0
selected
-
1.
Occupational exposure to silica and risk of heart disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Liu, K, Mu, M, Fang, K, Qian, Y, Xue, S, Hu, W, Ye, M
BMJ open. 2020;(1):e029653
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To search for evidence of the relationship between occupational silica exposure and heart disease. DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis. BACKGROUND Growing evidence suggests a relationship between occupational silica exposure and heart disease; however, the link between them is less clear. DATA SOURCES PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer and EMBASE were searched for articles published between 1 January 1995 and 20 June 2019. Articles that investigated the effects of occupational silica exposure on the risk of heart disease were considered. STUDY SELECTION We included cohort studies, including prospective, retrospective and retroprospective studies. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS We extracted data using a piloted data collection form and conducted random-effects meta-analysis and exposure-response analysis. The meta-relative risk (meta-RR), a measure of the average ratio of heart disease rates in those with and without silica exposure, was used as an inverse variance-weighted average of relative risks from the individual studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort studies was used for study quality assessment. OUTCOME MEASURE We calculated the risk of heart diseases such as pulmonary heart disease, ischaemic heart disease and others. RESULTS Twenty cohort studies were included. The results suggest a significant increase in the risk of overall heart disease (meta-RR=1.08, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.13). Stronger evidence of association with pulmonary heart disease was found in the risk estimate of both categories of heart disease (meta-RR=1.24, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.43) and in the exposure-response analysis (meta-RR=1.39, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.62). Our subgroup analyses also revealed that the statistical heterogeneity among studies could be attributed mainly to the diversity in reference group, occupation and study quality score. CONCLUSIONS Silica-exposed workers are at an increased risk for overall heart disease, especially pulmonary heart disease. Further research is needed to better clarify the relationship between occupational silica exposure and ischaemic heart disease. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019124673.
-
2.
Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in people with workplace exposure to asbestos.
Maisonneuve, P, Rampinelli, C, Bertolotti, R, Misotti, A, Lococo, F, Casiraghi, M, Spaggiari, L, Bellomi, M, Novellis, P, Solinas, M, et al
Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2019;:23-30
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Smoking is the main risk factor for lung cancer, but environmental and occupational exposure to carcinogens also increase lung cancer risk. We assessed whether extending low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening to persons with occupational exposure to asbestos may be an effective way reducing lung cancer mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a nested case-control study within the COSMOS screening program, assessing past asbestos exposure with a questionnaire. LDCT scans of asbestos-exposed participants were reviewed to assess the presence of pulmonary, interstitial and pleural alterations in comparison to matched unexposed controls. We also performed an exhaustive review, with meta-analysis, of the literature on LDCT screening in asbestos-exposed persons. RESULTS Exposure to asbestos, initially self-reported by 9.8% of COSMOS participants, was confirmed in 216 of 544 assessable cases, corresponding to 2.6% of the screened population. LDCT of asbestos-exposed persons had significantly more pleural plaques, diaphragmatic pleural thickening and pleural calcifications, but similar frequency of parenchymal and interstitial alterations to unexposed persons. From 16 papers, including this study, overall lung cancer detection rates at baseline were 0.81% (95% CI 0.50-1.19) in asbestos-exposed persons, 0.94% (95% CI 0.47-1.53) in asbestos-exposed smokers (12 studies), and 0.11% (95% CI 0.00-0.43) in asbestos-exposed non-smokers (9 studies). CONCLUSION Persons occupationally exposed to asbestos should be monitored to gather more information about risks. Although LDCT screening is effective in the early detection lung cancer in asbestos-exposed smokers, our data suggest that screening of asbestos-exposed persons with no additional risk factors for cancer does is not viable due to the low detection rate.
-
3.
Risk of obstructive pulmonary diseases and occupational exposure to pesticides: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pourhassan, B, Meysamie, A, Alizadeh, S, Habibian, A, Beigzadeh, Z
Public health. 2019;:31-41
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis study was performed to examine the relationship between occupational exposure to pesticides and the risk of obstructive pulmonary diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic bronchitis. STUDY DESIGN This is a systematic review and meta-analysis study. METHODS PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for English-language publications. Eight cohort studies and one case-control study were included in the pooled analysis. RESULTS These studies had a total of 101,353 participants from eleven different countries and were published between 2006 and 2018. The heterogeneity among the studies was high (P < 0.001, I2 = 68.7%). In a random-effects model meta-analysis, a pooled odds ratio (OR) analysis showed that there was a direct relationship between occupational exposure to the pesticides and obstructive pulmonary diseases (OR = 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-1.47). A positive significant relationship was also observed between exposure to the pesticides and risk of chronic bronchitis (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.23-1.31). Also, there was a significant relationship between occupational exposure to the pesticides and an increased risk of COPD (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.81). No evidence of publication bias was found among the studies according to the results of the Egger's test (P of bias = 0.157). CONCLUSIONS Findings of this study show that occupational exposure to pesticides can be associated with an increased risk of obstructive lung diseases including chronic bronchitis and COPD.
-
4.
Effect of Occupational Exposure to Radar Radiation on Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Safari Variani, A, Saboori, S, Shahsavari, S, Yari, S, Zaroushani, V
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2019;(11):3211-3219
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Microwave radiation is one of the most growing environmental workplace factors that exposes too many workers in the various workplaces. Regard to concerns about cancer incidence in these workers and lack of systematic or meta-analytic studies about this object, so, we conducted a meta-analysis to acquire an understanding of the association between cancer risk and occupational exposure to radar radiation. METHODS A systematic search was carried out on case-control, cohort and clinical control trial studies that published in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus and Google scholar databases that accomplished from March 2017 to March 2018 and updated on 30 September, 2018 in English and Persian articles without time limit in publication date. Keywords were selected based on PICO principle and collected from MeSH database. After removal of duplicated studied, taking into inclusion and exclusion criteria, the process of screening was carried out and data were extracted after preparation of the full text of included articles. Article collection was completed by manually searching for a reference list of eligible studies. For quality assessment of included studies, Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used. RESULTS a total of 533 studies was found in the first step of literature search, only 6 were included with 53,008 sample size according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Estimated pooled random effects size analysis showed no significant increasing effect of occupational exposure to radar radiation on mortality rate (MR=0.81, 95%CI: 0.78, 0.83) and relative risk (RR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.75, 0.99, P <0.0001) of cancer with a significant heterogeneity between the selected studies. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis study have shown no significant increase in overall mortality ratio and cancer risk ratio from occupational exposure to the radar frequency of workers. But, these results are not conclusive. As regards to some limitation such as fewer numbers of included studies, lack of data about exposure characterizations and demographic characterizations in this meta-analysis, this result is not certain and conclusive. It is recommended to conduct future studies.