-
1.
Fasting Status and Circadian Variation Must be Considered When Performing AUC-based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Gustavsen, MT, Midtvedt, K, Robertsen, I, Woillard, JB, Debord, J, Klaasen, RA, Vethe, NT, Bergan, S, Åsberg, A
Clinical and translational science. 2020;(6):1327-1335
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is mandatory for the immunosuppressive drug tacrolimus (Tac). For clinical applicability, TDM is performed using morning trough concentrations. With recent developments making tacrolimus concentration determination possible in capillary microsamples and Bayesian estimator predicted area under the concentration curve (AUC), AUC-guided TDM may now be clinically applicable. Tac circadian variation has, however, been reported, with lower systemic exposure following the evening dose. The aim of the present study was to investigate tacrolimus pharmacokinetic (PK) after morning and evening administrations of twice-daily tacrolimus in a real-life setting without restrictions regarding food and concomitant drug timing. Two 12 hour tacrolimus investigations were performed; after the morning dose and the following evening dose, respectively, in 31 renal transplant recipients early after transplantation both in a fasting-state and under real-life nonfasting conditions (14 patients repeated the investigation). We observed circadian variation under fasting-conditions: 45% higher peak-concentration and 20% higher AUC following the morning dose. In the real-life nonfasting setting, the PK-profiles were flat but comparable after the morning and evening doses, showing slower absorption rate and lower AUC compared with the fasting-state. Limited sampling strategies using concentrations at 0, 1, and 3 hours predicted AUC after fasting morning administration, and samples obtained at 1, 3, and 6 hours predicted AUC for the other conditions (evening and real-life nonfasting). In conclusion, circadian variation of tacrolimus is present when performed in patients who are in the fasting-state, whereas flatter PK-profiles and no circadian variation was present in a real-life, nonfasting setting.
-
2.
Serum phosphate levels modify the impact of parathyroid hormone levels on renal outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.
Doi, Y, Hamano, T, Ichimaru, N, Tomida, K, Obi, Y, Fujii, N, Yamaguchi, S, Oka, T, Sakaguchi, Y, Matsui, I, et al
Scientific reports. 2020;(1):13766
Abstract
Separate assessment of mineral bone disorder (MBD) parameters including calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25D) predict renal outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), with conflicting results. To date, data simultaneously evaluating these parameters and interwoven relations on renal outcomes are scarce. We conducted a prospective long-term follow-up cohort study included 263 KTRs with grafts functioning at least 1 year after transplantation. The outcome was a composite of estimated GFR halving and graft loss. Cox regression analyses were employed to evaluate associations between a panel of six MBD parameters and renal outcomes. The outcome occurred in 98 KTRs during a median follow-up of 10.7 years. In a multivariate Cox analysis, intact PTH (iPTH), phosphate, and 1,25D levels were associated with the outcome (hazard ratio, 1.60 per log scale; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.14, 1.60 per mg/dL; 1.14-2.23 and 0.82 per 10 pg/mL; 0.68-0.99, respectively). Competing risk analysis with death as a competing event yielded a similar result. After stratification into four groups by iPTH and phosphate medians, high risks associated with high iPTH was not observed in KTRs with low phosphate levels (P-interaction < 0.1). Only KTRs not receiving active vitamin D, poor 1,25D status predicted the worse outcome (P-interaction < 0.1). High iPTH, phosphate, and low 1,25D, but not FGF23, levels predicted poor renal outcomes. Simultaneous evaluation of PTH and phosphate levels may provide additional information regarding renal allograft prognosis.
-
3.
Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Chronic Kidney Disease or Kidney Transplant.
