-
1.
Panretinal Photocoagulation for Diabetic Retinopathy in the RIDE and RISE Trials: Not "1 and Done".
Gonzalez, VH, Wang, PW, Ruiz, CQ
Ophthalmology. 2021;(10):1448-1457
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) treatment and re-treatment patterns in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 RIDE (clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT00473382) and RISE (clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT00473330) clinical trials of ranibizumab for the treatment of DME. PARTICIPANTS Seven hundred fifty-nine patients were randomized for treatment. METHODS Panretinal photocoagulation treatment patterns and clinical experiences were assessed by baseline PRP treatment status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Number and timing of on-study PRP treatment sessions undergone through month 24. Time to new proliferative event (composite end point) was also assessed. RESULTS At baseline, approximately 25% of patients in RIDE and RISE had undergone PRP treatment before enrollment (22.2%, 24.4%, and 25.4% of patients in the sham, ranibizumab 0.3 mg, and ranibizumab 0.5 mg arms, respectively). In patients without prior PRP at baseline (n = 577), 9.5% of sham-treated patients underwent 1 or more PRP treatments through month 24, compared with 1.1% and 1.6% of patients receiving ranibizumab 0.3 mg and ranibizumab 0.5 mg, respectively (P < 0.001 for both ranibizumab arms vs. sham). In patients with prior PRP at baseline (n = 182), 19.3% of sham-treated patients underwent 1 or more PRP treatments through month 24. No ranibizumab-treated patients with prior PRP at baseline required additional on-study PRP through month 24 (P < 0.001 for both ranibizumab arms vs. sham). Ranibizumab treatment also significantly reduced clinical DR progression among patients who underwent prior PRP. By month 24 in patients with prior PRP at baseline, the probability of experiencing a new proliferative event was 10.3% and 9.9% in patients receiving ranibizumab 0.3 mg and ranibizumab 0.5 mg treatment, respectively, compared with 39.4% in sham-treated patients (P < 0.0001). Overall, sham-treated patients, including those patients who were PRP naïve at baseline who went on to require PRP, experienced more clinical events than ranibizumab-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS In RIDE and RISE, PRP treatment was not a "1 and done" procedure, with on-study PRP re-treatment occurring in patients both with and without prior PRP treatment at baseline. Ranibizumab treatment reduced on-study PRP treatment and DR progression regardless of prior PRP treatment status at baseline.
-
2.
Changes in entropy on polarized-sensitive optical coherence tomography images after therapeutic subthreshold micropulse laser for diabetic macular edema: A pilot study.
Ueda, K, Shiraya, T, Araki, F, Hashimoto, Y, Yamamoto, M, Yamanari, M, Ueta, T, Minami, T, Aoki, N, Sugiyama, S, et al
PloS one. 2021;(9):e0257000
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the dynamics of the healing process after therapeutic subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) for diabetic macular edema (DME) using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT). METHODS Patients with treatment-native or previously-treated DME were prospectively imaged using PS-OCT at baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. The following outcomes were evaluated: changes in the entropy value per unit area (pixel2) in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) on the B-scan image; changes in the entropy value in each stratified layer (retina, RPE, choroid) based on the ETDRS grid circle overlaid with en face entropy mapping, not only the whole ETDRS grid area but also a sector irradiated by the SMPL; and the relationship between edema reduction and entropy changes. RESULTS A total of 11 eyes of 11 consecutive DME patients were enrolled. No visible signs of SMPL treatment were detected on PS-OCT images. The entropy value per unit area (pixel2) in the RPE tended to decrease at 3 and 6 months from baseline (35.8 ± 17.0 vs 26.1 ± 9.8, P = 0.14; vs 28.2 ± 18.3, P = 0.14). Based on the en face entropy mapping, the overall entropy value did not change in each layer in the whole ETDRS grid; however, decrease of entropy in the RPE was observed at 2, 3, and 6 months post-treatment within the SMPL-irradiated sectors (P < 0.01, each). There was a positive correlation between the change rate of retinal thickness and that of entropy in the RPE within the SMPL-irradiated sector at 6 months (r2 = 0.19, P = 0.039). CONCLUSION Entropy measured using PS-OCT may be a new parameter that facilitates objective monitoring of SMPL-induced functional changes in the RPE that could not previously be assessed directly. This may contribute to a more promising therapeutic evaluation of DME. CLINICAL TRIAL This clinical study was registered in UMIN-CTR (ID: UMIN000042420).
