1.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Assessment of the Clinical Efficacy of Bismuth Subsalicylate for Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diarrhea.
Brum, JM, Gibb, RD, Ramsey, DL, Balan, G, Yacyshyn, BR
Digestive diseases and sciences. 2021;(7):2323-2335
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large number of studies have evaluated the pharmacology, safety, and/or efficacy of bismuth subsalicylate for the relief of common gastrointestinal symptoms, diarrhea and vomiting due to acute gastroenteritis. In addition, short-term (48 h) medication with bismuth subsalicylate is known to be effective against infectious gastroenteritis such as travelers' diarrhea. AIMS Previous studies have documented the bacteriostatic/bactericidal effects of bismuth subsalicylate against a variety of pathogenic gastrointestinal bacteria. However, meta-analyses of the clinical efficacy of bismuth subsalicylate for both prevention and treatment of travelers' diarrhea have not yet been published. METHODS A total of 14 clinical studies (from 1970s to 2007) comprised the core data used in this assessment of efficacy of bismuth subsalicylate against infectious (including travelers') diarrhea. These studies allowed for statistical meta-analyses regarding prevention (three travelers' diarrhea studies) and treatment of infectious diarrhea (11 studies [five travelers' diarrhea]). RESULTS The results show that subjects treated with bismuth subsalicylate for up to 21 days have 3.5 times greater odds of preventing travelers' diarrhea compared with placebo (95% CI 2.1, 5.9; p < 0.001). In addition, subjects with infectious diarrhea treated with bismuth subsalicylate had 3.7 times greater odds of diarrhea relief (recorded on diaries as subjective symptomatic improvement) compared to those receiving placebo (95% CI 2.1, 6.3; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that bismuth subsalicylate can be beneficial for those at risk or affected by food and waterborne diarrheal disease such as traveler's (infectious) diarrhea, and may decrease the risk of inappropriate antibiotic utilization.
2.
Meta-analysis of Modified FOLFIRINOX Regimens for Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.
Usón Junior, PLS, Rother, ET, Maluf, FC, Bugano, DDG
Clinical colorectal cancer. 2018;(3):187-197
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a meta-analysis of previous reports evaluating the effect of mFIO (modified FOLFIRINOX; leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) regimens in advanced pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a meta-analysis of reported studies in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (1950-2016) in December 2016. The inclusion criteria were randomized trials, prospective or retrospective cohorts, patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the use of mFIO or FOLFIRINOX (FIO) chemotherapy, and available information for ≥ 1 efficacy endpoint (response rate, progression-free survival, and/or overall survival). The outcomes were compared according to the chemotherapy regimen using a random effects model. We also performed a meta-regression analysis to evaluate the effect of dose reductions on outcomes. RESULTS Of 2525 abstracts, 32 were considered eligible. Modifications in the FIO regimen included omission of the 5-fluorouracil bolus and/or dose reductions in infusional 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and/or oxaliplatin. mFIO was not associated with inferior response rates (32% vs. 33%; P = .879), lower rates of survival at 11 months (47% vs. 50%; P = .38), or lower 6-month progression-free survival rates (47% vs. 53%; P = .38). The meta-regression of the percentage of dose reduction failed to show any association. CONCLUSION The results of the present meta-analysis with a combined sample size of 1461 patients suggest that it is reasonable to consider mFIO regimens for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.