-
1.
Randomized Safety and Feasibility Trial of Ultra-Rapid Cooling Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injections.
Besirli, CG, Smith, SJ, Zacks, DN, Gardner, TW, Pipe, KP, Musch, DC, Shah, AR
Ophthalmology. Retina. 2020;(10):979-986
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE To test the safety and preliminary efficacy of rapid, nonpharmacologic anesthesia via cooling for intravitreal injections. DESIGN Single-center, randomized phase 1 dose-ranging safety study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02872012). PARTICIPANTS Adults 18 years of age or older with a diagnosis of exudative macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema requiring bilateral anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included. METHODS A handheld device was developed to provide anesthesia via cooling to a focal area on the surface of the eye before intravitreal treatment (IVT). In 22 patients undergoing bilateral IVT, 1 eye was randomized to receive standard of care (SOC) lidocaine-based anesthesia and the other eye received cooling-anesthesia at 1 of 5 different temperatures and cooling times. Subjective pain was assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS; range, 1-10) at 2 time points: (1) immediately after IVT and (2) 4 hours after IVT. Treated eyes were assessed for ocular safety 24 hours after IVT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We determined the occurrence of adverse events in eyes treated with cooling anesthesia. Mean VAS pain scores immediately after IVT and 4 hours after IVT in eyes receiving cooling anesthesia were compared with eyes receiving SOC. RESULTS A total of 44 eyes were treated, 22 with cooling anesthesia and 22 with SOC. No dose-related toxicity was found with cooling anesthesia. Mild, transient adverse events were recorded in 32% of patients treated with cooling anesthesia versus 44% of patients receiving SOC. The mean±standard error of the mean (SEM) VAS pain scores immediately after intravitreal injection were 2.3 ± 0.4 for patients receiving SOC and 2.2 ± 0.6 in patients receiving -10° C cooling anesthesia (P = 0.8). Mean±SEM pain scores 4 hours after injection were 1.6 ± 0.4 for SOC and 1.2 ± 0.5 in the combined -10° C arms (P = 0.56). Total mean±SEM procedure time was 124 ± 5 seconds for patients treated with cooling anesthesia versus 395 ± 40 seconds for SOC (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Ultra-rapid cooling of the eye for anesthesia was well tolerated, with -10° C treatment resulting in comparable levels of anesthesia to SOC with a reduction in procedure time.
-
2.
A Randomized, Double-Masked, Multicenter, Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab versus Aflibercept in Patients with Visual Impairment due to Diabetic Macular Edema (KITE).
Garweg, JG
Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde. 2020;(4):450-453
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brolucizumab is a single-chain variable antibody fragment (scVF) that specifically binds to VEGF-A. The results of two large phase III, multicentre, randomized clinical trials comparing intravitreal treatment with Brolucizumab and Aflibercept in neovascular age-related degeneration demonstrated its potency in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS The currently tested injected dose of 6 mg Brolucizumab results in a 11.2 - 13.3 times higher equivalent molar dose compared to Aflibercept 2 mg. Thus, it is conceivable that the effect of Brolucizumab in DME exceeds that of other currently used anti-VEGF agents with regards to effect durability; this was confirmed for nAMD in a phase I/II study. RESULTS Approved anti-VEGF drugs have shown unprecedented success compared to laser treatment with regards to restoration of visual acuity and improvement of diabetic retinopathy severity scores for up to 5 years. The visual gains were sustained after the loading phase and a reduced number of injections were required after the first year independent of the treatment strategy. Compared to pan-retinal laser photocoagulation, the time to progression of DRP was markedly extended and was proven by better preservation of the visual field, prevention of severe vision loss, hemorrhagic complications, and the need for intraocular surgery. CONCLUSIONS The ongoing prospective, randomized, phase III clinical studies in DME, KITE, and KESTREL aim to confirm the non-inferiority of Brolucizumab 6 mg compared to Aflibercept 2 mg on a functional and morphological level as well as durability effect over 2 years.
-
3.
Evaluation of ranibizumab and aflibercept for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in daily clinical practice.
