-
1.
Sociodemographic and lifestyle-related risk factors for identifying vulnerable groups for type 2 diabetes: a narrative review with emphasis on data from Europe.
Kyrou, I, Tsigos, C, Mavrogianni, C, Cardon, G, Van Stappen, V, Latomme, J, Kivelä, J, Wikström, K, Tsochev, K, Nanasi, A, et al
BMC endocrine disorders. 2020;20(Suppl 1):134
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) results from progressive loss of insulin secretion, which is typically combined with various degrees of insulin resistance. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of key sociodemographic and lifestyle-related risk factors for identifying vulnerable groups for T2DM with emphasis on data from Europe. This study is a narrative review which includes 101 publications. Literature shows that prevention of T2DM should be a collaborative effort which mobilizes multiple partners/ stakeholders at a national and international (e.g. European) level. In addition, a holistic approach is becoming increasingly essential in order to put into effect multidimensional public health programs and integrated interventions for effective T2DM prevention which will take into account both traditional and socioeconomic/socioecological factors. Authors conclude that a multidimensional approach for the prevention of T2DM may have a broader impact against the current diabesity epidemic within and across countries in Europe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) comprises the vast majority of all diabetes cases in adults, with alarmingly increasing prevalence over the past few decades worldwide. A particularly heavy healthcare burden of diabetes is noted in Europe, where 8.8% of the population aged 20-79 years is estimated to have diabetes according to the International Diabetes Federation. Multiple risk factors are implicated in the pathogenesis of T2DM with complex underlying interplay and intricate gene-environment interactions. Thus, intense research has been focused on studying the role of T2DM risk factors and on identifying vulnerable groups for T2DM in the general population which can then be targeted for prevention interventions. METHODS For this narrative review, we conducted a comprehensive search of the existing literature on T2DM risk factors, focusing on studies in adult cohorts from European countries which were published in English after January 2000. RESULTS Multiple lifestyle-related and sociodemographic factors were identified as related to high T2DM risk, including age, ethnicity, family history, low socioeconomic status, obesity, metabolic syndrome and each of its components, as well as certain unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. As Europe has an increasingly aging population, multiple migrant and ethnic minority groups and significant socioeconomic diversity both within and across different countries, this review focuses not only on modifiable T2DM risk factors, but also on the impact of pertinent demographic and socioeconomic factors. CONCLUSION In addition to other T2DM risk factors, low socioeconomic status can significantly increase the risk for prediabetes and T2DM, but is often overlooked. In multinational and multicultural regions such as Europe, a holistic approach, which will take into account both traditional and socioeconomic/socioecological factors, is becoming increasingly crucial in order to implement multidimensional public health programs and integrated community-based interventions for effective T2DM prevention.
-
2.
The COVID-19 Pandemic: a Call to Action to Identify and Address Racial and Ethnic Disparities.
Laurencin, CT, McClinton, A
Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities. 2020;7(3):398-402
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus was first identified in late 2019 in Wuhan, China. Various unsubstantiated reports emerged declaring that the genetic constitution of Blacks or even the presence of melanin rendered Blacks immune to the virus. This study is a call of action which reviews preliminary data on race and ethnicity in the peer-reviewed literature for citizens in America affected by COVID-19. Findings demonstrate that communities of colour (Blacks) have a higher rate of infection and death in comparison to their population percentage in the state of Connecticut. However, authors are unable to draw conclusions since race and ethnicity data is missing and the data in this paper is the earliest data available. Therefore, the authors call for action to identify and address racial and ethnic health disparities in the COVID-19 crisis.
Abstract
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted and devastated the world. As the infection spreads, the projected mortality and economic devastation are unprecedented. In particular, racial and ethnic minorities may be at a particular disadvantage as many already assume the status of a marginalized group. Black Americans have a long-standing history of disadvantage and are in a vulnerable position to experience the impact of this crisis and the myth of Black immunity to COVID-19 is detrimental to promoting and maintaining preventative measures. We are the first to present the earliest available data in the peer-reviewed literature on the racial and ethnic distribution of COVID-19-confirmed cases and fatalities in the state of Connecticut. We also seek to explode the myth of Black immunity to the virus. Finally, we call for a National Commission on COVID-19 Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities to further explore and respond to the unique challenges that the crisis presents for Black and Brown communities.
