1.
The impact of diabetes mellitus type 1 on male fertility: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Facondo, P, Di Lodovico, E, Delbarba, A, Anelli, V, Pezzaioli, LC, Filippini, E, Cappelli, C, Corona, G, Ferlin, A
Andrology. 2022;10(3):426-440
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus and male hypogonadism is well known, whereas the impact of type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) on male fertility and testis functions has been less studied. The aim of this study was to systematically review and discuss the available evidence evaluating paternity rate, male gonadal axis, and sperm parameters in men with DM1. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of fourteen studies. Results show: - reduced fertility potential in patients with DM1, as they have a lower number of children compared with unaffected population. In fact, the rate of children is statistically significantly lower among men who had been diagnosed with DM1 at an earlier age, according to a longer duration of the disease. - that men with DM1, compared with controls, have significantly lower normal sperm morphology, progressive motility and a trend toward a reduced semen volume, without difference in total sperm count and concentration. Authors conclude that DM1 might impair reproductive health at different levels, including functional sperm alterations definitively leading to reduced fertility rate in these patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some evidence suggests that diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) could affect male fertility, gonadal axis, semen parameters, and spermatogenesis because of effects of hyperglycemia and insulin deficiency. Anyhow, the exact impact of DM1 on male fertility is unclear. OBJECTIVES To review the studies evaluating paternity rate, male gonadal axis, and semen parameters in men with DM1. MATERIALS AND METHODS A review of relevant literature from January 1980 to December 2020 was performed. Only studies published in English reporting data on fatherhood (rate of children by natural fertility), hormonal and seminal parameters were included. Out of 14 retrieved articles, the eight studies evaluating semen parameters were meta-analyzed. RESULTS The rate of children (four studies) was lower than controls among men affected by DM1, especially in men with a longer duration of disease. The data of gonadal hormonal profile in DM1 men (six studies) are very heterogeneous and a neutral effect of DM1 or a condition of subclinical hypogonadism could not be concluded. Meta-analysis showed that men with DM1 (n = 380), compared with controls (n = 434), have significantly lower normal sperm morphology [-0.36% (-0.66; -0.06), p < 0.05, six studies] and sperm progressive motility [33.62% (-39.13; -28.11), p < 0.001, two studies] and a trend toward a lower seminal volume [-0.51 (-1.03; 0.02), p = 0.06, eight studies], without difference in total sperm count and concentration. Data on scrotal ultrasound and sperm DNA fragmentation are too few. No study evaluated other factors of male infertility, such as transrectal ultrasound, semen infections, sperm auto-antibodies, and retrograde ejaculation. DISCUSSION DM1 might impair male fertility and testis functions (endocrine, spermatogenesis), but definition of its actual impact needs further studies. CONCLUSION Men with DM1 should be evaluated with a complete hormonal, seminal, and ultrasound workup to better define their fertility potential and need for follow up of testis functions.
2.
Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: a summary review of meta-analytical studies.
Maisonneuve, P, Lowenfels, AB
International journal of epidemiology. 2015;44(1):186-98
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the four or five most common causes of cancer mortality in developed countries. The aim of this review was to summarize results from pooled analyses and meta-analyses to estimate the fraction of PCs attributable to many different risk factors. A comprehensive review of the literature was carried out by searching for meta-analytical studies on the association between specific risk factors and PC risk or multiple cancer sites. Results indicate that PC has a multifactorial aetiology. All identified factors can be combined into a specific aetiological (the philosophy or study of causation) pathway for PC. The main pathways include insulin resistance (central adiposity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome), inflammation (tobacco, alcohol, pancreatitis), DNA damage (tobacco, red meat) and haemostasis (blood group, history of thrombosis). Authors conclude that about two-thirds of the major risk factors associated with PC are potentially modifiable, affording a unique opportunity for preventing one of our deadliest cancers.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aetiology of pancreatic cancer (PC) has been extensively studied and is the subject of numerous meta-analyses and pooled analyses. We have summarized results from these pooled and meta-analytical studies to estimate the fraction of PCs attributable to each of the identified risk factors. METHODS Using a comprehensive strategy, we retrieved 117 meta-analytical or pooled reports dealing with the association between specific risk factors and PC risk. We combined estimates of relative risk and estimates of exposure to calculate the fraction of PCs caused or prevented by a particular exposure. RESULTS Tobacco smoking ('strong' evidence) and Helicobacter pylori infection ('moderate' evidence) are the major risk factors associated with PC, with respective estimated population attributable fractions of 11-32% and 4-25%. The major protective factors are history of allergy ('strong' evidence) and increasing fruit or folate intake ('moderate' evidence), with respective population preventable fractions of 3-7% and 0-12%. CONCLUSIONS We summarized results of 117 meta-analytical or pooled data reports dealing with 37 aetiological exposures, to obtain robust information about the suspected causes of PC. By combining these estimates with their prevalences in the population, we calculated population attributable or population preventable fractions. About two-thirds of the major risk factors associated with PC are potentially modifiable, affording a unique opportunity for preventing one of our deadliest cancers.