0
selected
-
1.
Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Lipoprotein(a): Two Partners in Crime?
Alonso, R, Argüeso, R, Álvarez-Baños, P, Muñiz-Grijalvo, O, Diaz-Diaz, JL, Mata, P
Current atherosclerosis reports. 2022;(6):427-434
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Familial hypercholesterolemia is a high cardiovascular risk disorder. We will review the role of lipoprotein(a) in cardiovascular risk and in aortic valve stenosis in familial hypercholesterolemia, as well as its association with their phenotype, and strategies to identify this high-risk population. RECENT FINDINGS Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia have higher lipoprotein(a) levels mainly due to an increased frequency of LPA variants, and the cardiovascular risk is increased twofolds when both conditions coexist. Also, an increased risk for aortic valve stenosis and valve replacement has been observed with high lipoprotein(a) levels. Assessment of lipoprotein(a) during the cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia is a good opportunity to identify this high-risk population. High cardiovascular risk in familial hypercholesterolemia is increased even more when lipoprotein(a) is also elevated. Measurement of lipoprotein(a) in these patients is crucial to identify those subjects who need to intensify LDL-cholesterol reduction pending availability of lipoprotein(a)-specific treatments.
-
2.
The Role of Antisense Therapies Targeting Lipoprotein(a).
Plakogiannis, R, Sorbera, M, Fischetti, B, Chen, M
Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology. 2021;(1):e5-e11
Abstract
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) continues to be the leading cause of preventable death in the United States. Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is well known to result in cardiovascular disease. Mainstay therapy for reducing LDL-C and ASCVD risk is statin therapy. Despite achieving desired LDL-C levels with lipid-lowering therapy, cardiovascular residual risk often persists. Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels have been highlighted as an inherent independent predictor of ASCVD, and decreasing Lp(a) levels may result in a significant reduction in the residual risk in high-risk patients. To date, there are no approved medications to lower Lp(a) levels. Nicotinic acid, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors, and antisense oligonucleotide have demonstrated modest to potent Lp(a) reduction. Spotlight has been placed on antisense oligonucleotides and their role in Lp(a) lowering. APO(a)LRx is in the frontline for selectively decreasing Lp(a) concentrations and ongoing research may prove that this medication may lower Lp(a)-mediated residual risk, translating into cardiovascular benefit.
-
3.
Emerging RNA Therapeutics to Lower Blood Levels of Lp(a): JACC Focus Seminar 2/4.
Tsimikas, S, Moriarty, PM, Stroes, ES
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021;(12):1576-1589
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has risen to the level of an accepted cardiovascular disease risk factor, but final proof of causality awaits a randomized trial of Lp(a) lowering. Inhibiting apolipoprotein(a) production in the hepatocyte with ribonucleic acid therapeutics has emerged as an elegant and effective solution to reduce plasma Lp(a) levels. Phase 2 clinical trials have shown that the antisense oligonucleotide pelacarsen reduced mean Lp(a) levels by 80%, allowing 98% of subjects to reach on-treatment levels of <125 nmol/l (∼50 mg/dl). The phase 3 Lp(a)HORIZON (Assessing the Impact of Lipoprotein(a) Lowering With TQJ230 on Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients With CVD) outcomes trial is currently enrolling approximately 7,680 patients with history of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and symptomatic peripheral arterial disease and controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to pelacarsen versus placebo. The co-primary endpoints are major adverse cardiovascular events in subjects with Lp(a) >70 mg/dl and >90 mg/dl, in which either of the two being positive will lead to a successful trial. Additional ribonucleic acid-targeted therapies to lower Lp(a) are in preclinical and clinical development. The testing of the Lp(a) hypothesis will provide proof whether Lp(a)-mediated risk can be abolished by potent Lp(a) lowering.
-
4.
Emerging Pharmacotherapy to Reduce Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Plasma Levels.
Eraikhuemen, N, Lazaridis, D, Dutton, MT
American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions. 2021;(3):255-265
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) is a unique form of low-density lipoprotein. It is associated with a high incidence of premature atherosclerotic disease such as coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Plasma levels of this lipoprotein and its activities are highly variable. This is because of a wide variability in the size of the apolipoprotein A moiety, which is determined by the number of repeats of cysteine-rich domains known as "kringles." Although the exact mechanism of lipoprotein(a)-induced atherogenicity is unknown, the lipoprotein has been found in the arterial walls of atherosclerotic plaques. It has been implicated in the formation of foam cells and lipid deposition in these plaques. Pharmacologic management of elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) with statins, fibrates, or bile acid sequestrants is ineffective. The newer and emerging lipid-lowering agents, such as the second-generation antisense oligonucleotides, cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors offer the most effective pharmacologic therapy.