Guggino, J, Coumes, S, Wion, N, Reche, F, Arvieux, C, Borel, AL
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2020;(12):2290-2304
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate (1) the effectiveness, complications, and postoperative access to transplantation in end-stage chronic kidney disease (ECKD) and (2) the effectiveness and complications of bariatric surgery in patients who had already undergone kidney transplant. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality and complications rates were performed. Thirty studies were reviewed. RESULTS After bariatric surgery, patients with ECKD had similar postoperative weight loss to patients from the general population. Meta-analysis showed post-bariatric surgery rates of 2% (95% CI: 0%-3%) for mortality and 7% (95% CI: 2%-14%) for complications. Approximately one-fifth of the patients had access to a transplant. This rate may be underestimated because of the short duration of follow-up. The lack of control groups did not allow for a conclusion on the role of bariatric surgery in facilitating access to kidney transplantation. In patients who had received a kidney transplant, bariatric surgery seemed to improve renal function but increased graft-rejection risk, possibly because of changes in the bioavailability of immunosuppressant drugs. CONCLUSIONS Bariatric surgery yields significant weight loss in patients with ECKD that improves patients' chances of accessing a transplant but does not guarantee it; however, the risk for complications and death is higher than in other patients. After transplantation, bariatric surgery-induced weight loss appeared to positively impact the function of the grafted kidney, but careful monitoring of immunosuppressant medications is required.
-
4.
Glucose-lowering agents for treating pre-existing and new-onset diabetes in kidney transplant recipients.
Lo, C, Toyama, T, Oshima, M, Jun, M, Chin, KL, Hawley, CM, Zoungas, S
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2020;(8):CD009966
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation is the preferred management for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, it is often complicated by worsening or new-onset diabetes. The safety and efficacy of glucose-lowering agents after kidney transplantation is largely unknown. This is an update of a review first published in 2017. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents for treating pre-existing and new onset diabetes in people who have undergone kidney transplantation. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 16 January 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and cross-over studies examining head-to-head comparisons of active regimens of glucose-lowering therapy or active regimen compared with placebo/standard care in patients who have received a kidney transplant and have diabetes were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Four authors independently assessed study eligibility and quality and performed data extraction. Continuous outcomes were expressed as post-treatment mean differences (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Adverse events were expressed as post-treatment absolute risk differences (RD). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS Ten studies (21 records, 603 randomised participants) were included - three additional studies (five records) since our last review. Four studies compared more intensive versus less intensive insulin therapy; two studies compared dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to placebo; one study compared DPP-4 inhibitors to insulin glargine; one study compared sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to placebo; and two studies compared glitazones and insulin to insulin therapy alone. The majority of studies had an unclear to a high risk of bias. There were no studies examining the effects of biguanides, glinides, GLP-1 agonists, or sulphonylureas. Compared to less intensive insulin therapy, it is unclear if more intensive insulin therapy has an effect on transplant or graft survival (4 studies, 301 participants: RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.94; I2 = 49%; very low certainty evidence), delayed graft function (2 studies, 153 participants: RR 0.63, 0.42 to 0.93; I2 = 0%; very low certainty evidence), HbA1c (1 study, 16 participants; very low certainty evidence), fasting blood glucose (1 study, 24 participants; very low certainty evidence), kidney function markers (1 study, 26 participants; very low certainty evidence), death (any cause) (3 studies, 208 participants" RR 0.68, 0.29 to 1.58; I2 = 0%; very low certainty evidence), hypoglycaemia (4 studies, 301 participants; very low certainty evidence) and medication discontinuation due to adverse effects (1 study, 60 participants; very low certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, it is unclear whether DPP-4 inhibitors have an effect on hypoglycaemia and medication discontinuation (2 studies, 51 participants; very low certainty evidence). However, DPP-4 inhibitors may reduce HbA1c and fasting blood glucose but not kidney function markers (1 study, 32 participants; low certainty evidence). Compared to insulin glargine, it is unclear if DPP-4 inhibitors have an effect on HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, hypoglycaemia or discontinuation due to adverse events (1 study, 45 participants; very low certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors probably do not affect kidney graft survival (1 study, 44 participants; moderate certainty evidence), but may reduce HbA1c without affecting fasting blood glucose and eGFR long-term (1 study, 44 participants, low certainty evidence). SGLT2 inhibitors probably do not increase hypoglycaemia, and probably have little or no effect on medication discontinuation due to adverse events. However, all participants discontinuing SGLT2 inhibitors had urinary tract infections (1 study, 44 participants, moderate certainty evidence). Compared to insulin therapy alone, it is unclear if glitazones added to insulin have an effect on HbA1c or kidney function markers (1 study, 62 participants; very low certainty evidence). However, glitazones may make little or no difference to fasting blood glucose (2 studies, 120 participants; low certainty evidence), and medication discontinuation due to adverse events (1 study, 62 participants; low certainty evidence). No studies of DPP-4 inhibitors, or glitazones reported effects on transplant or graft survival, delayed graft function or death (any cause). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents in the treatment of pre-existing and new-onset diabetes in kidney transplant recipients is questionable. Evidence from existing studies examining the effect of intensive insulin therapy, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT inhibitors and glitazones is mostly of low to very low certainty. Appropriately blinded, larger, and higher quality RCTs are needed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of contemporary glucose-lowering agents in the kidney transplant population.