-
3.
Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Requiring Cataract Surgery in VISTA and VIVID Studies.
Moshfeghi, AA, Thompson, D, Berliner, AJ, Saroj, N
Ophthalmology. Retina. 2020;(5):481-485
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of cataract surgery on visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) or laser control and who did not require rescue therapy. DESIGN Post hoc analysis of 2 phase 3 trials, Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema (VISTA) and Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Vision Impairment Due to DME (VIVID). PARTICIPANTS Fifty-four patients (laser treatment, n = 11; IAI, n = 43) who underwent cataract surgery during the study period. METHODS In VISTA and VIVID, patients received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks, IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses, or laser control through week 100. Starting at week 24, if rescue treatment criteria were met, IAI patients received laser therapy, and laser therapy patients received IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks (after 5 monthly doses). Patients who received rescue treatment before cataract surgery were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in the laser control and pooled IAI groups before and after cataract surgery. RESULTS The cumulative incidence of cataract surgery did not depend on treatment group assignment (rate ratio, = 1.517; 95% confidence interval, 0.782-2.944; P = 0.2174). At the last study visit before surgery, BCVA was 62.2 and 56.9 letters and CRT was 342 μm and 301 μm in the laser control and IAI groups, respectively. At the first study visit after cataract surgery, BCVA was improved significantly in both the laser control and IAI groups to 73.5 letters (P = 0.010 compared with last visit before surgery) and 67.2 letters (P < 0.001 compared with last visit before surgery), respectively. Corresponding change in CRT was a modest increase to 364 μm (P > 0.05 compared with last visit before surgery) and 359 μm (P = 0.013 compared with last visit before surgery), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Incidence of cataract surgery was similar in both treatment groups. Despite a modest worsening in CRT after cataract surgery, BCVA was improved in both treatment groups.
-
4.
Higher-Order Assessment of OCT in Diabetic Macular Edema from the VISTA Study: Ellipsoid Zone Dynamics and the Retinal Fluid Index.
Ehlers, JP, Uchida, A, Hu, M, Figueiredo, N, Kaiser, PK, Heier, JS, Brown, DM, Boyer, DS, Do, DV, Gibson, A, et al
Ophthalmology. Retina. 2019;(12):1056-1066
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate retinal fluid features and ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity dynamics on spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in the VISTA-DME study. DESIGN A post hoc subanalysis of a phase III, prospective clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS Eyes received either IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4) or every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses (2q8). METHODS All eyes from the VISTA Phase III study in the IAI groups imaged with the Cirrus HD-OCT system (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) were included. The OCT macular cube datasets were evaluated using a novel software platform to generate retinal layer and fluid boundary lines that were manually corrected for assessment of change in EZ parameters and volumetric fluid parameters from baseline. The retinal fluid index (i.e., proportion of the retinal volume consisting of cystic fluid) was also calculated at each time point. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The feasibility of volumetric assessment of higher-order OCT-based retinal parameters and its correlation with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS Overall, 106 eyes of 106 patients were included. Specifically, 52 eyes of 52 patients were included in the IAI 2q4 arm, and 54 eyes of 54 patients were included in the IAI 2q8 arm. Ellipsoid zone integrity metrics significantly improved from baseline to week 100, including central macular mean EZ to retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) thickness (2q4: 26.6 μm to 31.6 μm, P < 0.001; 2q8: 25.2 μm to 31.4 μm, P < 0.001). At week 100, central macular intraretinal fluid volume was reduced by >65% (P < 0.001) and central macular subretinal fluid volume was reduced by >99% in both arms (P < 0.001). Central macular retinal fluid index (RFI) significantly improved in both arms (2q4: 17.9% to 7.2%, P < 0.001; 2q8: 19.8% to 4.2%, P < 0.001). Central macular mean EZ-RPE thickness (i.e., a surrogate for photoreceptor outer segment length) and central RFI were independently correlated with BCVA at multiple follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS Intravitreal aflibercept injection resulted in significant improvement in EZ integrity and quantitative fluid metrics in both 2q4 and 2q8 arms and correlated with visual function.
-
5.
Difference in Treatment Effect Between Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection and Laser by Baseline Factors in Diabetic Macular Edema.
Singh, RP, Silva, FQ, Gibson, A, Thompson, D, Vitti, R, Berliner, AJ, Saroj, N
Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. 2019;(3):167-173
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of baseline factors on differences in vision gains with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) versus laser control in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). PATIENTS AND METHODS This was an integrated post-hoc subanalysis of two phase 3 trials (VISTA, VIVID) in patients with DME. Least square (LS) mean differences of patients treated with IAI compared to laser control in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline at week 100 were evaluated for association with baseline demographics and baseline systemic disease characteristics. RESULTS At week 100, LS mean differences in BCVA change from baseline with IAI compared to laser control were not significant for association with baseline age, gender, and race or status of glycosylated hemoglobin, body mass index, renal impairment, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSION Vision gains with IAI were significantly greater than laser control and were not influenced by demographics and systemic disease control at baseline. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:167-173.].
-
6.
Targeted Retinal Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema with Peripheral Retinal Nonperfusion: Three-Year Randomized DAVE Trial.
Brown, DM, Ou, WC, Wong, TP, Kim, RY, Croft, DE, Wykoff, CC, ,
Ophthalmology. 2018;(5):683-690
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of targeted retinal photocoagulation (TRP) on visual and anatomic outcomes and treatment burden in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN Phase I/II prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS Forty eyes of 29 patients with center-involved macular edema secondary to diabetes mellitus. METHODS Eyes with center-involved DME and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 20/32 and 20/320 (Snellen equivalent) were randomized 1:1 to monotherapy with 0.3 mg ranibizumab (Lucentis, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) or combination therapy with 0.3 mg ranibizumab and TRP guided by widefield fluorescein angiography. All eyes received 4 monthly ranibizumab injections followed by monthly examinations and pro re nata (PRN) re-treatment through 36 months. Targeted retinal photocoagulation was administered outside the macula to areas of retinal capillary nonperfusion plus a 1-disc area margin in the combination therapy arm at week 1, with re-treatment at months 6, 18, and 25, if indicated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mean change in ETDRS BCVA from baseline and number of intravitreal injections administered. RESULTS At baseline, mean age was 55 years, mean BCVA was 20/63 (Snellen equivalent), and mean central retinal subfield thickness (CRT) was 530 μm. Thirty-four eyes (85%) completed month 36, at which point mean BCVA improved 13.9 and 8.2 letters (P = 0.20) and mean CRT improved 302 and 152 μm (P = 0.03) in the monotherapy and combination therapy arms, respectively. The mean number of injections administered through month 36 was 24.4 (range, 10-34) and 27.1 (range, 12-36), with 73% (362/496) and 80% (433/538) of PRN injections administered (P = 0.004) in the monotherapy and combination therapy arms, respectively. Goldmann visual field isopter III-4e area decreased by 2% and 18% in the monotherapy and combination therapy arms, respectively (P = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS In this 3-year randomized trial of 40 eyes with DME, there was no evidence that combination therapy with ranibizumab and TRP improved visual outcomes or reduced treatment burden compared with ranibizumab alone.
-
7.
The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema.
Lang, GE, Liakopoulos, S, Vögeler, J, Weiß, C, Spital, G, Gamulescu, MA, Lohmann, C, Wiedemann, P
Acta ophthalmologica. 2018;(3):e377-e385
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg plus laser (COMBI) versus laser monotherapy (LASER) in patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME) in either nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and to analyse the relevance of inner versus outer retinal thickness. METHODS In this double-masked, multicentre phase IIIb study, patients (N = 128) were randomized (2:1) to receive COMBI (n = 85) versus LASER (n = 43). Patients received four initial monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg (COMBI) or sham (LASER) followed by pro re nata (PRN) injections. In both groups, patients received laser at baseline and additional laser at 3 monthly intervals, as needed. The study was started in 2010 and was prematurely terminated due to approval of ranibizumab for DME. RESULTS The least squares (LS) mean change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 12 was higher in the COMBI (6.5) versus LASER (2.3) group (LS mean difference: 4.2 [95% CI 0.9; 7.4] letters, p = 0.01, primary end-point). There was also a tendency in the same direction for the subgroup of 26 patients with PDR (LS mean difference 14.7, p = 0.11). Mean central retinal thickness decreased by 107.3 μm in the COMBI group and by 80.3 μm in the LASER group from baseline to month 12 (p = 0.28). Ranibizumab was well tolerated. CONCLUSION This study showed that ranibizumab plus laser is a valuable treatment option for the management of DME. Patients with DME in PDR might also benefit from combined therapy compared to laser alone.
-
8.
Ranibizumab Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation versus Panretinal Photocoagulation Alone for High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PROTEUS Study).
Figueira, J, Fletcher, E, Massin, P, Silva, R, Bandello, F, Midena, E, Varano, M, Sivaprasad, S, Eleftheriadis, H, Menon, G, et al
Ophthalmology. 2018;(5):691-700
Abstract
PURPOSE Comparison of the efficacy of ranibizumab (RBZ) 0.5 mg intravitreal injections plus panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) versus PRP alone in the regression of the neovascularization (NV) area in subjects with high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (HR-PDR) over a 12-month period. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II/III study. PARTICIPANTS Eighty-seven participants (aged ≥18 years) with type 1/2 diabetes and HR-PDR (mean age, 55.2 years; 37% were female). METHODS Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive RBZ+PRP (n = 41) or PRP monotherapy (n = 46). The RBZ+PRP group received 3 monthly RBZ injections along with standard PRP. The PRP monotherapy group received standard PRP between day 1 and month 2; thereafter, re-treatments in both groups were at the investigators' discretion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was regression of NV total, on the disc (NVD) plus elsewhere (NVE), defined as any decrease in the area of NV from the baseline to month 12. Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes from baseline to month 12, time to complete NV regression, recurrence of NV, macular retinal thickness changes from baseline to month 12, need for treatment for diabetic macular edema, need for vitrectomy because of occurrence of vitreous hemorrhage, tractional retinal detachment or other complications of DR, and adverse events (AEs) related to treatments. RESULTS Seventy-seven participants (88.5%) completed the study. Overall baseline demographics were similar for both groups, except for age. At month 12, 92.7% of participants in the RBZ+PRP group presented NV total reduction versus 70.5% of the PRP monotherapy participants (P = 0.009). The number of participants with NVD and NVE reductions was higher with RBZ+PRP (93.3% and 91.4%, respectively) versus PRP (68.8% and 73.7%, respectively), significant only for NVE (P = 0.048). Complete NV total regression was observed in 43.9% in the RBZ+PRP group versus 25.0% in the PRP monotherapy group (P = 0.066). At month 12, the mean BCVA was 75.2 letters (20/32) in the RBZ+PRP group versus 69.2 letters (20/40) in the PRP monotherapy group (P = 0.104). In the RBZ+PRP group, the mean number of PRP treatments over month 12 was 3.5±1.3, whereas in the PRP monotherapy group, it was 4.6±1.5 (P = 0.001). No deaths or unexpected AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with RBZ+PRP was more effective than PRP monotherapy for NV regression in HR-PDR participants over 12 months.
-
9.
Baseline Factors Affecting Changes in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale Score After Intravitreal Aflibercept or Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema: Post Hoc Analyses from VISTA and VIVID.
Dhoot, DS, Baker, K, Saroj, N, Vitti, R, Berliner, AJ, Metzig, C, Thompson, D, Singh, RP
Ophthalmology. 2018;(1):51-56
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate whether select baseline systemic and ocular factors influence ≥2-step improvement in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score at week 100 in VISTA and VIVID. DESIGN Post hoc analysis of 2 similarly designed phase 3 trials, VISTA and VIVID. PARTICIPANTS Total of 456 patients with center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS VISTA and VIVID randomized 872 DME patients to receive intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation. This post hoc analysis evaluated the influence of select baseline factors on ≥2-step DRSS score improvement by logistic regression in an integrated VISTA and VIVID dataset using observed cases (n = 456) with patients in each treatment group divided into tertiles based on each characteristic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Proportion of patients with ≥2-step improvement in DRSS score from baseline at week 100 by age, duration of diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and DRSS score. RESULTS At week 100, 10.1%, 34.3%, and 37.6% of patients in the laser, 2q4, and 2q8 groups experienced a ≥2-step DRSS score improvement, respectively. Age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, BMI, BCVA, and CST had no impact on the ability to achieve ≥2-step improvement in DRSS score. Initial DRSS score was the only factor significantly associated with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement in all treatment groups at weeks 24, 52, 76, and 100. Relatively higher proportions of IAI-treated patients with worse BCVA or thicker CST experienced ≥2-step DRSS score improvement compared with those with better BCVA or thinner CST, respectively, but these associations were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION A strong association was present between baseline DRSS score and ≥2-step DRSS score improvement at week 100 for DME patients in VISTA and VIVID.
-
10.
Outcomes With As-Needed Aflibercept and Macular Laser Following the Phase III VISTA DME Trial: ENDURANCE 12-Month Extension Study.
Wykoff, CC, Le, RT, Khurana, RN, Brown, DM, Ou, WC, Wang, R, Clark, WL, Boyer, DS, ,
American journal of ophthalmology. 2017;:56-63
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether the efficacy and safety achieved with 2.0 mg intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAIs) for diabetic macular edema (DME) during the phase III VISTA DME trial were maintained with individualized, as-needed treatment. DESIGN Phase IV, multicenter, open-label extension study. METHODS Sixty patients completing VISTA DME elected to enter the ENDURANCE extension study. All patients received IAIs in the presence of clinically relevant DME. Patients were observed at 4-, 8-, or 12-week intervals depending on the need for treatment. Main outcome measures were mean IAIs given through month 12 (M12), the proportion of patients receiving no IAIs, and the role of macular laser in decreasing treatment burden among patients requiring ongoing IAIs. RESULTS A mean of 4.5 IAIs were administered through M12. Eighteen (30%) patients required no IAIs, and among those who met IAI retreatment criteria, a mean of 6.0 IAIs were administered through M12. Best-corrected visual acuity gains achieved during VISTA DME were maintained and stable with individualized dosing during ENDURANCE, fluctuating by <1.5 mean letters from the baseline at all time points. Likewise, mean central retinal thickness remained relatively stable during ENDURANCE. Thirty-seven (62%) patients met macular laser criteria at a mean of 19.5 weeks with no significant difference in the frequency of IAIs before or after macular laser. CONCLUSION Vision gains achieved during the 3-year VISTA DME trial were maintained through M12 of the ENDURANCE extension study with a reduced treatment frequency, with 30% of patients receiving no IAIs. No significant reduction in IAI frequency was observed after macular laser application.