-
1.
Reducing the cost of managing patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting.
Mehran, R, Vogel, B, Levy, P
Journal of cardiology. 2021;(1):93-99
Abstract
Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have an increased risk of both ischemic events and bleeding complications resulting from antithrombotic therapy. These events are particularly common in patients with a concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation, such as those with atrial fibrillation, and are associated with a substantial healthcare resource burden. Advances in procedural aspects of PCI have led to marked improvements in outcomes and a consequent reduction in the costs resulting from PCI-associated complications. Furthermore, recent randomized clinical trials have investigated the optimal antithrombotic strategy in the specific case of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI, leading to a shift toward the tailoring of antithrombotic therapy according to the patient's individual stroke and bleeding risks. Here we review these recent advances, with a particular focus on the improvements in antithrombotic strategies offered by the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.
-
2.
Emerging Technologies in Flow Diverters and Stents for Cerebrovascular Diseases.
Karsy, M, Guan, J, Brock, AA, Amin, A, Park, MS
Current neurology and neuroscience reports. 2017;(12):96
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Stents and flow diverters have revolutionized the treatment of cerebrovascular disease. Guglielmi coils, flexible microcatheters, and first-generation intracranial stents, such as Neuroform (Stryker Neurovascular) and Enterprise stents (Codman/DePuy-Synthes), have paved the way for the development of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) (ev3/Covidien/Medtronic) and other endovascular approaches. RECENT FINDINGS This review discusses the historical development of flow diverter technologies from the PED to similar devices, such as the Surpass stent (Stryker Neurovascular), the Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED; MicroVention, Inc.), the SILK stent (Balt Extrusion), and the p64 Flow Modulation Device (Phenox). In addition, the potential use of drug-eluting stents and various bioresorbable scaffolds (e.g., poly-L-lactic acid, magnesium), new developments in stent material (e.g., thin-film nitinol), design (e.g., biocompatible polymers, embedded microcircuitry, flow models), and potential applications for flow diverters will be considered. Endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular disease is rapidly advancing via continued development of new technology.
-
3.
The Evolution and Current Utility of Esophageal Stent Placement for the Treatment of Acute Esophageal Perforation.
Herrera, A, Freeman, RK
Thoracic surgery clinics. 2016;(3):305-14
Abstract
Esophageal stent placement was used primarily for the treatment of malignant strictures until the development of a new generation of biomaterials allowed the production of easily removable, occlusive stents in 2001. Since then, thoracic surgeons have gained experience using esophageal stents for the treatment of acute esophageal perforation. As part of a hybrid treatment strategy, including surgical drainage of infected spaces, enteral nutrition, and aggressive supportive care, esophageal stent placement has produced results that can exceed those of traditional surgical repair. This review summarizes the evolution of esophageal stent use for acute perforation and provides evidence-based recommendations for the technique.
-
4.
Should oesophageal stents be used before neo-adjuvant therapy to treat dysphagia in patients awaiting oesophagectomy? Best evidence topic (BET).
Jones, CM, Griffiths, EA
International journal of surgery (London, England). 2014;(11):1172-80
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Patients who develop significant dysphagia secondary to a potentially curable oesophageal cancer pose a significant clinical problem. Their nutritional needs can be met either by dietary supplementation, insertion of an oesophageal stent or through nasogastric or surgical feeding tube placement. We sought to determine whether, in patients about to start neo-adjuvant therapy prior to oesophagectomy, the use of oesophageal stent improves clinical outcomes. A best evidence topic in upper gastrointestinal surgery was written according to a structured protocol in order to answer this question. Two hundred and forty eight papers were found, of which eleven level III and one level IV study were considered to best address the clinical question. These indicate that whilst oesophageal stents do successfully relieve dysphagia throughout neoadjuvant therapy, they are not consistently associated with maintenance of, or improvement in, serum albumin or body weight. They are, however, commonly associated with stent migration and chest discomfort, both of which may frequently result in the need for stent removal or replacement. There is additional evidence within the manuscripts reviewed to demonstrate that the use of oesophageal stents in the neoadjuvant setting can lead to significant complications in a small proportion of patients which can compromise opportunity for curative surgery. The use of stents in this situation cannot be recommended.
-
5.