-
5.
Evaluation of Renal Function at 24, 48, and 72 Hours and 3 Months After Transplant: Comparison of 3 Anesthetic Techniques.
Calixto-Flores, A, Román-Sánchez, M, Jiménez-Sánchez, E, Cruz-Santiago, J, Meza-Jiménez, G, Bernáldez-Gómez, G
Transplantation proceedings. 2020;(4):1094-1101
Abstract
BACKGROUND General anesthesia is the conventional management of renal transplant, and its evolution has revolved around the development of new drugs; however, a group of patients meet conditions for neuraxial anesthesia, because of their comorbidities, who are at greater risk of complications with general anesthesia and are not favorable to grafting. METHODS We conducted a controlled clinical trial of 109 renal transplant recipients where renal function was evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 hours and 3 months after transplant, and we compared regional, general anesthesia with inhaled anesthetic and total intravenous anesthesia. It was performed for 1 year, and serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, and electrolytes were evaluated. During the intraoperative period central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, vasopressors, fluid therapy, diuretics, surgical time, anesthesia, hot and cold ischemia, immunosuppressants, and antihypertensives were evaluated. They were analyzed with χ2 independence and 1-way and 2-way repeated measures. RESULTS The type of anesthesia was associated with hemodynamic stability (P = .018), the use of vasopressor (P = .005), and fluid therapy (P = .011). A value of P = .005 was found for central venous pressure at discharge from the operating room, and preincisional mean arterial pressure (P = .015) was among the types of anesthesia. Creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, sodium, and potassium were statistically significant over time (P < .001) but showed no difference between types of anesthesia. CONCLUSION There is no difference between anesthetic techniques and clinical results over time. The personalized anesthetic technique will improve the neuroendocrine response and surgical stress, decrease the need for vasopressors and analgesics, and reduce complications.
-
6.
Joint association of vitamins D and K status with long-term outcomes in stable kidney transplant recipients.
van Ballegooijen, AJ, Beulens, JWJ, Keyzer, CA, Navis, GJ, Berger, SP, de Borst, MH, Vervloet, MG, Bakker, SJL
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2020;(4):706-714
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) experience substantial survival benefit compared with dialysis patients. However, their mortality and graft failure risk remain high. KTRs are often low in micronutrient status, including vitamins D and K. We investigated the association of both vitamins D and K status, and vitamin D treatment with all-cause mortality and death-censored graft failure. METHODS We studied 461 KTRs from a single-centre study at median 6.1 years after transplantation. At baseline, vitamins D and K concentrations were measured by 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and dephosphorylated uncarboxylated matrix gla protein (dp-ucMGP) and patients were categorized into: 25(OH)D <50/≥50 nmol/L and median dp-ucMGP <1057/≥1057 pmol/L. RESULTS Mean age was 52 ± 12 years, and 122 KTRs (26%) had low vitamins D and K status. During median 9.8 years follow-up, 128 patients (28%) died and 48 (10%) developed death-censored graft failure. Low vitamins D and K status was associated with 2.33 (1.26-4.30) [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)] increased mortality risk and 3.25 (1.17-9.08) increased graft failure risk compared with KTR with 25(OH)D ≥50 nmol/L and dp-ucMGP <1057 pmol/L. Dp-ucMGP was strongly associated with mortality (per 500 pmol/L increase): 1.41 (1.08-1.41) for vitamin D treatment versus no treatment 1.07 (0.97-1.18), and graft failure 1.71 (1.17-2.49) for vitamin D treatment versus 1.19 (1.05-1.36) no treatment, P-interaction <0.07 for vitamin D treatment (n = 44). CONCLUSIONS Combined vitamins D and K deficiency are highly prevalent and are associated with increased mortality and graft failure risk compared with high vitamins D and K status. Low vitamin K status was strongly associated with an increased risk of premature mortality and graft failure for patients treated with vitamin D versus no vitamin D treatment.
