-
1.
Beneficial effect of probiotics supplements in reflux esophagitis treated with esomeprazole: A randomized controlled trial.
Sun, QH, Wang, HY, Sun, SD, Zhang, X, Zhang, H
World journal of gastroenterology. 2019;(17):2110-2121
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reflux esophagitis (RE) is a common digestive disorder, and its frequent recurrences cause significant physical pain and are financially burdensome to patients. However, studies on the natural history of treated RE are few. Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as the first-line treatment provide notable symptomatic relief, disordered gut microbiota has been observed among PPI users. Probiotics are commonly administered to patients to regulate the disordered intestinal flora. AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic effects in RE patients treated with a combination of esomeprazole and probiotics [Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium)]. METHODS One hundred and thirty-four RE patients were randomized into two groups of 67 subjects each. The probiotics group was administered with esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. and live combined B. subtilis and E. faecium enteric-coated capsules 500 mg t.i.d. for eight weeks; the placebo group was administered with esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. and placebo for eight weeks. Subsequently, 12-wk follow-up was carried out on patients who achieved both endoscopic and clinical cure. Endoscopy, reflux diagnostic questionnaire (RDQ), gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), and lactulose hydrogen breath test were performed to evaluate the therapeutic effects. A difference of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Sixty-six patients in the probiotics group and 64 patients in the placebo group completed the 8-wk treatment. The healing rate and RDQ score had no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the GSRS diarrhea syndrome score was decreased significantly in the probiotics group (P = 0.002), and the small intestinal bacterial overgrowth negative rate in the probiotics group was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (P = 0.002). Of 114 endoscopically and clinically cured patients, 96 completed the follow-up. The log-rank test showed that the time to relapse was shorter in the placebo group than in the probiotics group (P = 0.041). Furthermore, the therapy had a significant influence on relapse time, and the risk of relapse in the probiotics group was lower than that in the placebo group at any time point during the 12-wk follow-up (hazard ratio = 0.52, P = 0.033). CONCLUSION Esomeprazole combined with probiotics (B. subtilis and E. faecium) have a beneficial effect on RE treatment and patient management.
-
2.
Helicobacter pylori eradication increases the serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol level in the infected patients with chronic gastritis: A single-center observational study.
Iwai, N, Okuda, T, Oka, K, Hara, T, Inada, Y, Tsuji, T, Komaki, T, Inoue, K, Dohi, O, Konishi, H, et al
PloS one. 2019;(8):e0221349
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extra-gastric manifestation of Helicobacter pylori infection involves systemic inflammation, which results in the production of several cytokines. Only a few clinical trials have investigated the effect of H. pylori eradication therapy on lipid metabolism in the infected patients with chronic gastritis. We aimed to evaluate the effect of H. pylori eradication therapy on lipid metabolism in a Japanese population with chronic gastritis. METHODS One hundred and sixty-three patients with H. pylori-associated chronic gastritis were enrolled in this study between June 2015 and March 2017. They underwent H. pylori eradication therapy; the effects of the therapy were assessed by the urea breath test performed at least 4 weeks after the therapy. After confirming H. pylori eradication, the health screening examination was repeated between May 2016 and August 2018. The clinical parameters were compared before and after the administration of the eradication therapy. RESULTS The mean age of the enrolled patients was 56.7 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 514.7 days. Weight, body mass index, and obesity index were significantly increased post-eradication therapy compared to those pre-eradication therapy. White blood cell and platelet counts were significantly decreased, and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) level was significantly increased (P = 0.001), while low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), total cholesterol, and triglycerides levels were not altered significantly. Hence, the LDL/HDL ratio was significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS This study reported that H. pylori eradication therapy increase the HDL levels in the infected patients with chronic gastritis. Hence, the LDL/HDL ratio, which is used to evaluate the risk of atherosclerosis, was significantly decreased post-eradication therapy compared to that pre-eradication therapy.
-
3.
A Study to Evaluate Doravirine Pharmacokinetics When Coadministered With Acid-Reducing Agents.
