0
selected
-
1.
Analytical barriers in clinical B-type natriuretic peptide measurement and the promising analytical methods based on mass spectrometry technology.
Xiao, P, Li, H, Li, X, Song, D
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. 2019;(7):954-966
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a circulating biomarker that is mainly applied in heart failure (HF) diagnosis and to monitor disease progression. Because some identical amino acid sequences occur in the precursor and metabolites of BNP, undesirable cross-reactions are common in immunoassays. This review first summarizes current analytical methods, such as immunoassay- and mass spectrometry (MS)-based approaches, including the accuracy of measurement and the inconsistency of the results. Second, the review presents some promising approaches to resolve the current barriers in clinical BNP measurement, such as how to decrease cross-reactions and increase the measurement consistency. Specific approaches include research on novel BNP assays with higher-specificity chemical antibodies, the development of International System of Units (SI)-traceable reference materials, and the development of structure characterization methods based on state-of-the-art ambient and ion mobility MS technologies. The factors that could affect MS analysis are also discussed, such as biological sample cleanup and peptide ionization efficiency. The purpose of this review is to explore and identify the main problems in BNP clinical measurement and to present three types of approaches to resolve these problems, namely, materials, methods and instruments. Although novel approaches are proposed here, in practice, it is worth noting that the BNP-related peptides including unprocessed proBNP were all measured in clinical BNP assays. Therefore, approaches that aimed to measure a specific BNP or proBNP might be an effective way for the standardization of a particular BNP form measurement, instead of the standardization of "total" immunoreactive BNP assays in clinical at present.
-
2.
A review of pediatric pulmonary hypertension with new guidelines.
Kula, S, Pektaş, A
Turkish journal of medical sciences. 2017;(2):375-380
Abstract
This study aims to review pediatric pulmonary hypertension (PH) by comparing the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS), the American Heart Association (AHA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Pediatric Pulmonary Vascular Disease Network (EPPVDN). All three sets of guidelines define PH as having a mean pulmonary artery pressure of ≥25 mmHg and accept the validity of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. Every child with a high index of suspicion for PH should undergo an initial work-up of chest X-rays, electrocardiography, and echocardiography. The AHA/ATS guidelines emphasize the necessity of cardiac catheterization and hemodynamic studies. As mentioned in the AHA/ATS guidelines, the symptoms and tests that can detect PH include right ventricle failure, WHO functional class, syncope, echocardiography findings, hemodynamic data, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)/N-terminal pro-BNP, the 6-min walk test, and cardiopulmonary exercise tests. The EPPVDN guidelines refer to positive acute vasoreactivity test results and growth as risk factors. All three guidelines highlight the importance of treating and following affected children in specialized centers and recommend calcium channel blockers as a first-line treatment in children (aged >12 months) who have a positive acute vasoreactivity test. Children with PH have distinct clinical features. In order to overcome the controversies related to the optimal management of pediatric PH, well-designed clinical studies should be carried out on a large cohort of affected children.
-
3.
Utility of traditional circulating and imaging-based cardiac biomarkers in patients with predialysis CKD.
Colbert, G, Jain, N, de Lemos, JA, Hedayati, SS
Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2015;(3):515-29
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Cardiac biomarkers, such as cardiac troponin T (cTnT), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and N-terminal-pro-BNP (NT-pro-BNP), are commonly used to diagnose acute coronary syndrome and congestive heart failure exacerbation in symptomatic patients. Levels of these biomarkers are frequently chronically elevated in asymptomatic patients with ESRD who are receiving maintenance dialysis. Other imaging biomarkers commonly encountered in nephrologists' clinical practice, such as coronary artery calcium measured by computed tomography, left ventricular hypertrophy, and carotid intima-media thickness, are also frequently abnormal in asymptomatic patients with ESRD. This article critically reviews the limited observational data on associations between cTnT, BNP, NT-pro-BNP, coronary artery calcium, left ventricular hypertrophy, and carotid intima-media thickness with cardiovascular events and death in non-dialysis-dependent patients with CKD. Although sufficient evidence suggests that these biomarkers may be used for prognostication, the diagnostic utility of cTnT, BNP, and NT-pro-BNP remain challenging in patients with CKD. Decreased renal clearance may affect the plasma levels of these biomarkers, and upper reference limits were originally derived in patients without CKD. Until better data are available, higher cutoffs, or a rise in level compared with previous values, have been proposed to help distinguish acute myocardial infarction from chronic elevations of cTnT in symptomatic patients with CKD. Additionally, it is not known whether these biomarkers are modifiable and amenable to interventions that could change hard clinical outcomes in patients with CKD not yet undergoing long-term dialysis.
