0
selected
-
1.
Cytopenias among patients with rheumatic diseases using methotrexate: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
Vanni, KMM, Lyu, H, Solomon, DH
Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2020;(4):709-717
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of anaemia, leucopoenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia associated with MTX plus folic acid among patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE through August 2016 for all randomized controlled clinical trials with a MTX monotherapy arm. We excluded randomized controlled clinical trials for cancer and included only double-blind studies that reported on haematologic adverse events. Studies were excluded if patients did not receive folic acid or leucovorin supplementation. Full text articles were assessed by two independent reviewers. Incidence estimates were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS Of 1601 studies identified, 30 (1.87%) were included, representing 3858 patients; all had RA. Seventeen trials reported on anaemia (n = 2032), 17 reported on leucopoenia (n = 2220), 16 reported on neutropenia (n = 2202) and 12 reported on thrombocytopenia (n = 1507). The incidence for any anaemia was 2.55% (95% CI 0.60-5.47%), any leucopoenia 1.17% (95% CI 0.16-2.80%), any neutropenia 1.77% (95% CI 0.33-4.00%), and any thrombocytopenia 0.19% (95% CI 0.00-0.86%). Four cases of severe anaemia were reported, as defined by authors, along with three cases of severe neutropenia. No cases of severe leucopoenia, severe thrombocytopenia or pancytopenia were reported. CONCLUSION Cytopenias are an uncommon side effect of low-dose MTX with folic acid supplementation among RA patients. Further research is needed to reach a more precise estimate.
-
2.
Low-Dose Methotrexate and Mucocutaneous Adverse Events: Results of a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Lalani, R, Lyu, H, Vanni, K, Solomon, DH
Arthritis care & research. 2020;(8):1140-1146
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Methotrexate (MTX) increases the risk of alopecia and stomatitis, but the prevalence of these adverse events among rheumatic patients taking MTX is poorly defined. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of alopecia and stomatitis with MTX in rheumatic diseases. METHODS We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases for double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with an MTX monotherapy arm. Alopecia, stomatitis, and oral/mouth ulcers data were extracted. The quality of trials was assessed by 2 authors. We included trials published since 1990 that used at least 10 mg of MTX weekly, coadministered with folic or folinic acid. We estimated the prevalence using random-effects models because heterogeneity was anticipated. Two estimates of prevalence were included; the lower bound estimate included all trials (assuming no alopecia and stomatitis if not mentioned), and the upper bound estimate included only those that specifically described prevalence estimates of alopecia or stomatitis. RESULTS Of 3,954 studies identified, 20 RCTs were included, with a total of 24 MTX monotherapy arms, of which 10 reported the prevalence of alopecia (n = 1,113), and 21 reported stomatitis or mouth/oral ulcers (n = 2,056). The prevalence of alopecia was between 1.0% and 4.9%. The prevalence of stomatitis was between 5.7% and 8.0%. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis gives more precise estimates of mucocutaneous adverse events that occur in rheumatic disease patients taking MTX. These estimates will help inform patient decision-making regarding MTX.
-
3.
A systemic review and meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of total glucosides of peony combined with methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis.
Feng, ZT, Xu, J, He, GC, Cai, SJ, Li, J, Mei, ZG
Clinical rheumatology. 2018;(1):35-42
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
To assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of total glucoside of peony (TGP) and methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on the traditional Chinese active component TGP combined with MTX vs. MTX alone for the treatment of RA was collected by searching the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP Journals database, and Wanfang database up to February 2017. Study selection, data extraction, data synthesis, and data analyses were performed according to the Cochrane standards. A total of eight RCTs involving 522 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with MTX alone, the use of TGP combined with MTX exhibited better therapeutic effects for the treatment of RA (P = 0.004). In addition, TGP combined with MTX caused a more significant decrease in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (P < 0.0001) and swollen joint count (SJC) (P < 0.00001). However, no significant differences were found in C-reactive protein (CRP) (P = 0.19), duration of morning stiffness (DMS) (P = 0.32), or tender joint count (TJC) (P = 0.23) between the two groups. In addition, adverse events were more frequently reported in the MTX monotherapy group than in the TGP and MTX combination group (P = 0.0007). Our study demonstrates that TGP combined with MTX is more effective than MTX alone for the treatment of RA. Nevertheless, the adverse effects of the combination of TGP and MTX need to be further assessed. Due to the poor methodological quality of included trials, well-designed, multi-center, and large-scale RCTs are necessary to draw a more definitive conclusion.
-
4.
Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.
