-
1.
The Efficacy of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in the Prevention of Left Atrial Thrombus in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Compared With Vitamin K Antagonists: A Meta-Analysis.
Liu, J, Wu, Y, Li, S, Song, L, Hu, C
The heart surgery forum. 2020;(6):E733-E739
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still a paucity of data on the efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the prevention of left atrial thrombus (LAT) formation before cardioversion or catheter ablation. To assess the efficacy of NOACs in the prevention of LAT in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), we conducted a meta-analysis. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. For meta-analysis, dichotomous variables were analyzed by using the odds ratios (OR) computed using the Mantel Haenszel method (random models). All results were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS A total of 13 studies (one randomized controlled investigation and 12 observational studies) were included in the meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the NOACs and VKAs groups with respect to the odds of LAT/LAAT formations (OR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.52-1.21; P = .29; (I2 = 14%). CONCLUSIONS NOACs were as effective as VKAs in the prevention of LAT/LAAT formation in patients with NVAF. Though patients on NOACs therapy showed a lower incidence of LAT/LAAT formation compared with VKAs, it was not significant (P = .29).
-
2.
New Insights Into the Pathogenesis of Bullous Pemphigoid: 2019 Update.
Genovese, G, Di Zenzo, G, Cozzani, E, Berti, E, Cugno, M, Marzano, AV
Frontiers in immunology. 2019;:1506
Abstract
There are several lines of evidence indicating that the physiopathological bases of bullous pemphigoid (BP), the most common subepidermal autoimmune bullous disease, are hallmarked by the production of autoantibodies directed against the hemidesmosomal anchoring proteins BP180 and BP230. In contrast to the robustness of the latter assumption, the multifaceted complexity of upstream and downstream mechanisms implied in the pathogenesis of BP remains an area of intense speculation. So far, an imbalance between T regulatory cells and autoreactive T helper (Th) cells has been regarded as the main pathogenic factor triggering the autoimmune response in BP patients. However, the contributory role of signaling pathways fostering the B cell stimulation, such as Toll-like receptor activation, as well as that of ancillary inflammatory mechanisms responsible for blister formation, such as Th17 axis stimulation and the activation of the coagulation cascade, are still a matter of debate. In the same way, the pathomechanisms implied in the loss of dermal-epidermal adhesion secondary to autoantibodies binding are not fully understood. Herein, we review in detail the current concepts and controversies on the complex pathogenesis of BP, shedding light on the most recent theories emerging from the literature.
-
3.
Dual versus triple antithrombotic therapy: is there a role for direct oral anticoagulants in arterial thrombosis?
Garcia-Ropero, A, Santos-Gallego, CG, Zafar, MU, Badimon, JJ
Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998). 2019;(3):197-214
Abstract
The number of patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with an additional indication for long-term oral anticoagulation has substantially increased over time. This population is facing an unacceptable risk of bleeding events, particularly among elderly individuals, who are especially vulnerable to complications. Further strategies to minimize this bleeding risk, including various drug combinations, different dosage regimens and even numerous attempts to find the appropriate duration of the treatment, have been evaluated in a multitude of randomized control trials. Moreover, the recent incorporation of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to the therapeutic armamentarium may represent an alternative to treat such patients, since they have demonstrated to be noninferior to the classic vitamin K antagonists and with lower bleeding rates. The aim of this review is to summarize the most recent literature on the use of DOACs in patients with an indication for dual antiplatelet therapy (mostly subjects with coronary artery disease) and also an established indication for chronic anticoagulation (chiefly individuals with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation). The role of DOACs in ischemic heart disease alone is also discussed.
-
4.
[Antithrombotic therapy and digestive endoscopy: a difficult management.].
De Francesco, V, Manta, R, Zullo, A
Recenti progressi in medicina. 2019;(11):535-542
Abstract
Antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet and anticoagulant) is frequently used in clinical practice for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients at risk, such as those with atrial fibrillation or pro-thrombotic conditions. On the other hand, endoscopic investigations on the upper digestive tract (gastroscopy, endoscopic retrograde colangiopancreatography) and lower (colonoscopy) are increasingly performed to prevent, diagnose and treat different diseases of digestive tract. Therefore, it is not uncommon for a patient to undergo endoscopic examination while taking antithrombotic therapy. The pharmacological management of these patients requires a careful balance between the haemorrhagic risk linked to the continuation of therapy and the hemorrhagic risk inherent to the endoscopic procedure, particularly when an operative procedure (polypectomy, sphincterotomy, etc.) is required. Beyond classical anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists, dicumarolici), the so-called "direct-acting anticoagulants" have been recently introduced, and management of these drugs in before an endoscopic examination is different. Since endoscopic procedures are largely scheduled as "open access" directly by general practitioner, she/he is clearly involved in the management of these patients. This review aims to report the recommendations of international guidelines on this field, and to provide some schematic tools for performing a correct management of patients on antithrombotic therapy before gastrointestinal endoscopy.