-
4.
Effect of B-type natriuretic peptide-guided treatment of chronic heart failure on total mortality and hospitalization: an individual patient meta-analysis.
Troughton, RW, Frampton, CM, Brunner-La Rocca, HP, Pfisterer, M, Eurlings, LW, Erntell, H, Persson, H, O'Connor, CM, Moertl, D, Karlström, P, et al
European heart journal. 2014;(23):1559-67
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIMS: Natriuretic peptide-guided (NP-guided) treatment of heart failure has been tested against standard clinically guided care in multiple studies, but findings have been limited by study size. We sought to perform an individual patient data meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of NP-guided treatment of heart failure on all-cause mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS Eligible randomized clinical trials were identified from searches of Medline and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register. The primary pre-specified outcome, all-cause mortality was tested using a Cox proportional hazards regression model that included study of origin, age (<75 or ≥75 years), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, ≤45 or >45%) as covariates. Secondary endpoints included heart failure or cardiovascular hospitalization. Of 11 eligible studies, 9 provided individual patient data and 2 aggregate data. For the primary endpoint individual data from 2000 patients were included, 994 randomized to clinically guided care and 1006 to NP-guided care. All-cause mortality was significantly reduced by NP-guided treatment [hazard ratio = 0.62 (0.45-0.86); P = 0.004] with no heterogeneity between studies or interaction with LVEF. The survival benefit from NP-guided therapy was seen in younger (<75 years) patients [0.62 (0.45-0.85); P = 0.004] but not older (≥75 years) patients [0.98 (0.75-1.27); P = 0.96]. Hospitalization due to heart failure [0.80 (0.67-0.94); P = 0.009] or cardiovascular disease [0.82 (0.67-0.99); P = 0.048] was significantly lower in NP-guided patients with no heterogeneity between studies and no interaction with age or LVEF. CONCLUSION Natriuretic peptide-guided treatment of heart failure reduces all-cause mortality in patients aged <75 years and overall reduces heart failure and cardiovascular hospitalization.
-
5.
You can do more to slow the progression of heart failure.
Wexler, R, Elton, T, Pleister, A, Feldman, D
The Journal of family practice. 2009;(3):122-8
-
6.
Endogenous B-type natriuretic peptide: a limb of the regulatory response to acutely decompensated heart failure.
Hobbs, RE, Mills, RM
Clinical cardiology. 2008;(9):407-12
Abstract
Acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) represents an episodic failure of cardiorenal homeostasis that may resolve with upregulation of natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, and certain prostacyclins. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has multiple favorable effects, including vasodilation, diuresis, natriuresis, and inhibition of vascular endothelial proliferation and cardiac fibrosis. By antagonizing the effects of activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system in volume overload, the endogenous BNP response may help rescue patients from episodic ADHF. Although knowledge of BNP physiology is expanding, we still have limited understanding of the heterogeneity of proBNP-derived molecules, including active 32 amino acid BNP and less active junk BNP forms. Emerging evidence suggests that in ADHF, the endogenous BNP response is overwhelmed by neurohormonal activation. This relative BNP deficiency may also be accompanied by physiologic resistance to BNP. Additionally, abnormalities of BNP production may result in a lower proportion of active BNP relative to less active forms that may also be detected by point-of-care tests. Improved detection of the various BNP species may clarify these concepts and facilitate improved clinical management of ADHF.
-
7.
Clinical applications of B-type natriuretic peptide levels in the care of cardiovascular patients.
McCullough, PA
Minerva cardioangiologica. 2004;(6):479-89
Abstract
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), is a cardiac neurohormone, and is released as prepro BNP and then enzymatically cleaved to the N-terminal-proBNP and BNP upon ventricular myocyte stretch. Blood measurements of BNP have been used to identify patients with heart failure (HF). The BNP assay is currently used in diagnosis, prognosis, screening, and response to treatment for patients with HF. In general, a BNP level below 100 pg/mL excludes acutely decompensated HF and levels > 500 pg/ml indicate decompensation. There are supportive data for using BNP to guide both inpatient and outpatient HF diagnosis and treatment. When BNP is elevated in acute coronary syndromes, pulmonary embolism, and sepsis, it implies that subclinical left ventricular dysfunction is present and a higher mortality rate can be expected. Elevated BNP levels before cardiac surgery are associated with higher rates of atrial fibrillation and death. After bypass surgery, as left ventricular function improves, the BNP level can be expected to fall. Lastly, in patients with aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation, BNP elevates and is associated or may precede the development of symptoms and possibly can serve as a trigger for additional evaluation or intervention.