0
selected
-
1.
Effects of a Raisin Supplement on Cognitive Performance, Quality of Life, and Functional Activities in Healthy Older Adults-Randomized Clinical Trial.
Rodrigo-Gonzalo, MJ, González-Manzano, S, Pablos-Hernández, MC, Méndez-Sánchez, R, Ayuda Duran, B, González-Sánchez, J, Barbero-Iglesias, F, González-Paramás, AM, Recio-Rodríguez, JI
Nutrients. 2023;15(12)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The regular intake of foods rich in polyphenols shows many biological activities, such as antioxidant, cardioprotective, anti-inflammation and anti-aging properties. This diversity of compounds found in grapes, especially red grapes, makes it a candidate for testing the role of dietary polyphenols to health. The objective of this single blinded randomised controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of consuming 50g of Málaga muscatel raisins which are dried grapes on cognitive performance, quality of life, and functional activities in healthy adults over 70 years. According to the researchers this is the first study looking at the effect of raisins on cognitive performance. A group of 80 participants were split into two groups with one group adding 50g of raisins a day to their usual diet for six months and a control group of 40 patients receiving no raisins. Cognitive performance was measured by various tests which are summarised in the full text article. The results of this study showed that the supplement of 50 g of raisins slightly improved cognitive performance including spatial orientation, memory and comprehension, reading, writing, and drawing. In addition to a slight improvement in quality of life and functional activities. This shows promising results and that the addition of raisins to the diet along with a variety of foods rich in polyphenols can confer positive health benefits that can prevent age related cognitive decline. More research is needed to know exactly the mechanism of action of polyphenols on cognitive performance.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of consuming 50 g of raisins on cognitive performance, quality of life, and functional activities in healthy older adults. This is a parallel randomized controlled clinical trial, in which 80 subjects over 70 years of age participated. For 6 months, the intervention group (IG; n = 40) consumed 50 g of raisins per day added to their usual diet, whereas the control group (CG; n = 40) received no supplement. All variables were measured at baseline and at 6 months. Cognitive performance assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) test shows a difference of 3.27 points (95% CI 1.59 to 4.96), p ≤ 0.001, favorable to the IG, after the intervention. Among the cognitive performances, an improvement is observed in the IG in orientation, assessed both with the MOCA test 0.49 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.87), p = 0.014, and with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) test, 0.36 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.70), p = 0.038. In visuospatial/executive capacity and in language, improvements were also observed in the IG, 1.36 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.95), p = 0.001, and 0.54 points (95% CI 0.12 to 0.96), p = 0.014, respectively. Immediate and delayed recall, assessed with the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, improved in the IG. In addition, the IG showed a better quality of life and greater autonomy in instrumental activities of daily living after 6 months. No significant changes were observed in the rest of the variables analyzed. Therefore, the consumption of 50 g of raisins produces a slight improvement in cognitive performance, quality of life, and functional activities in the elderly.
-
2.
Association of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Diagnosis With Adolescent Quality of Life.
Kazda, L, McGeechan, K, Bell, K, Thomas, R, Barratt, A
JAMA network open. 2022;5(10):e2236364
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is “a persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that interferes with functioning…and negatively impacts…social and academic activities”. This negative effect can extend beyond activities directly impacted by hyperactive or inattentive (H/I) behaviours, thus affecting overall quality of life (QOL). The aim of this study was to investigate whether an ADHD diagnosis in childhood or early adolescence is associated with improved QOL in adolescents compared with well-matched individuals without diagnosis. This study is a cohort study which followed an emulated target trial design using prospective, observational data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. Results show that children diagnosed with ADHD reported similar or poorer QOL at age 14 to 15 years compared with children who had grown up experiencing the same levels of H/I behaviours but had not been given an ADHD diagnosis. Furthermore, an ADHD diagnosis did have some negative associations, including an increase in risk of self-harm. Authors conclude that their findings raise important questions about the long-term effectiveness and safety of diagnosing children and adolescents with ADHD, especially for those with low-risk or borderline H/I behaviours.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Appropriate diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can improve some short-term outcomes in children and adolescents, but little is known about the association of a diagnosis with their quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVE To compare QOL in adolescents with and without an ADHD diagnosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study followed an emulated target trial design using prospective, observational data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, a representative, population-based prospective cohort study with biennial data collection from 2006 to 2018 with 8 years of follow-up (ages 6-7 to 14-15 years). Propensity score matching was used to ensure children with and without ADHD diagnosis were well matched on a wide range of variables, including hyperactive/inattentive (H/I) behaviors. Eligible children were born in 1999 to 2000 or 2003 to 2004 and did not have a previous ADHD diagnosis. All incident ADHD cases were matched with controls. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to January 2022. EXPOSURES Incident parent-reported ADHD diagnosis at age 6 to 7, 8 to 9, 10 to 11, 12 to 13, or 14 to 15. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Quality of life at age 14 to 15 was measured with Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) and 8 other prespecified, self-reported measures mapped to the World Health Organization's QOL domains. Pooled regression models were fitted for each outcome, with 95% CIs and P values calculated using bootstrapping to account for matching and repeat observations. RESULTS Of 8643 eligible children, a total of 393 adolescents had an ADHD diagnosis (284 [72.2%] boys; mean [SD] age, 10.03 [0.30] years; mean [SD] H/I Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire score, 5.05 [2.29]) and were age-, sex-, and H/I score-matched with 393 adolescents without ADHD diagnosis at time zero. Compared with adolescents without diagnosis, those with an ADHD diagnosis reported similar QOL on CHU9D (mean difference, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.01; P = .10), general health (mean difference, 0.11; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.27; P = .15), happiness (mean difference, -0.18; 95% CI, -0.37 to 0.00; P = .05), and peer trust (mean difference, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.00 to 1.30; P = .05). Diagnosed adolescents had worse psychological sense of school membership (mean difference, -2.58; 95% CI, -1.13 to -4.06; P < .001), academic self-concept (mean difference, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.02 to -0.26; P = .02), and self-efficacy (mean difference, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.05 to -0.33; P = .007); displayed more negative social behaviors (mean difference, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.55 to 2.66; P = .002); and were more likely to harm themselves (odds ratio, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.49 to 4.37; P < .001) than adolescents without diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, ADHD diagnosis was not associated with any self-reported improvements in adolescents' QOL compared with adolescents with similar levels of H/I behaviors but no ADHD diagnosis. ADHD diagnosis was associated with worse scores in some outcomes, including significantly increased risk of self-harm. A large, randomized clinical trial with long-term follow-up is needed.
-
3.
Effect of a Multidomain Lifestyle Intervention on Estimated Dementia Risk.
Solomon, A, Handels, R, Wimo, A, Antikainen, R, Laatikainen, T, Levälahti, E, Peltonen, M, Soininen, H, Strandberg, T, Tuomilehto, J, et al
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. 2021;82(4):1461-1466
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Early identification of individuals at-risk of dementia is essential for effective preventive strategies. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a multidomain lifestyle intervention on the risk of dementia. This study is a post-hoc analyses of intervention effects on change in the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE) Dementia Risk Score. The CAIDE score was used to select at-risk participants to the FINGER trial. FINGER is a multicentre study conducted in 6 centres in Finland. Results show a significant beneficial intervention effect, especially in women, on reducing estimated dementia risk measured by the CAIDE score. Authors conclude that CAIDE risk score can be used as a tool to communicate dementia risk, and to select persons that may benefit from lifestyle interventions.
Abstract
We investigated the effect of a multidomain lifestyle intervention on the risk of dementia estimated using the validated CAIDE risk score (post-hoc analysis). The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) is a 2-year randomized controlled trial among 1,260 at-risk older adults (60-77 years). Difference in the estimated mean change in CAIDE score at 2 years in the intervention compared to the control group was -0.16 (95 %CI -0.31 to 0.00) (p = 0.013), corresponding to a relative dementia risk reduction between 6.04-6.50%. This could be interpreted as a reflection of the prevention potential of the intervention.
-
4.
Predictors of weight stigma experienced by middle-older aged, general-practice patients with obesity in disadvantaged areas of Australia: a cross-sectional study.
Spooner, C, Jayasinghe, UW, Faruqi, N, Stocks, N, Harris, MF
BMC public health. 2018;18(1):640
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
People in higher categories of obesity are at substantially increased health risk because mortality increases sharply as body mass index rises above 30. In addition to physical health risks, people with obesity commonly experience weight-related stigma. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of perceived weight stigma among patients with obesity attending general practices in socioeconomically disadvantaged urban areas of Australia. This is a cross-sectional study for which data from telephone interviews with patients with obesity were used. Patients were recruited from 17 general practices in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas of Sydney and Adelaide. Results indicate that one-third of the sample had experienced direct forms of weight discrimination in the week before being interviewed. Furthermore, weight discrimination was more likely to be experienced by patients in higher obesity categories, who were not employed, who spoke a language other than English at home and who had lower scores on the Health Literacy Questionnaire domain (that measures the ability to actively engage with healthcare providers). Authors conclude that weight stigma may compound other forms of social disadvantage. Thus, strategies are needed to address weight stigma at the individual, system and population levels and to educate primary care providers to be more alert to the needs of their patients with obesity.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rates of obesity have increased globally and weight stigma is commonly experienced by people with obesity. Feeling stigmatised because of one's weight can be a barrier to healthy eating, physical activity and to seeking help for weight management. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of perceived weight among middle-older aged patients with obesity attending general practices in socioeconomically disadvantaged urban areas of Australia. METHODS As part of a randomised clinical trial in Australia, telephone interviews were conducted with 120 patients from 17 general practices in socioeconomically disadvantaged of Sydney and Adelaide. Patients were aged 40-70 years with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. The interviews included questions relating to socio-demographic variables (e.g. gender, language spoken at home), experiences of weight-related discrimination, and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Multi-level logistic regression data analysis was undertaken to examine predictors of recent experiences of weight-related discrimination ("weight stigma"). RESULTS The multi-level model showed that weight stigma was positively associated with obesity category 2 (BMI = 35 to < 40; OR 4.47 (95% CI 1.03 to 19.40)) and obesity category 3 (BMI = ≥ 40; OR 27.06 (95% CI 4.85 to 150.95)), not being employed (OR 7.70 (95% CI 2.17 to 27.25)), non-English speaking backgrounds (OR 5.74 (95% CI 1.35 to 24.45)) and negatively associated with the HLQ domain: ability to actively engage with healthcare providers (OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.28)). There was no association between weight stigma and gender, age, education or the other HLQ domains examined. CONCLUSIONS Weight stigma disproportionately affected the patients with obesity most in need of support to manage their weight: those with more severe obesity, from non-English speaking backgrounds and who were not in employment. Additionally, those who had experienced weight stigma were less able to actively engage with healthcare providers further compounding their disadvantage. This suggests the need for a more proactive approach to identify weight stigma by healthcare providers. Addressing weight stigma at the individual, system and population levels is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered with the Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN126400102162 .
-
5.
The impact of financial incentives on participants' food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial.
Olstad, DL, Crawford, DA, Abbott, G, McNaughton, SA, Le, HN, Ni Mhurchu, C, Pollard, C, Ball, K
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2017;14(1):115
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Food prices are a key driver of food purchasing behaviours, and The Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf) study has shown that price discounts on healthier foods can increase their purchase. The aim of this study was to quantify whether participants in the SHELf study switched to study supermarkets for purchasing their FV during the intervention because of the discounted price. 642 participants completed self-reported surveys on the proportion of FV purchased at the study supermarket at baseline, 3 months and 6 months post intervention. This study found that it is likely that participants switched supermarket choice during the intervention to purchase their FV from the study supermarkets. The authors conclude that unless food-purchasing data are available from all sources, differential changes in purchasing patterns can make it difficult to discern the effectiveness of nutrition interventions.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impacts of supermarket-based nutrition promotion interventions might be overestimated if participants shift their proportionate food purchasing away from their usual stores. This study quantified whether participants who received price discounts on fruits and vegetables (FV) in the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf) randomized controlled trial (RCT) shifted their FV purchasing into study supermarkets during the intervention period. METHODS Participants were 642 females randomly assigned to a 1) skill-building (n = 160), 2) price reduction (n = 161), 3) combined skill-building and price reduction (n = 160), or 4) control (n = 161) group. Participants self-reported the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at baseline, 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Fisher's exact and χ2 tests assessed differences among groups in the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at each time point. Multinomial logistic regression assessed differences among groups in the change in proportionate FV purchasing over time. RESULTS Post-intervention, 49% of participants purchased ≥50% of their FV in study supermarkets. Compared to all other groups, the price reduction group was approximately twice as likely (RRR: 1.8-2.2) to have increased proportionate purchasing of FV in study supermarkets from baseline to post-intervention (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Participants who received price reductions on FV were approximately twice as likely to shift their FV purchasing from other stores into study supermarkets during the intervention period. Unless food purchasing data are available for all sources, differential changes in purchasing patterns can make it difficult to discern the true impacts of nutrition interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION The SHELf trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials Registration ISRCTN39432901, Registered 30 June 2010, Retrospectively registered ( http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39432901 ).