0
selected
-
1.
[J-ELAN study (effect of losartan and amlodipine on left ventricular diastolic function in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension)].
Yamamoto, K, Hori, M
Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine. 2007;:513-5
-
2.
[HOSP study].
Kawano, Y
Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine. 2006;:465-9
-
3.
[Clinical utility of angiotensin II receptor antagonist].
Yokohama, S, Nakamura, K, Haneda, M
Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine. 2006;(6):1152-6
Abstract
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) can potentially progress to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The causes of this disease are not well defined, and although several therapies have been tried, the optimal treatment has not been established. Recently, a role for angiotensin II in insulin resistance, oxidative stress and hepatic stellate cell activation has been reported. We treated patients who had NASH and hypertension with losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist for 48 weeks. The losartan treatment improved hepatic necroinflammation and fibrosis in NASH patients. Moreover, a disappearance of iron deposition in hepatocytes, and a decrease in activated hepatic stellate cells were detected after treatment. Our results suggest the therapeutic efficacy of angiotensin II receptor antagonist in patients with NASH.
-
4.
Stroke prevention with losartan in the context of other antihypertensive drugs.
Chrysant, SG
Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998). 2004;(9):791-801
Abstract
Several large clinical trials have demonstrated that successful control of blood pressure decreases the incidence of strokes. Also, drugs that stimulate the production of angiotensin II, such as diuretics, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), provide additional stroke reduction than drugs that suppress angiotensin II production such as beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Since the stroke-protective effect of angiotensin II is mediated through stimulation of the AT2 receptors, drugs that selectively block the AT1, such as the ARBs, provide greater stroke protection than the other antihypertensive drugs. The blockade of the AT1 receptors lessens local brain ischemia, whereas the stimulation of the AT2 receptors increases local blood flow through recruitment of collateral vessels. Among the ARBs, losartan possesses certain unique properties not shared by other members of its class, which enhance its stroke-protective effects. These include the prevention of platelet adhesiveness and aggregation and the decrease of serum uric acid levels, which both lead to reduction in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. (
-
5.
[The best of clinical pharmacology in 2002].
Andréjak, M, Gayet, JL, Ambrosi, P
Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux. 2003;:41-50
Abstract
The results of several large therapeutic cardiovascular trials were reported in 2002. The LIFE study concluded that losartan is superior compared to atenolol in terms of prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, the benefit being for CVA without changing the incidence of myocardial infarction. The OPTIMAAL study stated the disappointing results of post-infarct losartan. The IONA study represents a first demonstration with nicorandil of benefit not only in angina crises but equally on cardiac morbidity and mortality. The HPS study confirms the benefit of a statin in secondary prevention but for the first time, no matter what the initial level of LDL-cholesterol. Finally in the LIPS study, it is reported that statins reduce major cardiovascular events after coronary angioplasty. The year 2002 was marked elsewhere by imagination after the publication of the RAVEL study on coated stents delivering anti-proliferative drugs in order to avoid coronary restenosis. Three drugs were the subject of work confirming their potential significance in cardiovascular pathology: a) ezetimibe, representing a new class of cholesterol lowering drugs with which the association with statins seems especially synergic, b) nesiritide recombinant type B natriuretic peptide, whose significance was confirmed in acute cardiac insufficiency. c) levosimendan (calcium sensitisor) which moreover can be a significant treatment in cardiac decompensation as suggested by the LIDO study with a follow up of 180 days. By contrast, omapatrilate did not confirm its potential superiority over ACE inhibitors in the treatment of cardiac insufficiency. Some encouraging data were reported in 2002 in the field of therapeutic angiogenesis as much at the myocardial level as in lower limb arteritis. Finally, 2002 was marked by the publication of the WHI study which intensified suspicions regarding hormonal substitution treatment, confirming the advantage of not only secondary but perhaps primary cardiovascular prevention.
-
6.
Losartan and other angiotensin II antagonists for nephropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of the clinical trial evidence.