-
5.
Vitamin K antagonists and emergencies.
Lapostolle, F, Siguret, V, Martin, AC, Pailleret, C, Vigué, B, Zerbib, Y, Tazarourte, K
European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. 2018;(6):378-386
Abstract
The recent emergence of 'non-VKA' oral anticoagulants may have led to some forgetting that vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are by far the most widely prescribed oral anticoagulants worldwide. Consequently, we decided to summarize the information available on them. This paper presents the problems facing emergency physicians confronted with patients on VKAs in 10 points, from pharmacological data to emergency management. Vitamin K antagonists remain preferable in many situations including in the elderly, in patients with extreme body weights, severe chronic kidney or liver disease or valvular heart disease, and in patients taking VKAs with well-controlled international normalized ratios (INRs). Given the way VKAs work, a stable anticoagulant state can only be achieved at the earliest 5 days after starting therapy. The induction phase of VKA treatment is associated with the highest risk of bleeding; validated algorithms based on INR values have to be followed. VKA asymptomatic overdoses and 'non-severe' hemorrhage are managed by omitting a dose or stopping treatment plus administering vitamin K depending on the INR. Major bleeding is managed using a VKA reversal strategy. A prothrombin complex concentrate infusion plus vitamin K is preferred to rapidly achieve an INR of up to 1.5 and maintain a normal coagulation profile. The INR must be measured 30 min after the infusion. Before an invasive procedure, if an INR of less than 1.5 (<1.3 in neurosurgery) is required, it can be achieved by combining prothrombin complex concentrate and vitamin K. A well-codified strategy is essential for managing patients requiring emergency invasive procedures or presenting bleeding complications.
-
6.
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents for primary prevention of thrombosis in individuals with antiphospholipid antibodies.
Bala, MM, Paszek, E, Lesniak, W, Wloch-Kopec, D, Jasinska, K, Undas, A
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018;(7):CD012534
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterised by the presence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies that have prothrombotic activity. Antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with an increased risk of pregnancy complications (recurrent miscarriage, premature birth, intrauterine growth retardation) and thrombotic events (both arterial and venous). The most common thrombotic events include brain ischaemia (stroke or transient ischaemic attack) and deep vein thrombosis. To diagnose APS, the presence of aPL antibodies in two measurements and at least one thrombotic event or pregnancy complication are required. It is unclear if people with positive aPL antibodies but without any previous thrombotic events should receive primary antithrombotic prophylaxis. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents versus placebo or no intervention or other intervention on the development of thrombosis in people with aPL antibodies who have not had a thrombotic event. We did not address obstetric outcomes in this review as these have been thoroughly addressed by other Cochrane Reviews. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register (4 December 2017), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (last search 29 November 2017), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, CINAHL, and AMED (searched 4 December 2017), and trials registries (searched 29 November 2017). We also checked reference lists of included studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines, and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, or their combinations, at any dose and mode of delivery with placebo, no intervention, or other intervention. We also included RCTs that compared antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents with each other or that compared two different doses of the same drug. We included studies performed in people of any age and with no history of thrombosis (as defined by APS Sapporo classification criteria or updated Sydney classification criteria), but with aPL antibodies confirmed on at last two separate measurements. The studies included both pregnant women who tested positive for aPL antibodies and had a history of recurrent obstetric complications, as well as non-pregnancy related cases with positive screening for antibodies, in accordance with the criteria mentioned above. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Pairs of authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies and quality of evidence using GRADE. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion or by consulting a third review author when necessary. In addition, one review author checked all the extracted numerical data. MAIN RESULTS We included nine studies involving 1044 randomised participants. The studies took place in several countries and had different funding sources. No study was at low risk of bias in all domains. We classified all included studies as at unclear or high risk of bias in two or more domains. Seven included studies focused mainly on obstetric outcomes. One study included non-pregnancy-related cases, and one study included both pregnancy-related cases and other patients with positive results for aPL antibodies. The remaining studies concerned women with aPL antibodies and a history of pregnancy failure. Four studies compared anticoagulant with or without acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) versus ASA only and observed no clear difference in thrombosis risk (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 3.77; 4 studies; 493 participants; low-quality evidence). No major bleeding was reported, but minor bleeding risk (nasal bleeding, menorrhagia) was higher in the anticoagulant with ASA group as compared with ASA alone in one study (RR 22.45, 95% CI 1.34 to 374.81; 1 study; 164 participants; low-quality evidence). In one study ASA was compared with placebo, and there were no clear differences in thrombosis (RR 5.21, 95% CI 0.63 to 42.97; 1 study; 98 participants; low-quality evidence) or minor bleeding risk between the groups (RR 3.13, 95% CI 0.34 to 29.01; 1 study; 98 participants; low-quality evidence), and no major bleeding was observed. Two studies compared ASA with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus placebo or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and no thrombotic events were observed in any of the groups. Moreover, there were no clear differences in the risk of bleeding requiring transfusion (RR 9.0, 95% CI 0.49 to 164.76; 1 study; 180 participants; moderate-quality evidence) or postpartum bleeding (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.81; 1 study; 180 participants; moderate-quality evidence) between the groups. Two studies compared ASA with high-dose LMWH versus ASA with low-dose LMWF or unfractionated heparin (UFH); no thrombotic events or major bleeding was reported. Mortality and quality of life data were not reported for any of the comparisons. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate benefit or harm of using anticoagulants with or without ASA versus ASA alone in people with aPL antibodies and a history of recurrent pregnancy loss and with no such history; ASA versus placebo in people with aPL antibodies; and ASA with LMWH versus placebo or IVIG, and ASA with high-dose LMWH versus ASA with low-dose LMWH or UFH, in women with aPL antibodies and a history of recurrent pregnancy loss, for the primary prevention of thrombotic events. In a mixed population of people with a history of previous pregnancy loss and without such a history treated with anticoagulant combined with ASA, the incidence of minor bleeding (nasal bleeding, menorrhagia) was increased when compared with ASA alone. Studies that are adequately powered and that focus mainly on thrombotic events are needed to draw any firm conclusions on the primary prevention of thrombotic events in people with antiphospholipid antibodies.
-
7.
Hemostasis in the Very Young.
Kenet, G, Barg, AA, Nowak-Göttl, U
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis. 2018;(7):617-623
Abstract
Hemostasis is a dynamic process that starts in utero. The coagulation system evolves with age, as evidenced by marked physiological differences in the concentration of the majority of hemostatic proteins in early life compared with adulthood. This concept, known as "developmental hemostasis," has important biological and clinical implications. Overall, impaired platelet function, along with physiologically reduced levels of vitamin K-dependent and contact coagulation factors, may cause poorer clot firmness even in healthy neonates. However, increased activity of von Willebrand factor and low levels of coagulation inhibitors that promote hemostasis counterbalance the delicate and immature hemostatic system. Since this hemostatic system has little reserve capacity, preterm neonates or sick infants are extremely vulnerable and predisposed to either hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications. This review will address the concept and manifestations of developmental hemostasis with respect to clinical disease phenotypes. It will discuss bleeding diagnosis in neonates, dealing especially with the devastating complications of intracerebral and pulmonary hemorrhage in preterm infants. Neonates, especially the sickest preterm ones, are also extremely susceptible to thrombotic complications; thus, thrombosis in neonates will be reviewed, with special focus on arterial ischemic perinatal stroke. Based on the concept of developmental hemostasis, the phenotypes of clinically relevant bleeding or thrombotic disorders among neonates may differ from those of older infants and children. Treatment options for these conditions will be suggested and reviewed.
-
8.
A new assay for global fibrinolysis capacity (GFC): Investigating a critical system regulating hemostasis and thrombosis and other extravascular functions.