Plaza-Ramos, P, Borque, E, García-Layana, A
PloS one. 2019;(10):e0223793
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab and aflibercept in the treatment of diabetic macular edema in a real world study, and to compare the two treatments with each other. METHODS Retrospective observational study of 213 eyes from 141 patients with diabetic macular edema was completed between June 2014 and June 2016. 122 were treated with ranibizumab intravitreal injection and 91 with aflibercept intravitreal injection, with a loading phase of 3 injections and a Pro Re Nata protocol. The drug was selected by the physician and fluorescein angiography was performed by physician`s criteria. Re-treatment was performed when a decline in BCVA, an increase of central macular thickness or an increase or persistence of intraretinal fluid in OCT was observed. The primary outcome was the mean change in best corrected visual acuity at 1 year, while central macular thickness, central macular volume, the number of injections and visits were evaluated as secondary outcomes. The correlation between BCVA at 4th month visit and BCVA at 12th month visit was also evaluated. RESULTS The mean baseline best corrected visual acuity for the eyes treated with ranibizumab was 0.55 (+/- 0.35) logMAR, and with aflibercept it was 0.48 (+/- 0.29) (P = 0.109). Best corrected visual acuity improved in both groups, and at the end of the follow-up was 0.40 (+/- 0.35) in the ranibizumab group and 0.40 (+/- 0.29) in the aflibercept group (P = 0.864). Best corrected visual acuity at 4th month visit is correlated at a high value (R = 0.789) with the one at the end of the study. No differences were found in central macular thickness, central macular volume and glycosylated hemoglobin when adjusting with baseline values. The overall number of injections was 5.77 (+/- 2.01), being 5.56 (+/- 2.0) in the ranibizumab group and 6.07 (+/- 1.99) in the aflibercept group (P = 0.069). The main outcome determining final best corrected visual acuity was the baseline best corrected visual acuity (P<0.001). CONCLUSION There are no differences in efficacy between ranibizumab and aflibercept in diabetic macular edema treatment in this real world study.
-
4.
Difference in Treatment Effect Between Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection and Laser by Baseline Factors in Diabetic Macular Edema.
Singh, RP, Silva, FQ, Gibson, A, Thompson, D, Vitti, R, Berliner, AJ, Saroj, N
Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. 2019;(3):167-173
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of baseline factors on differences in vision gains with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) versus laser control in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). PATIENTS AND METHODS This was an integrated post-hoc subanalysis of two phase 3 trials (VISTA, VIVID) in patients with DME. Least square (LS) mean differences of patients treated with IAI compared to laser control in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline at week 100 were evaluated for association with baseline demographics and baseline systemic disease characteristics. RESULTS At week 100, LS mean differences in BCVA change from baseline with IAI compared to laser control were not significant for association with baseline age, gender, and race or status of glycosylated hemoglobin, body mass index, renal impairment, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSION Vision gains with IAI were significantly greater than laser control and were not influenced by demographics and systemic disease control at baseline. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:167-173.].
-
5.
Simultaneous Inhibition of Angiopoietin-2 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A with Faricimab in Diabetic Macular Edema: BOULEVARD Phase 2 Randomized Trial.
Sahni, J, Patel, SS, Dugel, PU, Khanani, AM, Jhaveri, CD, Wykoff, CC, Hershberger, VS, Pauly-Evers, M, Sadikhov, S, Szczesny, P, et al
Ophthalmology. 2019;(8):1155-1170
Abstract
PURPOSE The phase 2 BOULEVARD trial compared safety and efficacy of faricimab, a novel bispecific antibody targeting angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), with ranibizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN The BOULEVARD trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02699450) was a prospective, randomized, active comparator-controlled, double-masked, multicenter, phase 2 study conducted at 59 sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS The trial enrolled patients 18 years of age or older with center-involving DME, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 73 to 24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, and central subfield thickness (CST) of 325 μm or more. METHODS Anti-VEGF treatment-naïve patients were randomized 1:1:1 to intravitreal 6.0 mg faricimab, 1.5 mg faricimab, or 0.3 mg ranibizumab, and patients previously treated with anti-VEGF were randomized 1:1 to 6.0 mg faricimab or 0.3 mg ranibizumab. Patients were dosed monthly for 20 weeks, followed by an observation period up to week 36 to assess durability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The prespecified primary outcome measure was mean change in BCVA from baseline at week 24 for faricimab versus ranibizumab in treatment-naïve patients. Key secondary and exploratory outcome measures included CST, Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score, and durability as assessed by time to re-treatment. RESULTS The trial enrolled 229 patients (168 treatment-naïve and 61 previously treated with anti-VEGF). In treatment-naïve patients, 6.0 mg faricimab, 1.5 mg faricimab, and 0.3 mg ranibizumab resulted in mean improvements of 13.9, 11.7, and 10.3 ETDRS letters from baseline, respectively. The 6.0-mg faricimab dose demonstrated a statistically significant gain of 3.6 letters over ranibizumab (P = 0.03). In both patient populations, faricimab resulted in dose-dependent reductions in CST, improvements in DRSS score, and longer time to re-treatment during the observation period compared with ranibizumab. Faricimab showed no new or unexpected safety signals. CONCLUSIONS The BOULEVARD trial met its primary end point; faricimab demonstrated statistically superior visual acuity gains versus ranibizumab at week 24 in treatment-naïve patients. Central subfield thickness reduction, DRSS score improvement, and extended durability outcomes support the primary outcome. These findings suggest the benefit of simultaneous inhibition of angiopoietin-2 and VEGF-A with faricimab for patients with DME.
-
6.
A CCR2/5 Inhibitor, PF-04634817, Is Inferior to Monthly Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema.
Gale, JD, Berger, B, Gilbert, S, Popa, S, Sultan, MB, Schachar, RA, Girgenti, D, Perros-Huguet, C
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2018;(6):2659-2669
Abstract
PURPOSE Ligands for the proinflammatory C-C chemokine receptor types 2 and 5 (CCR2 and CCR5) are elevated in the eyes of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of PF-04634817, an oral CCR2/5 dual antagonist, versus intravitreal ranibizumab, in adult subjects with DME. METHODS In this phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked study, eligible subjects (≥18 years of age) had type 1 or 2 diabetes and DME with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/32 or worse (letter score ≤ 78), and up to 20/320 or better (≥24 letter score), in the study eye. Subjects were assigned randomly 1:1 to once-daily (QD) oral PF-04634817 200 mg plus masked sham therapy as placebo or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.3/0.5 mg plus QD oral placebo. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of PF-04634817 compared with ranibizumab in change from baseline in BCVA after 12 weeks in a noninferiority design. Noninferiority was based on BCVA 80% confidence interval (CI): there had to be a less than three letter loss in the PF-04634817 arm compared with the ranibizumab arm. RESULTS A total of 199 subjects were randomized. Least squares mean difference in change in BCVA from baseline to week 12 in the study eye for the PF-04634817 arm was -2.41 letters (80% CI: -3.91, -0.91; P = 0.04) compared with ranibizumab. PF-04634817 was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with oral CCR2/5 receptor dual antagonist PF-04634817 was associated with a modest improvement in BCVA, but did not meet the predefined noninferiority criteria compared with intravitreal ranibizumab.
-
7.
The effects and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone injections in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.
Zając-Pytrus, HM, Kaczmarek, R, Strońska-Lipowicz, D, Pomorska, M, Misiuk-Hojło, M
Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University. 2017;(1):45-49
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetic macular edema (DME) is responsible for three-quarters of vision-loss cases in diabetic eye disease. In most cases, early treatment by laser photocoagulation can only stabilize vision. Glucocorticoids have been used as a local pharmacological treatment in DME when the inflammation seems to have a pathological background. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to establish the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone injections in the treatment of DME. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty mg intravitreal injections of triamcinole acetonide (IVTA) were applied to 110 DME patients after ineffective laserphotocoagulation or as an initial treatment. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for distant and near vision, central retinal thickness and intraocular pressure (IOP) were analyzed before and after the treatment at intervals of 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. The measurements were continued in cases of repeated IVTA. RESULTS Statistically significant improvements were observed in BCVA in near and distant vision, as well as a decrease in central retinal thickness after all time-intervals following IVTA. BCVA in distant vision was not significantly improved after repeated IVTA. IOP increases were observed 1 week, 1 and 3 months after IVTA, but not at 6 months after IVTA. No sight-threatening side effects of IVTA were observed. CONCLUSIONS IVTA is useful in stabilizing DME progression, although its therapeutic effect may be timelimited.
-
8.
Association of Bone Metabolic Markers With Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema in Elderly Chinese Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Zhang, X, Yang, J, Zhong, Y, Xu, L, Wang, O, Huang, P, Li, C, Qu, B, Wang, J, Zheng, C, et al
The American journal of the medical sciences. 2017;(4):355-361
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common and specific microvascular complication of diabetes. The association of bone metabolic markers with the risk of DR and diabetic macular edema (DME) is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS We investigated the association between bone turnover markers commonly examined in a clinical setting and DR and DME risk in elderly Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A total of 408 patients aged 55-70 years with T2DM were included. We first performed univariable logistic regression followed by multivariable logistic regression that included variables selected using purposeful selection. RESULTS Fasting blood glucose (P = 0.007) and duration of diabetes (P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with DME in multivariable logistic regression; however, the association of beta C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (β-CTx) with DME risk was not statistically significant (P = 0.053). Sex-stratified analysis showed that β-CTx was significantly associated with DME only in female subjects (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS β-CTx had no significant association with DR. It was significantly associated with DME in female patients with T2DM, but not in male patients with T2DM. More prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate our findings.
-
9.
Long-term outcomes of phakic patients with diabetic macular oedema treated with intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implants.
Yang, Y, Bailey, C, Holz, FG, Eter, N, Weber, M, Baker, C, Kiss, S, Menchini, U, Ruiz Moreno, JM, Dugel, P, et al
Eye (London, England). 2015;(9):1173-80
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is a leading cause of blindness in working-age adults. Slow-release, nonbioerodible fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implants have shown efficacy in the treatment of DMO; however, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends that FAc should be used in patients with chronic DMO considered insufficiently responsive to other available therapies only if the eye to be treated is pseudophakic. The goal of this analysis was to examine treatment outcomes in phakic patients who received 0.2 μg/day FAc implant. METHODS This analysis of the phase 3 FAME (Fluocinolone Acetonide in Diabetic Macular Edema) data examines the safety and efficacy of FAc implants in patients who underwent cataract extraction before (cataract before implant (CBI) group) or after (cataract after implant (CAI) group) receiving the implant. The data were further examined by DMO duration. RESULTS Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 36 months was comparable in the CAI and CBI groups. Both the percentage of patients gaining ≥ 3 lines of vision and mean change in BCVA letter score were numerically greater in the CAI group. In addition, most patients who underwent cataract surgery experienced a net gain in BCVA from presurgery baseline as well as from original study baseline. CONCLUSIONS These data support the use of 0.2 μg/day FAc implants in phakic as well as in pseudophakic patients. These findings will serve as a pilot for design of future studies to evaluate the potential protective effect of FAc implants before cataract surgery in patients with DMO and cataract.
-
10.
Three-year patient-reported visual function outcomes in diabetic macular edema managed with ranibizumab: the RESTORE extension study.
Mitchell, P, Massin, P, Bressler, S, Coon, CD, Petrillo, J, Ferreira, A, Bressler, NM
Current medical research and opinion. 2015;(11):1967-75
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of ranibizumab 0.5 mg on patient-reported visual function over 36 months in individuals with visual impairment from diabetic macular edema. METHODS RESTORE comprises a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, 12 month core study and a 24 month open-label extension study. Eyes assigned to ranibizumab in the core study received ranibizumab for 36 months; eyes assigned to laser monotherapy in the core study received ranibizumab during the extension. The primary outcome was least-squares mean change in National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) overall composite and subscale scores. RESULTS Of 303 core study participants, 240 (79%) entered the extension, comprising 83 (35%) participants initially assigned to ranibizumab, 83 (35%) assigned to ranibizumab plus laser combination therapy, and 74 (31%) assigned to laser monotherapy. Least-squares mean (standard error) change in NEI VFQ-25 composite score from baseline to month 12 (+5.9 [1.5]; +5.0 [1.5], for the ranibizumab and combination therapy groups, respectively) decreased by month 36 (+4.1 [1.7]; +4.0 [1.7], respectively, from baseline to month 36) following reduced injection frequency relative to the core study. At 36 months, the least-squares mean (standard error) change in the laser monotherapy group was similar to that in the ranibizumab groups (+4.1 [1.8]). Most subscale scores showed outcomes similar to that for the composite score. The greatest NEI VFQ-25 gains were consistently observed in participants for whom the study eye was the better-seeing eye. LIMITATIONS Patients entering the extension were not randomized, and 21% of the core study participants did not enter the extension, which may have affected the results. CONCLUSIONS Gains in patient-reported visual function at month 12 among eyes receiving ranibizumab in the core study decreased slightly by 36 months. Eyes originally receiving laser monotherapy for 12 months then ranibizumab for 24 months achieved similar gains by 36 months to eyes receiving ranibizumab for 36 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00687804 and NCT00906464.