Risk of bleeding on triple antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention/stenting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Andrade, JG, Deyell, MW, Khoo, C, Lee, M, Humphries, K, Cairns, JA
The Canadian journal of cardiology. 2013;(2):204-12
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no reported randomized controlled trials of triple antithrombotic therapy (TT; aspirin plus a thienopyridine plus vitamin K antagonist) vs dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; aspirin plus a thienopyridine) among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting (PCI-S). A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the risk of bleeding among patients receiving TT after PCI-S. METHODS Electronic databases were searched for studies reporting bleeding among patients receiving TT after PCI-S. Of the 4108 articles screened, 18 met study inclusion criteria and underwent detailed data extraction: of these, 6 reported in-hospital outcomes, 14 reported 30-day outcomes, and 9 reported 6-month outcomes. At each time point, pooled estimates of bleeding with TT were ascertained and where possible summary odds ratios (ORs) for comparative risks vs DAPT were calculated. RESULTS The pooled estimate of major bleeding rate with TT post PCI-S was 2.38% by 30 days postprocedure (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-3.77%) and 4.55% by 6 months postdischarge (95% CI, 0.56-8.53%). At 30 days and 6 months the rates of major bleeding with TT were significantly higher than those observed with DAPT OR, 2.38 at 30 days (95% CI, 1.05-5.38) and OR, 2.87 at 6 months (95% CI, 1.47-5.62). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis of reports of triple therapy with a vitamin K antagonist, aspirin, and clopidogrel after PCI-S provides precise and valid bleeding risk data. Based on existing observational studies the rates of major and any bleeding associated with TT are clinically important and significantly greater than those reported with DAPT.
-
6.
Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.
Palmerini, T, Biondi-Zoccai, G, Della Riva, D, Stettler, C, Sangiorgi, D, D'Ascenzo, F, Kimura, T, Briguori, C, Sabatè, M, Kim, HS, et al
Lancet (London, England). 2012;(9824):1393-402
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relative safety of drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents, especially with respect to stent thrombosis, continues to be debated. In view of the overall low frequency of stent thrombosis, large sample sizes are needed to accurately estimate treatment differences between stents. We compared the risk of thrombosis between bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. METHODS For this network meta-analysis, randomised controlled trials comparing different drug-eluting stents or drug-eluting with bare-metal stents currently approved in the USA were identified through Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases, and proceedings of international meetings. Information about study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample characteristics, and clinical outcomes was extracted. FINDINGS 49 trials including 50,844 patients randomly assigned to treatment groups were analysed. 1-year definite stent thrombosis was significantly lower with cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents (CoCr-EES) than with bare-metal stents (odds ratio [OR] 0·23, 95% CI 0·13-0·41). The significant difference in stent thrombosis between CoCr-EES and bare-metal stents was evident as early as 30 days (OR 0·21, 95% CI 0·11-0·42) and was also significant between 31 days and 1 year (OR 0·27, 95% CI 0·08-0·74). CoCr-EES were also associated with significantly lower rates of 1-year definite stent thrombosis compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents (OR 0·28, 95% CI 0·16-0·48), permanent polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents (OR 0·41, 95% CI 0·24-0·70), phosphorylcholine-based zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR 0·21, 95% CI 0·10-0·44), and Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR 0·14, 95% CI 0·03-0·47). At 2-year follow-up, CoCr-EES were still associated with significantly lower rates of definite stent thrombosis than were bare-metal (OR 0·35, 95% CI 0·17-0·69) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (OR 0·34, 95% CI 0·19-0·62). No other drug-eluting stent had lower definite thrombosis rates compared with bare-metal stents at 2-year follow-up. INTERPRETATION In randomised studies completed to date, CoCr-EES has the lowest rate of stent thrombosis within 2 years of implantation. The finding that CoCr-EES also reduced stent thrombosis compared with bare-metal stents, if confirmed in future randomised trials, represents a paradigm shift. FUNDING The Cardiovascular Research Foundation.
-
7.
Multi-Link Vision stent vs. first-generation drug-eluting stents: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Testa, L, Latini, RA, Pizzocri, S, Lanotte, S, Agnifili, M, Laudisa, ML, Brambilla, N, Bedogni, F
QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians. 2011;(12):1025-34
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since its introduction, the cobalt chromium alloy MULTI-LINK VISION stent (MLV) has been extensively investigated thus leading to the largest amount of data so far available for a bare metal stent. Aim and METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis (according to Cochrane collaboration guidelines) aiming at summarizing the real world safety and efficacy of MLV stent. Endpoints of interest were: major adverse events [(MAE) combination of overall death and non-fatal myocardial infarction, MI], and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Rate of stent thrombosis was also assessed. RESULTS Eleven studies finally retrieved totalling 5539 patients [7 study registries, 4243 patients and 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MLV vs. first generation of drug-eluting stent (DES) (paclitaxel or sirolimus eluting), (RCTs) 1296 patients]. Across study registries, at a mean follow-up of 11.1 months, MLV was associated with a 5.3% risk of MAE, 3% of death, 2.3% of MI and a 9% of TVR. Risk of ST was 0.5%. Compared to first generation of DES in RCTs, at a mean follow-up of 10.5 months, MLV achieved similar results in terms of MAE, death and MI. On the other hand, MLV was associated with a double risk of TVR [OR 2.01 (1.34-3.01), P < 0.001, number needed to treat 18 (13-40)]. Overall, in stent late loss with MLV was 0.81 mm (±0.51), while the in segment late loss was 0.61 mm (±0.5). Risk of stent thrombosis was equivalent. Of note, performance of MLV in terms of safety, efficacy and risk of repeat revascularization was quite consistent across all the published studies, despite inherent differences in study design, clinical setting, complexity of the lesions and ethnicity. CONCLUSION Compared to first-generation DES, MLV showed substantial equivalence with respect to hard clinical endpoints. Data are consistent in study registries and RCTs meaning that the overall performance of MLV is quite predictable and reproducible into the wide spectrum of clinical settings.
