-
1.
The efficacy and safety of low dialysate sodium levels for patients with maintenance haemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geng, X, Song, Y, Hou, B, Ma, Y, Wang, Y
International journal of surgery (London, England). 2020;:332-339
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIM: Fluid overload and hypertension frequently results in cardiovascular disease, which is one of the leading causes of death in dialysis patients. It is plausible that low dialysate [Na+] may decrease total body sodium content, thereby reducing fluid overload and hypertension, and ultimately reducing cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using a low (<138 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance haemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science up to August 22, 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), both parallel and cross-over, of low (<138 mM) versus neutral (138-140 mM) or high (>140 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance HD patients were included. Mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values were estimated to compare the outcomes. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality independently. All statistical analyses were performed using the standard statistical procedures of RevMan 5.2. RESULTS 12 Randomised controlled trials with 390 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Of these studies, three studies were parallel group, and the remaining nine were crossover. Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+], low dialysate [Na+] reduced dialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP) with a pooled MD of -3.38 mmHg (95% CI -4.57 to -2.19; P < 0.00001), reduced interdialytic weight gain with a pooled MD of -0.35 kg (95% CI -0.51 to -0.18; P < 0.0001), reduced predialysis serum [Na+] with a pooled MD of -2.62 mM (95% CI -3.59 to -1.66; P < 0.00001). In contrast, low dialysate [Na+] increased intradialytic hypotension events with a pooled RR of 1.54 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.05; P = 0.003), increased the incidence of intradialytic cramps with a pooled RR of 1.77 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.73; P = 0.01). However, no difference was found between lower and higher dialysate [Na+] in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS Though our pooled result indicated that low dialysate [Na+] reduced MAP, interdialytic weight gain and predialysis serum [Na+] significantly, it also indicated that low dialysate [Na+] could increase the incidence of intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic cramps events. Considering the contradiction in efficacy and safety of low dialysate [Na+] in our analysis, future larger and up-to-date definitive studies are needed to evaluate the medium to long-term effects of low sodium levels in dialysis fluid, and better inform clinical practice.
-
2.
Reducing the risk of intradialytic hypotension by altering the composition of the dialysate.
Vareesangthip, K, Davenport, A
Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis. 2020;(3):276-281
Abstract
Hypotension is the most common complication of outpatient hemodialysis sessions, with a reported prevalence of 4% to 31%, depending on which definition has been used and whether patients are symptomatic and nursing interventions were required. Dialysis centers which mix the dialysate in the dialysis machine have the opportunity to individualize the composition of the dialysate for patients. This permits a choice of dialysate sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate, acetate, and citrate concentrations and temperature. Studies have reported a higher intradialytic systolic blood pressure and fewer episodes of intradialytic hypotension when using a higher dialysate sodium, calcium, magnesium concentrations and lower temperature, but no clinical advantage for changing the potassium, bicarbonate, or citrate for acetate concentrations. The introduction of newer technology allowing real time measurements of plasma electrolyte concentrations will potentially allow changing the dialysate composition to reduce the risk of intradialytic hypotension without increasing the risk of positive electrolyte balances.
-
3.
Sodium, volume and pressure control in haemodialysis patients for improved cardiovascular outcomes.
Pinter, J, Chazot, C, Stuard, S, Moissl, U, Canaud, B
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2020;(Suppl 2):ii23-ii30
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Chronic volume overload is pervasive in patients on chronic haemodialysis and substantially increases the risk of cardiovascular death. The rediscovery of the three-compartment model in sodium metabolism revolutionizes our understanding of sodium (patho-)physiology and is an effect modifier that still needs to be understood in the context of hypertension and end-stage kidney disease. Assessment of fluid overload in haemodialysis patients is central yet difficult to achieve, because traditional clinical signs of volume overload lack sensitivity and specificity. The highest all-cause mortality risk may be found in haemodialysis patients presenting with high fluid overload but low blood pressure before haemodialysis treatment. The second highest risk may be found in patients with both high blood pressure and fluid overload, while high blood pressure but normal fluid overload may only relate to moderate risk. Optimization of fluid overload in haemodialysis patients should be guided by combining the traditional clinical evaluation with objective measurements such as bioimpedance spectroscopy in assessing the risk of fluid overload. To overcome the tide of extracellular fluid, the concept of time-averaged fluid overload during the interdialytic period has been established and requires possible readjustment of a negative target post-dialysis weight. 23Na-magnetic resonance imaging studies will help to quantitate sodium accumulation and keep prescribed haemodialytic sodium mass balance on the radar. Cluster-randomization trials (e.g. on sodium removal) are underway to improve our therapeutic approach to cardioprotective haemodialysis management.
-
4.
High magnesium dialysate does not improve intradialytic hemodynamics or abrogate myocardial stunning.
