-
1.
Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System.
Puglisi, S, Rossini, A, Poli, R, Dughera, F, Pia, A, Terzolo, M, Reimondo, G
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2021;:738848
Abstract
Sodium-glucose cotransporters inhibitors (SGLT2-i) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are glucose-lowering drugs that are proved to reduce the cardiovascular (CV) risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this process, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is assumed to play a role. The inhibition of SGLT2 improves hyperglycemia hampering urinary reabsorption of glucose and inducing glycosuria. This "hybrid" diuretic effect, which couples natriuresis with osmotic diuresis, potentially leads to systemic RAAS activation. However, the association between SGLT2-i and systemic RAAS activation is not straightforward. Available data indicate that SGLT2-i cause plasma renin activity (PRA) increase in the early phase of treatment, while PRA and aldosterone levels remain unchanged in chronic treated patients. Furthermore, emerging studies provide evidence that SGLT2-i might have an interfering effect on aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) in patients with T2DM, due to their diuretic and sympathoinhibition effects. The cardio- and reno-protective effects of GLP-1-RA are at least in part related to the interaction with RAAS. In particular, GLP1-RA counteract the action of angiotensin II (ANG II) inhibiting its synthesis, increasing the inactivation of its circulating form and contrasting its action on target tissue like glomerular endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, GLP1-RA stimulate natriuresis inhibiting Na+/H+ exchanger NHE-3, which is conversely activated by ANG II. Moreover, GLP1 infusion acutely reduces circulating aldosterone, but this effect does not seem to be chronically maintained in patients treated with GLP1-RA. In conclusion, both SGLT2-i and GLP1-RA seem to have several effects on RAAS, though additional studies are needed to clarify this relationship.
-
2.
Association of SGLT2 inhibitors with arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in patients with type 2 diabetes or heart failure: A meta-analysis of 34 randomized controlled trials.
Fernandes, GC, Fernandes, A, Cardoso, R, Penalver, J, Knijnik, L, Mitrani, RD, Myerburg, RJ, Goldberger, JJ
Heart rhythm. 2021;(7):1098-1105
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce hospitalizations and death from heart failure (HF), but their effect on arrhythmia expression has been poorly investigated. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of SGLT2is with arrhythmias in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or HF. METHODS We searched PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. Two independent investigators identified randomized double-blind trials that compared SGLT2is with placebo or active control for adults with T2DM or HF. Primary outcomes were incident atrial arrhythmias, ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and sudden cardiac death (SCD). RESULTS We included 34 randomized (25 placebo-controlled and 9 active-controlled) trials with 63,166 patients (35,883 SGLT2is vs 27,273 control: mean age 53-67 years; 63% male). Medications included canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, or ertugliflozin. Except for 1 study of HF, all patients had T2DM. Follow-up ranged from 24 weeks to 5.7 years. The cumulative incidence of events was low: 3.6, 1.4, and 2.5 per 1000 patient-years for atrial arrhythmias, VAs and SCD, respectively. SGLT2i therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of incident atrial arrhythmias (odds ratio 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.95; P = .008) and the "SCD" component of the SCD outcome (odds ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.97; P = .03) compared with control. There was no significant difference in incident VA or the "cardiac arrest" SCD component between groups. CONCLUSION SGLT2is are associated with significantly reduced risks of incident atrial arrhythmias and SCD in patients with T2DM. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm the antiarrhythmic effect of SGLT2is and whether this is a class or drug-specific effect.
-
3.
Dapagliflozin in patients with cardiometabolic risk factors hospitalised with COVID-19 (DARE-19): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Kosiborod, MN, Esterline, R, Furtado, RHM, Oscarsson, J, Gasparyan, SB, Koch, GG, Martinez, F, Mukhtar, O, Verma, S, Chopra, V, et al
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2021;(9):586-594
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 can lead to multiorgan failure. Dapagliflozin, a SGLT2 inhibitor, has significant protective benefits for the heart and kidney. We aimed to see whether this agent might provide organ protection in patients with COVID-19 by affecting processes dysregulated during acute illness. METHODS DARE-19 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor (ie, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease). Patients critically ill at screening were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to dapagliflozin (10 mg daily orally) or matched placebo for 30 days. Dual primary outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population: the outcome of prevention (time to new or worsened organ dysfunction or death), and the hierarchial composite outcome of recovery (change in clinical status by day 30). Safety outcomes, in patients who received at least one study medication dose, included serious adverse events, adverse events leading to discontinuation, and adverse events of interest. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04350593. FINDINGS Between April 22, 2020 and Jan 1, 2021, 1250 patients were randomly assigned with 625 in each group. The primary composite outcome of prevention showed organ dysfunction or death occurred in 70 patients (11·2%) in the dapagliflozin group, and 86 (13·8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·80, 95% CI 0·58-1·10; p=0·17). For the primary outcome of recovery, 547 patients (87·5%) in the dapagliflozin group and 532 (85·1%) in the placebo group showed clinical status improvement, although this was not statistically significant (win ratio 1·09, 95% CI 0·97-1·22; p=0·14). There were 41 deaths (6·6%) in the dapagliflozin group, and 54 (8·6%) in the placebo group (HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·52-1·16). Serious adverse events were reported in 65 (10·6%) of 613 patients treated with dapagliflozin and in 82 (13·3%) of 616 patients given the placebo. INTERPRETATION In patients with cardiometabolic risk factors who were hospitalised with COVID-19, treatment with dapagliflozin did not result in a statistically significant risk reduction in organ dysfunction or death, or improvement in clinical recovery, but was well tolerated. FUNDING AstraZeneca.
