-
1.
Effects of sartans and low-dose statins on cerebral white matter hyperintensities and cognitive function in older patients with hypertension: a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Zhang, H, Cui, Y, Zhao, Y, Dong, Y, Duan, D, Wang, J, Sheng, L, Ji, T, Zhou, T, Hu, W, et al
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2019;(5):717-729
Abstract
Cerebral white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and cognitive impairment are common in elderly hypertensive patients, and more needs to be learned about their prevention and treatment. Our aim was to investigate the effect of low-dose statins on WMH and cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing antihypertensive treatment. A total of 732 elderly hypertensive patients taking hydrochlorothiazide as their baseline medication were randomized using a 2 × 2 factorial design with antihypertensive (telmisartan vs. placebo) and lipid-modulating (low-dose rosuvastatin vs. placebo) arms. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cognitive function data were obtained. After a mean follow-up time of 59.8 (range 12-65) months, there were no differences in WMH progression and cognitive function decline over time between the groups in the antihypertensive arm. The risks of new-incident WMH Fazekas scale scores ≥ 2 and the incidence of cognitive impairment did not differ between the telmisartan and placebo groups. Rosuvastatin use was associated with lower risks of new-incident Fazekas scale scores ≥2 (hazard ratio = 0.500; 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.74) and cognitive impairment (hazard ratio = 0.54; 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.80). Telmisartan interacted with rosuvastatin on reducing WMH progression and cognitive function decline. Findings suggest that low-dose rosuvastatin could reduce WMH progression and cognitive function decline in antihypertensive patients, as demonstrated by the interaction between telmisartan and low-dose rosuvastatin to this effect.
-
2.
Comparison of Methods to Generalize Randomized Clinical Trial Results Without Individual-Level Data for the Target Population.
Hong, JL, Webster-Clark, M, Jonsson Funk, M, Stürmer, T, Dempster, SE, Cole, SR, Herr, I, LoCasale, R
American journal of epidemiology. 2019;(2):426-437
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Our study explored the application of methods to generalize randomized controlled trial results to a target population without individual-level data. We compared 4 methods using aggregate data for the target population to generalize results from the international trial, Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER), to a target population of trial-eligible patients in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The gold-standard method used individual data from both the trial and CPRD to predict probabilities of being sampled in the trial and to reweight trial participants to reflect CPRD patient characteristics. Methods 1 and 2 used weighting methods based on simulated individual data or the method of moments, respectively. Method 3 weighted the trial's subgroup-specific treatment effects to match the distribution of an effect modifier in CPRD. Method 4 calculated the expected absolute benefits in CPRD assuming homogeneous relative treatment effect. Methods based on aggregate data for the target population generally yielded results between the trial and gold-standard estimates. Methods 1 and 2 yielded estimates closest to the gold-standard estimates when continuous effect modifiers were represented as categorical variables. Although individual data or data on joint distributions remains the best approach to generalize trial results, these methods using aggregate data might be useful tools for timely assessment of randomized trial generalizability.
-
3.
Effects of Rosuvastatin and Aspirin on Retinal Vascular Structures in Hypercholesterolemic Patients with Low-to-Moderate Risk of Coronary Artery Disease.
Li, L, Wang, S, Huang, H, Cai, Y, Xi, Y, Bai, Y, Ma, C
American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions. 2019;(4):415-420
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Atherosclerosis erodes large elastic arteries and damages peripheral small vessels. Evaluating retinal vessel caliber enables exploration of the effect of improving microcirculation with statins. OBJECTIVE We investigated whether rosuvastatin therapy improves retinal vasculature in hypercholesterolemic patients with a low-to-moderate risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS This was a prospective, open-label, randomized study in which 127 patients were enrolled and randomized (ratio 1:1) into rosuvastatin and control groups. RESULTS Rosuvastatin increased retinal arteriolar calibers by 3.560 µm at 12 months, decreased retinal venular calibers by 3.110 µm at 6 months and by 5.860 µm at 12 months, and increased the artery-vein ratio (AVR) by 2.68% at 6 months and by 5.90% at 12 months. Meanwhile, in the control group, retinal arteriolar calibers decreased by 1.110 µm at 12 months, retinal venular calibers increased by 1.020 µm at 6 months and by 1.04 µm at 12 months, and AVR decreased by 1.12% at 6 months and by 1.73% at 12 months. All the above parameters were statistically significant between groups, but there was no significant change in retinal arteriolar calibers at 6 months. The increased AVR correlated significantly with decreased C-reactive protein (CRP) at 6 months and decreased low-density lipoprotein and CRP at 12 months. DISCUSSION For patients with a low-to-moderate risk of CAD, we found a significant effect of rosuvastatin on retinal microvasculature, including AVR increase, venular constriction, and arteriolar dilation after 6-12 months of treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier number ChiCTR-IOR-15006664.
-
4.
Comparative effects of atorvastatin 80 mg and rosuvastatin 40 mg on the levels of serum endocan, chemerin, and galectin-3 in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Tunçez, A, Altunkeser, BB, Öztürk, B, Ateş, MS, Tezcan, H, Aydoğan, C, Kırık, EC, Yalçın, U, Aygül, N, Demir, K, et al
Anatolian journal of cardiology. 2019;(5):240-249
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endocan, chemerin, and galectin-3 are discrete biomarkers associated with cardiovascular diseases and acting through different pathophysiological pathways. The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the effects of high doses of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on serum endocan, chemerin, and galectin-3 levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS Sixty-three patients with AMI were randomized to receive atorvastatin (80 mg/day) or rosuvastatin (40 mg/day) after percutaneous revascularization. Serum levels of endocan, chemerin, and galectin-3 were evaluated at baseline and after 4-week therapy. RESULTS Endocan levels were not decreased statistically significantly with atorvastatin 80 mg, but rosuvastatin 40 mg markedly decreased the levels of endocan according to baseline [from 110.27 (86.03-143.69) pg/mL to 99.22 (78.30-122.87) pg/mL with atorvastatin 80 mg and from 110.73 (77.28-165.22) pg/mL to 93.40 (70.48-115.13) pg/mL with rosuvastatin 40 mg, p=0.242 for atorvastatin 80 mg and p=0.014 for rosuvastatin 40 mg]. Chemerin levels significantly decreased in both groups according to baseline [from 264.90 (196.00-525.95) ng/mL to 135.00 (105.95-225.65) ng/mL with atorvastatin 80 mg and from 309.95 (168.87-701.27) ng/mL to 121.25 (86.60-212.65) ng/mL with rosuvastatin 40 mg, p<0.001, respectively, for both groups]. Galectin-3 levels did not change markedly with atorvastatin 80 mg, but they decreased with rosuvastatin 40 mg [from 17.00 (13.10-22.25) ng/mL to 19.30 (15.25-23.45) ng/mL with atorvastatin 80 mg, p=0.721, and from 18.25 (12.82-23.82) ng/mL to 16.60 (10.60-20.15) ng/mL with rosuvastatin 40 mg, p=0.074]. There were no significant between-group differences in terms of absolute and percentage changes of endocan, chemerin, and galectin-3 at 4 weeks. CONCLUSION We reported that both statins similarly decreased the endocan levels, whereas rosuvastatin seems to have more prominent effects on the reduction of the chemerin and galectin-3 levels in patients with AMI.
-
5.
Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Candesartan and Rosuvastatin on Blood Pressure and Cholesterol in Patients With Hypertension and Hypercholesterolemia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Phase III Clinical Study.
Cho, KI, Kim, BH, Park, YH, Ahn, JC, Kim, SH, Chung, WJ, Kim, W, Sohn, IS, Shin, JH, Kim, YJ, et al
Clinical therapeutics. 2019;(8):1508-1521
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the blood pressure-lowering and cholesterol-lowering effects of a fixed-dose combination therapy using candesartan (CND)/rosuvastatin (RSV) compared with CND or RSV monotherapy in patients with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. METHODS This study was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. A total of 394 patients were screened. After a 4-week run-in period, 219 of these patients with hypertension and primary hypercholesterolemia were randomized. Patients received 1 of 3 regimens for 8 weeks: (1) CND 32 mg/RSV 20 mg, (2) RSV 20 mg, or (3) CND 32 mg. The primary outcome variables were changes in the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and the percentage changes in LDL-C from baseline to the drug treatment at 8 weeks. The secondary outcome variables were percentage changes of total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein A-I, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and glucose metabolic indices, including percentage changes of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), adiponectin, and hemoglobin A1c. Tolerability of combination therapy was compared with other monotherapy groups. FINDINGS The percentage changes of LDL-C were -48.6% (from 157.2 to 80.1 mg/dL) in the RSV group and -49.8% (from 160.2 to 78.9 mg/dL) in the CND/RSV group from baseline to the end of 8 weeks of treatment. Mean SBP and DBP were significantly decreased in the CND/RSV and CND groups after 8 weeks (P < 0.001 for all); however, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. Total cholesterol levels, triglycerides, non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B were significantly reduced in the CND/RSV and RSV groups, with no significant differences between the groups compared with the CND group (P < 0.001 for all). The percentage changes of HOMA-IR, adiponectin, and hemoglobin A1c had no significant differences between the combination groups and monotherapy groups. However, in a 2-sample t test, HOMA-IR was significantly decreased in the CND/RSV group compared with the RSV group in nondiabetic patients (mean [SD] percentage change of HOMA-IR, -8.7% [37.6%] vs 17.1% [53.1%]; P = 0.048). There were no significant differences in metabolic indices between the diabetic groups. Adverse events in the CND/RSV group were similar to those in the monotherapy group. IMPLICATIONS Once-daily fixed-dose combination therapy with CND/RSV is an effective, tolerable, convenient treatment option for patients with essential hypertension and hypercholesteremia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02770261.
