0
selected
-
1.
Comparison between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and pioglitazone as additions to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A systematic review with an indirect comparison meta-analysis.
Cho, YK, Kim, YJ, Kang, YM, Lee, SE, Park, JY, Lee, WJ, Jung, CH
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2018;(4):882-892
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone (PIO) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as additions to insulin therapy for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2016. Randomized controlled trials published in English that compared SGLT2i plus insulin (SGLT2i/INS) or PIO plus insulin (PIO/INS) with placebo plus insulin (PCB/INS) in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients were included. We compared the efficacy and safety between SGLT2i/INS and PIO/INS indirectly. RESULTS A total of 14 randomized controlled trials comparing 7,226 participants were included (8 SGLT2i and 6 PIO studies). SGLT2i/INS achieved similar reductions in hemoglobin A1c (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.01% [-0.1 mmol/mol], 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.25 to 0.22% [-2.7 to -2.4 mmol/mol]; P = 0.896) and fasting plasma glucose (WMD -0.90 mg/dL, 95% CI: -15.50 to 13.71 mg/dL; P = 0.904), and a similar proportion of participants achieved hemoglobin A1c <7.0% (<53.0 mmol/mol; relative risk 0.98, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.33; P = 0.917) as compared with the PIO/INS group, with greater weight reduction (WMD -4.54 kg, 95% CI: -5.67 to -3.41 kg; P < 0.001). PIO/INS showed non-significant trends toward a higher risk of hypoglycemia (relative risk 1.15, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.35; P = 0.102) and higher reduction of total daily insulin doses (WMD -2.45 IU/day, 95% CI: -7.30 to 2.40 IU/day; P = 0.438). CONCLUSIONS Both PIO and SGLT2i are feasible adjunctive oral agents to pre-existing insulin therapy in individuals with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.
-
2.
Thiazolidinediones for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
He, L, Liu, X, Wang, L, Yang, Z
Medicine. 2016;(42):e4947
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The findings regarding the effects of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients have been inconsistent, and the assessment of different clinical variables for evaluating the effects of TZDs confound a direct comparison of the results of different randomized clinical trials (RCTs), especially with regard to lifestyle changes. In this paper, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to clarify the effects of TZD treatment with and without lifestyle changes on histological markers of NASH and clinical variables related to insulin resistance (IR), hyperlipidemia, and obesity. We searched the literature using the following MeSH terms: "nonalcoholic steatohepatitis," "non-alcoholic steatohepatitis," "thiazolidinedione," "pioglitazone," "rosiglitazone," "randomized," and "clinical trial." Five eligible RCTs were selected, in which patients were treated with either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone, with or without lifestyle changes. We compared the effects of TZD treatment on hepatic fibrosis, lobular inflammation, IR improvement, fasting serum insulin, adiposity, and dyslipidemia between the various studies using fixed and random effects models, and heterogeneity in clinical outcomes was assessed. Significant improvement in hepatic fibrosis did not occur among the patients treated with TZDs alone or in those who underwent both lifestyle changes and TZD therapy. Lobular inflammation decreased in NASH patients who received TZD treatment and in those who underwent both TZD therapy and lifestyle changes. Although TZD treatment resulted in no significant improvement in IR, NASH patients who underwent both lifestyle changes and TZD therapy experienced a significantly greater reduction in their fasting insulin level than that observed in the control patients, whereas patients treated with TZDs alone did not. Although TZD-treated patients experienced significantly greater weight gain than the control patients, TZD treatment had no significant impact on body-mass index, percentage of body fat, or serum levels of cholesterol and triglyceride. Our findings indicate that additional variables should be assessed to obtain a more comprehensive evaluation of the effects of TZD treatment on IR and comorbidity risk factors in NASH patients, and suggest that including lifestyle changes and additional insulin-sensitizing agents in TZD regimens might improve the benefits of TZD therapy for NASH.
-
3.
Medical and Surgical Treatment Options for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
Corey, KE, Rinella, ME
Digestive diseases and sciences. 2016;(5):1387-97
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of liver disease in the USA with a growing prevalence worldwide. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), progressive form of NAFLD, can lead to the development of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and the need for liver transplantation. Treatment of NASH may decrease the risk of progressive disease. Treatment for NAFLD should center around weight loss and exercise. Pharmacotherapy with vitamin E and pioglitazone should be considered for those with NASH, especially those with fibrosis. Weight loss surgery is also an effective treatment for NASH in individuals with other indications for surgery. In this review, we will discuss the currently available therapies for NASH including lifestyle, pharmacologic, and surgical options.
-
4.