Jefferies, HJ, Lemoine, S, McIntyre, CW
Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis. 2020;(4):506-515
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hemodialysis (HD) induces myocardial stunning and is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Intradialytic hypotension is a modifiable determinant of myocardial stunning. Magnesium (Mg) is reported to be valuable in maintaining intradialytic blood pressure, which potentially would protect against demand myocardial ischemia. This study aimed to compare high vs. low dialysate Mg effects on intradialytic hemodynamics and HD-induced myocardial stunning. METHODS Twenty stable prevalent HD patients entered a randomized cross-over trial of low (0.5 mmol/L) vs. high (1.0 mmol/L) dialysate Mg. Patients were studied after 2 weeks of standard HD with each Mg concentration. Serial echocardiography assessed myocardial stunning, measured by left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs). Continuous intradialytic hemodynamics were measured noninvasively using thoracic bioimpedance. FINDINGS Median predialysis serum Mg was higher with high dialysate Mg (1.45[1.29-1.55] vs. 1.03[0.98-1.1] mmol/L, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in maximum intradialytic reduction in systolic BP. There was no significant difference in stroke volume, total peripheral resistance, and cardiac output. Overall ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) (as a sensitive marker of contractile function) was higher before dialysis in high Mg group, but there was no difference in GLS at peak stress. However, we showed a significant correlation between Mg changes and GLS changes, r = -0.47, P = 0.02. There was no difference in mean number of peak stress RWMAs per patient (4.0 ± 2.2 vs. 4.3 ± 2.9, P = 0.5). Ultrafiltration volume, a critical determinant of stunning, was not different between high and low dialysate Mg studies (1.35[0-3.3] vs. 1.5[0-2.8], P = 0.49). DISCUSSION Manipulation of magnesium by altering dialysate magnesium concentration does not influence intradialytic hemodynamic response or HD-induced myocardial stunning in the short term. However, decreasing Mg changes appears to decrease GLS changes.
-
5.
Fluid Therapy: Friend or Foe?
Grace, E, Keir, AK
Clinics in perinatology. 2020;(3):515-528
Abstract
Many questions surround fluid bolus therapy and subsequent fluid management in neonatal critical care as they do in pediatric and adult critical care. This review explores the known key clinical aspects of fluid bolus therapy and fluid balance in the first 7 days of life and provides suggestions for further work in this area. It draws on the pediatric and adult critical care literature to provide thought-provoking data around the potential harms of excessive intravenous fluids, which may prove relevant to neonatology. Current data suggest that fluid bolus therapy and early-life positive fluid balance in neonates may be associated with harm.
-
6.
Metformin attenuates the postprandial fall in blood pressure in type 2 diabetes.
Borg, MJ, Jones, KL, Sun, Z, Horowitz, M, Rayner, CK, Wu, T
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2019;(5):1251-1254
Abstract
Metformin has been shown to modulate the cardiovascular response to intraduodenal glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and may have the capacity to regulate postprandial blood pressure (BP), which is often inadequately compensated in T2DM, resulting in postprandial hypotension. In the present study, we evaluated the acute effects of metformin on the BP and heart rate (HR) responses to oral glucose in patients with T2DM. Ten diet-controlled T2DM patients were evaluated on two occasions in a double-blind, randomized, crossover design. Participants received either metformin 1 g or saline (control) intraduodenally 60 minutes before ingesting a 50 g glucose drink labelled with 150 mg 13 C-acetate. BP, HR, plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and gastric emptying (breath test) were evaluated over 180 minutes. Systolic and diastolic BP decreased and HR increased after oral glucose (P < 0.001 for all) on both days. Metformin attenuated the fall in systolic BP (P < 0.001), increased plasma GLP-1 concentrations (P < 0.05) and slowed gastric emptying (P < 0.05) without significantly affecting diastolic BP or HR. In conclusion, metformin acutely attenuates the hypotensive response to oral glucose, associated with augmented GLP-1 secretion and delayed gastric emptying, effects potentially relevant to its favourable cardiovascular profile.
-
7.
International, multicentre, observational study of fluid bolus therapy in neonates.