Ruilope, LM, Segura, J
Clinical therapeutics. 2003;(12):3044-64
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-stage renal disease (ESRD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with a bleak prognosis. The life span of patients with DM who have undergone renal transplantation or who are undergoing dialysis is up to 30% shorter than that of individuals in the general population. Preventing or delaying the progression of renal disease from microalbuminuria to nephropathy, and ultimately, to ESRD is thus a crucial goal of DM management. OBJECTIVE This article reviews the growing worldwide problem of type 2 DM and ESRD, the renoprotective benefits of angiotensin II (AII) antagonists (AIIAs) such as losartan in patients with or without type 1 or 2 DM, potential mechanisms of renoprotection of AIIAs beyond blood pressure (BP) control, and the clinical-practice implications of available megatrials. METHODS Articles included in this review were identified using a MEDLINE search for English-language studies published between 1990 and 2003 and included the search terms diabetic nephropathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, microalbuminuria, proteinuria, angiotensin II antagonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and cardiovascular disease. Articles describing major clinical trials, new data, or new mechanisms pertinent to the management of type 2 DM were selected for review. RESULTS Currently, AIIAs such as losartan represent the only evidence-based treatment strategy for patients with type 2 DM and proteinuria. The Irbesartan in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria (IRMA-2) study, the Reduction of End Points in Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study, and the Irbesartan Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) indicate that AIIAs postpone the progression of type 2 diabetic renal disease at all stages, ranging from microproteinuria to overt nephropathy and ESRD, RENAAL showed that losartan improves renal outcomes in patients with type 2 DM and nephropathy over and above that attributable to BP control alone. The renoprotective effect of losartan corresponded to an average delay of 2 years in the need for dialysis or kidney transplantation. CONCLUSIONS AIIAs such as losartan should perhaps be considered mandatory therapy in patients with diabetic nephropathy and should complement existing management strategies, such as reduced dietary protein intake, strict blood glucose control, and standard antihypertensive therapy. Collectively, these measures should improve survival and quality of life and reduce the health care burden of managing patients with diabetic nephropathy.
-
7.
Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension after renal transplantation.
Holgado, R, Anaya, F, Del Castillo, D
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2001;:117-20
Abstract
Hypertension is highly prevalent after renal transplantation and has been associated with lower graft survival. Optimum management of post-transplant hypertension remains to be defined. Losartan, a potent, orally active and selective non-peptide blocker of the angiotensin subtype 1 receptor, could represent a useful drug for treating post-transplant hypertension. Recently, a prospective study of 12 weeks treatment with losartan has showed a satisfactory control of arterial hypertension associated with a decrease in proteinuria in this high-risk group of renal transplant patients. A retrospective study was performed to review the role of losartan as a renoprotective agent (evaluating blood pressure and proteinuria) in renal transplant recipients in a long-term follow-up. A total of 150 transplant recipients were included in the study. None of the patients had a serum creatinine >3 mg/dl, or suspected renal artery stenosis, or other severe concomitant diseases. The indication for losartan therapy was hypertension, proteinuria and/or post-transplant erythrocytosis. The values of blood pressure, results of fasting haematology, blood chemistry and total proteinuria in 24-h urine samples were recorded at the time of initiation of losartan therapy, 6 and 3 months before the start, and at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months thereafter. A tendency analysis by linear regression comparing two slopes before and after treatment was realized. A decrease in mean blood pressure and proteinuria, from 106.7+/-0.9 to 98.2+/-2.1 mmHg and from 1253.9+/-188 to 91.2+/-33.7 mg/24 h, P<0.05, respectively, was observed after introduction of losartan. A progressive increase in creatinine clearance was observed after the third month of losartan treatment. No significant changes were seen in haematocrit or serum potassium levels. We can conclude that a progressive decrease in mean arterial pressure associated with a decrease in proteinuria was observed during long-term follow-up. Based on the capacity of losartan to improve renal function, this drug could be decisive for the treatment and prevention of chronic allograft nephropathy.
-
8.
[Losartan potassium, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist].
Yoshinaga, K
Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine. 2000;:140-3