-
3.
Greater risk of severe COVID-19 in Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic populations is not explained by cardiometabolic, socioeconomic or behavioural factors, or by 25(OH)-vitamin D status: study of 1326 cases from the UK Biobank.
Raisi-Estabragh, Z, McCracken, C, Bethell, MS, Cooper, J, Cooper, C, Caulfield, MJ, Munroe, PB, Harvey, NC, Petersen, SE
Journal of public health (Oxford, England). 2020;42(3):451-460
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has to date resulted in over 6 million cases. Growing reports highlight men and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) cohorts as at higher risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether differential patterns of COVID-19 incidence and severity, by sex and ethnicity, might be explained by cardiometabolic, socio-economic, lifestyle and behavioural exposures. This study is a prospective cohort study of over half a million men and women from across the UK. Results showed that male sex, BAME ethnicity, higher body mass index and greater household size were associated with significantly greater odds of a positive result. However, the sex and ethnicity differential pattern of COVID-19 is not adequately explained by variations in cardiometabolic factors, 25(OH)-vitamin D levels, socio-economic or behavioural factors. Authors conclude that investigation of alternative biological and genetic susceptibilities as well as more comprehensive assessment of the complex economic, social and behavioural differences should be prioritised.
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined whether the greater severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) amongst men and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) individuals is explained by cardiometabolic, socio-economic or behavioural factors. METHODS We studied 4510 UK Biobank participants tested for COVID-19 (positive, n = 1326). Multivariate logistic regression models including age, sex and ethnicity were used to test whether addition of (1) cardiometabolic factors [diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol, prior myocardial infarction, smoking and body mass index (BMI)]; (2) 25(OH)-vitamin D; (3) poor diet; (4) Townsend deprivation score; (5) housing (home type, overcrowding) or (6) behavioural factors (sociability, risk taking) attenuated sex/ethnicity associations with COVID-19 status. RESULTS There was over-representation of men and BAME ethnicities in the COVID-19 positive group. BAME individuals had, on average, poorer cardiometabolic profile, lower 25(OH)-vitamin D, greater material deprivation, and were more likely to live in larger households and in flats/apartments. Male sex, BAME ethnicity, higher BMI, higher Townsend deprivation score and household overcrowding were independently associated with significantly greater odds of COVID-19. The pattern of association was consistent for men and women; cardiometabolic, socio-demographic and behavioural factors did not attenuate sex/ethnicity associations. CONCLUSIONS In this study, sex and ethnicity differential pattern of COVID-19 was not adequately explained by variations in cardiometabolic factors, 25(OH)-vitamin D levels or socio-economic factors. Factors which underlie ethnic differences in COVID-19 may not be easily captured, and so investigation of alternative biological and genetic susceptibilities as well as more comprehensive assessment of the complex economic, social and behavioural differences should be prioritised.
-
4.
COVID-19: Exposing and addressing health disparities among ethnic minorities and migrants.
Greenaway, C, Hargreaves, S, Barkati, S, Coyle, CM, Gobbi, F, Veizis, A, Douglas, P
Journal of travel medicine. 2020;27(7)
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has swept across the world affecting all countries. As COVID-19 has spread within countries, vulnerable and marginalized populations, and those with low income and low socioeconomic status have been unduly affected. Every country has vulnerable populations that require special attention from policy makers in their response to the current pandemic. In fact, current literature shows that migrants living in refugee camps, detention centres and reception centres are at particularly high risk for COVID-19 exposure. Therefore, they should be included in national surveillance and be entitled to health care. In addition, it is essential to foster trust between public health practitioners and the leadership of these communities so that they may work together to effectively deliver prevention and intervention strategies. Authors conclude that COVID-19 pandemic has exposed health disparities among ethnic minorities and certain migrant groups. Thus, they highlight the importance of prompting greater health equity for diverse ethnocultural communities.
-
5.
COVID-19: Unique public health issues facing Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities.