Current concepts and management approaches in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Attar, BM, Van Thiel, DH
TheScientificWorldJournal. 2013;:481893
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of liver dysfunction worldwide. NAFLD may progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and in turn cirrhosis. Importantly, hepatic cancer can occur in NASH in the absence of cirrhosis. The cardinal histologic feature of NAFLD is the presence of an excessive accumulation of triacylglycerols and diacylglycerols in hepatocytes. The presence of obesity and insulin resistance lead to an increased hepatic-free fatty acid (FFA) flux creating an environment appropriate for the development of NAFLD. The generation of toxic reactive oxygen species with the production of hepatic injury and inflammation as a consequence of FFA oxidation will ultimately lead to the initiation and progression of fibrosis. Lifestyle modifications specifically weight loss, physical exercise, and cognitive behavior therapy have been recommended as treatments for NASH. Dietary fructose is an independent risk factor for the development of NAFLD. Pioglitazone can be used to treat biopsy-proven NASH; however, its safety risks should be considered carefully. Greater consumption for coffee, independent of its caffeine component, has been associated with a significant reduced risk of advanced fibrosis in NASH. Additional data are needed before recommending bariatric surgery as an established option for the specific treatment of NASH.
-
5.
Selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) modulation as a strategy for safer therapeutic PPARgamma activation.
Higgins, LS, Depaoli, AM
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2010;(1):267S-272S
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) is a clinically validated target for treatment of insulin resistance. PPARgamma activation by full agonists such as thiazolidinediones has shown potent and durable glucose-lowering activity in patients with type 2 diabetes without the concern for hypoglycemia or gastrointestinal toxicities associated with some other medications used to treat this disease. However, thiazolidinediones are linked to safety and tolerability issues such as weight gain, fluid retention, edema, congestive heart failure, and bone fracture. Distinctive properties of PPARgamma provide the opportunity for selective modulation of the receptor such that desirable therapeutic effects may be attained without the unwanted effects of full activation. PPARgamma is a nuclear receptor that forms a complex with coreceptor RXR and a cell type- and cell state-specific array of coregulators to control gene transcription. PPARgamma affinity for these components, and hence transcriptional response, is determined by the conformational changes induced by ligand binding within a complex pocket with multiple interaction points. This molecular mechanism thereby offers the opportunity for selective modulation. A desirable selective PPARgamma modulator profile would include high-affinity interaction with the PPARgamma-binding pocket in a manner that leads to retention of the insulin-sensitizing activity that is characteristic of full agonists as well as mitigation of the effects leading to increased adiposity, fluid retention, congestive heart failure, and bone fracture. Examples of endogenous and synthetic selective PPARgamma modulator (SPPARM) ligands have been identified. SPPARM drug candidates are being tested clinically and provide support for this strategy.
-
6.
PROactive 07: pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: results of the PROactive study.
Erdmann, E, Dormandy, J, Wilcox, R, Massi-Benedetti, M, Charbonnel, B
Vascular health and risk management. 2007;(4):355-70
Abstract
Patients with type 2 diabetes face an increased risk of macrovascular disease compared to those without. Significant reductions in the risk of major cardiovascular events can be achieved with appropriate drug therapy, although patients with type 2 diabetes remain at increased risk compared with non-diabetics. The thiazolidinedione, pioglitazone, is known to offer multiple, potentially antiatherogenic, effects that may have a beneficial impact on macrovascular outcomes, including long-term improvements in insulin resistance (associated with an increased rate of atherosclerosis) and improvement in the atherogenic lipid triad (low HDL-cholesterol, raised triglycerides, and a preponderance of small, dense LDL particles) that is observed in patients with type 2 diabetes. The recent PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events (PROactive) study showed that pioglitazone can reduce the risk of secondary macrovascular events in a high-risk patient population with type 2 diabetes and established macrovascular disease. Here, we summarize the key results from the PROactive study and place them in context with other recent outcome trials in type 2 diabetes.
-
7.
[Towards a tripple oral therapy in the pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes?].
Scheen, AJ
Revue medicale de Liege. 2005;(5-6):414-8
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes is a complex disease combining several disturbances in various organs, especially a defect of insulin secretion by the pancreas, an increased production of glucose by the liver and a reduced insulin-mediated glucose uptake by the skeletal muscle. Each of these abnormalities can be, at least partially, reversed by a specific pharmacological approach, an agent promoting insulin secretion (sulphonylurea, glinide), metformin and a thiazolidinedione (glitazone), respectively. A triple oral therapy with "sulphonylurea (glinide)--metformin--glitazone", targeting simultaneously the three main metabolic abnormalities of type 2 diabetes, deserves special attention. Promising results have been observed in recent clinical trials as far as blood glucose control and some other cardiovascular risk factors are concerned. The precise place of such oral triple therapy remains to be specified, at a late stage to delay the shift to insulin or earlier in the natural history of the disease, to avoid the decline of the number and/or function of beta cells and the resulting metabolic deterioration.