-
6.
Comparative efficacy between atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular disease recurrence.
Perez-Calahorra, S, Laclaustra, M, Marco-Benedi, V, Pinto, X, Sanchez-Hernandez, RM, Plana, N, Ortega, E, Fuentes, F, Civeira, F
Lipids in health and disease. 2019;(1):216
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no randomized clinical trials with recurrence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) as a major outcome with rosuvastatin. In order to analyze potential differences in the clinical response to atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in secondary ASCVD prevention, we have analyzed the clinical evolution of those subjects of the Dyslipemia Registry of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis (SEA) who at the time of inclusion in the Registry had already suffered an ASCVD. METHODS This observational, retrospective, multicenter, national study was designed to determine potential differences between the use of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in the ASCVD recurrence. Three different follow-up start-times were performed: time of inclusion in the registry; time of first event if this occurred after 2005, and time of first event without date restriction. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Among atorvastatin or rosuvastatin users, 89 recurrences of ASCVD were recorded (21.9%), of which 85.4% were coronary. At the inclusion of the subject in the registry, 345 participants had not suffered a recurrence yet. These 345 subjects accumulated 1050 person-years in a mean follow-up of 3 years. Event rates were 2.73 (95% CI: 1.63, 4.25) cases/100 person-years and 2.34 (95% CI: 1.17, 4.10) cases/100 person-years in the atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups independently of the follow-up start-time. CONCLUSIONS This study does not find differences between high doses of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in the recurrence of ASCVD, and supports their use as clinically equivalent in secondary prevention of ASCVD.
-
7.
Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of [11 C]Rosuvastatin Hepatic Concentrations and Hepatobiliary Transport in Humans in the Absence and Presence of Cyclosporin A.
Billington, S, Shoner, S, Lee, S, Clark-Snustad, K, Pennington, M, Lewis, D, Muzi, M, Rene, S, Lee, J, Nguyen, TB, et al
Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2019;(5):1056-1066
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Using positron emission tomography imaging, we determined the hepatic concentrations and hepatobiliary transport of [11 C]rosuvastatin (RSV; i.v. injection) in the absence (n = 6) and presence (n = 4 of 6) of cyclosporin A (CsA; i.v. infusion) following a therapeutic dose of unlabeled RSV (5 mg, p.o.) in healthy human volunteers. The sinusoidal uptake, sinusoidal efflux, and biliary efflux clearance (CL; mL/minute) of [11 C]RSV, estimated through compartment modeling were 1,205.6 ± 384.8, 16.2 ± 11.2, and 5.1 ± 1.8, respectively (n = 6). CsA (blood concentration: 2.77 ± 0.24 μM), an organic-anion-transporting polypeptide, Na+ -taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide, and breast cancer resistance protein inhibitor increased [11 C]RSV systemic blood exposure (45%; P < 0.05), reduced its biliary efflux CL (52%; P < 0.05) and hepatic uptake (25%; P > 0.05) but did not affect its distribution into the kidneys. CsA increased plasma concentrations of coproporphyrin I and III and total bilirubin by 297 ± 69%, 384 ± 102%, and 81 ± 39%, respectively (P < 0.05). These data can be used in the future to verify predictions of hepatic concentrations and hepatobiliary transport of RSV.
-
8.
Evaluation of Clinically Relevant Drug-Drug Interactions and Population Pharmacokinetics of Darolutamide in Patients with Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results of Pre-Specified and Post Hoc Analyses of the Phase III ARAMIS Trial.
Shore, N, Zurth, C, Fricke, R, Gieschen, H, Graudenz, K, Koskinen, M, Ploeger, B, Moss, J, Prien, O, Borghesi, G, et al
Targeted oncology. 2019;(5):527-539
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Darolutamide, an androgen receptor antagonist with a distinct molecular structure, significantly prolonged metastasis-free survival versus placebo in the phase III ARAMIS study in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). In this population, polypharmacy for age-related comorbidities is common and may increase drug-drug interaction (DDI) risks. Preclinical/phase I study data suggest darolutamide has a low DDI potential-other than breast cancer resistance protein/organic anion transporter protein substrates (e.g., statins), no clinically relevant effect on comedications is expected. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to evaluate the effect of commonly administered drugs on the pharmacokinetics of darolutamide and the effect of comedications potentially affected by darolutamide on safety in patients with nmCRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Comorbidities and comedication use in the 1509 ARAMIS participants treated with darolutamide 600 mg twice daily or placebo were assessed. A population pharmacokinetic analysis evaluated whether comedications affected the pharmacokinetics of darolutamide in a subset of 388 patients. A subgroup analysis of adverse events (AEs) in statin users versus nonusers was conducted. RESULTS Most participants (median age 74 years) had at least one comorbidity (98.4% in both arms) and used at least one comedication (98.7% with darolutamide vs. 98.0% with placebo); these were similar across study arms. Despite frequent use of comedications with DDI potential, no significant effects on darolutamide pharmacokinetics were identified. Comedications included lipid-modifying agents (34.5%), β-blockers (29.7%), antithrombotics (42.8%), and systemic antibiotics (26.9%). AE incidence was similar across study arms in statin users and nonusers. Study limitations include the small sample size for sub-analyses. CONCLUSIONS These analyses suggest the pharmacokinetic profile of darolutamide is not affected by a number of commonly administered drugs in patients with nmCRPC. Although pharmacokinetic data have indicated that darolutamide has the potential to interact with rosuvastatin, used to assess DDI in these studies, this finding did not seem to translate into increased AEs due to statin use in the ARAMIS trial. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02200614.
-
9.
Circulating microparticles and central blood pressure according to antihypertensive strategy.
Massunaga, ND, França, CN, Bianco, HT, Ferreira, CES, Kato, JT, Póvoa, RMS, Figueiredo Neto, AM, Izar, MCO, Fonseca, FAH
Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2019;:e1234
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This prospective, randomized, open-label study aimed to compare the effects of antihypertensive treatment based on amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide on the circulating microparticles and central blood pressure values of hypertensive patients. METHODS The effects of treatments on circulating microparticles were assessed during monotherapy and after the consecutive addition of valsartan and rosuvastatin followed by the withdrawal of rosuvastatin. Each treatment period lasted for 30 days. Central blood pressure and pulse wave velocity were measured at the end of each period. Endothelial, monocyte, and platelet circulating microparticles were determined by flow cytometry. Central blood pressure values and pulse wave velocity were recorded at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS No differences in brachial blood pressure were observed between the treatment groups throughout the study. Although similar central blood pressure values were observed during monotherapy, lower systolic and diastolic central blood pressure values and early and late blood pressure peaks were observed in the amlodipine arm after the addition of valsartan alone or combined with rosuvastatin. Hydrochlorothiazide-based therapy was associated with a lower number of endothelial microparticles throughout the study, whereas a higher number of platelet microparticles was observed after rosuvastatin withdrawal in the amlodipine arm. CONCLUSIONS Despite similar brachial blood pressure values between groups throughout the study, exposure to amlodipine was associated with lower central blood pressure values after combination with valsartan, indicating a beneficial interaction. Differences between circulating microparticles were modest and were mainly influenced by rosuvastatin withdrawal in the amlodipine arm.
-
10.
Efficacy of alirocumab for reducing plaque vulnerability: Study protocol for ALTAIR, a randomized controlled trial in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease receiving rosuvastatin.
Otake, H, Sugizaki, Y, Toba, T, Nagano, Y, Tsukiyama, Y, Yanaka, KI, Yamamoto, H, Nagasawa, A, Onishi, H, Takeshige, R, et al
Journal of cardiology. 2019;(3):228-232
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although a recent clinical trial demonstrated that alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, significantly reduces the incidence of acute coronary events, the impact of alirocumab on plaque stabilization remains uncertain. The Efficacy of ALirocumab for Thin-cap fibroatheroma in patients with coronary Artery disease estImated by optical coherence tomogRaphy (ALTAIR) study will investigate the effect of alirocumab on thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) in Japanese patients who underwent recent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND DESIGN ALTAIR is a phase IV, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, single-center study involving blinded optical coherence tomography (OCT) image analysis in Japanese adults hospitalized for PCI and having suboptimal control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (>70mg/dL) despite statin therapy. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to the alirocumab arm (alirocumab 75mg every 2 weeks added to rosuvastatin 10mg/day) or the standard-of-care arm (rosuvastatin 10mg/day, with initiation and/or dose adjustment of non-statin lipid-lowering to achieve an LDL-C target of <70mg/dL). OCT imaging will be conducted at baseline and at week 36 (post-treatment). The primary objective is to compare the alirocumab and standard-of-care arms regarding the change in TCFA fibrous-cap thickness after 9 months of treatment. CONCLUSION The outcomes of ALTAIR (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03552432) will provide insights into the effect of alirocumab on plaque vulnerability following PCI in patients with suboptimal LDL-C control despite stable statin therapy.