-
1.
Evaluation of a Home-Based Behavioral Treatment Model for Children With Tube Dependency.
Taylor, S, Purdy, SC, Jackson, B, Phillips, K, Virues-Ortega, J
Journal of pediatric psychology. 2019;(6):656-668
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate a home-based behavioral treatment model for children with tube dependency. METHODS Nine children (aged 4-14 years) dependent on nasogastric and gastrostomy tubes were consecutively admitted into a home-based behavioral treatment program. A psychologist specializing in applied behavior analysis led the assessment and treatment phases with the support of caregivers and a multidisciplinary team. Caregivers participated in a caregiver training program and continued the intervention once the service was discontinued. We conducted follow-up visits up to 12 months after treatment. The program was evaluated with a multiple-baseline across participants design. We computed on-treatment and intention-to-treat effects according to the Hedges-Pustejovsky-Shadish model. We monitored behavioral (food acceptance and swallowing) and nutritional outcomes (body weight, oral intake, and tube intake), treatment acceptability and satisfaction, caregiver stress, and estimated treatment cost savings. RESULTS Food acceptance, swallowing, oral intake, and tube intake demonstrated large treatment gains relative to pretreatment levels (effect size range of the intention-to-treat analysis = 0.74-2.1). All participants maintained or increased their body weight. Follow-up effect sizes indicated further improvements. By the final follow-up assessment, six out of the nine children had ceased tube feeding, and one had tube feeds reduced. Caregivers and health professionals provided strong ratings of treatment satisfaction. The cost-savings analysis suggested that a home-based treatment may be a cost-effective alternative to prolonged tube feeding as well as to other treatment approaches. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence supporting home-based multicomponent behavioral interventions in the treatment of pediatric feeding disorders. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER ACTRN12614001127695, https://goo.gl/XSQ4ZH.
-
2.
Enteral Nutrition via Nasogastric Tube for Refeeding Patients With Anorexia Nervosa: A Systematic Review.
Rizzo, SM, Douglas, JW, Lawrence, JC
Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2019;(3):359-370
Abstract
Weight restoration is an important first step in treating patients with anorexia nervosa (AN), because it is essential for medical stabilization and reversal of long-term complications. Tube feeding may help facilitate weight restoration, but its role in treatment remains unclear. This study aimed to review the literature describing the efficacy, safety, tolerance, and long-term effects of nasogastric (NG) refeeding for patients with AN. Four electronic databases were systematically searched through May 2018. Boolean search terms included "anorexia nervosa," "refeeding," and "nasogastric tube feeding." Ten studies were eligible for inclusion: 8 retrospective chart reviews, 1 prospective cohort, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Nine of the studies were performed in-hospital. In 8 studies, NG nutrition resulted in an average rate of weight gain exceeding 1 kg/wk. In 4 of 5 studies including an oral-only control group, mean weekly weight gain and caloric intake were significantly higher in tube-fed patients. Six studies provided prophylactic phosphate supplementation, all with <1% occurrence rate of refeeding hypophosphatemia. Seven studies reported on other physiological disturbances, 6 evaluated medical and gastrointestinal side effects, 3 considered psychological outcomes, and 4 assessed patients postdischarge. Results indicated that NG feeding was not associated with an increased risk for adverse outcomes. Overall, in these studies, NG nutrition was considered safe and well tolerated, and effectively increased caloric intake and rate of weight gain in patients with AN. However, results are limited by weaknesses in study designs, and more rigorous methods are needed for development of evidence-based, standardized refeeding protocols.
-
3.
The Use of Ultrasonography for Verifying Gastric Tube Placement in Newborns.
Dias, FSB, Alvares, BR, Jales, RM, Franco, APV, Silva, JEFD, Fabene, SMS, Caldas, JPS, Carmona, EV
Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses. 2019;(3):219-225
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of gastric tubes in newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit is fairly high, and there is a risk of serious complications related to this procedure. PURPOSE Considering the need to find a method that does not involve the patient's exposure to radiation, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for verifying gastric tube placement in newborns. METHODS This was a prospective, double-blind, observational study performed in a neonatal intensive care unit, in which 159 infants had gastric intubation using ultrasound examination and radiological imaging, to verify positioning. Results were analyzed in terms of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS The tubes were correctly positioned in 157 cases (98.7%), according to radiological images, and in 156 cases (98.1%), according to ultrasound. The sensitivity analysis was 0.98 and the positive predictive value was 0.99. It was not possible to perform a specificity analysis, as there were not enough negative cases in the sample. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The use of ultrasonography to identify correct positioning of gastric tubes in infants and newborns shows good sensitivity. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH It was not possible to evaluate the ultrasonography specificity; further studies with greater samples are probably necessary, so that this objective can be achieved.Video Abstract available at https://journals.lww.com/advancesinneonatalcare/Pages/videogallery.aspx?videoId=29&autoPlay=true.
-
4.
Auscultation-assisted bedside postpyloric placement of feeding tube in critically ill patients: a prospective, observational study.
Xiao, J, Mao, Z, Hua, M, Chen, T, Liu, H, Hu, P, Tang, S, Kang, H, Zhou, F
Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition. 2019;(3):435-441
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and safety of auscultation-assisted bedside postpyloric feeding tube (ABPFT) placement in early enteral nutritional support for critically ill patients. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN A prospective observational study was conducted and 92 critically ill patients who met the inclusion criteria undergoing ABPFT placement after the intravenous injection of 10 mg of metoclopramide were included. Abdominal X-ray was performed to confirm the location of the catheter tip. End points investigated were the success rate of tube placement, rate of jejunal tube placement, duration of the procedure, length of insertion, and number of attempts. Operational-related adverse events or complications were also documented and evaluated. RESULTS The total success rate of postpyloric feeding tube implantation was 97.8% (90/92), among which, 89.1% (82/92) of the tubes were placed proximal to the jejunum. The first-attempt success rate was 91.3% (84/92) and the mean attempt per individual patient was 1.11±0.38 times. The mean operation time was 28.6±17.7 minutes, and the mean insertion length of tube was 106±9.6 cm. A total of 27 adverse events occurred in 19.6% (18/92) patients and there was no serious adverse events or complications during the study period. CONCLUSIONS Assistance by auscultation can significantly improve the success rate of nasal feeding tube placement. This simple, safe and fast approach is feasible for the application among health practitioners in the intensive care unit.
-
5.
Endoscopic Insertion of Nasojejunal Feeding Tube at Bedside for Critically Ill Patients: Relationship between Tube Position and Intragastric Countercurrent of Contrast Medium.
Tatsumi, H, Akatsuka, M, Kazuma, S, Katayama, Y, Goto, Y, Monma, K, Yoshida, S, Masuda, Y
Annals of nutrition & metabolism. 2019;(3):163-167
Abstract
UNLABELLED Background and Oblectives: We evaluated the success rate of endoscopically positioned nasojejunal feeding tubes and the intragastric countercurrent of contrast medium thereafter. METHOD This retrospective observational study investigated patients who were admitted to a single intensive care unit and required endoscopic placement of a post-pyloric feeding tube between January 2010 and June 2016. The feeding tube was grasped with forceps via a transoral endoscope and inserted into the duodenum or jejunum. Thereafter, we assessed the position of the tube and the intragastric countercurrent using abdominal radiography with contrast medium. RESULTS The tube tip was inserted at the jejunum and the duodenal fourth portion in 55.8 and 33.6% of patients, respectively. The tip of the inserted tube had moved into the jejunum of 71.7% of patients by the following day. The countercurrent rate was significantly lower among patients with a tube inserted into the duodenal fourth portion or more distal than among those with tubes inserted more proximally (8.4 vs. 45.4%, p = 0.0022). CONCLUSIONS The endoscopic insertion and positioning of a nasojejunal feeding tube seemed effective because the rate of tube insertion into the duodenal fourth portion or more distal was about 90%. The findings of intragastric countercurrents indicated that feeding tubes should be inserted into the duodenal fourth portion or beyond to prevent vomiting and the aspiration of enteral nutrients.
-
6.
Adequacy of different measurement methods in determining nasogastric tube insertion lengths: An observational study.
Fan, PEM, Tan, SB, Farah, GI, Cheok, PG, Chock, WT, Sutha, W, Xu, D, Chua, W, Kwan, XL, Li, CL, et al
International journal of nursing studies. 2019;:73-78
Abstract
BACKGROUND Distance from the tip of the nose to earlobe to xiphisternum is commonly used to determine the length of nasogastric tube to be inserted. However, it is not evidence-based and frequently leads to improper positioning. OBJECTIVES This study evaluated four formulae and the distance from the tip of the nose to earlobe to xiphisternum in estimating the internal length of nasogastric tube required for optimal positioning. DESIGN Observational Study. SETTINGS Tertiary hospital in Singapore involving patients from the medical and surgical intensive care units and a neurosurgical ward. PARTICIPANTS Inclusion criteria were patients who required a nasogastric tube insertion and age > = 21 years old and =<85 years old. Patients who required an orogastric tube insertion or did not require a chest x-ray post nasogastric tube insertion were excluded. METHODS Upon nasogastric tube insertion, the external length of the tube was measured and the corresponding internal length calculated. Several anatomical measurements were taken as required in the formulae below: 1. ((Distance from tip of nose to earlobe to xiphisternum-50 cm)/2) + 50 cm. 2. 29.38 + 4.53*gender+0.34*distance from nose to umbilicus with head flat on bed-0.06*weight (gender = 1 for male, and 0 for female). 3. Distance from xiphisternum to earlobe to nose + 10 cm. 4. Distance from earlobe to xiphisternum to umbilicus-distance from tip of the nose to earlobe. Post insertion chest x-rays were examined to evaluate the position of the nasogastric tube. For those with optimal positioning, the distance from tip of the nose to earlobe to xiphisternum and the four formulae were compared to determine which provided the least difference with the internal length of the nasogastric tube. RESULTS Ninety-two participants were recruited. The average age of the cohort was 62.9 years old with 54% being male. Twenty-five had nasogastric tubes in optimal position; 13 had it too short and 54 had it too long. For nasogastric tubes in optimal position, distance from xiphisternum to earlobe to nose + 10 cm provided the best estimate of the internal length. Average difference between the distance from xiphisternum to earlobe to nose + 10 cm and internal length of the nasogastric tubes in optimal position was only 1.8 cm which was by far the least difference compared to other formulae. CONCLUSION This study found distance from xiphisternum to earlobe to nose + 10 cm to provide the best estimate for the internal length of nasogastric tube required. However, even this formula could result in placement that is not optimal due to anatomical differences.
-
7.
Erythromycin versus metoclopramide for post-pyloric spiral nasoenteric tube placement: a randomized non-inferiority trial.
Hu, B, Ouyang, X, Lei, L, Sun, C, Chi, R, Guo, J, Guo, W, Zhang, Y, Li, Y, Huang, D, et al
Intensive care medicine. 2018;(12):2174-2182
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether erythromycin is non-inferior to metoclopramide in facilitating post-pyloric placement of self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tubes (NETs) in critically ill patients. METHODS A prospective, multicenter, open-label, parallel, and non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing erythromycin with metoclopramide in facilitating post-pyloric placement of spiral NETs in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) of eight tertiary hospitals in China. The primary outcome was procedure success defined as post-pyloric placement (spiral NETs reached the first portion of the duodenum or beyond confirmed by abdominal radiography 24 h after tube insertion). RESULTS A total of 5688 patients were admitted to the ICUs. Of these, in 355 patients there was a plan to insert a nasoenteric feeding tube, of whom 332 were randomized, with 167 patients assigned to the erythromycin group and 165 patients assigned to the metoclopramide group. The success rate of post-pyloric placement was 57.5% (96/167) in the erythromycin group, as compared with 50.3% (83/165) in the metoclopramide group (a difference of 7.2%, 95% CI - 3.5% to 17.9%), in the intention-to-treat analysis, not including the prespecified margin of - 10% for non-inferiority. The success rates of post-D1 (reaching the second portion of the duodenum or beyond), post-D2 (reaching the third portion of the duodenum or beyond), post-D3 (reaching the fourth portion of the duodenum or beyond), and proximal jejunum placement and the incidence of any adverse events were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Erythromycin is non-inferior to metoclopramide in facilitating post-pyloric placement of spiral NETs in critically ill patients. The success rates of post-D1, post-D2, post-D3, and proximal jejunum placement were not significantly different.
-
8.
Associations of hyperosmolar medications administered via nasogastric or nasoduodenal tubes and feeding adequacy, food intolerance and gastrointestinal complications amongst critically ill patients: A retrospective study.
Wesselink, E, Koekkoek, KWAC, Looijen, M, van Blokland, DA, Witkamp, RF, van Zanten, ARH
Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2018;:78-86
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adequate nutrition is essential during critical illness. However, providing adequate nutrition is often hindered by gastro-intestinal complications, including feeding intolerance. It is suggested that hyperosmolar medications could be causally involved in the development of gastro-intestinal complications. The aims of the present study were 1) to determine the osmolality of common enterally administered dissolved medications and 2) to study the associations between nasogastric and nasoduodenal administered hyperosmolar medications and nutritional adequacy as well as food intolerance and gastro-intestinal symptoms. METHODS This retrospective observational cohort study was performed in a medical-surgical ICU in the Netherlands. Adult critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition and admitted for a minimum ICU duration of 7 days were eligible. The osmolalities of commonly used enterally administrated medications were measured using an osmometer. Patients were divided in two groups: Use of hyperosmolar medications (>500 mOsm/kg) on at least one day during the first week versus none. The associations between the use of hyperosmolar medications and nutritional adequacy were assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis. The associations between hyperosmolar medication and food intolerance as well as gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed using ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS In total 443 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the assessed medications, only three medications were found hyperosmolar. We observed no associations between the use of hyperosmolar medications and nutritional adequacy in the first week of ICU admission (caloric intake β -0.27 95%CI -1.38; 0.83, protein intake β 0.32 95%CI -0.90; 1.53). In addition, no associations were found for enteral feeding intolerance, diarrhea, obstipation, gastric residual volume, nausea and vomiting in ICU patients receiving hyperosmolar medications via a nasogastric tube. A subgroup analysis of patients on duodenal feeding showed that postpyloric administration of hyperosmolar medications was associated with increased risk of diarrhea (OR 138.7 95%CI 2.33; 8245). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that nasogastric administration of hyperosmolar medication via a nasogastric tube does not affect nutritional adequacy, development of enteral feeding intolerance and other gastro-intestinal complications during the first week after ICU admission. During nasoduodenal administration an increased diarrhea incidence may be encountered.
-
9.
Placement of a Jejunal Feeding Tube via an Ultrasound-Guided Antral Progressive Water Injection Method.
Zhang, Q, Sun, JH, Liu, JT, Wang, XT, Liu, DW
Chinese medical journal. 2018;(14):1680-1685
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Jejunal feeding tube allows the nutrition of critical care patients more easy and safe. However, its placement remains a challenge. This study aimed to introduce a jejunal feeding tube through an ultrasound-guided antral progressive water injection method and subsequently to examine its efficacy. METHODS Between April 2016 and April 2017, 54 patients hospitalized in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China who needed nutritional support through a jejunal feeding tube were recruited for this study. Patients who applied ultrasound-guided antral progressive water injection method were classified into the experimental group. Patients who applied conventional method were registered as control group. RESULTS No significant differences were found in age, body mass index, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score, but a significant difference in operation time was found between the experimental group and the control group. Of the 24 individuals in the control group, 17 displayed clear catheter sound shadows once the tube entered the esophagus. In comparison, of the 30 individuals in the experimental group, all harbored catheter sound shadows through the esophageal gas injection method. Subsequent observation revealed that in the control group (via ultrasonographic observation), 15 individuals underwent successful antral tube entry, for a success rate of 63%. In the experimental group (via antral progressive water injection), 27 individuals underwent successful antral tube entry, for a success rate of 90%. There was a significant difference between the success rates of the two groups (χ2 = 5.834, P = 0.022). CONCLUSION The antral progressive water injection method for the placement of a jejunal feeding tube is more effective than the traditional ultrasonic placement method.
-
10.
Effect of Nasogastric Tube on Aspiration Risk: Results from 147 Patients with Dysphagia and Literature Review.
Kim, G, Baek, S, Park, HW, Kang, EK, Lee, G
Dysphagia. 2018;(6):731-738
Abstract
Nasogastric tube (NGT) is a common feeding strategy for patients at risk of endotracheal aspiration with an oral diet. With NGT feeding, however, swallowing of small amounts saliva cannot be avoided. We investigated whether the aspiration rate when swallowing 1 mL of fluid increased in patients using an NGT in different dysphagia severities. One hundred forty-seven patients who had been receiving NGT feeding underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). During VFSS, subjects were offered 1 mL of fluid twice: initially, with the tube inserted (NGT-in) and, subsequently, with the tube removed (NGT-out). Aspiration depth was determined using the 8-point Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) (0 points, no aspiration/penetration; 8 points, aspiration passing the vocal cords with no ejection efforts). PAS-diff was computed (PASNGT-in - PASNGT-out), and a positive PAS-diff (PAS-diff > 0) meant increased aspiration depth in the presence of NGT. After VFSS, diet recommendations were made according to dysphagia severity assessment: non-oral feeding (n = 59), diet modification (n = 74), and diet as tolerated (n = 13). Cognitive level (mini-mental state examination, MMSE) and general functional level (Modified Barthel Index, MBI) were compared between the PAS-diff > 0 and PAS-diff ≤ 0 groups. Aspiration severity did not significantly change after NGT removal (PASNGT-in, 2.45 ± 2.40; PASNGT-out, 2.57 ± 2.58; P = .50). Regardless of recommended diet, PAS-diff values were not significantly different (P = .49). MMSE and MBI were not significantly different (P = .23 and .94) between subjects with PAS-diff > 0 (n = 25) and PAS-diff ≤ 0 (n = 121). In conclusion, the risk of aspirating a small amount of fluid was not significantly different before and after NGT removal, regardless of swallowing function, cognitive level, or general functional level.