-
1.
Neoadjuvant FLOT versus SOX phase II randomized clinical trial for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.
Sah, BK, Zhang, B, Zhang, H, Li, J, Yuan, F, Ma, T, Shi, M, Xu, W, Zhu, Z, Liu, W, et al
Nature communications. 2020;(1):6093
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FLOT regimen) has shown promising results in terms of pathological response and survival rate in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (LAGC). However, tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (SOX regimen) is the preferred chemotherapy regimen in Eastern countries. Here, we conduct an open label, two-arm, phase II randomized interventional clinical trial (Dragon III; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03636893) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both regimens. Patients with LAGC are randomly assigned to receive either 4 cycles of the neoadjuvant FLOT regimen (40 patients) or 3 cycles of the SOX regimen (34 patients) before gastrectomy. The primary endpoint is the comparison of complete (TRG1a) or subtotal (TRG1b) tumor regression grading in the primary tumor. There are no significant differences in adverse effects or postoperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. No significant differences in the proportion of tumor regression grading between the FLOT group and the SOX group are found. Complete or subtotal TRG is 20.0% in the FLOT group versus 32.4% in the SOX group. Therefore, our study does not find statistically significant differences between neoadjuvant FLOT and SOX regimens for the primary outcomes reported here in locally advanced gastric cancer.
-
2.
A Phase II Study of Modified FOLFOX6 for Advanced Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies.
Mitani, S, Kadowaki, S, Komori, A, Kondoh, C, Oze, I, Kato, K, Masuishi, T, Honda, K, Narita, Y, Taniguchi, H, et al
Advances in therapy. 2020;(6):2853-2864
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to chemotherapy, the treatment options are limited. Via this phase II study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin (modified FOLFOX6). METHODS Patients who had histologically confirmed metastatic gastric cancer refractory to ≥ two previous chemotherapy regimens were included. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) by an independent central review. According to an assumption of a threshold ORR of 10% and expected ORR of 25%, with α = 0.05 and β = 0.20, at least 33 patients were required. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life measured by EQ-5D, and safety. RESULTS Among the 35 enrolled patients, 33 were included in the primary analysis. All patients previously received fluoropyrimidines, cisplatin, and taxanes, and 24 (73%) were pretreated with irinotecan. The confirmed ORR was 27% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13-46]. The median PFS and OS were 2.2 (95% CI 1.2-3.2) and 5.6 (95% CI 4.1-7.0) months, respectively. In the multivariate analyses, immunotherapy within 90 days and a Glasgow Prognostic Score of 0 were associated with better treatment outcomes. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse event was neutropenia (36%), and no febrile neutropenia was observed. The median EQ-5D scores did not change from baseline at 2, 4, and 8 weeks (p value = 0.38, 0.79, and 0.98, respectively). CONCLUSION Modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) showed substantial activity and acceptable toxicity for chemotherapy-refractory advanced gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000016416).
-
3.
Folinic acid improves the score of Autism in the EFFET placebo-controlled randomized trial.
Renard, E, Leheup, B, Guéant-Rodriguez, RM, Oussalah, A, Quadros, EV, Guéant, JL
Biochimie. 2020;:57-61
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are influenced by interacting maternal and environmental risk factors. High-dose folinic acid has shown improvement in verbal communication in ASD children. The EFFET randomized placebo-controlled trial (NCT02551380) aimed to evaluate the efficacy of folinic acid (FOLINORAL®) at a lower dose of 5 mg twice daily. Nineteen children were included in the EFFET trial. The primary efficacy outcome was improvement of Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) score. The secondary outcomes were the improvement in ADOS sub scores communication, social interactions, Social Responsiveness Score (SRS) and treatment safety. The global ADOS score and social interaction and communication sub scores were significantly improved at week 12 compared to baseline in the folinic acid group (P = 0.003, P = 0.004 and P = 0.022, respectively), but not in the placebo group (P = 0.574, P = 0.780, P = 0.269, respectively). We observed a greater change of ADOS global score (-2.78 vs. -0.4 points) and (-1.78 vs. 0.20 points) in the folinic acid group, compared to the placebo group. No serious adverse events were observed. This pilot study showed significant efficacy of folinic acid with an oral formulation that is readily available. It opens a perspective of therapeutic intervention with folinic acid but needs to be confirmed by a multi-center trial on a larger number of children.
-
4.
NET-02 trial protocol: a multicentre, randomised, parallel group, open-label, phase II, single-stage selection trial of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC).
Craig, Z, Swain, J, Batman, E, Wadsley, J, Reed, N, Faluyi, O, Cave, J, Sharma, R, Chau, I, Wall, L, et al
BMJ open. 2020;(2):e034527
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Poorly differentiated (PD), extrapulmonary (EP), neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are rare but aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms. First-line treatment for advanced disease is an etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy combination. There is no established second-line treatment for patients with PD-EP-NEC, and this is an area of unmet need. METHODS AND ANALYSIS NET-02 is a UK, multicentre, randomised (1:1), parallel group, open-label, phase II, single-stage selection trial of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive PD-EP-NEC. One hundred and two eligible participants will be randomised to receive either nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid or docetaxel. The primary objective is to determine the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary objectives of this study are to determine PFS, overall survival, objective response rate, toxicity, quality of life and whether neuron-specific enolase is predictive of treatment response. If either treatment is found to have a 6-month PFS rate of at least 25%, that treatment will be considered for a phase III trial. If both treatments meet this target, prespecified selection criteria will be applied to establish which treatment to take forward. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has ethical approval from the Greater Manchester Central Research Ethics Committee (reference no. 18/NW/0031) and clinical trial authorisation from the Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and uploaded to the European Union Clinical Trials Register. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS ISRCTN10996604, NCT03837977, EudraCT Number: 2017-002453-11.
-
5.
Experience with ambulatory high-dose methotrexate administration as CNS prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Pampín, R, Labeaga, Y, Rodríguez, B, Fernández, B, Fernández, R, Carbajales, M
Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners. 2020;(3):549-555
Abstract
BACKGROUND We describe the feasibility and safety of an oral administration schedule of hydration, alkalinization and leucovorin rescue with an ambulatory high-dose methotrexate regimen. METHODS Single-centre prospective observational study conducted within a tertiary hospital where all patients have received systemic high-dose methotrexate (3.5 g/m2). Patients were instructed to keep an adequate ambulatory oral hydration and alkalinization to monitor urine pH and to adjust bicarbonate according to our institution's treatment protocol. High-dose methotrexate was infused over 4 h. Urine pH was checked before high-dose methotrexate administration, and for any value less than 7 a sodium bicarbonate bolus was given. Leucovorin at a standard dose was begun 24 h after high-dose methotrexate. methotrexate serum concentrations were monitored daily from 24 h after administration until clearance (level ≤ 0.1 µmol/L). RESULTS From January 2016 to June 2018, 49 ambulatory high-dose methotrexate courses were given to 18 patients. No dose reduction was required afterwards. All patients completed succesfully the planned three doses in an outpatient basis, except four patients, one of them due to pneumonitis. Previous to methotrexate infusion, urinary pH > 7 was achieved in 35 (79.5%) cycles. Methotrexate clearance was achieved by 72 h in 35 courses (71.4%), and by 96 h in 100%. Neutropenia/trombocytopenia grades III/IV were observed in four cycles (8.16%) and two (4.08%) cycles, respectively. Around 20.40% were associated with stomatitis, 14.20% vomiting, 10.20% asthenia, 8.16% diarrhea and 6.12% with renal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Ambulatory administration of high-dose methotrexate as CNS prophylaxis is safe and feasible following the described approach, allowing us to optimize healthcare resources.
-
6.
Folinic acid alleviates side effects of methotrexate in arthritis patients with side effects despite folic acid supplementation: an observational cohort study.
Fischer, EA, Hetland, ML, Krabbe, S
Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2020;(11):3566-3568
-
7.
Part II. high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue for severe COVID-19: An immune stabilization strategy for SARS-CoV-2 induced 'PANIC' attack.
Frohman, EM, Villemarette-Pittman, NR, Cruz, RA, Longmuir, R, Rowe, V, Rowe, ES, Varkey, TC, Steinman, L, Zamvil, SS, Frohman, TC
Journal of the neurological sciences. 2020;:116935
Abstract
Here, in Part II of a duology on the characterization and potential treatment for COVID-19, we characterize the application of an innovative treatment regimen for the prevention of the transition from mild to severe COVID-19, as well as detail an intensive immunotherapy intervention hypothesis. We propose as a putative randomized controlled trial that high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin (HDMTX-LR) rescue can abolish 'PANIC', thereby 'left-shifting' severe COVID-19 patients to the group majority of those infected with SARS-CoV-2, who are designated as having mild, even asymptomatic, disease. HDMTX-LR is endowed with broadly pleiotropic properties and is a repurposed, generic, inexpensive, and widely available agent which can be administered early in the course of severe COVID-19 thus rescuing the critical and irreplaceable gas-exchange alveoli. Further, we describe a preventative treatment intervention regimen for those designated as having mild to moderate COVID-19 disease, but who exhibit features which herald the transition to the severe variant of this disease. Both of our proposed hypothesis-driven questions should be urgently subjected to rigorous assessment in the context of randomized controlled trials, in order to confirm or refute the contention that the approaches characterized herein, are in fact capable of exerting mitigating, if not abolishing, effects upon SARS-CoV-2 triggered 'PANIC Attack'. Confirmation of our immunotherapy hypothesis would have far-reaching ramifications for the current pandemic, along with yielding invaluable lessons which could be leveraged to more effectively prepare for the next challenge to global health.
-
8.
Folate Supplementation for Methotrexate Therapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.
Liu, L, Liu, S, Wang, C, Guan, W, Zhang, Y, Hu, W, Zhang, L, He, Y, Lu, J, Li, T, et al
Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases. 2019;(5):197-202
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence for benefits and harms of folate (folic acid or folinic acid) supplementation on methotrexate (MTX) treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to assess whether or not folate supplementation would reduce MTX toxicity or reduce MTX benefits, and to decide whether a higher MTX dosage is essential. METHODS We performed a sensitive search strategy and searched systematically the Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 2 June 2016. Abstracts from major rheumatology meetings and major trial registers were also searched to retrieve all randomized controlled trials that interested us. RESULTS Seven studies with 709 patients were included. No significant heterogeneity was found between these trials. For RA patients treated with MTX, those supplied with folate were less likely to have elevated transaminase (odds ratio [OR] 0.15; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.10, 0.23 [p < 0.00001]) and gastrointestinal side-effects such as nausea and vomiting (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.51, 0.99 [p = 0.04]). Folate appeared to promote compliance to MTX as it reduced patient withdrawal compared to placebo (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.21, 0.42 [p < 0.00001]). There was no statistical difference for mouth sores between folate and placebo (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.57, 1.22 [p = 0.35]). As the markers of disease activity in those trials were not consistent, it was impossible to decide whether folate supplementation reduced MTX efficacy. Besides, we compared high-dose folate (≥25 mg per week) and low-dose folate (≤10 mg per week) on MTX efficacy, finding no statistical difference (OR 2.07; 95% CI 0.81, 5.30 [p = 0.13]), nor on MTX toxicity (OR 1.56; 95% CI 0.80,3.04 [p = 0.19]). CONCLUSION Folate supplementation can reduce the incidence of hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal side-effects of MTX in patients with RA. It can also reduce patient withdrawal from MTX treatment. Although it tended to reduce mouth sores, it had no statistical significance. No significant difference was found between high-dose folate and low-dose folate on MTX efficacy or toxicity.
-
9.
Resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma neo-adjuvant FOLF(IRIN)OX-based chemotherapy - a multicenter, non-comparative, randomized, phase II trial (PANACHE01-PRODIGE48 study).
Schwarz, L, Vernerey, D, Bachet, JB, Tuech, JJ, Portales, F, Michel, P, Cunha, AS
BMC cancer. 2018;(1):762
Abstract
BACKGROUND At time of diagnosis, less than 10% of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC) are considered to be immediately operable (i.e. resectable). Considering their poor overall survival (OS), only tumours without vascular invasion (NCCN 2017) should be considered for resection, i.e. those for which resection with disease-free margins (R0) is theoretically possible in absence of presurgery treatment. With regard to high R1 rates and undetectable locoregional and/or metastatic spreading prior to surgery explain (at least in part) the observed 1-year relapse and mortality rates of 50 and 25%, respectively. Today, upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the reference treatment in Europe. The main limitation of the adjuvant approach is the low rate of completion of the full therapeutic sequence. Indeed, only 47 to 60% patients received any adjuvant therapy after resection compared to more than 75% for neoadjuvant therapy. No previous prospective study has compared this approach to a neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or FOLFOX chemotherapy for resectable PDAC. METHODS PANACHE01-PRODIGE48 is a prospective multicentre controlled randomized non comparative Phase II trial, evaluating the safety and efficacy of two regimens of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (4 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX or FOLFOX) relative to the current reference treatment (surgery and then adjuvant chemotherapy) in patients with resectable PDAC. The main co-primary endpoints are OS rate at 12 months and the rate of patients undergoing the full therapeutic sequence. DISCUSSION The "ideal" cancer treatment for resectable PDAC would have the following characteristics: administration to the highest possible proportion of patients, ability to identify fast-progressing patients (i.e. poor candidates for surgery), a low rate of R1 resections (through optimisation of local disease control), and an acceptable toxicity profile. The neoadjuvant approach may meet all these criteria. With respect to published data on the efficacy of FOLFOX and mFOLFIRINOX, these two regimens are potential candidates for neoadjuvant use in the aim to optimising oncological outcomes in resectable PDAC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02959879 . Trial registration date: November 9, 2016.
-
10.
Phase III trial comparing UFT + PSK to UFT + LV in stage IIB, III colorectal cancer (MCSGO-CCTG).
Miyake, Y, Nishimura, J, Kato, T, Ikeda, M, Tsujie, M, Hata, T, Takemasa, I, Mizushima, T, Yamamoto, H, Sekimoto, M, et al
Surgery today. 2018;(1):66-72
Abstract
PURPOSE Oral adjuvant uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin (UFT/LV) is not inferior to standard weekly fluorouracil and folinate for stage II/III colon cancer. However, protein-bound polysaccharide K (PSK) has been evaluated as postoperative adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. This report is the first of MCSGO-CCTG, which compared UFT/LV to UFT/PSK as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIB or III colorectal cancer in patients who had undergone Japanese D2/D3 lymph node dissection. METHODS The primary endpoint was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). A randomized non-inferiority study compared UFT/LV to UFT/PSK. The overall survival, adverse events, compliance, and quality of life were also investigated as the secondary endpoints. RESULTS Between March 2006 and December 2010, 357 patients were randomized to UFT/PSK (n = 178) or UFT/LV (n = 179) (median age 65 years, colon/rectum 67.4/32.6%, stage IIB/IIIA/IIIB/IIIC 11.1/15.7/55.0/18.2%). The 3-year DFS rate was 82.3% in those receiving UFT/LV and 72.1% in those receiving UFT/PSK. The non-inferiority of UFT/PSK adjuvant therapy to UFT/LV therapy was not verified (-9.06%, 90% confidence interval -17.06 to -1.06%). The 3-year overall survival rate was 95.4% in those receiving UFT/LV and 90.7% in those receiving UFT/PSK. CONCLUSIONS As adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIB and III colorectal cancer patients, UFT/PSK adjuvant therapy was not non-inferior to UFT/LV therapy with respect to the DFS.