Abuelgasim, E, Saw, LJ, Shirke, M, Zeinah, M, Harky, A
Current problems in cardiology. 2020;45(8):100621
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19), is a public health emergency with serious adverse implications for populations, healthcare systems, and economies globally. The aim of this review was to explore the possible association between ethnicity, incidence and outcomes of COVID-19 using both recent COVID-19 studies and studies of previous pandemics. Findings show that: - ethnic minorities have lower lung function compared to their Caucasian counterparts. - Black, Asian and Minority Ethnics communities are prone to higher rates of cardiovascular disease and are subject to adverse healthcare disparities. - ethnic minorities are disproportionately affected, and experience worse health outcomes compared to other groups. They are also more likely to be socioeconomically disadvantaged compared to white communities. - Africans are at a higher risk of receiving later and more indigent healthcare compared to other ethnic groups. Authors conclude that data on ethnicity should be routinely collected by governments to robustly determine magnitude of association. In addition, governments should also recommend strategies to mitigate risks on minority ethnicities due to socioeconomic disadvantages.
Abstract
The 2019 coronavirus disease is a serious public health emergency, with serious adverse implications for populations, healthcare systems, and economies globally. Recently, concerns have been raised about possible association between ethnicity, incidence and outcomes of COVID-19 arisen from early government data. In this review, we will explore the possible association using both recent COVID-19 studies and studies of previous pandemics. We call for data on ethnicity to be routinely collected by governments, as part of an international collaboration, alongside other patient demographics and further research to robustly determine the magnitude of association. Moreover, governments must learn from previous pandemics and recommended strategies to mitigate risks on minority ethnicities due to socioeconomic disadvantages.
-
6.
Laboratory features of severe vs. non-severe COVID-19 patients in Asian populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ghahramani, S, Tabrizi, R, Lankarani, KB, Kashani, SMA, Rezaei, S, Zeidi, N, Akbari, M, Heydari, ST, Akbari, H, Nowrouzi-Sohrabi, P, et al
European journal of medical research. 2020;25(1):30
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak started in December 2019 in China has spread sharply all over the world. Apart from the clinical symptoms and pulmonary computed tomography findings, a large number of COVID-19 confirmed patients showed laboratory fluctuations. The aim of this study was to quantify the results of previously published studies, comparing the laboratory fluctuations, and some new combined inflammatory laboratory tests in severe/critical versus non-severe confirmed infected cases of COVID-19. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis which included 22 studies with a total of 3396 patients who were classed into two groups: 720 in severe and 2676 in non-severe groups. Results showed that the results of complete blood count test, liver and kidney function tests, inflammatory/infection markers, serum electrolytes and glucose were significantly different between severe and non-severe cases of COVID-19. In fact, there was significant decreased levels of certain types of white blood cells (lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil), haemoglobin, and platelet, whereas elevated neutrophil [white blood cell] counts among the complete blood count indices in severe vs. non-severe patients. Authors conclude that further well-methodologically designed studies from other populations are strongly recommended.
Abstract
BACKGROUND More severe cases of COVID- 19 are more likely to be hospitalized and around one-fifth, needing ICU admission. Understanding the common laboratory features of COVID-19 in more severe cases versus non-severe patients could be quite useful for clinicians and might help to predict the model of disease progression. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the laboratory test findings in severe vs. non-severe confirmed infected cases of COVID-19. METHODS Electronic databases were systematically searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from the beginning of 2019 to 3rd of March 2020. Heterogeneity across included studies was determined using Cochrane's Q test and the I2 statistic. We used the fixed or random-effect models to pool the weighted mean differences (WMDs) or standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). FINDINGS Out of a total of 3009 citations, 17 articles (22 studies, 21 from China and one study from Singapore) with 3396 ranging from 12 to1099 patients were included. Our meta-analyses showed a significant decrease in lymphocyte, monocyte, and eosinophil, hemoglobin, platelet, albumin, serum sodium, lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), leukocyte to C-reactive protein ratio (LeCR), leukocyte to IL-6 ratio (LeIR), and an increase in the neutrophil, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), fibrinogen, prothrombin time (PT), D-dimer, glucose level, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the severe group compared with the non-severe group. No significant changes in white blood cells (WBC), Creatine Kinase (CK), troponin I, myoglobin, IL-6 and K between the two groups were observed. INTERPRETATION This meta-analysis provides evidence for the differentiation of severe cases of COVID-19 based on laboratory test results at the time of ICU admission. Future well-methodologically designed studies from other populations are strongly recommended.
-
7.
