-
1.
Emerging targeted drug delivery strategies toward ovarian cancer.
Wang, Z, Meng, F, Zhong, Z
Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2021;:113969
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a high-mortality malignancy in women. The contemporary clinical chemotherapy with classic cytotoxic drugs, targeted molecular inhibitors would mostly fail when ovarian cancer cells become drug-resistant or metastasize through the body or when patients bare no more toleration because of strong adverse effects. The past decade has spotted varying targeted delivery systems including antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), peptide/folate/aptamer-drug conjugates, polymer-drug conjugates, ligand-functionalized nanomedicines, and dual-targeted nanomedicines that upgrade ovarian cancer chemo- and molecular therapy effectively in preclinical/clinical settings via endowing therapeutic agents selectivity and bypassing drug resistance as well as lessening systemic toxicity. The targeted delivery approaches further provide means to potentiate emergent treatment modalities such as molecular therapy, gene therapy, protein therapy, photodynamic therapy, dual-targeting therapy and combination therapy for ovarian cancer. This review highlights up-to-date development of targeted drug delivery strategies toward advanced, metastatic, relapsed, and drug resistant ovarian cancers.
-
2.
Diet and ovarian cancer risk: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies.
Sun, H, Gong, TT, Xia, Y, Wen, ZY, Zhao, LG, Zhao, YH, Wu, QJ
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2021;(4):1682-1690
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Diet may play an important role in the etiology of ovarian cancer (OC). We aimed to evaluate the strength and credibility of evidence pertaining to dietary risk factors for OC. METHODS We comprehensively searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, PROSPERO and EMBASE databases to identify related systematic reviews and meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies. This study had been registered at PROSPERO. The registration number is CRD42020187651. For each association, we estimated the summary effect size using fixed and random effects models, the 95% confidence interval and the 95% prediction interval. We assessed heterogeneity, evidence of small-study effects, and excess significance bias. RESULTS A total of 22 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included in the present study. These previous reports evaluated 184 individual studies, which proposed a total of 36 associations between dietary factors and OC risk. Out of the 36 associations, there were no strong, highly suggestive and suggestive evidence, only four (black tea, skim/low-fat milk, lactose, and calcium) were determined to be supported by weak evidence. OC risk was inversely associated with intake of black tea or calcium, and positively associated with intake of skim/low-fat milk or lactose. CONCLUSIONS Our studies revealed that four associations between OC risk and dietary factors (black tea, skim/low-fat milk, lactose, and calcium) were supported by weak evidence. The remaining 32 associations were not confirmed. Additional studies are needed to carefully evaluate the relationship between dietary factors and OC risk.
-
3.
Scoring systems for the evaluation of adnexal masses nature: current knowledge and clinical applications.
Terzic, M, Aimagambetova, G, Norton, M, Della Corte, L, Marín-Buck, A, Lisón, JF, Amer-Cuenca, JJ, Zito, G, Garzon, S, Caruso, S, et al
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2021;(3):340-347
Abstract
Adnexal masses are a common finding in women, with 20% of them developing at least one pelvic mass during their lifetime. There are more than 30 different subtypes of adnexal tumours, with multiple different subcategories, and the correct characterisation of the pelvic masses is of paramount importance to guide the correct management. On that basis, different algorithms and scoring systems have been developed to guide the clinical assessment. The first scoring system implemented into the clinical practice was the Risk of Malignancy Index, which combines ultrasound evaluation, menopausal status, and serum CA-125 levels. Today, current guidelines regarding female patients with adnexal masses include the application of International Ovarian Tumours Analysis simple rules, logistic regression model 1 (LR1) and LR2, OVERA, cancer ovarii non-invasive assessment of treating strategy, and assessment of Different Neoplasias in the adnexa. In this scenario, the choice of the scoring system for the discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian tumours can be complex when approaching patients with adnexal masses. This review aims to summarise the available evidence regarding the different scoring systems to provide a complete overview of the topic.
-
4.
Non-epithelial ovarian carcinoma: what is the optimal staging surgery?
Medina-Franco, H, Colonna-Márquez, LE
Chinese clinical oncology. 2020;(4):50
Abstract
Non-epithelial ovarian neoplasms are a group of infrequent, heterogenous clinical and histological tumors that account from 6% to 10% of ovarian malignancies, the two most common non-epithelial ovarian neoplasms are germ cell tumors and sex cord-stromal cell tumors, each of these classifications is divided in multiple histologic subtypes. In the case of epithelial ovarian tumors comprehensive surgical staging has remained as the gold standard for staging, nonetheless for non-epithelial ovarian neoplasms the use of staging surgery has remained debatable and controversial throughout the years in order to correctly stage non-epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Despite the fact that the role of surgery remains critical in the adequate management of all ovarian tumors, there are several manners to surgically approach an ovarian tumor depending on the type of tumor, risk factors and staging of disease. There are multiple reasons why the use of surgery in non-epithelial ovarian tumors is still debatable nowadays, for instance the main reason relies in the low prevalence of this disease, therefore there are few studies that actually offer a clear and sufficient overview to this issue. The objective of this manuscript is to present a comprehensive review of the non-epithelial carcinoma and to focus in the latest information, evidence and recommendations about the optimal treatment and staging surgery for these tumors.
-
5.
Systemic therapy for non-serous ovarian carcinoma.
Chávarri-Guerra, Y, González-Ochoa, E, De-la-Mora-Molina, H, Soto-Perez-de-Celis, E
Chinese clinical oncology. 2020;(4):52
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the top ten most common cancers in women around the world, with high-grade serous epithelial cancer being the most frequent type. However, around a quarter of cases consist of non-serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), which is a heterogeneous group of malignancies that includes endometroid, mucinous, clear cell carcinoma (CCC), and carcinosarcoma. Another relevant group of nonepithelial tumors are those arising from germ cells or sex-cord stromal cells, which account for about 10% of all ovarian cancers. Although there are similarities in the presentation, evaluation, and management of these tumors, they have unique characteristics in terms of epidemiology, tumor biology, tumor marker expression, and response to treatment, warranting a different approach to each one of them. Collectively, the treatment of most of EOC include surgical cytoreduction followed by adjuvant systemic platinum-based chemotherapy. The most common chemotherapy and route of administration for systemic treatment is paclitaxel plus carboplatin given intravenously. However, the treatment of EOC has been rapidly evolving and emerging targeted therapies such as poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antiangiogenic agents are also available. On the other hand, non-EOC responds well to combination chemotherapy used to treat testicular cancer (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin) and has a good prognosis. Frontline chemotherapeutic regimen selection differs according to histological subtype, molecular alterations, and patient characteristics. Here, we review specific characteristics of non-serous and non-EOC emphasizing the peculiarities of systemic therapy for each subtype.
-
6.
Recent advancements in fabrication of nanomaterial based biosensors for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.
Sha, R, Badhulika, S
Mikrochimica acta. 2020;(3):181
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed via determination of biomarkers like CA125, Mucin 1, HE4, and prostasin that can be present in the blood. However, there is a substantial need for less expensive, simpler, and portable diagnostic tools, both for timely diagnosis and management of ovarian cancer. This review (with 101 refs.) discusses various kinds of nanomaterial-based biosensors for tumor markers. Following an introduction into the field, a first section covers different kinds of biomarkers for ovarian cancer including CA125 (MUC16), mucin 1 (MUC1), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), and prostasin. This is followed by a short overview on conventional diagnostic approaches. A large section is then presented on biosensors for determination of ovarian cancer, with subsections on optical biosensors (fluorimetric, colorimetric, surface plasmon resonance, chemiluminescence, electrochemiluminescence), on electrochemical sensors, molecularly imprinted sensors, paper-based biosensors, microfluidic (lab-on-a-chip) assays, chemiresistive and field effect transistor-based sensors, and giant magnetoresistive sensors. Tables are presented that give an overview on the wealth of methods and materials. A concluding section summarizes the current status, addresses current challenges, and gives an outlook on potential future trends. Graphical abstract Schematic representation of the review covering the advancements in the fabrication of various nanomaterial based biosensors for diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
-
7.
Can we prevent ovarian cancer?
Aus, AT
Ceska gynekologie. 2020;(1):49-58
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An ovarian cancer prevention program must encourage the application of factors associated with decreased risk that include both surgical and non-surgical approaches. Non-surgical preventive approaches include oral contraceptives, parity, multiparity and breastfeeding. In addition, approaches that decrease inflammation and oxidative stress such as regular exercise and a healthy diet are also important. Surgical approaches include tubal ligation, hysterectomy and prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. OBJECTIVE To highlight protective approaches for the prevention of ovarian cancer in order to increase awareness among women of the general population and too find out whether or not these approaches are enough to prevent the disease. DESIGN Review article. SETTING Department of Chemical Pathology, NHLS, Tygerberg Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. METHODS Literary sources related to the topic were used. Articles were selected primarily based on PubMed and Google searches. CONCLUSION Ovarian cancer cannot be prevented completely, however the application of preventive approaches may decrease the risk significantly. Although, multiparity followed by long periods of breastfeeding may not seem feasible for most today women, it is the most pronounced preventive approach for women in the general population. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy also reduce the risk significantly. Opportunistic salpingectomy may provide better prevention for women at average risk, while women at high risk (BRCA mutation and family with history of ovarian cancer) are advised to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Highlighting these approaches may increase women's awareness towards decreasing risk and decrease the incidence of ovarian cancer and potentially increase the five-year survival rate.
-
8.
[Perioperative care of epithelial ovarian cancer: Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa].
Lemoine, A, Lambaudie, E, Bonnet, F, Leblanc, E, Alfonsi, P
Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie. 2019;(2):187-196
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The following recommendations cover the perioperative management of ovarian, Fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers. Five questions related to pre-habilitation and enhanced recovery after surgery were evaluated. The conclusions and recommendations are based on an analysis of the level of evidence available in the literature. These recommendations are part of the overall recommendations for improving the management of ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer, made with the support of INCa (Institut National du Cancer). The main preoperative measures are screening for nutritional deficiencies (Grade B) and for anaemia (GradeC) in patients with ovarian cancer. It is not possible to make recommendations on the correction of malnutrition and/or anemia or on the contribution of pre-operative immuno-nutrition due to the absence of data in ovarian cancer, tube cancer or primary peritoneum cancer. For the same reasons, no recommendation can be made on the value of preoperative digestive preparation in ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneum cancer. During surgery, goal-directed fluid therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer is recommended (Grade B). A single dose infusion of tranexamic acid is recommended for patients with ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer (GradeC). For postoperative analgesia, epidural analgesia is recommended for patients undergoing cyto-reduction surgery by laparotomy (Grade B). In the absence of epidural analgesia, patient controlled analgesia with morphine without continuous infusion (Grade B) is recommended. No recommendation can be given regarding intravenous administration of lidocaine and/or ketamine during surgery, or, regarding peri-operatively prescription of gabapentin or pregabalin. In the absence of studies on the impact of different non-opiate analgesic combinations for ovarian cancer surgery, no recommendations can be made. Early oral feeding is recommended, including in cases of digestive resection (Grade B). The implementation of enhanced recovery programs, including early mobilization, is recommended (GradeC).
-
9.
Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: What have we learned so far?
Herreros-Villanueva, M, Chen, CC, Tsai, EM, Er, TK
Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry. 2019;:63-72
Abstract
Endometriosis is defined as the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue outside of the uterine cavity, most commonly in the ovaries and peritoneum. It is a complex disease that is influenced by multiple factors. It is also a common gynecological disorder and affects approximately 10-15% of all women of reproductive age. Recent molecular and pathological studies indicate that endometriosis may serve as a precursor of ovarian cancer (endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer, EAOC), particularly endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancers. Although histological and epidemiological studies have demonstrated that endometriosis has a malignant potential, the molecular mechanism that underlies the malignant transformation of endometriosis is still controversial, and the precise mechanism of carcinogenesis must be fully elucidated. Currently, the development and improvement of a new sequencing technology, next-generation sequencing (NGS), has been increasingly relevant in cancer genomics research. Recently, NGS has also been utilized in clinical oncology to advance the personalized treatment of cancer. In addition, the sensitivity, speed, and cost make NGS a highly attractive platform compared to other sequencing modalities. For this reason, NGS may lead to the identification of driver mutations and underlying pathways associated with EAOC. Here, we present an overview of the molecular pathways that have led to the current opinions on the relationship between endometriosis and ovarian cancer.
-
10.
Assessment and management of diarrhea following VEGF receptor TKI treatment in patients with ovarian cancer.
Liu, J, Nicum, S, Reichardt, P, Croitoru, K, Illek, B, Schmidinger, M, Rogers, C, Whalen, C, Jayson, GC
Gynecologic oncology. 2018;(1):173-179
Abstract
Angiogenesis is a proven clinical target for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) offer patients potential new treatment regimens as they can be given as monotherapy, in combination with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, or with and following cytotoxic chemotherapy. If VEGFR-TKIs are licensed for use in ovarian cancer, patients will require prompt and effective management of adverse events, including diarrhea, to optimize compliance and benefit. As diarrhea is one of the most prevalent toxicities of this class of drug, it is important to consider the potential causes, be they disease related (bowel obstruction), treatment related (VEGFR-TKI-related or infective/neutropenic septic diarrhea when patients are receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy combined with VEGFR inhibitor treatment), or incurred through diet. Here, we provide an overview of the possible mechanisms responsible for VEGFR-TKI-induced diarrhea. We review potential interventions that can help in the management of diarrhea induced by VEGFR-TKIs, when used in combination or as single agents, and we provide a diarrhea treatment algorithm to serve as a clinical reference point for the management of diarrhea in patients with ovarian cancer treated with a VEGFR-TKI in combination with chemotherapy or PARP inhibitors, or as monotherapy.