Khalilieh, SG, Yee, KL, Sanchez, RI, Fan, L, Vaynshteyn, K, Deschamps, K, Martell, M, Jordan, HR, Iwamoto, M
Journal of clinical pharmacology. 2019;(8):1093-1098
Abstract
Doravirine is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Because of potential concomitant administration with acid-reducing agents, a drug-interaction trial was conducted to evaluate the potential impact of these types of medications on doravirine pharmacokinetics. In an open-label, 3-period, fixed-sequence trial, healthy adult participants received the following: period 1, a single dose of doravirine 100 mg; period 2, coadministration of a single dose of doravirine 100 mg and an antacid (1600 mg aluminum hydroxide, 1600 mg magnesium hydroxide, and 160 mg simethicone); period 3, 40 mg pantoprazole once daily on days 1-5 coadministered with a single dose of doravirine 100 mg on day 5. There was a minimum 10-day washout between periods. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected, and safety was assessed. Fourteen participants (8 male, 6 female) were enrolled, and 13 completed the trial. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for doravirine AUC0-inf , Cmax , and C24 for doravirine + antacid/doravirine were 1.01 (0.92-1.11), 0.86 (0.74-1.01), and 1.03 (0.94-1.12), respectively, and for doravirine + pantoprazole/doravirine were 0.83 (0.76-0.91), 0.88 (0.76-1.01), and 0.84 (0.77-0.92), respectively. Doravirine was generally well tolerated administered alone or with either of the acid-reducing agents. Coadministration of an aluminum/magnesium-containing antacid or pantoprazole did not have a clinically meaningful effect on doravirine pharmacokinetics, supporting the use of acid-reducing agents with doravirine.
-
4.
Efficacy of vonoprazan in prevention of bleeding from endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcers: a prospective randomized phase II study.
Hamada, K, Uedo, N, Tonai, Y, Arao, M, Suzuki, S, Iwatsubo, T, Kato, M, Shichijo, S, Yamasaki, Y, Matsuura, N, et al
Journal of gastroenterology. 2019;(2):122-130
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vonoprazan, potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to reduce incidence of delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, preliminary data to design a large-scale comparative study are lacking. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of vonoprazan in preventing delayed bleeding after gastric ESD. METHODS In this single-center randomized phase II trial, a modified screened selection design was used with a threshold non-bleeding rate of 89% and an expected rate of 97%. In this design, Simon's optimal two-stage design was first applied for each parallel group, and efficacy was evaluated in comparison with the threshold rate using binomial testing. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vonoprazan 20 mg (VPZ group) or lansoprazole 30 mg (PPI group) for 8 weeks from the day before gastric ESD. The primary endpoint was the incidence of delayed bleeding, defined as endoscopically confirmed bleeding accompanied by hematemesis, melena, or a decrease in hemoglobin of ≥ 2 g/dl. RESULTS Delayed bleeding occurred in three of 69 patients (4.3%, 95% CI 0.9-12.2%, p = 0.047) in the VPZ group, and four of 70 (5.7%, 95% CI 1.6-14.0%, p = 0.104) in the PPI group. As only vonoprazan showed significant reduction in delayed bleeding compared with the threshold rate, it was determined to be efficacious treatment. CONCLUSIONS Vonoprazan efficaciously reduced the delayed bleeding rate in patients with an ESD-induced gastric ulcer. A large-scale, randomized, phase III study is warranted to definitively test the effectiveness of vonoprazan compared with proton pump inhibitors.
-
5.
Proton pump inhibitors and dysbiosis: Current knowledge and aspects to be clarified.
Bruno, G, Zaccari, P, Rocco, G, Scalese, G, Panetta, C, Porowska, B, Pontone, S, Severi, C
World journal of gastroenterology. 2019;(22):2706-2719
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are common medications within the practice of gastroenterology. These drugs, which act through the irreversible inhibition of the hydrogen/potassium pump (H+/K+-ATPase pump) in the gastric parietal cells, are used in the treatment of several acid-related disorders. PPIs are generally well tolerated but, through the long-term reduction of gastric acid secretion, can increase the risk of an imbalance in gut microbiota composition (i.e., dysbiosis). The gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem in which microbes coexist and interact with the human host. Indeed, the resident gut bacteria are needed for multiple vital functions, such as nutrient and drug metabolism, the production of energy, defense against pathogens, the modulation of the immune system and support of the integrity of the gut mucosal barrier. The bacteria are collected in communities that vary in density and composition within each segment of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Therefore, every change in the gut ecosystem has been connected to an increased susceptibility or exacerbation of various GI disorders. The aim of this review is to summarize the recently available data on PPI-related microbiota alterations in each segment of the GI tract and to analyze the possible involvement of PPIs in the pathogenesis of several specific GI diseases.
-
6.
Intraluminal therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection.
Liou, TC, Liao, PH, Lin, YC, Chu, CH, Shih, SC
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2019;(8):1337-1343
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Several strategies have been proposed to increase the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori. However, the widespread increasing resistance rates to current multiple-dose oral antibiotic therapies call for alternative therapeutic approaches. We aim to develop a novel intraluminal therapy for H. pylori infection (ILTHPI). METHODS From April 2017 to December 2017, 100 H. pylori-infected treatment-naïve patients with upper abdominal pain or discomfort underwent endoscopic examinations and concomitant ILTHPI, which comprised the control of intragastric pH, the irrigation of gastric mucosal surface with a mucolytic agent, and the application of single-dose medicaments containing antibiotic powders. The safety profiles while conducting ILTHPI and adverse events after ILTHPI were evaluated. The success of eradication was assessed based on the result of the 13 C-urea breath test 6 weeks after ILTHPI. In addition, a patient with successful ILTHPI was reconfirmed by a negative H. pylori stool antigen test four to 6 months after ILTHPI to exclude short-term recurrence. RESULTS All the 100 enrolled patients completed the ILTHPI with good safety profiles and mild adverse events (6%). Five patients dropped out, and 51 of 95 patients (53.7%) achieved successful eradication immediately after endoscopic examinations. All 51 patients revealed negative stool H. pylori antigen tests four to 6 months after successful ILTHPI. No short-term recurrence was observed. CONCLUSIONS We have developed a novel therapeutic approach. With the ILTHPI, H. pylori can be eradicated immediately by administrating a single-dose regimen while conducting an endoscopic examination. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER NCT03124420.
-
7.
Comparison of the Use of Vonoprazan and Proton Pump Inhibitors for the Treatment of Peptic Ulcers Resulting from Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
He, HS, Li, BY, Chen, QT, Song, CY, Shi, J, Shi, B
Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2019;:1169-1176
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment for ulcers resulting from endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Vonoprazan is a new oral potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of vonoprazan with PPIs in the treatment of peptic ulcers resulting from ESD. MATERIAL AND METHODS Published results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing vonoprazan with PPIs in the treatment of ulcers resulting from ESD were identified up to March 2018. The main clinical endpoints evaluated were healing rate and adverse events. The meta-analysis included quality assessment of the studies, statistical analysis of endpoints, and sensitivity analysis using Revman version 5.3 meta-analysis software. RESULTS Systematic literature review identified seven published studies that included 548 patients. Five studies were published as full-text manuscripts, and two studies were published as abstracts. Meta-analysis of the vonoprazan treatment, compared with PPI treatment, for ESD showed that the pooled relative risk (RR) of healing rate was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.33-1.22) for the 4-week study group and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.84-1.15) for the 8-week study group. The RR for adverse events was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.31-1.38) (P>0.05). No statistical evidence of publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS The findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of vonoprazan was comparable with PPIs for the treatment of peptic ulcers following ESD. Further studies are required to support the safety and efficacy of vonoprazan compared with different types of PPIs.
-
8.
Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamine 2 receptor antagonists in critically ill adults - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.
Zhou, X, Fang, H, Xu, J, Chen, P, Hu, X, Chen, B, Wang, H, Hu, C, Xu, Z
BMC gastroenterology. 2019;(1):193
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) have been widely used as stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in critically ill patients, however, its efficacy and safety remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the effect of SUP on clinical outcomes in critically ill adults. METHODS Literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database of clinical trials for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated SUP, with PPI or H2RA, versus placebo or no prophylaxis in critically ill patients from database inception through 1 June 2019. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. The primary outcomes were clinically important gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and overt GI bleeding. Conventional meta-analysis with random-effects model and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed. RESULTS Twenty-nine RCTs were identified, of which four RCTs were judged as low risk of bias. Overall, SUP could reduce the incident of clinically important GI bleeding [relative risk (RR) = 0.58; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.42-0.81] and overt GI bleeding (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.36-0.63), these results were confirmed by the sub-analysis of trials with low risk of bias, TSA indicated a firm evidence on its beneficial effects on the overt GI bleeding (TSA-adjusted CI: 0.31-0.75), but lack of sufficient evidence on the clinically important GI bleeding (TSA-adjusted CI: 0.23-1.51). Among patients who received enteral nutrition (EN), SUP was associated with a decreased risk of clinically important GI bleeding (RR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.44-0.85; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.16-2.38) and overt GI bleeding (RR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.42-0.96; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.12-3.35), but these benefits disappeared after adjustment with TSA. Among patients who did not receive EN, SUP had only benefits in reducing the risk of overt GI bleeding (RR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.25-0.55; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.22-0.63), but not the clinically important GI bleeding (RR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.04-2.09). CONCLUSIONS SUP has benefits on the overt GI bleeding in critically ill patients who did not receive EN, however, its benefits on clinically important GI bleeding still needs more evidence to confirm.
-
9.
Enteral nutrition better than proton pump inhibitors?
Jalil, BA, El-Kersh, K
Current opinion in critical care. 2019;(4):334-339
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically-ill patients has been a subject of extensive research, with multiple clinical trials attempting to study the best method of stress ulcer prophylaxis with the least adverse effects. Until recently, pharmacologic prophylaxis has prevailed as the primary choice for the prevention of stress ulcers but recent clinical studies have attempted to evaluate the role of enteral nutrition in stress ulcer prophylaxis. RECENT FINDINGS The incidence of stress ulcers that result in clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding (CIGIB) has drastically decreased over the last two decades. Furthermore, in the current era CIGB in the ICU does not seem to be associated with an increased mortality. Multiple recent clinical studies aimed to evaluate the role of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients who tolerate enteral nutrition in the ICU. SUMMARY The results of multiple recent clinical studies call for re-evaluation of the routine use of PPIs in critically ill patients who tolerates enteral nutrition in the ICU. Despite the promising preliminary results, definitive recommendations need larger clinical trials that are powered to evaluate any added benefits of using PPI in critically ill patients who tolerate enteral nutrition given the low incidence of CIGB in the current era.
-
10.
Effect of Gastric Acid Suppressants on Response to a Physical Activity Intervention and Major Mobility Disability in Older Adults: Results from the Lifestyle Interventions for Elders (LIFE) Study.
Squires, PJ, Pahor, M, Manini, TM, Brown, JD
Pharmacotherapy. 2019;(8):816-826
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine2 receptor antagonists (H2 RAs) are associated with pharmacologic effects that may be detrimental to mobility and response to physical activity. Mobility disability and injurious fall outcomes in PPI and H2 RA users were compared with nonusers in this secondary analysis of data from the Lifestyle Interventions for Elders (LIFE) study. METHODS Participants ages 70-89 years were randomized to a physical activity (PA) or successful aging intervention and evaluated by medication use. Confounders included baseline demographic characteristics, physical function, cognitive function, sleep quality, and acid reflux symptoms that were adjusted via propensity score weighting. Outcomes were incident and persistent major mobility disability (MMD and pMMD) and injurious falls. Weighted proportional hazard models evaluated independent and interaction effects of PPIs and H2 RAs. RESULTS No interaction was found between PPIs and H2 RAs and the PA intervention. Drug use associations were significant for H2 RAs (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.68]) and PPIs (HR 1.32 [95% CI 1.02-1.70]) compared with nonusers for pMMD. PPIs were associated with increased injurious falls compared with nonusers (HR 1.44 [95% CI 1.06-1.96]). Pooling of data from the H2 RA and PPI exposure groups showed a 26% increase in MMD (HR 1.26 [95% CI 1.07-1.48]), a 44% increase in pMMD (HR 1.44 [95% CI 1.16-1.77]), and a 48% increase in injurious falls (HR 1.48 [95% CI 1.15-1.91]) compared with nonusers. All direct comparisons between PPIs and H2 RAs were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS Compared with nonusers, participants using either PPIs or H2 RAs had an increased risk of MMD, pMMD, and injurious falls. It is not known if these effects are related to the individual pharmacology of each medication, reduced acid secretion, or the underlying disease state. Further study is required to determine causality.