Wang, Y, MacDonald, JK, Vandermeer, B, Griffiths, AM, El-Matary, W
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015;(8):CD007560
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Methotrexate, a folate antagonist, is an immunosuppressant drug that is effective for treating several inflammatory disorders including Crohn's disease. Ulcerative colitis, a related chronic inflammatory bowel disease, can be challenging to treat. T his updated systematic review summarizes the current evidence on the use of methotrexate for induction maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this review were to assess the efficacy and safety of methotrexate for maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and the Cochrane IBD/FBD group specialized trials register from inception to June 26, 2014. Study references and review papers were also searched for additional trials. Abstracts from major gastroenterological meetings were searched to identify research published in abstract form only. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials in which methotrexate was compared to placebo or an active comparator in patients with quiescent ulcerative were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for each study. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinical or endoscopic relapse as defined by the primary studies. Secondary outcomes included frequency and nature of adverse events, change of disease activity score and steroid-sparing effect. We calculated the risk ratio and corresponding 95% confidence interval for dichotomous outcomes. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS Three trials (165 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One study compared oral methotrexate (12.5 mg/week) to placebo, another compared oral methotrexate (15 mg/week) to 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP, 1.5 mg/kg/day) or 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA, 3 g/day) and the other compared methotrexate (15 mg/week) in combination sulfasalazine (3 g/day) to sulfasalazine. The placebo-controlled study was rated as low risk of bias. The study comparing methotrexate to 6-MP and 5-ASA was rated as high risk of bias and the study assessing methotrexate and sulfasalazine was rated as unclear risk of bias for sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding. The placebo-controlled study found no statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients who maintained remission. At nine months, 36% (5/14) of methotrexate patients maintained remission compared to 54% (10/18) of placebo patients (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.45). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence for this outcome was low due to very sparse data (15 events). The study comparing combination therapy to sulfasalazine found no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients who maintained remission. At 12 months, 100% (14/14) of patients in the combination group maintained remission compared to 75% (9/12) of sulfasalazine patients (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.86), A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence for this outcome was very low due to unknown risk of bias and very sparse data (23 events). There were no statistically significant differences in maintenance of remission rates between methotrexate and 6-MP or between methotrexate and 5-ASA. At 76 weeks, 14% (1/7) of methotrexate patients maintained remission compared to 64% (7/11) of 6-MP patients (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.45) and 0% (0/2) of 5-ASA patients (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.06 to 20.71). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence from this study was very low due to high risk of bias and very sparse data. Adverse events reported in these studies included transient leucopenia, migraine, nausea and dyspepsia, mild alopecia, mild increase in aspartate aminotransferase levels, peritoneal abscess, hypoalbuminemia, severe rash and atypical pneumonia AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The results for efficacy and safety outcomes between methotrexate and placebo, methotrexate and sulfasalazine, methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate and 5-aminosalicylic acid were uncertain. Whether a higher dose or parenteral administration of methotrexate would be effective in quiescent ulcerative colitis is unknown. At present there is no evidence supporting the use of methotrexate for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. More studies are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of methotrexate maintenance therapy in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Large scale methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials are needed. These studies should investigate higher doses of methotrexate (e.g. 15 to 25 mg/week) and parenteral administration.
-
5.
Association of the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms with methotrexate toxicity in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.
Song, GG, Bae, SC, Lee, YH
Clinical rheumatology. 2014;(12):1715-24
Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore whether the C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) play a role in methotrexate (MTX) toxicity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MEDLINE and EMBASE database searches and subsequent manual searches were utilized to identify articles in which C677T and A1298C MTHFR polymorphisms were evaluated in RA patients taking MTX. A meta-analysis was conducted to identify associations between MTHFR polymorphisms and MTX toxicity. Twelve studies comprising a total of 2,288 RA patients were included in our meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed an association between the overall toxicity of MTX and the MTHFR 677TT genotype (odds ratio [OR] = 1.615, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.185-2.200, p = 0.002). Stratification by ethnicity indicated an association between the MTHFR 677TT genotype and the overall toxicity of MTX in East Asians (OR = 1.583, 95 % CI = 1.075-2.331, p = 0.020). The toxicity of MTX also was found to be associated with the TT genotype in patients taking folate (OR = 1.893, 95 % CI = 1.283-2.793, p = 0.001). Stratification by toxicity type indicated an association between the MTHFR 677TT genotype and any adverse effects (OR = 1.716, 95 % CI = 1.127-2.612, p = 0.012). Meta-analysis stratified by toxicity type indicated an association between the MTHFR 1298CC genotype and any adverse effects (OR = 0.501, 95 % CI = 0.284-0.886, p = 0.017). The results of our meta-analysis suggest that the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are associated with MTX toxicity in RA patients.
-
6.
RFC1 80G>A is a genetic determinant of methotrexate efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: a human genome epidemiologic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Kung, TN, Dennis, J, Ma, Y, Xie, G, Bykerk, V, Pope, J, Thorne, C, Keystone, E, Siminovitch, KA, Gagnon, F
Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.). 2014;(5):1111-20
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Associations have been reported between candidate genes and the response to methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, but most of the studies have been small and have yielded conflicting results. This study was undertaken to provide a systematic review of all genetic variant associations with MTX efficacy and toxicity, and to conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the most commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphism for which prior cumulative analysis has been lacking. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify genetic variant associations with MTX efficacy and toxicity. Studies were identified from the Medline, EMBase, HuGENet Navigator, and Cochrane Library databases through December 2012, and from the 2009-2011 abstracts of the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism annual meeting proceedings. Additional unpublished genotype data from a Canadian cohort of patients with early RA were also included. RESULTS Among the 87 identified studies examining genetic associations with MTX efficacy and toxicity, the reduced folate carrier 1 gene (RFC1) variant 80G>A (Arg(27) His, rs1051266) was selected for random-effects meta-analysis. RFC1 80G>A was associated with MTX efficacy in both the recessive model (odds ratio [OR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.04-1.93) and the additive model (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.49). Restriction of the sensitivity analyses to studies that involved Caucasian subjects only and that used similar outcome measures (MTX failure versus nonfailure) maintained and improved the associations in both models. No significant association between RFC1 80G>A and MTX toxicity was detected. CONCLUSION In these analyses of available data from observational studies, RFC1 80G>A was found to be associated with MTX efficacy, but not toxicity, in RA patients. This variant merits further prospective analysis as a potential predictor of MTX efficacy. Variability in the definitions of response in pharmacogenetic studies is a source of data heterogeneity that should be addressed.