Keir, AK, Karam, O, Hodyl, N, Stark, MJ, Liley, HG, Shah, PS, Stanworth, SJ, ,
Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2019;(6):632-639
Abstract
AIM: To assess the prevalence, types and indications for fluid bolus therapy in neonates with haemodynamic compromise. METHODS This was a pragmatic, international, multicentre observational study in neonatal units across Australasia, Europe and North America with a predefined study period of 10-15 study days per participating neonatal unit between December 2015 and March 2017. Infants ≤28 days of age who received a fluid bolus for the management of haemodynamic compromise (≥10 mL/kg given at ≤6 h) were included. RESULTS A total of 163 neonates received a bolus over 8479 eligible patient days in 41 neonatal units. Prevalence of fluid bolus therapy varied between centres from 0 to 28.6% of admitted neonates per day, with a pooled prevalence rate of 1.5% (95% confidence interval 1.1-1.9%). The most common fluid used was 0.9% sodium chloride (129/163; 79%), and the volume of fluid administered was most commonly 10 mL/kg (115/163; 71%) over a median of 30 min (interquartile range 20-60). The most frequent indications were hypotension (n = 56; 34%), poor perfusion (n = 20; 12%) and metabolic acidosis (n = 20; 12%). Minimal or no clinical improvement was reported by clinicians in 66 of 163 cases (40%). CONCLUSIONS Wide international variations in types, indications and effects of fluid bolus administration in haemodynamically compromised neonates suggest uncertainty in the risk-benefit profile. This is likely to reflect the lack of robust evidence to support the efficacy of different fluid types, doses and appropriate indications. Together, these highlight a need for further clinically relevant studies.
-
8.
Blood Pressure and Cognitive Performance After a Single Administration of a Camphor-Crataegus Combination in Adolescents with Low Blood Pressure.
Schandry, R, Lindauer, D, Mauz, M
Planta medica. 2018;(17):1249-1254
Abstract
Low blood pressure is rather widespread among adolescents and frequently accompanied by complaints. Two single-center, double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled trials were performed with adolescent participants in the age range of 14 - 17 y having a systolic blood pressure below 118 mmHg (boys) or 110 mmHg (girls). They received a single dose of 20 drops of a fixed combination of natural D-camphor and an ethanolic extract from fresh Crataegus berries (CCC) or of an ethanolic placebo. The efficacy of CCC (commercial name Korodin) has proven its efficacy in the treatment of low blood pressure in adults of all ages, although related placebo-controlled, double-blind studies for adolescents following European (EU) pediatric regulations are lacking. Blood pressure and heart rate were assessed during a rest period, prior to substance administration, 1 min thereafter, and after about 5 min. Additionally, performance was assessed by two cognitive tests. After administration of CCC, a significantly greater rise in blood pressure occurred compared to placebo. In the cognitive tasks, no significant differences were observed. No adverse events or subjective complaints were reported at the final examination; thus, the present study provides evidence for the safety and tolerability of CCC after a single administration.
-
9.
Feeding during dialysis-risks and uncertainties.
Agarwal, R, Georgianos, P
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2018;(6):917-922
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Allowing dialysis patients to eat during the treatment is controversial. It is, therefore, no surprise that practices and policies with respect to intradialytic food consumption vary considerably from unit to unit and from country to country. Those who defend the position of feeding during dialysis reason that intradialytic meals offer a supervised and effective therapy for protein-energy wasting. Those who take the opposite view argue that intradialytic food intake should be avoided for the following three reasons. First, interventional studies show that eating during dialysis causes a clinically significant reduction in systemic blood pressure during the postprandial period and elevates the risk of symptomatic intradialytic hypotension; the latter is associated with increased mortality risk. Second, clinical studies have shown that eating during dialysis interferes with the adequacy of the delivered dialysis, whereas eating 2-3 h before the dialysis session has no impact on the efficiency of the subsequent dialysis treatment. And third, randomized studies show that eating during dialysis focus on the positive outcomes but do not adequately balance this potential benefit against the risk of intradialytic hemodynamic instability and poor quality of delivered dialysis. Even after half a century of providing long-term dialysis, definitive randomized trials that balance risks and benefits of eating during dialysis are missing. These knowledge gaps require randomized trials. Since there is a real possibility of harm with eating during dialysis, we caution that instead of encouraging the widespread use of intradialytic meals, practices and policies should focus on adequate nutrient intake during the interdialytic interval.
-
10.
Effects of Sodium Concentration and Dialysate Temperature Changes on Blood Pressure in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized, Triple-Blind Crossover Clinical Trial.
Ebrahimi, H, Safavi, M, Saeidi, MH, Emamian, MH
Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. 2017;(2):117-125
Abstract
The present study investigated the effects of different temperatures and sodium dialysate concentration on blood pressure in hemodialysis patients. Following Williams' design, hemodialysis patients were randomly assigned into four dialysis modes. Dialysate temperature was set at 37°C for modes A and C and, 35°C for modes B and D. Sodium concentration was set at 138 mmol/L in modes A and B, while it changed from 150 mmol/L to 138 mmol/L in modes C and D. Using analysis of variance for repeated measures, the mean values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were investigated. The mean values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in modes C and D had a significant difference with the values in mode A. The mean values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients dialyzed with mode B had a significant difference with the values in those dialyzed with mode D. Moreover, there were significant differences in the incidence of hypotension between A and other modes and between B and modes C and D, but this difference was not significant between modes C and D. In order to reduce intradialytic blood pressure fluctuations and hypotension, the nursing staff are recommended to gradually reduce dialysate sodium concentration.