-
8.
Stents and statins: history, clinical outcomes and mechanisms.
Nair, PK, Mulukutla, SR, Marroquin, OC
Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2010;(9):1283-95
Abstract
The 1980s witnessed the inception of both stents and 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins). While they evolved separately, it was soon realized that they each offered a unique and powerful mechanism for targeting the major offender in cardiovascular disease, namely atherosclerosis. Coincidentally, the first statin was approved by the US FDA in 1987, the same year that the coronary stent was conceived. Since that time, stents and statins have revolutionized the field of cardiovascular medicine and their paths have been intertwined. Several pivotal randomized clinical trials have established statins as an effective therapy for improving clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients presenting with stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes. In addition, chronic statin therapy and acute loading of statins prior to PCI has consistently been shown to limit periprocedural myocardial necrosis. The mechanism for improved clinical outcomes with statins has clearly been associated with statin-induced reductions in LDL. In addition, statins may also exert 'pleiotropic' effects, independent of LDL lowering, that might counteract the inflammatory and prothrombotic mileu created with PCI. This article provides a brief historical perspective of the evolution of the use of statins and stents in patients with coronary artery disease, an evaluation of the available clinical data supporting the use of statins in patients undergoing PCI across a wide spectrum of clinical scenarios, and a discussion of the potential mechanisms of the benefit of statins in these patients.
-
9.
Emerging drugs for coronary restenosis: the role of systemic oral agents the in stent era.
Rodriguez, AE
Expert opinion on emerging drugs. 2009;(4):561-76
Abstract
Introduction of drug eluting stents (DES) during percutaneous coronary interventions significantly reduces the rate of angiographic restenosis, target lesion and vessel revascularization. In spite of these benefits, other clinical hard end points such as death or myocardial infarction were not reduced and, furthermore, new concerns associated with the presence of late and very late stent thrombosis have been raised. The requirement of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy is another limitation associated with DES. Conversely, in this decade, other options to DES have been simultaneously discussed in observational and randomized studies. Several registries and randomized trials using the systemic approach with anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive or antiplatelet therapies have been identified and discussed in this manuscript. In spite of all randomized studies with oral therapies in the bare metal stent (BMS) era demonstrating positive reductions in coronary restenosis, this practice has not been introduced clinically. Furthermore, a recent randomized trial comparing oral sirolimus plus BMS versus DES demonstrated that the first approach was cost saving and of comparable efficacy to DES. Conclusive evidence of high incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis with DES, together with clinical limitations for its widespread use, has opened up a large opportunity to search for alternative therapies in coronary restenosis prevention.
-
10.
Long-term care after percutaneous coronary intervention: focus on the role of antiplatelet therapy.
Stone, GW, Aronow, HD
Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2006;(5):641-52
Abstract
Arterial wall injury caused by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) triggers transient platelet activation and mural thrombosis; these effects are superimposed on the preexisting platelet hyperreactivity associated with underlying atherothrombosis. Platelet activation has been implicated in the major complications of PCI: acute and subacute thrombosis and restenosis. Antithrombotic and anticoagulant therapy minimizes thrombotic complications after PCI. Aspirin plus a thienopyridine (ticlopidine or clopidogrel) is more effective than aspirin plus heparin and extended warfarin therapy in preventing periprocedural ischemic events and subsequent stent thrombosis and results in less major and minor bleeding. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel (the preferred thienopyridine because of its superior hematologic safety) is recommended for at least 4 weeks to prevent subacute stent thrombosis with bare-metal stents and 3 to 6 months to prevent late-stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents. Coronary atherothrombosis is a diffuse vascular disease, and reduction of the risk of future ischemic events requires strategies that extend beyond the focal treatment of stenotic lesions. Optimal long-term care after PCI requires aggressive systemic pharmacotherapy (antiplatelet agents, statins, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme Inhibitors) in conjunction with therapeutic lifestyle changes (smoking cessation, weight reduction, dietary measures, and exercise). In this context, dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) is recommended for at least 12 months after PCI for prophylaxis of future atherothrombotic events.