Amiral, J, Laroche, M, Seghatchian, J
Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis. 2018;(1):118-126
Abstract
For many years, the importance of fibrinolysis has been recognized, first for its intravascular antithrombotic action, and more recently for its many extravascular activities, associated with matrix degradation and tissue remodeling. In the blood circulation system, fibrinolysis prevents thrombosis, and is associated with various biological and clinical situations: risk factors for cardio-vascular diseases in high risk clinical situations (type II diabetes, hypertension, triglycerides, high BMI, elevated glucose, etc.), probably resulting from a significant reduction of the fibrinolysis potential, and elevation of PAI-1. Noteworthy, t-PA is mainly present as an inactive complex with PAI-1, and its concentration in plasma tends to follow that of PAI-1, but in a lesser extent. Hypofibrinolysis can favor the occurrence of thrombotic events, and possibly other biological dysfunctions. Fibrinolysis activity is however difficult to evaluate as it has a delayed activity after clot formation, is initiated and regulated after fibrin generation, and conversely to clotting, its action is delayed (long lag phase) and slow, before being dramatically amplified leading to rapid clot dissolution. We have designed a new assay for evaluating the global fibrinolytic capacity (GFC) in the body. Reagents are used in association with a specific instrument, which can be connected to any computer, and dedicated software is used for analyzing clot lysis kinetics. The assay is performed in a micro-cuvette, introduced into one of the instrument wells at 37 °C, and light transmittance is continuously measured. Assayed plasma is first supplemented with a limited and constant amount of t-PA with silica and is then clotted with thrombin and calcium. Clot dissolution (measurement of turbidity change) is recorded over time using the dedicated instrument (Lysis Timer), and clot lysis kinetics are analyzed with the associated software: primary and secondary derivatives of the light transmission curve give information on kinetics and completion of clot dissolution. Total assay time is about 1 h (but in the presence of hypofibrinolysis it can be prolonged). The concentration of t-PA used for the assay has been adjusted (100 ng/ml) to obtain an optimal sensitivity to hypofibrinolysis within a short time interval, and clot dissolution occurs within about 45 min for normal individuals, with a broad range from 30 min to 60 min, with some samples presenting a clot dissolution time >60 min (hypofibrinolysis). This new assay is performed with the tested plasma intrinsic factors, especially its own fibrinogen, and only exogeneous t-PA is added. GFC is highly sensitive to PAI-1 activity, but other factors regulating fibrinolysis contribute to the clot dissolution kinetics. Freshly prepared or frozen and thawed citrated plasma can be used. The usefulness of this assay for clinical applications is under investigation. Although fibrinolysis is mainly initiated in the body upon stimulation or blood clotting, and rapidly diluted and inhibited in the circulation, evaluation of its "residual" activity in plasma is expected to reflect its global body potential.
-
9.
Thrombosis of atypical location: how to treat patients in the era of direct oral anticoagulants?
Mimier, MK, Janczak, DT, McBane, RD, Houghton, DE, Wysokinski, WE
Polish archives of internal medicine. 2018;(10):604-608
Abstract
In 4% of cases, venous thromboembolism (VTE) involves organ‑related venous territories such as splanchnic, renal, gonadal, and cerebral venous segments, and is often called venous thromboembolism of atypical location (VTE‑AL). Recommendations regarding the method, intensity, and duration of anticoagulant therapy for VTE‑AL are not well established. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been a promising alternative to vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of acute VTE. However, all major clinical trials on DOACs excluded patients with VTE‑AL. Therefore, data on the use of DOACs in patients with VTE‑AL are still limited to case reports and small clinical series, with a relative predominance of publications on splanchnic vein thrombosis including mesenteric, splenic, portal, and hepatic vein thrombosis. The only randomized clinical trial comparing a clinical outcome of patients with acute portal vein thrombosis randomized to either rivaroxaban or warfarin treatment yielded significantly impaired results due to the use of an atypical rivaroxaban dose. A prospective registration of clinical outcome for DOACs used in patients with VTE‑AL, in those with VTE of typical location, and in those with VTE‑AL treated with enoxaparin showed similar VTE recurrence and major bleeding rates in all 3 groups. High cancer prevalence, typical for VTE‑AL, significantly impacted survival as well as VTE recurrence rates and major bleeding outcomes in this study. In general, although still limited, the results for DOAC use in VTE‑AL are encouraging and we do not hesitate to use DOACs, particularly rivaroxaban or apixaban, in selected patients with VTE‑AL.
-
10.
Antithrombotic medications in dialysis patients: a double-edged sword.
Vlachopanos, G, Ghalli, FG
Journal of evidence-based medicine. 2017;(1):53-60
Abstract
In the clinical context of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), thrombosis and bleeding risks are simultaneously increased and may have devastating consequences. While anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs are indispensable for the prevention of thromboembolic events, the significantly higher bleeding risk makes their handling extremely complicated. In ESRD, they are frequently administered for a wide array of conditions. For example, atrial fibrillation is quite common in ESRD and warrants the use of anticoagulants like warfarin. Unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparins are typically used for clotting prevention in the hemodialysis extracorporeal circuit. The antithrombotics use dilemma has worsened because ESRD patients have been excluded from major clinical trials that defined standard indications, contraindications and optimal management of these medications. That limits our knowledge and results in that the process of decision-making depends on weaker data. Besides the substantial bleeding risk, warfarin may also increase cardiovascular risk because it is implicated in the pathogenesis of vascular calcifications in ESRD. The present article attempts to offer a comprehensive overview of practical considerations for the use of the most common antithrombotic medications in ESRD linking them, at the same time, to the best available evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies.