-
1.
Early life gut microbiota profiles linked to synbiotic formula effects: a randomized clinical trial in European infants.
Lagkouvardos, I, Intze, E, Schaubeck, M, Rooney, JP, Hecht, C, Piloquet, H, Clavel, T
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2023;117(2):326-339
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Microbial colonisation of the intestine after birth is a central event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Although improvement of hygienic conditions reduces infant mortality due to infections, environments with low microbial biomass counteract natural colonisation by commensal microbes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) on faecal microbiota. This study was a multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind intervention trial which enrolled 540 infants. Infants whose parents had chosen not to breastfeed or were not able to breastfeed prior to study inclusion were allocated randomly to 1 of 2 formula groups (n = 230 control formula, n = 230 IF). The infants in the breastfed reference group (n = 80) were mainly fed human milk. Results showed that synbiotic intervention influenced the gut microbiota and milieu parameters during early life to resemble some major characteristics found in breastfed infants (higher relative abundances of bifidobacteria, lower richness, lower faecal pH and butyrate concentrations), and effects depended on the ecosystem profile of the infants. Authors conclude that specific randomised, controlled studies that focus on infants born by Caesarean section and how early nutrition can support the beneficial development of their microbiota are needed.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Infant gut colonisation differs in vaginal versus cesarean section deliveries and between breastfed and infant formula practices.
- Both enriched strain-specific probiotic and standard infant formula were shown to have a marked effect on microbiota colonisation in infants at age 4 months.
- By the age of 2 years, however, there is no significant difference between breastfed and formula fed infants.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This randomised controlled intervention study compared gut health parameters with the use of a synbiotic pre- and probiotic strain enriched infant formula with human milk and standard formula at three intervals over a period of 2 years.
Methods
This was a double-blinded controlled study of 540 infants from France and Belgium. Participants were randomly allocated to 2 formula groups (n = 230 Control Formula (CF), n = 230 Intervention Formula (IF)) and the breastfed reference group (n = 80) as well as delivery mode (Cesarean and vaginal delivery). The synbiotic IF was a standard infant formula enriched with prebiotic GOS (0.02 g/g) and the probiotic strain L. fermentum CECT5716 (at least 1.0 × 106 cfu/g).
Stool analysis was conducted at three time intervals, 4, 12, and 24 months (infant age). Biomarkers included short chain fatty acids, pH, secretory IgA, calprotectin, and various bacterial phyla via microbiota analysis.
Results
- At 4 months, the IF group tested higher for Bifidobacterium spp., and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives compared to CF. They also had lower fecal pH and butyrate levels
- Both the formula cohorts had lower SigA and more basic pH values than the human milk cohort, as well as higher prevalence of anaerobes belonging to the bacterial genera Akkermansia, Collinsella, and Faecalibacterium.
- By age 24 months, the IF cohort exhibited increased levels of Akkermansia, Escherichia-Shigella, and R.gnavus. However there were no significant differences between the formula fed and human milk cohort at this time interval.
- The differences observed at 4 months disappeared over time, except for a significantly higher relative abundance of bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium spp. in IF infants at 12 months compared with CF infants.
Conclusion:
Although prominent differences between the cohorts were observed at 4 months, it appears that by the age of 2 years, there is little observable difference. This is most likely due to gut ecosystem maturation. The paper draws attention to the fact that changes to microbiota following treatment were more pronounced in infants who tested lower in occurrences of Bacteroides spp at age 4 months. Of note is the prevalence of cesarean birth deliveries in this cohort thereby indicating potential improved alternative feeding options when breastfeeding is not possible for these infants.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic L.fermentum and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharide enriched infant formula appears to the improve infant microbiome, when compared to that of breastfed infants.
- The most receptive infants were those born via cesarean section.
Limitations to consider:
- The sample groups were from France and Belgium, with no indication as to culture, socio-economic, or sex distribution.
- The two infant formula groups were n=230 each with only 80 infants in the breastfed reference group.
- There was no indication of maternal diet practices pre-, during, and post- pregnancy.
- Stool samples were not collected from the infants at baseline visit prior to formula intervention.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include more diverse cultural and socio-economic cohorts to ascertain the potential influence of parental diet in baseline infant microbiome.
- It is imperative to establish what role solid food choices, generally introduced at 6 months, might have on gut ecosystem maturation.
- It would be useful to have a larger cesarean section birth cohort to compare to vaginal deliveries for more definitive results.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract after birth is an essential event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Therefore, it is important to investigate strategies to positively modulate colonization in early life. OBJECTIVES This randomized, controlled intervention study included 540 infants to investigate the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) containing Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 and galacto-oligosaccharides on the fecal microbiome. METHODS The fecal microbiota from infants was analyzed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing at 4, 12, and 24 months of age. Metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids) and other milieu parameters (e.g., pH, humidity, and IgA) were also measured in stool samples. RESULTS Microbiota profiles changed with age, with major differences in diversity and composition. Significant effects of the synbiotic IF compared with control formula (CF) were visible at month 4, including higher occurrence of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives. This was accompanied by lower fecal pH and concentrations of butyrate. After de novo clustering at 4 months of age, overall phylogenetic profiles of the infants receiving IF were closer to reference profiles of those fed with human milk than infants fed CF. The changes owing to IF were associated with fecal microbiota states characterized by lower occurrence of Bacteroides compared with higher levels of Firmicutes (valid name Bacillota), Proteobacteria (valid name Pseudomonadota), and Bifidobacterium at 4 months of age. These microbiota states were linked to higher prevalence of infants born by Cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS The synbiotic intervention influenced fecal microbiota and milieu parameters at an early age depending on the overall microbiota profiles of the infants, sharing a few similarities with breastfed infants. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02221687.
-
2.
Functional response to a microbial synbiotic in the gastrointestinal system of children: a randomized clinical trial.
Tierney, BT, Versalovic, J, Fasano, A, Petrosino, JF, Chumpitazi, BP, Mayer, EA, Boetes, J, Smits, G, Parkar, SG, Voreades, N, et al
Pediatric research. 2023;93(7):2005-2013
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The composition of the human gut microbiome has been identified as playing a role in regulating bowel movements in children. This includes functional constipation, which is characterised by infrequent bowel movements and associated phenotypes such as stool consistency, pain when defecating and bloating. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a nine-strain (eight species) synbiotic (a prebiotic and defined microbial consortium) formulation (with the prebiotic comprising mixed-chain length oligosaccharides) on ameliorating constipation. This study was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, and placebo-controlled with two parallel arms. Ninety-one healthy male/female subjects were recruited and randomly assigned to one of the two arms; treatment or placebo group. Results showed that: - compared to placebo, synbiotic use increased weekly bowel movements (WBMs) in constipated children. - there was an increased abundance of the administered probiotic species (bifidobacteria) in the treatment arm. - baseline microbial richness demonstrated potential as a predictive biomarker for response to intervention. Authors conclude that a synbiotic formulation may increase weekly WBMs in children who have low-frequency WBMs.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral microbial therapy has been studied as an intervention for a range of gastrointestinal disorders. Though research suggests that microbial exposure may affect the gastrointestinal system, motility, and host immunity in a pediatric population, data have been inconsistent, with most prior studies being in neither a randomized nor placebo-controlled setting. The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy of a synbiotic on increasing weekly bowel movements (WBMs) in constipated children. METHODS Sixty-four children (3-17 years of age) were randomized to receive a synbiotic (n = 33) comprising mixed-chain length oligosaccharides and nine microbial strains, or placebo (n = 31) for 84 days. Stool microbiota was analyzed on samples collected at baseline and completion. The primary outcome was a change from baseline of WBMs in the treatment group compared to placebo. RESULTS Treatment increased (p < 0.05) the number of WBMs in children with low baseline WBMs, despite broadly distinctive baseline microbiome signatures. Sequencing revealed that low baseline microbial richness in the treatment group significantly anticipated improvements in constipation (p = 0.00074). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest the potential for (i) multi-species-synbiotic interventions to improve digestive health in a pediatric population and (ii) bioinformatics-based methods to predict response to microbial interventions in children. IMPACT Synbiotic microbial treatment improved the number of spontaneous weekly bowel movements in children compared to placebo. Intervention induced an increased abundance of bifidobacteria in children, compared to placebo. All administered probiotic species were enriched in the gut microbiome of the intervention group compared to placebo. Baseline microbial richness demonstrated potential as a predictive biomarker for response to intervention.
-
3.
The Role of Genetically Engineered Probiotics for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.
Zhang, T, Zhang, J, Duan, L
Nutrients. 2023;15(7)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), largely classified as Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic intestinal inflammatory disorder mediated by genetic, immune, microbial, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to summarise the efficacy of different genetically modified probiotics compared to wild-type probiotics in the treatment of IBD in animal models and patients and to investigate the specific effects and main mechanisms involved. This study was a systematic review of forty-five preclinical studies and one clinical study. Results showed a protective effect of genetically modified organisms (gm) probiotics in colitis. Several protective mechanisms have been identified: reduction of the pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in colonic tissue and plasma, modulation of the activity of oxidative stress in the colon, improvement of intestinal barrier integrity, modulation of the diversity and composition of gut microbiota, and production of favourable metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids, by beneficial bacteria. Authors concluded that gm probiotics are more effective and safer than wild-type probiotics, to facilitate clinical translation.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Conclusions of this review were largely based on mouse models and although treatment using probiotics is generally considered safe in humans, with only minor side-effects (flatulence), practitioners need to be aware that in an IBD population the use of GM formulations might not be completely without risk.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This paper summarises the efficacy of specific genetically modified (GM) probiotic formulations for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) when compared to wild type probiotics. The aim was to ascertain what specific effects and mechanisms such probiotics have on IBD symptomatology.
Methods
- A total of 46 published articles were included; 45 mouse experimental models (induced acute or chronic colitis) (n=15-130) and 1 human IBD population clinical trial (n=10)
- The effect of GM probiotics were compared to placebo and wild-type probiotics in trials including preclinical studies, randomised controlled trials and cohort studies
- Animals received probiotics via gastric gavage (105 - 4 x 1012 CFU) for 3-6 weeks
- The human placebo-uncontrolled trial lasted 7 days and patients received 10 GM capsules of L.lactis (1 x 1010 CFU) twice daily.
Results
- GM probiotics that secrete immunoregulatory cytokines such as IL-10 appear to reduce intestinal damage
- The human trial using GM L.lactis resulted in 5 patients who went into complete clinical remission (CDAI, <150) with 3 patients exhibiting a clinical response (decrease in CDAI, >70). with only minor adverse events (flatulence)
- However, human cytokines that promote intestinal barrier function and epithelial restitution were not enhanced with oral administration of probiotics
- Two studies concluded that GM L.lactis and S.boulardii, that secrete atrial natriuretic peptide, might be the most effective options in supporting colitis
- GM L.casei resulted in faster recovery from weight loss in acute colitis models
- Superoxide dismutase (SOD) producing GM L.fermentum increased SOD activity by almost eightfold compared to the wild type
- GM Lact. fermentum furthermore showed a higher survival rate and lower disease activity index (P <0·05) in colitis models
- GM L.lactis improved gut microbial composition and GM S.cerevisiae improved microbial diversity whilst reducing the Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio
- GM E.coli significantly reduced weight loss, colon shortening plus lower disease activity and histological changes (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Despite the heterogeneity of the trials, GM probiotics appear to play a notable part in ameliorating IBD symptomatology and disease severity when compared to wild-type probiotics. Human efficacy and potential adverse effects require more in-depth trials to ascertain safety and optimal dosages.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotics species used in the trials included S.thermophilus, E.coli, L.lactis, B.ovatus, S.boulardii, L.fermentum, B.longhum, L.casei, L.plantarum, and S.cerevisiae. Wild-types of some of these are already available to use in clinical practice
- Note that oral administration in the human trial showed no significant health outcome, therefore efficacy and safety need to be ascertained on an individual patient level
- Colonisation of beneficial bacteria in the gut of IBD patients might be difficult and any form of supplementation therefore needs to be closely monitored.
Considerations for future research:
- More evidence is needed to demonstrate that GM probiotic formulations result in significantly improved outcomes when compared to wild-types
- Future randomised placebo-controlled trials need to include larger cohorts to determine supplement efficacy
- Longer periods of intervention are needed to confirm efficacy, safety, and tolerance for both Crohn’s Disease and Colitis
- Optimal GM probiotic formulation, doses, and means of application need to be identified.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many preclinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of genetically modified probiotics (gm probiotics) in animal models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). OBJECTIVE This systematic review was performed to investigate the role of gm probiotics in treating IBD and to clarify the involved mechanisms. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Medline were searched from their inception to 18 September 2022 to identify preclinical and clinical studies exploring the efficacy of gm probiotics in IBD animal models or IBD patients. Two independent researchers extracted data from the included studies, and the data were pooled by the type of study; that is, preclinical or clinical. RESULTS Forty-five preclinical studies were included. In these studies, sodium dextran sulfate and trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid were used to induce colitis. Eleven probiotic species have been genetically modified to produce therapeutic substances, including IL-10, antimicrobial peptides, antioxidant enzymes, and short-chain fatty acids, with potential therapeutic properties against colitis. The results showed generally positive effects of gm probiotics in reducing disease activity and ameliorating intestinal damage in IBD models; however, the efficacy of gm probiotics compared to that of wild-type probiotics in many studies was unclear. The main mechanisms identified include modulation of the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota, production of regulatory metabolites by beneficial bacteria, reduction of the pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in colonic tissue and plasma, modulation of oxidative stress activity in the colon, and improvement of intestinal barrier integrity. Moreover, only one clinical trial with 10 patients with Crohn's disease was included, which showed that L. lactis producing IL-10 was safe, and a decrease in disease activity was observed in these patients. CONCLUSIONS Gm probiotics have a certain efficacy in colitis models through several mechanisms. However, given the scarcity of clinical trials, it is important for researchers to pay more attention to gm probiotics that are more effective and safer than wild-type probiotics to facilitate further clinical translation.
-
4.
The role of gut microbiome in inflammatory skin disorders: A systematic review.
Widhiati, S, Purnomosari, D, Wibawa, T, Soebono, H
Dermatology reports. 2022;14(1):9188
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gut-skin axis refers to the complex cross-talk between gut bacteria and skin. Although the exact mechanism underlying chronic inflammatory skin conditions is unknown, imbalances in the composition of gut microbes are believed to play a role. Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review to assess whether gut microbial imbalance may contribute to inflammatory skin conditions such as Psoriasis, Acne Vulgaris, Atopic Dermatitis, and Urticaria. According to this systematic review, immune stimulation, inflammation, and disruption of bacterial composition are common mechanisms in all these skin disorders. A western diet and environmental exposures are found to be contributing to the disruption of bacteria and the pathology of these skin disorders. It has been observed that friendly gut bacteria such as Bifidobacterium are reduced in people with inflammatory skin conditions, whereas elevated levels of pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli and Proteobacteria are present in the gut of patients with inflammatory skin conditions. The abundance of anti-inflammatory bacteria such as Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Clostridium leptum, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium may protect against inflammatory skin conditions. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the pathogenesis behind inflammatory skin conditions as well as the involvement of gut bacteria in the development and progression of the disease. Healthcare professionals can gain a deeper understanding of gut bacteria that contribute to the pathology of inflammatory diseases as well as how clinically using anti-inflammatory bacterial species may improve the condition of individuals suffering from inflammatory skin conditions.
Abstract
The close relationship between the intestine and the skin has been widely stated, seen from gastrointestinal (GI) disorders often accompanied by skin manifestations. Exactly how the gut microbiome is related to skin inflammation and influences the pathophysiology mechanism of skin disorders are still unclear. Many studies have shown a two-way relationship between gut and skin associated with GI health and skin homeostasis and allostasis. This systematic review aimed to explore the associations between the gut microbiome with inflammatory skin disorders, such as acne, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and urticaria, and to discover the advanced concept of this relationship. The literature search was limited to any articles published up to December 2020 using PubMed and EBSCOHost. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines for conducting a systematic review. Of the 319 articles screened based on title and abstract, 111 articles underwent full-text screening. Of these, 23 articles met our inclusion criteria, comprising 13 atopic dermatitis (AD), three psoriasis, four acne vulgaris, and four chronic urticaria articles. Acne vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and chronic urticaria are inflammation skin disorders that were studied recently to ascertain the relationship of these disorders with dysbiosis of the GI microbiome. All acne vulgaris, psoriasis, and chronic urticaria studies stated the association of gut microbiome with skin manifestations. However, the results in atopic dermatitis are still conflicting. Most of the articles agree that Bifidobacterium plays an essential role as anti-inflammation bacteria, and Proteobacteria and Enterobacteria impact inflammation in inflammatory skin disorders.
-
5.
Intestinal Microbial Composition of Children in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Probiotics to Treat Acute Gastroenteritis.
Horne, RG, Freedman, SB, Johnson-Henry, KC, Pang, XL, Lee, BE, Farion, KJ, Gouin, S, Schuh, S, Poonai, N, Hurley, KF, et al
Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2022;12:883163
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
During the first few years of life the diversity of the gut microbiome increases with increasing age. Many factors influence the colonisation after birth and during infancy. There are some studies that have looked at the use of probiotics as a treatment for gastrointestinal distresses in children with some success. These studies however focus on the outcome. They do not consider the differences in gut microbiota in children and do not look at individual responses to probiotics. The purpose of this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was to understand the effect of a probiotic treatment on children under 4 years old admitted to the emergency department of hospital with acute diarrhea. 70 children were included (30 in the probiotic group, 32 placebo). Stool analyses were done on admission (day 0), then 5 days after administration of a probiotic or placebo and then again at day 28. The results showed that participants younger than 1 year had lower bacterial diversity than older children. The age of the child is a dominant factor in determining the overall diversity of the gut microbiome. Probiotic treatment for 5 days did not alter the composition of the gut microbiota. However, there was lower diversity in the presence of enteric bacterial pathogens; in particular, with C. difficile in stool samples. This study highlights that base line measurements should be included and that age is a key factor when designing future studies of this kind.
Abstract
UNLABELLED Compositional analysis of the intestinal microbiome in pre-schoolers is understudied. Effects of probiotics on the gut microbiota were evaluated in children under 4-years-old presenting to an emergency department with acute gastroenteritis. Included were 70 study participants (n=32 placebo, n=38 probiotics) with stool specimens at baseline (day 0), day 5, and after a washout period (day 28). Microbiota composition and deduced functions were profiled using 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and predictive metagenomics, respectively. Probiotics were detected at day 5 of administration but otherwise had no discernable effects, whereas detection of bacterial infection (P<0.001) and participant age (P<0.001) had the largest effects on microbiota composition, microbial diversity, and deduced bacterial functions. Participants under 1 year had lower bacterial diversity than older aged pre-schoolers; compositional changes of individual bacterial taxa were associated with maturation of the gut microbiota. Advances in age were associated with differences in gut microbiota composition and deduced microbial functions, which have the potential to impact health later in life. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01853124.
-
6.
Interaction of cervical microbiome with epigenome of epithelial cells: Significance of inflammation to primary healthcare.
Holubekova, V, Kolkova, Z, Kasubova, I, Samec, M, Mazurakova, A, Koklesova, L, Kubatka, P, Rokos, T, Kozubik, E, Biringer, K, et al
Biomolecular concepts. 2022;13(1):61-80
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A female health is one medical area of the framework strategies in predictive, preventive, and personalized (3P) medicine. Cervical cancer is preventable and successfully treatable at early stages that makes the disease as an ideal candidate applicable in the context of 3P medicine. The aim of this study was to examine the interaction of the cervical microbiome with epithelial cells in relation to inflammation, and to assess direct evidence of epigenetic changes related to the cervical microbiome. This study is a systematic review of publications in the field of cervical cancer research. This review shows that: - cervical cancer screening in future integration of precision cancer prevention regimes should match an individual’s risk of cancer in context with genomic and environmental factors. - identification of microbiome population might be one of the key aspects of precision medicine in the future. Microbial composition may early identify the potential risk of precancerous lesion formation or permanent bacterial vaginosis. - the composition of the microbiome can be influenced by dietary composition, which will also affect the epigenetic background of the microbiome. However, food forms the microbiome through epigenetic mechanisms, and it is thus necessary to clarify how cancer risk is increased due to food-related microbially produced metabolites. - an examination of the metabolites during inflammation of the cervical epithelium and bacterial vaginosis may improve the precise identification of inflammatory-induced biomarkers that could aid in the precision medicine in prediction of the risk of cervical dysplasia development. - cancer-associated inflammation pathways can be influenced by phytochemicals with anti-inflammatory effects on immune cells, suppression of proinflammatory transcription factors, cytokines, and chemokines. The biological balance between uncontrolled chronic inflammation and controlled inflammation is essential for cancer prevention, prediction, and prognostication. Authors conclude that their review highlighted the pivotal contribution of cervical microbiome, epigenetic changes, and inflammation to the formation of cervical intraepithelial lesion and progression to cervical cancer.
Abstract
One pillar of the predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine framework strategies is the female health. The evaluation of women's lifestyle and dietary habits in context with genetic and modifiable risk factors may reflect the prevention of cervical cancer before the occurrence of clinical symptoms and prediction of cervical lesion behavior. The main aim of this review is to analyze publications in the field of precision medicine that allow the use of research knowledge of cervical microbiome, epigenetic modifications, and inflammation in potential application in clinical practice. Personalized approach in evaluating patient's risk of future development of cervical abnormality should consider the biomarkers of the local microenvironment characterized by the microbial composition, epigenetic pattern of cervical epithelium, and presence of chronic inflammation. Novel sequencing techniques enable a more detailed characterization of actual state in cervical epithelium. Better understanding of all changes in multiomics level enables a better assessment of disease prognosis and selects the eligible targeted therapy in personalized medicine. Restoring of healthy vaginal microflora and reversing the outbreak of cervical abnormality can be also achieved by dietary habits as well as uptake of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, microbial transplantation, and others.
-
7.
Association of vaginal bacterial communities and reproductive outcomes with prophylactic antibiotic exposure in a subfertile population undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective exploratory study.
Eskew, AM, Stout, MJ, Bedrick, BS, Riley, JK, Herter, BN, Gula, H, Jungheim, ES, Wylie, KM
F&S science. 2021;2(1):71-79
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Approximately 1 in 8 couples receive infertility services in their lifetime. However, despite the increasing usage of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) technologies, the success rate, as measured using live birth rates, is just <50% in women <35 years of age. A low-diversity, Lactobacillus-dominated microbiome in the female reproductive tract has been thought to be a sign of optimal reproductive health, whereas an increased microbial diversity has been shown to be associated with poorer reproductive outcomes. The aims of this study were to (a) explore the effect of prophylactic azithromycin treatment on the vaginal bacterial microbiome longitudinally throughout an IVF cycle and (b) determine whether the characteristics of the vaginal bacterial communities are associated with clinical outcomes. This study is an a priori prospective exploratory cohort study conducted as a part of an ongoing randomized, controlled noninferiority trial. Subjects in the parent trial were randomly assigned to an azithromycin group or no-azithromycin group. The female subjects of the parent trial who were aged between 18–43 years and undergoing the first IVF cycle with a fresh embryo transfer were eligible for this study (n=27). Results show that in vaginal microbiome samples taken at the time of egg retrieval and embryo transfer, changes in the taxonomic composition, alpha diversity, and beta diversity are not associated with azithromycin [antibiotic] exposure at the time of gonadotropin initiation. Furthermore, bacterial community structures at baseline are not predictive of those at the time of embryo transfer. Authors conclude that their findings highlight the importance of timing in the assessment of vaginal microbiome to determine its associations with reproductive outcomes.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether prophylactic azithromycin is associated with the vaginal bacterial microbiome and clinical outcomes in subfertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN Prospective exploratory cohort study. SETTING Single academic fertility center. PATIENTS Subfertile women aged 18-43 years undergoing their first IVF cycle and fresh embryo transfer. INTERVENTION Primary exposure to prophylactic azithromycin (1 g orally) once at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the effect of azithromycin on the vaginal microbiome compared with a no-azithromycin group at 3 time points throughout the IVF cycle (baseline, retrieval, and embryo transfer). The secondary outcomes were associations of vaginal bacterial communities with clinical outcomes. RESULTS A planned a priori exploratory cohort of 27 subjects (12 in the azithromycin treatment group and 15 in the no-azithromycin group) contributed 79 vaginal swabs for the analysis as part of an ongoing randomized, controlled noninferiority trial. No specific taxa were associated with azithromycin or pregnancy at any time point. Azithromycin did not affect alpha diversity or community stability. Although there were trends of a lower bacterial load and higher percentage of Lactobacillus species in the azithromycin group at the time of transfer, these were not statistically significant. In women who did not become pregnant, the percentage of Lactobacillus species was lower (P = .048; Hodges-Lehmann estimate of difference, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.65) and the change in community composition over time was higher. The percentage of Lactobacillus species at baseline was not predictive of the percentage of Lactobacillus species at the time of embryo transfer. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic azithromycin at baseline is not associated with changes in vaginal bacterial communities. Bacterial community features at the time of embryo transfer are associated with pregnancy. Bacterial community structures at baseline are not predictive of those at the time of embryo transfer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03386227.
-
8.
Tenth year reenrollment randomized trial investigating the effects of childhood probiotics and calcium supplementation on height and weight at adolescence.
Setiawan, EA, Rianda, D, Kadim, M, Meilianawati, Susanto, F, Kok, FJ, Shankar, AH, Agustina, R
Scientific reports. 2021;11(1):11860
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In combination, probiotics and calcium may help to support gut health and aid growth in early life. This 10 year follow up of 238 children from a previous randomised control trial aimed to determine the long-term effects of probiotic and calcium supplementation on growth during adolescence. The use of probiotics and calcium had no effect on changes in height, weight, or body mass for age. When more analyses were performed the use of Lactobacillus casei was shown to influence changes in body mass for age but only in females. Interestingly those in the probiotic group had poorer gut health than those who were not supplemented. It was concluded that in females, the use of probiotics and calcium during early life may decrease the risk of obesity later in life due to improved body mass. However, this warrants further research. This study could be used by health care professionals to understand that the use of probiotics and calcium in early life may have long-term benefits such as risk reduction of metabolic diseases.
Abstract
Microbiota and its modification with specific probiotics in early life could provide long term health benefits. Probiotics and calcium strengthen intestinal integrity and may support linear growth. This study investigated the long-term effects of childhood probiotics and calcium supplementation on growth in adolescence. We re-enrolled 238 adolescents aged 11-18 years from 494 children 10-years after 6-months of supplementation with either low-lactose milk fortified with low levels of calcium (LC, ∼50 mg/day, n = 53/124), with regular levels of calcium (RC, ∼440 mg/day, n = 70/126), or with regular calcium + 5 x 108 CFU/day Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 (Reuteri, n = 55/124), or regular calcium + 5 x 108 CFU/day L. casei CRL 431 (Casei, n = 60/120). Changes in height-for-age z-score (HAZ) and body mass index-for-age z-score (BMIZ) were determined from the end of intervention to re-enrollment. General linear models were used to assess the effects on HAZ and BMIZ of group, gender, living area, maternal education, family income, physical activity, diet quality, nutritional status, and gut integrity as determined by urinary lactulose/mannitol ratio (L:M). Adolescent mean age was 15.3 years, mean HAZ was - 1.11, mean BMIZ was - 0.2 and median L:M (n = 155) was 0.23. Changes in HAZ and BMIZ were not significantly different between Casei, Reuteri, LC compared to RC. However, a significant decrease in BMIZ was observed among female adolescents in the Casei compared to RC group (- 0.5 SD, 95% CI - 0.8 to - 0.003, p = 0.048). Childhood probiotic and calcium supplementation may therefore selectively affect female adolescents.Clinical trial registration: This follow-up study has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov , Registry name: Rina Agustina, Registration number: NCT04046289, First Registration Date 06/08/19. web link: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04046289 .
-
9.
Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Children: A State-Of-The-Art Review.
Avelar Rodriguez, D, Ryan, PM, Toro Monjaraz, EM, Ramirez Mayans, JA, Quigley, EM
Frontiers in pediatrics. 2019;7:363
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) occurs when microorganisms overpopulate the small intestine and is characterised by gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and flatulence. This review focuses on paediatric SIBO, known to be increasing, with emphasis on the impact on gut microbiota. The gut microbiota is influenced by several factors including genetics, vaginal delivery, exercise and diet. SIBO in children has been studied in the context of stunting, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), obesity, and related to use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This review analysed 149 studies published since 2000 through till May 2019 with the aim of presenting the most up-to-date information. Risk factors included gastric acids and medications which suppress this activity, intestinal motility disturbances leading to bacterial overgrowth, anatomical anomalies where there is an absence of one or more intestinal valves, and poor socioeconomic status and diet. The review concluded that the recommended diagnosis is by methane and hydrogen breath testing and that Gold Standard treatment is antibiotic ‘rifaximin’ at 1,200 mg/d, reduced to 600 mg/d for 1 week in children. Alternative treatments discussed include FODMAP diets and probiotic protocols with best results coming from combining antibiotic and probiotic protocols. It concludes that SIBO in children is heterogenous and poorly understood and that a better diagnostic criteria is necessary in paediatrics.
Abstract
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a heterogenous and poorly understood entity characterised by an excessive growth of select microorganisms within the small intestine. This excessive bacterial biomass, in turn, disrupts host physiology in a myriad of ways, leading to gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal symptoms and complications. SIBO is a common cause of non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms in children, such as chronic abdominal pain, abdominal distention, diarrhoea, and flatulence, amongst others. In addition, it has recently been implicated in the pathophysiology of stunting, a disease that affects millions of children worldwide. Risk factors such as acid-suppressive therapies, alterations in gastrointestinal motility and anatomy, as well as impoverished conditions, have been shown to predispose children to SIBO. SIBO can be diagnosed via culture-dependant or culture-independent approaches. SIBO's epidemiology is limited due to the lack of uniformity and consensus of its diagnostic criteria, as well as the paucity of literature available. Antibiotics remain the first-line treatment option for SIBO, although emerging modalities such as probiotics and diet manipulation could also have a role. Herein, we present a state-of-the-art-review which aims to comprehensively outline the most current information on SIBO in children, with particular emphasis on the gut microbiota.
-
10.
Fecal Microbiome and Food Allergy in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.
Fieten, KB, Totté, JEE, Levin, E, Reyman, M, Meijer, Y, Knulst, A, Schuren, F, Pasmans, SGMA
International archives of allergy and immunology. 2018;175(1-2):77-84
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Atopic diseases, such as atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma and rhinitis, are on the increase worldwide. Exposure to microbes may be important in the development of an atopic disease. Specifically, reduced early-life exposure is thought to be a contributing factor because microbial colonisation of the intestines during infancy plays a crucial role in the maturation of the immune system. AD, also called eczema, is an inflammatory skin disease often seen in small children. Food allergies are common in children with AD, the most common allergens being eggs, cow’s milk, peanuts, soy and wheat. This cross-sectional observational pilot study with 82 young children with a diagnosis of AD set out to identify distinct microbial patterns in the children’s faecal microbiomes associated with a clinical diagnosis of food allergy. Stool and blood samples were collected for a microbiome analysis and IgE antibody measurement, respectively. 20 children had a confirmed food allergy (most commonly to cow’s milk and peanuts), while almost half of the children without a diagnosed food allergy were sensitised to common food allergens after a food challenge. The study identified a faecal microbial signature in children with AD that differentiates between the presence and absence of food allergy. Children with AD and food allergy had more Escherichia coli and Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum species and less Bifidobacterium breve, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Akkermansia muciniphila species than children without food allergy. The authors concluded that the study supports a hypothesis that the intestinal microbiome differs in children with AD, depending on whether they have a food allergy or not. They call for future studies to confirm these findings.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exposure to microbes may be important in the development of atopic disease. Atopic diseases have been associated with specific characteristics of the intestinal microbiome. The link between intestinal microbiota and food allergy has rarely been studied, and the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy (double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge [DBPCFC]) has seldom been used. We aimed to distinguish fecal microbial signatures for food allergy in children with atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS Pediatric patients with AD, with and without food allergy, were included in this cross-sectional observational pilot study. AD was diagnosed according to the UK Working Party criteria. Food allergy was defined as a positive DBPCFC or a convincing clinical history, in combination with sensitization to the relevant food allergen. Fecal samples were analyzed using 16S rRNA microbial analysis. Microbial signature species, discriminating between the presence and absence food allergy, were selected by elastic net regression. RESULTS Eighty-two children with AD (39 girls) with a median age of 2.5 years, and 20 of whom were diagnosed with food allergy, provided fecal samples. Food allergy to peanut and cow's milk was the most common. Six bacterial species from the fecal microbiome were identified, that, when combined, distinguished between children with and without food allergy: Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Escherichia coli, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and Akkermansia muciniphila (AUC 0.83, sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.80). CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study, we identified a microbial signature in children with AD that discriminates between the absence and presence of food allergy. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings.