause mortality, diarrhea, muscle spasms, and headache (all P > 0.05), but had a higher risk of hypocalcemia (RR 17.98, 95% CI 5.68-56.99, P < 0.001), and nausea or vomiting (RR 3.47, 95% CI 2.25-5.35, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In comparison with vitamin D alone, the combination use of cinacalcet and vitamin D significantly lowered serum calcium, phosphorus, and the calcium × phosphorus product, and did not increase the risk of all adverse events, all-cause mortality, diarrhea, muscle spasms, and headache, whereas had no effect on serum PTH and increased the risk of hypocalcemia and nausea or vomiting. Future studies are needed to assess the effects of cinacalcet plus vitamin D on PTH level, cardiovascular events, and other clinical outcomes in larger samples with longer durations.
-
4.
Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Etelcalcetide in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Receiving Hemodialysis.
Chen, P, Narayanan, A, Wu, B, Gisleskog, PO, Gibbs, JP, Chow, AT, Melhem, M
Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2018;(1):71-85
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Etelcalcetide is a novel calcimimetic that binds and activates calcium-sensing receptors (CaSRs) for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). METHODS To assess titrated dosing regimens, population pharmacokinetic (PK) and PK/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modeling of etelcalcetide was performed using NONMEM 7.2. In this analysis, plasma etelcalcetide, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcium (Ca) concentration-time data were collected from five phase I, II, and III clinical trials following single or multiple intravenous doses of etelcalcetide ranging from 2.5 to 60 mg. A semi-mechanistic model was used to describe the relationship between etelcalcetide, PTH, and Ca. This model included the role of PTH in Ca regulation, the feedback of Ca onto PTH production via the CaSR, and the activity of etelcalcetide plasma levels in increasing the sensitivity of the CaSR to Ca via the cooperative binding model. The impact of relevant covariates was evaluated by stepwise forward/backward selection. Model evaluation was based on standard goodness-of-fit plots and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPCs). Simulation was conducted to evaluate titrated dosing regimens. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The time courses of etelcalcetide, PTH, and Ca were well-described by the model. The clearance and central volume of distribution (Vc) of etelcalcetide were 0.472 L/h and 49.9 L, respectively, while estimates of the turnover half-lives of PTH and Ca were 0.36 and 23 h, respectively. The extent of interindividual variability in model parameters was low to moderate (6-67%), and no covariates were identified as significant predictors of PK and PD variability. pcVPCs confirmed the predictive ability of the model. CONCLUSIONS The current analysis confirms the putative mechanism of action of etelcalcetide as an allosteric activator of CaSR. Simulations showed that dose titration of etelcalcetide, rather than fixed dose, is needed to effectively decrease the PTH level in patient populations.
-
5.
Meta-analysis: the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism and proteinuria in chronic kidney disease.
Han, T, Rong, G, Quan, D, Shu, Y, Liang, Z, She, N, Liu, M, Yang, B, Cheng, G, Lv, Y, et al
BioMed research international. 2013;:320560
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of using Paricalcitol for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients on dialysis. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of Paricalcitol for the management of SHPT in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not yet on dialysis. A secondary aim was to determine if sufficient data was available to assess the effect of Paricalcitol for the management of proteinuria. METHODS A meta-analysis was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 4.2 software. RESULTS Paricalcitol is effective in lowering PTH in patients with CKD not yet on dialysis and is also effective in lowering proteinuria in diabetic CKD patients. However, we uncovered a safety signal identifying an elevated calcium phosphate product and a trend towards the development of hypercalcemia. A phosphate elevation was not demonstrated because the target used in the clinical studies was a P > 5.5 mg/dl, a value appropriate for dialysis patients and not CKD patients. CONCLUSION Although Paricalcitol is effective in lowering PTH, we advise caution in the use of any active Vitamin D analogues in patients with CKD because of the potential risk of exacerbating vascular calcification.
-
6.
Meta-analysis: vitamin D compounds in chronic kidney disease.
Palmer, SC, McGregor, DO, Macaskill, P, Craig, JC, Elder, GJ, Strippoli, GF
Annals of internal medicine. 2007;(12):840-53
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitamin D compounds are widely used to prevent and treat secondary hyperparathyroidism. PURPOSE To determine whether vitamin D therapy improves biochemical markers of mineral metabolism and cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in chronic kidney disease. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2007), EMBASE (January 1980 to July 2007), and Cochrane databases were searched without language restriction. STUDY SELECTION Randomized, controlled trials of vitamin D compounds in chronic kidney disease were identified. DATA EXTRACTION Two authors independently extracted data. DATA SYNTHESIS Seventy-six trials were identified for inclusion; 3667 participants were enrolled. Vitamin D compounds did not reduce the risk for death, bone pain, vascular calcification, or parathyroidectomy. Compared with placebo, established vitamin D sterols were associated with an increased risk for hypercalcemia (relative risk, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.16 to 4.85]) and hyperphosphatemia (relative risk, 1.77 [CI, 1.15 to 2.74]) but did not show a consistent reduction in parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Compared with placebo, more recently developed vitamin D analogues were associated with hypercalcemia (relative risk, 5.15 [CI, 1.06 to 24.97]) but not hyperphosphatemia, and levels of PTH were reduced (weighted mean difference, -10.77 pmol/L [CI, -20.51 to -1.03 pmol/L]). For suppression of PTH, intravenous administration was superior to oral vitamin D, but higher intravenous doses were used. LIMITATIONS Few studies reported patient-level outcomes, including mortality (8 of 76 trials), and only 5 trials directly compared the effects of treatment with newer vitamin D compounds versus established ones. Heterogeneity in some comparisons remained unexplained by metaregression analyses. CONCLUSION Vitamin D compounds do not consistently reduce PTH levels, and beneficial effects on patient-level outcomes are unproven. The value of vitamin D treatment for people with chronic kidney disease remains uncertain.