-
5.
Elevated Lipoprotein(a): Background, Current Insights and Future Potential Therapies.
Handhle, A, Viljoen, A, Wierzbicki, AS
Vascular health and risk management. 2021;:527-542
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) forms a subfraction of the lipid profile and is characterized by the addition of apolipprotein(a) (apo(a)) to apoB100 derived particles. Its levels are mostly genetically determined inversely related to the number of protein domain (kringle) repeats in apo(a). In epidemiological studies, it shows consistent association with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and most recently with extent of aortic stenosis. Issues with standardizing the measurement of Lp(a) are being resolved and consensus statements favor its measurement in patients at high risk of, or with family histories of CVD events. Major lipid-lowering therapies such as statin, fibrates, and ezetimibe have little effect on Lp(a) levels. Therapies such as niacin or cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors lower Lp(a) as well as reducing other lipid-related risk factors but have failed to clearly reduce CVD events. Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin-9 (PCSK9) inhibitors reduce cholesterol and Lp(a) as well as reducing CVD events. New antisense therapies specifically targeting apo(a) and hence Lp(a) have greater and more specific effects and will help clarify the extent to which intervention in Lp(a) levels will reduce CVD events.
-
6.
Familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated lipoprotein(a): double heritable risk and new therapeutic opportunities.
Vuorio, A, Watts, GF, Schneider, WJ, Tsimikas, S, Kovanen, PT
Journal of internal medicine. 2020;(1):2-18
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
There is compelling evidence that the elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in the general population. Like low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, Lp(a) particles contain cholesterol and promote atherosclerosis. In addition, Lp(a) particles contain strongly proinflammatory oxidized phospholipids and a unique apoprotein, apo(a), which promotes the growth of an arterial thrombus. At least one in 250 individuals worldwide suffer from the heterozygous form of familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), a condition in which LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) is significantly elevated since birth. FH-causing mutations in the LDL receptor gene demonstrate a clear gene-dosage effect on Lp(a) plasma concentrations and elevated Lp(a) levels are present in 30-50% of patients with HeFH. The cumulative burden of two genetically determined pro-atherogenic lipoproteins, LDL and Lp(a), is a potent driver of ASCVD in HeFH patients. Statins are the cornerstone of treatment of HeFH, but they do not lower the plasma concentrations of Lp(a). Emerging therapies effectively lower Lp(a) by as much as 90% using RNA-based approaches that target the transcriptional product of the LPA gene. We are now approaching the dawn of an era, in which permanent and significant lowering of the high cholesterol burden of HeFH patients can be achieved. If outcome trials of novel Lp(a)-lowering therapies prove to be safe and cost-effective, they will provide additional risk reduction needed to effectively treat HeFH and potentially lower the CVD risk in these high-risk patients even more than currently achieved with LDL-C lowering alone.
-
7.
Monozygotic twins with familial hypercholesterolemia and high lipoprotein(a) levels leading to identical cardiovascular outcomes: Case report and review of the literature.
Kayıkçıoğlu, M, Uzun, HG, Tetik Vardarlı, A, Tokgözoğlu, L
Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir. 2020;(5):531-538
Abstract
Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare, autosomal dominant disease that leads to premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). Since monozygotic twins share the intrauterine environment and have the same age and gene profile, they could represent a very special resource for the investigation of the causes and the natural course of FH. This report is a description of 36-year-old monozygotic twin brothers with almost identical early coronary artery involvement due to FH concomitant with high lipoprotein(a) (Lpa) levels and a review of the literature. Sequence analysis revealed that the twins were homozygous for the LDLR c.1060+10G>A (rs12710260) mutation and heterozygous for the LDLR c.542C>T (rs557344672) mutations. Both were also homozygous for the c.1060+7T>C (rs2738442) and c.1586+53A>G (rs1569372) mutations in the LDLR gene as well as c.4265A>T (rs568413) mutations in the APOB gene. In the literature, there are 7 twin cases with reported FH, but none with high Lpa levels. The HoFH twins in this case report had lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels than expected (before treatment 204 and 223 mg/dL), with almost identical coronary involvement. Both had an extremely high Lpa level (308 and 272 nmol/L) with a very low coronary calcium score (16 AU) and a good response to statins (>60%). There was a history of the first CVD event occurring at nearly the same age (32-34 years) in the family. This could be an important aspect of FH families as a result of the similar timing of cumulative LDL exposure exceeding the threshold of CVD events. In conclusion, this first report of monozygotic HoFH twins with elevated Lpa levels and almost identical early coronary artery involvement at the same age provides evidence to substantiate the hypothesis of lifetime cholesterol burden/exposure.
-
8.
The interconnection between lipoprotein(a), lipoprotein(a) cholesterol and true LDL-cholesterol in the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia.
Yeang, C, Willeit, P, Tsimikas, S
Current opinion in lipidology. 2020;(6):305-312
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are present in 30-50% of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. The contribution of Lp(a) towards risk stratification of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia has been recently recognized, with studies showing a significantly worse prognosis if Lp(a) is elevated. However, the role of elevated Lp(a) in diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia is less well defined or accepted. RECENT FINDINGS An important confounder in the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia is the significant contribution of the cholesterol content on Lp(a) (Lp(a)-C) in individuals with elevated Lp(a). Because Lp(a)-C is incorporated into all clinical LDL-C measurements, it can contribute significantly to the cholesterol threshold diagnostic criteria for familial hypercholesterolemia used in most clinical algorithms. SUMMARY In this review, we discuss the interrelationship of Lp(a), Lp(a)-C and correct LDL-C in the diagnosis and prognosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Future studies of accurately measuring correct LDL-C or in using apoB-100 and Lp(a) criteria may overcome the limitations of using estimated LDL-C in the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia in individuals with concomitant elevation of Lp(a).
-
9.
Lipoprotein(a): is it more, less or equal to LDL as a causal factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality?
Langsted, A, Nordestgaard, BG
Current opinion in lipidology. 2020;(3):125-131
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize the recent studies directly comparing LDL and lipoprotein(a) as causal factors for cardiovascular disease and mortality. RECENT FINDINGS In approximately 100,000 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study for risk of myocardial infarction, in observational analyses per 39 mg/dl (1 mmol/l) cholesterol increase, the hazard ratio was 1.3 (95% confidence interval: 1.2-1.3) for LDL cholesterol and 1.6 (1.4-1.9) for lipoprotein(a) cholesterol. In corresponding genetic analyses, the causal risk ratio was 2.1 (1.3-3.4) for LDL and 2.0 (1.6-2.6) for lipoprotein(a). Also, a 15 mg/dl (0.39 mmol/l) cholesterol increase was associated with a hazard ratio for cardiovascular mortality of 1.05 (1.04-1.07) for LDL cholesterol and 1.18 (1.12-1.25) for lipoprotein(a) cholesterol. Corresponding values for all-cause mortality were 1.01 (1.00-1.01) for LDL cholesterol and 1.07 (1.04-1.10) for lipoprotein(a) cholesterol. In genetic, causal analyses, the mortality increases for elevated lipoprotein(a) appeared to be through apolipoprotein(a) kringle IV-2 rather than through lipoprotein(a) levels per se. SUMMARY On cholesterol scales, lipoprotein(a) and LDL appeared equal as causal factors for myocardial infarction; however, lipoprotein(a) was most important for mortality. Lipoprotein(a) effects may not only be due to cholesterol content but could also be due to the structure of lipoprotein(a) resembling plasminogen.
-
10.
Lp(a): Addressing a Target for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.
Vasquez, N, Joshi, PH
Current cardiology reports. 2019;(9):102
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the current recommendations for lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) screening, the evidence behind the thresholds for increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and the available data supporting Lp(a) lowering. RECENT FINDINGS Lp(a) is almost entirely genetically determined and has an independent causal association with CVD. Measurement of Lp(a) is challenging given the structural heterogeneity of apolipoprotein a (apo(a)), for which isoform-insensitive immunoassays should be used. Current guidelines do not recommend treatment to lower Lp(a) but rather focus on intensified preventive measures including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering in patients with high Lp(a). Evidence suggests that levels higher than 50 mg/dL (125 nmol/L) identify significantly increased CVD risk. Mendelian randomization studies suggest that in order to have a clinically significant reduction in coronary heart disease, Lp(a) levels should be reduced by at least 60-70 mg/dL to attain a significant benefit. Ongoing studies of targeted therapy with antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) have shown promising reductions in Lp(a) up to 80%, but a cardiovascular outcomes trial is needed. There is unquestionably an increased risk for CVD in patients with elevated Lp(a); however, measurement assay issues and the lack of Lp(a)-targeted therapies with proven outcome reduction limit the clinical utility of this important risk factor. Available evidence suggesting specific thresholds for clinically significant CVD risk are based on European or Caucasian populations, not accounting for important racial differences. Novel Lp(a)-targeted emerging therapies may need to account for an expected reduction of at least 60-70 mg/dL to achieve a clinically significant benefit.