The role of cytokine profile and lymphocyte subsets in the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Akbari, H, Tabrizi, R, Lankarani, KB, Aria, H, Vakili, S, Asadian, F, Noroozi, S, Keshavarz, P, Faramarz, S
Life sciences. 2020;258:118167
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Literature shows that lymphopenia [reduced level of the blood cell lymphocyte] and cytokine release syndrome are among the characteristics caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) - the new infectious Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The main aims of this study were (a) to analyse the different characteristics of cytokine levels, lymphocyte subsets, complete blood count (CBC) indices, and a number of infection-related factors between mild/moderate and severe/critical patients, and (b) to screen out suitable indicators for the prediction of the disease severity in order to provide some insight into the subsequent clinical interventions. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis of 50 studies (44 articles) with a total of 7865 patients including 2286 in the severe group and 5579 in the non-severe group. Results demonstrated a significant lymphopenia in severe/critical infected cases compared to mild/moderate COVID-19 ones across 46 studies. The severity of COVID-19 has also a significant, positive association with a number of infection related factors (such as C-reactive protein) and ferritin levels. Moreover, with respect to CBC indices, the findings revealed significantly higher levels in white blood cells and neutrophil, while lower lymphocyte and monocyte levels in severe than in non-severe confirmed COVID-19 patients. Authors conclude that it is essential that clinicians have access to reliable quick pathogen tests and feasible differential diagnoses based on the clinical descriptions in their first contact with suspected patients.
Abstract
AIMS: This study aimed to make a comparison between the clinical laboratory-related factors, complete blood count (CBC) indices, cytokines, and lymphocyte subsets in order to distinguish severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases from the non-severe ones. MATERIALS AND METHODS Relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until March 31, 2020. Cochrane's Q test and the I2 statistic were used to determine heterogeneity. We used the random-effect models to pool the weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). KEY FINDINGS Out of a total of 8557 initial records, 44 articles (50 studies) with 7865 patients (ranging from 13 to 1582), were included. Our meta-analyses with random-effect models showed a significant decrease in lymphocytes, monocyte, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD3 cells, CD19 cells, and natural killer (NK) cells and an increase in the white blood cell (WBC), neutrophils, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP)/hs-CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), ferritin, procalcitonin (PCT), and serum amyloid A (SAA), interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-2R, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferon-gamma (INF-γ) in the severe group compared to the non-severe group. However, no significant differences were found in IL-1β, IL-17, and CD4/CD8 T cell ratio between the two groups. SIGNIFICANCE Decrease in total lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets as well as the elevation of CRP, ESR, SAA, PCT, ferritin, and cytokines, but not IL-1β and IL-17, were closely associated with COVID-19 severity, implying reliable indicators of severe COVID-19.
-
8.
How Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Progresses: The Natural History of ME/CFS.
Nacul, L, O'Boyle, S, Palla, L, Nacul, FE, Mudie, K, Kingdon, CC, Cliff, JM, Clark, TG, Dockrell, HM, Lacerda, EM
Frontiers in neurology. 2020;11:826
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A good understanding of the disease course is vital not only for the design of preventative and intervention studies, but also to assess the timing and type of intervention that minimizes disease risk or optimizes prognosis. The aim of this review was to explore the long-term course of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and how presentation and pathophysiological abnormalities may vary with time. Literature shows that it is unknown how the initial host response to a stressor or insult compares in individuals who do or do not develop typical symptoms of ME/CFS. However, the return to good health, following exposure to mild or moderate levels of insult, seems to be impeded in ME/CFS when symptoms persist for longer than 3–6 months. Authors sought to provide a simple framework, similar to those of other chronic diseases, in an effort to extend the temporal perception of ME/CFS and better incorporate the less defined pre-illness stages of the disease. In fact, they conclude that by applying this framework to ME/CFS research efforts could better elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease and identify potential therapeutic targets at distinct stages.
