-
1.
Phase 2 trial comparing sorafenib, pravastatin, their combination or supportive care in HCC with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis.
Blanc, JF, Khemissa, F, Bronowicki, JP, Monterymard, C, Perarnau, JM, Bourgeois, V, Obled, S, Abdelghani, MB, Mabile-Archambeaud, I, Faroux, R, et al
Hepatology international. 2021;(1):93-104
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS There is limited data regarding the role for systemic treatment in patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis. METHODS PRODIGE 21 was a multicentric prospective non-comparative randomized trial. Patients were randomized to receive sorafenib (Arm A), pravastatin (Arm B), sorafenib-pravastatin (Arm C) combination, or best supportive care (Arm D). Primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP), secondary endpoints included safety and overall survival (OS). RESULTS 160 patients were randomized and 157 patients were included in the final analysis. 86% of patients were BCLC C and 55% had macrovascular invasion. The safety profiles of the drugs were as expected. Median TTP was 3.5, 2.8, 2.0 and 2.2 months in arms A, B, C and D, respectively, but analysis was limited by the number of patients deceased without radiological progression (59%). Median OS was similar between the four arms: 3.8 [95% CI: 2.4-6.5], 3.1 [95% CI: 1.9-4.3], 4.0 [95% CI: 3.2-5.5] and 3.5 months [95% CI: 2.2-5.4] in arms A, B, C and D, respectively. Median OS was 4.0 months [95% CI: 3.3-5.5] for patients treated with sorafenib, vs 2.9 months [95% CI: 2.2-3.9] for patients not treated with sorafenib. In patients with ALBI grade 1/2, median OS was 6.1 months [95% CI: 3.8-8.3] in patients treated with sorafenib vs 3.1 months [95% CI: 1.9-4.8] for patients not treated with sorafenib. CONCLUSION In the overall Child-Pugh B population, neither sorafenib nor pravastatin seemed to provide benefit. In the ALBI grade 1/2 sub-population, our trial suggests potential benefit of sorafenib. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was referenced in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01357486).
-
2.
Different Influences of Statin Treatment in Preventing At-Risk Stroke Subtypes: A Post Hoc Analysis of J-STARS.
Hosomi, N, Kitagawa, K, Nagai, Y, Nakagawa, Y, Aoki, S, Nezu, T, Kagimura, T, Maruyama, H, Origasa, H, Minematsu, K, et al
Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2020;(5):449-460
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIMS: To understand the different influences of statins on the incidence rate of each stroke subtype in association with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, we performed a post hoc analysis on the data from the Japan Statin Treatment Against Recurrent Stroke (J-STARS) study. METHODS Subjects (n=1,578) were divided into three groups according to their mean postrandomized LDL cholesterol level (<100, 100-120, and ≥ 120 mg/dL) until the last observation before the event or the end of follow-up. A Cox proportional hazard model for time to events was used for calculating adjusted hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and the trend tests. RESULTS The event rates for atherothrombotic stroke did not decrease in accordance with the postrandomized LDL cholesterol level subgroups of either the control or the pravastatin group (p=0.15 and 0.33 for the trend, respectively). In the control group, however, no atherothrombotic stroke event was observed in the subgroup of the low postrandomized LDL cholesterol level (less than 100 mg/dL). The event rates for atherothrombotic stroke were lower in the middle postrandomized LDL cholesterol level subgroup (100-120 mg/dL) of the pravastatin group than that of the control group. The event rates for lacunar stroke decreased in the lower postrandomized LDL cholesterol level subgroup of the control group but not of the pravastatin group (p=0.004 and 0.06 for the trend, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Statins showed different influences on the risks of atherothromobotic and lacunar stroke according to postrandomized LDL cholesterol levels.
-
3.
Statins Reduce Epicardial Adipose Tissue Attenuation Independent of Lipid Lowering: A Potential Pleiotropic Effect.
Raggi, P, Gadiyaram, V, Zhang, C, Chen, Z, Lopaschuk, G, Stillman, AE
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2019;(12):e013104
Abstract
Background High epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) attenuation (Hounsfield units [ HUs] ) on computed tomography is considered a marker of inflammation and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Statins reduce the volume of EAT , but it is unknown whether they affect EAT HUs . Methods and Results We reviewed the chest computed tomographic scans of 420 postmenopausal women randomized to either 80 mg of atorvastatin or 40 mg of pravastatin daily and rescanned after 1 year to measure change in coronary artery calcium score. EAT HUs were measured near the proximal right coronary artery and remote from any area of coronary artery calcium. Computed tomographic images were also queried for subcutaneous adipose tissue (SubQ) attenuation ( HUs ) change over time. The mean patients' age was 65±6 years. The baseline EAT HU value was higher than the SubQ HU value (-89.4±24.0 HU versus -123.3±30.4 HU ; P<0.001). The EAT HU value decreased significantly in the entire cohort (-5.4±29.7 HU [-6% change]; P<0.001), but equally in the patients given atorvastatin and pravastatin (-6.35+31 HU and -4.55+28 HU ; P=0.55). EAT HU change was not associated with change in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, coronary artery calcium, and EAT volume (all P=not significant). Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was marginally associated with EAT HU change ( P=0.07). Statin treatment did not induce a change in SubQ HUs . Conclusions Statins induced a decrease in EAT HUs over time, independent of intensity of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering. The positive effect on EAT and the neutral effect on SubQ suggest that statins induced a decrease in metabolic activity in EAT by reduction in cellularity, vascularity, or inflammation. The clinical significance of the observed change in EAT HUs remains to be demonstrated.
-
4.
Pilot randomized trial of short-term changes in inflammation and lipid levels during and after aspirin and pravastatin therapy.
Flannagan, KS, Sjaarda, LA, Hill, MJ, Connell, MT, Zolton, JR, Perkins, NJ, Mumford, SL, Plowden, TC, Andriessen, VC, Radoc, JG, et al
Reproductive health. 2019;(1):132
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammation and elevated blood lipids are associated with infertility. Aspirin and statin therapy may improve infertility treatment outcomes among overweight and obese women with systemic inflammation, but little is known about the short-term effects of statins in this population. We conducted a pilot study of aspirin, pravastatin, or combined treatment among a group of overweight and obese, reproductive-aged women. Our goal was to characterize short-term changes in inflammatory and lipid biomarkers during and after treatment. METHODS In this open-label trial, women aged 18-40 years with a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 were randomized to receive either 162 mg aspirin, 40 mg pravastatin, or both. The study medication was taken daily for 2 weeks, and participants were then followed for a two-week washout period. Participants provided blood samples at baseline, after the intervention period, and after the washout period. The outcomes were changes in biomarkers of inflammation and lipids measured in blood components at each timepoint. RESULTS Nine, 8, and 8 women were randomized to the aspirin, pravastatin, and combined arms, respectively. Analyses were conducted among 8, 7, and 7 women in the aspirin, pravastatin, and combined arms for whom biomarker data was available at baseline. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels were lower after treatment in all arms and continued to decrease after washout in the pravastatin and combined arms. Results were consistent between the whole sample and women with baseline hsCRP between 2 and 10 mg/L. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was lower after treatment in the pravastatin and combined arms and rose slightly after washout. CONCLUSIONS Our results provide preliminary evidence that short-term aspirin and pravastatin therapy reduces hsCRP and LDL cholesterol among overweight and obese women of reproductive age, including those with low-grade inflammation. Because of these short-term effects, these drugs may improve infertility treatment outcomes in this population, which we will assess in a future randomized trial.
-
5.
Cumulative Effects of LDL Cholesterol and CRP Levels on Recurrent Stroke and TIA.
Kitagawa, K, Hosomi, N, Nagai, Y, Kagimura, T, Ohtsuki, T, Maruyama, H, Origasa, H, Minematsu, K, Uchiyama, S, Nakamura, M, et al
Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2019;(5):432-441
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate the relative contribution of on-treatment low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and C-reactive protein (CRP) to the risk of recurrent stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with history of ischemic stroke. METHODS A total of 1095 patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke were randomized into two groups: control and patients receiving 10 mg of pravastatin per day. After excluding 18 patients who did not have baseline CRP data, the effects of LDL cholesterol and CRP on recurrent stroke and TIA were prospectively assessed in 1077 patients. RESULTS During the follow-up of 4.9±1.4 years, there were 131 recurrent stroke or TIA cases. Patients with ontreatment LDL cholesterol <120 mg/dL showed 29% reduction in recurrent stroke and TIA than those with LDL cholesterol ≥ 120 mg/dL (event rate 2.20 vs. 3.11 per 100 person-years, hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.99, p=0.048). Patients with CRP <1 mg/L had 32% reduction compared with that of patients with CRP ≥ 1 mg/L (event rate 2.26 vs. 3.40 per 100 person-years; HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96, p=0.031). Although LDL cholesterol and CRP levels were not correlated in individual patients, those who achieved both LDL cholesterol <120 mg/dL and CRP <1 mg/L showed 51% reduction compared with that of patients with LDL cholesterol ≥ 120 mg/dL and CRP ≥ 1 mg/L (event rate 2.02 vs. 4.19 per 100 person-years; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.79). CONCLUSIONS The control of both LDL cholesterol and CRP levels appears to be effective for preventing recurrent stroke and TIA in patients with non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke.
-
6.
The effect of fasting status on lipids, lipoproteins, and inflammatory biomarkers assessed after hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome: Insights from PROVE IT-TIMI 22.
Steen, DL, Umez-Eronini, AA, Guo, J, Khan, N, Cannon, CP
Clinical cardiology. 2018;(1):68-73
Abstract
BACKGROUND For decades, fasting for 8 to 12 hours has been recommended for measurement of lipid profiles. The effect of fasting on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) has been described in healthy cohorts and those with stable disease states. Recently, guidelines suggested that fasting may not be necessary due to its small effect on lipid measures. Little is known, however, regarding whether the impact of fasting is altered in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). HYPOTHESIS We hypothesized that the post-ACS period would minimally effect the impact of fasting status on lipid measurements. METHODS We evaluated the association of fasting on lipid and other biomarkers at the randomization visit, which occurred at a median of 7 days after the onset of an ACS, as well as during follow-up, in a cohort of 4177 subjects from the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) trial. RESULTS Fasting samples were independently associated with a higher LDL-C of 4.1 mg/dL and apolipoprotein-B 100 of 2.6 mg/dL as well as a lower TG of 21.0 mg/dL and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein of 0.48 mg/dL. The relative difference was 3.8% for LDL-C and -11.3% for TG. Fasting did not change total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, lipoprotein(a), or apolipoprotein C-III. CONCLUSIONS Although fasting does impact lipid measurements, the effect on LDL-C is small (about 4 mg/dL), both early after ACS and during follow-up. These data provide support for recent guidelines that no longer advocate for fasting lipid samples, including in the setting of ACS.
-
7.
Pravastatin Reduces the Risk of Atherothrombotic Stroke when Administered within Six Months of an Initial Stroke Event.
Hosomi, N, Nagai, Y, Kitagawa, K, Nakagawa, Y, Aoki, S, Nezu, T, Kagimura, T, Maruyama, H, Origasa, H, Minematsu, K, et al
Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2018;(3):262-268
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIMS: The J-STARS study examined whether pravastatin (10 mg/day) reduces recurrence of stroke in non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke patients who were enrolled within 1 month to 3 years after initial stroke events (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00221104). The main results showed that the frequency of atherothrombotic stroke was low in pravastatin-treated patients, although no effect of pravastatin was found for the other stroke subtypes. We evaluated differences of early (within 6 months) or late (after 6 months) pravastatin treatment benefits on the incidence of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), as well as atherothrombotic stroke and the other subtypes. METHODS Subjects in the J-STARS study were classified into two cohorts, depending on whether they enrolled early (1 to 6 months) or late (6 months to 3 years) following initial stroke events. RESULTS A total of 1578 patients (491 female, 66.2±8.5 years) were randomly assigned to either the pravastatin group (n=793; n=426 in the early cohort, n=367 in the late cohort) or the control group (n=785; n=417 in the early cohort, n=368 in the late cohort). During the follow-up of 4.9± 1.4 years, the rate of atherothrombotic stroke was lower in the pravastatin group compared to controls in the early cohort (0.24 vs. 0.88%/year, p=0.01) but not in the late cohort (0.17 vs. 0.39%/year, p=0.29). However, this difference of pravastatin effect on atherothrombotic stroke was not significantly interacted by the early or late cohort (p=0.59). The incidence rates of other stroke subtype were not different in between pravastatin and control groups despite the timing of entry. CONCLUSIONS Pravastatin is likely to reduce atherothrombotic stroke in patients enrolled within 6 months after stroke onset. However, the clinical efficacy for prevention of recurrent stroke was not conclusive with earlier statin treatment.
-
8.
Statin Effects on Metabolic Profiles: Data From the PREVEND IT (Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease Intervention Trial).
Kofink, D, Eppinga, RN, van Gilst, WH, Bakker, SJL, Dullaart, RPF, van der Harst, P, Asselbergs, FW
Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics. 2017;(6)
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statins lower cholesterol by inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme of the metabolic pathway that produces cholesterol and other isoprenoids. Little is known about their effects on metabolite and lipoprotein subclass profiles. We, therefore, investigated the molecular changes associated with pravastatin treatment compared with placebo administration using a nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics platform. METHODS AND RESULTS We performed metabolic profiling of 231 lipoprotein and metabolite measures in the PREVEND IT (Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease Intervention Trial) study, a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial designed to test the effects of pravastatin (40 mg once daily) on cardiovascular risk. Metabolic profiles were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Pravastatin lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (change in SD units [95% confidence interval]: -1.01 [-1.14, -0.88]), remnant cholesterol (change in SD units [95% confidence interval]: -1.03 [-1.17, -0.89]), and apolipoprotein B (change in SD units [95% confidence interval]: -0.98 [-1.11, -0.86]) with similar effect magnitudes. In addition, pravastatin globally lowered levels of lipoprotein subclasses, with the exception of high-density lipoprotein subclasses, which displayed a more heterogeneous response pattern. The lipid-lowering effect of pravastatin was accompanied by selective changes in lipid composition, particularly in the cholesterol content of very-low-density lipoproteinparticles. In addition, pravastatin reduced levels of several fatty acids but had limited effects on fatty acid ratios. CONCLUSIONS These randomized clinical trial data demonstrate the widespread effects of pravastatin treatment on lipoprotein subclass profiles and fatty acids. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03073018.
-
9.
Effect of Statin Treatment vs Usual Care on Primary Cardiovascular Prevention Among Older Adults: The ALLHAT-LLT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Han, BH, Sutin, D, Williamson, JD, Davis, BR, Piller, LB, Pervin, H, Pressel, SL, Blaum, CS, ,
JAMA internal medicine. 2017;(7):955-965
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE While statin therapy for primary cardiovascular prevention has been associated with reductions in cardiovascular morbidity, the effect on all-cause mortality has been variable. There is little evidence to guide the use of statins for primary prevention in adults 75 years and older. OBJECTIVES To examine statin treatment among adults aged 65 to 74 years and 75 years and older when used for primary prevention in the Lipid-Lowering Trial (LLT) component of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Post hoc secondary data analyses were conducted of participants 65 years and older without evidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; 2867 ambulatory adults with hypertension and without baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were included. The ALLHAT-LLT was conducted from February 1994 to March 2002 at 513 clinical sites. INTERVENTIONS Pravastatin sodium (40 mg/d) vs usual care (UC). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome in the ALLHAT-LLT was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cause-specific mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction or fatal coronary heart disease combined (coronary heart disease events). RESULTS There were 1467 participants (mean [SD] age, 71.3 [5.2] years) in the pravastatin group (48.0% [n = 704] female) and 1400 participants (mean [SD] age, 71.2 [5.2] years) in the UC group (50.8% [n = 711] female). The baseline mean (SD) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were 147.7 (19.8) mg/dL in the pravastatin group and 147.6 (19.4) mg/dL in the UC group; by year 6, the mean (SD) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were 109.1 (35.4) mg/dL in the pravastatin group and 128.8 (27.5) mg/dL in the UC group. At year 6, of the participants assigned to pravastatin, 42 of 253 (16.6%) were not taking any statin; 71.0% in the UC group were not taking any statin. The hazard ratios for all-cause mortality in the pravastatin group vs the UC group were 1.18 (95% CI, 0.97-1.42; P = .09) for all adults 65 years and older, 1.08 (95% CI, 0.85-1.37; P = .55) for adults aged 65 to 74 years, and 1.34 (95% CI, 0.98-1.84; P = .07) for adults 75 years and older. Coronary heart disease event rates were not significantly different among the groups. In multivariable regression, the results remained nonsignificant, and there was no significant interaction between treatment group and age. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE No benefit was found when pravastatin was given for primary prevention to older adults with moderate hyperlipidemia and hypertension, and a nonsignificant direction toward increased all-cause mortality with pravastatin was observed among adults 75 years and older. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000542.
-
10.
Greater remnant lipoprotein cholesterol reduction with pitavastatin compared with pravastatin in HIV-infected patients.
Joshi, PH, Miller, PE, Martin, SS, Jones, SR, Massaro, JM, D'Agostino, RB, Kulkarni, KR, Sponseller, C, Toth, PP
AIDS (London, England). 2017;(7):965-971
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in those with HIV. An emerging CVD risk factor is triglyceride-rich remnant lipoprotein cholesterol (RLP-C: the sum of intermediate-density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol). The effects of statin therapy on lipoprotein subfractions, including RLP-C, in HIV dyslipidemia are unknown. METHODS This is a post hoc analysis of the randomized INTREPID trial (NCT 01301066) comparing pitavastatin 4 mg daily vs. pravastatin 40 mg daily in study participants with HIV. We measured apolipoproteins AI and B and lipoprotein cholesterol subfractions separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation at baseline and 12 weeks. We compared changes in atherogenic subfractions over 12 weeks in INTREPID participants using analysis of covariance. RESULTS Lipoprotein subfraction data were available for 213 study participants (pitavastatin n = 104, pravastatin n = 109). Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Reductions in RLP-C were significantly greater in the pitavastatin group compared with pravastatin group (-11.6 mg/dl vs. -8.5 mg/dl; P = 0.01). Similarly, ratios of risk [apolipoproteins B/apolipoproteins AI, total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)] showed greater reductions with pitavastatin (P < 0.05). There were no differences in changes in HDL-C, HDL-C subfractions or lipoprotein(a) cholesterol levels. CONCLUSION In patients with HIV, pitavastatin 4 mg/dl lowered both RLP-C and established apolipoprotein and lipid risk ratios more so than pravastatin 40 mg/dl. The impact of RLP-C reduction on CVD in HIV dyslipidemic patients merits further study.