-
4.
Effects of Dapagliflozin in Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease.
Chertow, GM, Vart, P, Jongs, N, Toto, RD, Gorriz, JL, Hou, FF, McMurray, JJV, Correa-Rotter, R, Rossing, P, Sjöström, CD, et al
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2021;(9):2352-2361
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease (DAPA-CKD) randomized, placebo-controlled trial, the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin significantly reduced risk of kidney failure and prolonged survival in patients with CKD with or without type 2 diabetes. METHODS Adults with eGFR of 25-75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 200-5000 mg/g had been randomized to receive dapagliflozin 10 mg/d or placebo. Here, we conducted a prespecified analysis of dapagliflozin's effects in patients with stage 4 CKD (eGFR,30 ml/min per 1.73 m2) at baseline. The primary end point was a composite of time to ≥50% sustained decline in eGFR, ESKD, or kidney or cardiovascular death. Secondary end points were a kidney composite (same as the primary end point but without cardiovascular death), a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause death. RESULTS A total of 293 participants with stage 4 CKD received dapagliflozin and 331 received placebo. Patients with stage 4 CKD randomized to dapagliflozin experienced a 27% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -2 to 47%) reduction in the primary composite endpoint, and 29% (-2 to 51%), 17% (-53 to 55%), and 32% (-21 to 61%) reductions in the kidney, cardiovascular and mortality endpoints, respectively, relative to placebo. Interaction P-values were 0.22, 0.13, 0.63, and 0.95, respectively, comparing CKD stages 4 versus 2/3. The eGFR slope declined by 2.15 and 3.38 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year in the dapagliflozin and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.005). Patients treated with dapagliflozin or placebo had similar rates of serious adverse events and adverse events of interest. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stage 4 CKD and albuminuria, the effects of dapagliflozin were consistent with those observed in the DAPA-CKD trial overall, with no evidence of increased risks.
-
5.
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Inhibitors in Non- Diabetic Heart Failure: A Narrative Review.
Dahal, R, Acharya, Y, Mukherjee, D
Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets. 2021;(1):1-6
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading public health problems with a substantial burden in the global healthcare system. Although significant efforts are based on prevention, early recognition, and proper management of HF, the worldwide surge of risk factors like hypertension, diabetes, and obesity has further complicated the existing problem. OBJECTIVE This study aims to define the role of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in non-diabetic HF. METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature review to examine the available evidence in the clinical implications of SGLT2 inhibitors in non-diabetic HF using the online databases (PubMed and Embase). RESULTS We identified two RCTs-DAPA-HF and DEFINE-HF, which were conducted to analyze the net clinical benefit of dapagliflozin in non-diabetic HF patients. Although we could not study the composite effects of these studies due to the difference in outcome measures, the individual outcomes look promising. The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one primary event was 21 (95% CI: 15 to 38) in the DAPA study. In DEFINE HF study, responder analysis showed a significant proportion of patients in the treatment arm experienced improvements in the functional status with clinically meaningful improvement in KCCQ-OS by 3.7 points and KCCQ-CS by 4.6 points with NNT of 10 and 7, respectively, at 12 weeks. Both studies also showed low safety concerns in patients without T2D. CONCLUSION The outcomes of the two RCTs, DAPA-HF and DEFINE-HF, that studied the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in non-diabetic HF showed promising clinical outcomes. Although we are waiting for other prospective RCTs to reflect similar results and safety profiles, it seems the SGLT2 inhibitors can have broader clinical implications in managing non-diabetic HF with improved cardiovascular outcomes.
-
6.
Regional variation of effects of new antidiabetic medications in cardiovascular outcome trials.
Cotter, G, Davison, BA, Edwards, C, Senger, S, Teerlink, JR, Zannad, F, Nielsen, OW, Metra, M, Mebazaa, A, Chioncel, O, et al
American heart journal. 2021;:73-80
Abstract
BACKGROUND In international trials, glucagon-like protein-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is) were effective in improving cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. METHODS We assessed the effect of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2Is treatment effect on CV endpoints by geographical region in multiple international trials using random effects weighted least squares meta-regressions. RESULTS The estimated effects of both SGLT2Is and GLP-1RAs on major adverse CV events (MACE) in North America (SGLT2Is n = 12,399, HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-1.01; GLP-1RAs n = 12,515, HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83- 1.09) and in Europe (SGLT2Is n = 19,435, HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.02; GLP-1RAs n = 22,812, HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.99) were numerically lower but not statistically different to the rest of the world (ROW) (SGLT2Is n = 15,127, HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.92, p-value for interaction 0.26; GLP-1RAs n = 17,494, HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.92, p-value for interaction 0.28). Effects of SGLT2Is on heart failure readmission or CV death varied significantly by region (P = 0.0094). The effect of SGLT2Is was significantly smaller in Europe (n = 18,653, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.95) than in the ROW (n = 12,463, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.76, P = 0.0024). The smaller effect in North America (n = 9776, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.87) did not differ significantly from that in the ROW (P = 0.2370). CONCLUSION The effects of SGLT2Is on HF events are larger in the ROW. Further analyses and studies are needed to better elucidate the differential effects of SGLTIs and GLP-1RAs by geographical regions.
-
7.
Pharmacological treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
Taylor, SI, Yazdi, ZS, Beitelshees, AL
The Journal of clinical investigation. 2021;(2)
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a major public health problem, affecting about 10% of the population. Pharmacotherapy aims to protect against microvascular complications, including blindness, end-stage kidney disease, and amputations. Landmark clinical trials have demonstrated that intensive glycemic control slows progression of microvascular complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy). Long-term follow-up has demonstrated that intensive glycemic control also decreases risk of macrovascular disease, albeit rigorous evidence of macrovascular benefit did not emerge for over a decade. The US FDA's recent requirement for dedicated cardiovascular outcome trials ushered in a golden age for understanding the clinical profiles of new type 2 diabetes drugs. Some clinical trials with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists reported data demonstrating cardiovascular benefit (decreased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and hospitalization for heart failure) and slower progression of diabetic kidney disease. This Review discusses current guidelines for use of the 12 classes of drugs approved to promote glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. The Review also anticipates future developments with potential to improve the standard of care: availability of generic dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors; precision medicine to identify the best drugs for individual patients; and new therapies to protect against chronic complications of diabetes.
-
8.
Effects of Sodium/Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors on Cardiovascular and Metabolic Outcomes in Patients Without Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials.
Teo, YH, Teo, YN, Syn, NL, Kow, CS, Yoong, CSY, Tan, BYQ, Yeo, TC, Lee, CH, Lin, W, Sia, CH
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021;(5):e019463
Abstract
Background Recent studies have increasingly shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may have beneficial cardiovascular and metabolic effects in patients without diabetes mellitus. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes in patients without diabetes mellitus. Methods and Results Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and SCOPUS) were searched on August 30, 2020 for articles published from January 1, 2000 to August 30, 2020, for studies that examined the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes in patients without diabetes mellitus. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis model was used to summarize the studies. A total of 8 randomized-controlled trials were included with a combined cohort of 5233 patients. In patients without diabetes mellitus, those with heart failure treated with SGLT2 inhibitors had a 20% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular deaths and heart failure hospitalizations, compared with those who were not treated (risk ratio, 0.78; P<0.001). We additionally found that treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors improved multiple metabolic indices. Patients on SGLT2 inhibitors had a reduction in body weight of -1.21 kg (P<0.001), body mass index of -0.47 kg/m2 (P<0.001), systolic blood pressure of -1.90 mm Hg (P=0.04), and fasting plasma glucose of -0.38 mmol/L (P=0.05), compared with those without. There were no between-group differences in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels, waist circumference, diastolic blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and estimated glomerular filtration rates. Across our combined cohort of 5233 patients, hypoglycemia was reported in 22 patients. Conclusions SGLT2 inhibitors improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients without diabetes mellitus with heart failure. In patients without diabetes mellitus, SGLT2 inhibitors showed positive metabolic outcomes in weight and blood pressure control.
-
9.
Do SGLT-2 inhibitors exhibit similar cardiovascular benefit in patients with heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction?
Singh, AK, Singh, R, Misra, A
Journal of diabetes. 2021;(7):596-600
Abstract
Highlights The beneficial cardiovascular (CV) effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in patients with heart failure are already known. Whether SGLT-2i exert similar CV effects in heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction is not known. This meta-analysis showed SGLT-2i exert similar CV benefits irrespective of the types of heart failure. Future trials will confirm or refute the CV effects of SGLT-2i in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
-
10.
SGLT2 Inhibitors Improve All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients Regardless of Diabetes or Heart Failure Status.
Shaughnessy, AF
American family physician. 2021;(10):630-631