-
7.
Robot-Assisted versus Conventional Open Kidney Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis.
Liu, G, Deng, Y, Zhang, S, Lin, T, Guo, H
BioMed research international. 2020;:2358028
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative and follow-up outcomes for patients that received robot-assisted kidney transplant (RAKT), compared to patients that received conventional open kidney transplant (OKT), remain unknown. We performed a meta-analysis of controlled studies to compare the safety and efficacy of RAKT versus OKT. METHODS Systematic searching of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify relevant randomized or nonrandomized controlled studies. Perioperative, in-hospital, and follow-up outcomes were summarized. A random-effect model incorporating the potential heterogeneity was used to synthesize the results. RESULTS Six nonrandomized controlled studies including 263 patients with RAKT and 804 patients with OKT were included. Pooled results showed that compared to those that received OKT, patients that received RAKT had significant higher rewarming time (mean difference (MD): 20.8 min, p < 0.001) and total ischemia time (MD: 17.8 min, p = 0.008) but a lower incidence of surgical site infection (SSI, risk ratio (RR): 0.22, p = 0.03). The incidence of delayed graft function was comparable between groups (RR: 1.10, p = 0.82), and the length of hospital stay was similar (MD: -2.03 days, p = 0.21). During a follow-up of 31 months, patients that received RAKT and OKT had similar serum creatinine levels (MD: 10.12 mmol/L, p = 0.42) and similar incidences of graft rejection (RR: 1.16, p = 0.53), graft failure (RR: 0.94, p = 0.79), and all-cause mortality (RR: 1.16, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION Current evidence from nonrandomized studies suggests that RAKT is associated with a lower risk of SSI and similar midterm functional and clinical efficacy compared to OKT. Randomized studies are needed to validate these findings.
-
8.
Modifiable Variables Are Major Risk Factors for Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus in a Time-Dependent Manner in Kidney Transplant: An Observational Cohort Study.
de Lucena, DD, de Sá, JR, Medina-Pestana, JO, Rangel, ÉB
Journal of diabetes research. 2020;:1938703
Abstract
Modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for developing posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) have already been established in kidney transplant setting and impact adversely both patient and allograft survival. We analysed 450 recipients of living and deceased donor kidney transplants using current immunosuppressive regimen in the modern era and verified PTDM prevalence and risk factors over three-year posttransplant. Tacrolimus (85%), prednisone (100%), and mycophenolate (53%) were the main immunosuppressive regimen. Sixty-one recipients (13.5%) developed PTDM and remained in this condition throughout the study, whereas 74 (16.5%) recipients developed altered fasting glucose over time. Univariate analyses demonstrated that recipient age (46.2 ± 1.3vs. 40.7 ± 0.6 years old, OR 1.04; P = 0.001) and pretransplant hyperglycaemia and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (32.8% vs. 21.6%, OR 0.54; P = 0.032 and 57.4% vs. 27.7%, OR 3.5; P < 0.0001, respectively) were the pretransplant variables associated with PTDM. Posttransplant transient hyperglycaemia (86.8%. 18.5%, OR 0.03; P = 0.0001), acute rejection (P = 0.021), calcium channel blockers (P = 0.014), TG/HDL (triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) ratio ≥ 3.5 at 1 year (P = 0.01) and at 3 years (P = 0.0001), and tacrolimus trough levels at months 1, 3, and 6 were equally predictors of PTDM. In multivariate analyses, pretransplant hyperglycaemia (P = 0.035), pretransplant BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (P = 0.0001), posttransplant transient hyperglycaemia (P = 0.0001), and TG/HDL ratio ≥ 3.5 at 3-year posttransplant (P = 0.003) were associated with PTDM diagnosis and maintenance over time. Early identification of risk factors associated with increased insulin resistance and decreased insulin secretion, such as pretransplant hyperglycaemia and overweight, posttransplant transient hyperglycaemia, tacrolimus trough levels, and TG/HDL ratio may be useful for risk stratification of patients to determine appropriate strategies to reduce PTDM.
-
9.
Effect of the proton-pump Inhibitor pantoprazole on MycoPhenolic ACid exposure in kidney and liver transplant recipienTs (IMPACT study): a randomized trial.
Sunderland, A, Russ, G, Sallustio, B, Cervelli, M, Joyce, D, Ooi, E, Jeffrey, G, Boudville, N, Chakera, A, Dogra, G, et al
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2020;(6):1060-1070
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is widely utilized as an immunosuppressant in kidney and liver transplantation, with reports suggesting an independent relationship between MPA concentrations and adverse allograft outcome. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) may have variable effects on the absorption of different MPA formulations leading to differences in MPA exposure. METHODS A multicentre, randomized, prospective, double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study was conducted to determine the effect of the PPI pantoprazole on the MPA and its metabolite MPA-glucuronide (MPA-G) area under the curve (AUC) >12 h (MPA-AUC12 h) in recipients maintained on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). We planned a priori to examine separately recipients maintained on MMF and EC-MPS for each pharmacokinetic parameter. The trial (and protocol) was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 24 March 2011, with the registration number of ACTRN12611000316909 ('IMPACT' study). RESULTS Of the 45 recipients screened, 40 (19 MMF and 21 EC-MPS) were randomized. The mean (standard deviation) recipient age was 58 (11) years with a median (interquartile range) time post-transplant of 43 (20-132) months. For recipients on MMF, there was a significant reduction in the MPA-AUC12 h [geometric mean (95% confidence interval) placebo: 53.9 (44.0-65.9) mg*h/L versus pantoprazole: 43.8 (35.6-53.4) mg*h/L; P = 0.004] when pantoprazole was co-administered compared with placebo. In contrast, co-administration with pantoprazole significantly increased MPA-AUC12 h [placebo: 36.1 (26.5-49.2) mg*h/L versus pantoprazole: 45.9 (35.5-59.3) mg*h/L; P = 0.023] in those receiving EC-MPS. Pantoprazole had no effect on the pharmacokinetic profiles of MPA-G for either group. CONCLUSIONS The co-administration of pantoprazole substantially reduced the bioavailability of MPA in patients maintained on MMF and had the opposite effect in patients maintained on EC-MPS, and therefore, clinicians should be cognizant of this drug interaction when prescribing the different MPA formulations.
-
10.
Comparing Glycaemic Benefits of Active Versus Passive Lifestyle Intervention in Kidney Allograft Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kuningas, K, Driscoll, J, Mair, R, Smith, H, Dutton, M, Day, E, Sharif, AA
Transplantation. 2020;(7):1491-1499
Abstract
BACKGROUND New-onset diabetes is common after kidney transplantation, but the benefit of lifestyle intervention to improve glucose metabolism posttransplantation is unproven. METHODS We conducted a single-center, randomized controlled trial involving 130 nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients with stable function between 3 and 24 months post-transplantation. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive active intervention (lifestyle advice delivered by renal dietitians using behavior change techniques) versus passive intervention (leaflet advice alone). Primary outcome was 6-month change in insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity, and disposition index. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes, cardiometabolic parameters, clinical outcomes, and safety endpoints. RESULTS Between August 17, 2015 and December 18, 2017, 130 individuals were recruited, of whom 103 completed the study (drop-out rate 20.8%). Active versus passive intervention was not associated with any change in glucose metabolism: insulin secretion (mean difference, -446; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3184 to 2292; P = 0.748), insulin sensitivity (mean difference, -0.45; 95% CI, -1.34 to 0.44; P = 0.319), or disposition index (mean difference, -940; 95% CI, -5655 to 3775; P = 0.693). Clinically, active versus passive lifestyle intervention resulted in reduced incidence of posttransplantation diabetes (7.6% versus 15.6%, respectively, P = 0.123), reduction in fat mass (mean difference, -1.537 kg; 95% CI, -2.947 to -0.127; P = 0.033), and improvement in weight (mean difference, -2.47 kg; 95% CI, -4.01 to -0.92; P = 0.002). No serious adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS Active lifestyle intervention led by renal dietitians did not improve surrogate markers of glucose metabolism. Further investigation is warranted to determine if clinical outcomes can be improved using this methodology.