Abstract
We propose a framework for understanding and interpreting the pathophysiology of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) that considers wider determinants of health and long-term temporal variation in pathophysiological features and disease phenotype throughout the natural history of the disease. As in other chronic diseases, ME/CFS evolves through different stages, from asymptomatic predisposition, progressing to a prodromal stage, and then to symptomatic disease. Disease incidence depends on genetic makeup and environment factors, the exposure to singular or repeated insults, and the nature of the host response. In people who develop ME/CFS, normal homeostatic processes in response to adverse insults may be replaced by aberrant responses leading to dysfunctional states. Thus, the predominantly neuro-immune manifestations, underlined by a hyper-metabolic state, that characterize early disease, may be followed by various processes leading to multi-systemic abnormalities and related symptoms. This abnormal state and the effects of a range of mediators such as products of oxidative and nitrosamine stress, may lead to progressive cell and metabolic dysfunction culminating in a hypometabolic state with low energy production. These processes do not seem to happen uniformly; although a spiraling of progressive inter-related and self-sustaining abnormalities may ensue, reversion to states of milder abnormalities is possible if the host is able to restate responses to improve homeostatic equilibrium. With time variation in disease presentation, no single ME/CFS case description, set of diagnostic criteria, or molecular feature is currently representative of all patients at different disease stages. While acknowledging its limitations due to the incomplete research evidence, we suggest the proposed framework may support future research design and health care interventions for people with ME/CFS.
-
9.
Liver injury is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
Parohan, M, Yaghoubi, S, Seraji, A
Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology. 2020;50(8):924-935
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause intestinal, respiratory, neuronal and hepatic diseases, and may lead to respiratory distress syndrome, organ failure, and even death in severe cases. The aim of this study was to assess the association between serum levels of Aspartate aminotransferase [enzyme], Alanine aminotransferase [enzyme], total Bilirubin [yellowish blood pigment] and Albumin [protein] with severity of COVID-19 infection. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis of 20 retrospective studies conducted in China. The sample size of studies ranged from 21 to 651 patients (mean age, 53.3 years). Results indicate that high serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin and lower serum levels of albumin are associated with a significant increase in the severity of COVID-19 infection. Authors conclude that attention should be paid to monitor the occurrence of liver dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 infection.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is a major threat to human beings. Lung injury has been reported as the major outcome of COVID-19 infection. However, liver damage has also been considered to occur in severe cases. The current meta-analysis of retrospective studies was carried out to summarize available findings on the association between liver injury and severity of COVID-19 infection. Online databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched to detect relevant publications up to 1 April 2020, using relevant keywords. To pool data, a fixed- or random-effects model was used depending on the heterogeneity between studies. Furthermore, publication bias test and sensitivity analysis were also applied. In total, 20 retrospective studies with 3428 COVID-19 infected patients (severe cases, n = 1455; mild cases, n = 1973), were included in this meta-analysis. Higher serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (weighted mean difference, 8.84 U/L; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.97 to 11.71; P < 0.001), alanine aminotransferase (weighted mean difference, 7.35 U/L; 95% CI, 4.77 to 9.93; P < 0.001), total bilirubin (weighted mean difference, 2.30 mmol/L; 95% CI, 1.24 to 3.36; P < 0.001), and lower serum levels of albumin (weighted mean difference, -4.24 g/L; 95% CI, -6.20 to -2.28; P < 0.001) were associated with a significant increase in the severity of COVID-19 infection. The incidence of liver injury, as assessed by serum analysis (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and albumin levels), seems to be higher in patients with severe COVID-19 infection.
-
10.
Dietary Intake of Acrylamide and Risk of Breast, Endometrial, and Ovarian Cancers: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis.
Adani, G, Filippini, T, Wise, LA, Halldorsson, TI, Blaha, L, Vinceti, M
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2020;29(6):1095-1106
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Acrylamide is an organic industrial chemical that is white, odourless, and crystalline in structure. It is used primarily in paper and plastic production as a flocculating agent to purify drinking water and wastewater, and as a sealing agent in buildings. The study is a dose–response meta-analysis based on epidemiologic studies of acrylamide dietary intake and risks of female breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer. Results show that acrylamide intake was associated with small increased risks of endometrial and ovarian cancer, with stronger and almost linear associations among never smokers. However, no positive relation emerged for breast cancer, except among premenopausal women for exposure above 20 mg/day. Authors conclude that their findings support the currently ongoing efforts to monitor and minimize acrylamide intake.
Abstract
Acrylamide is a probable human carcinogen. Aside from occupational exposures and smoking, diet is the main source of exposure in humans. We performed a systematic review of the association between estimated dietary intake of acrylamide and risk of female breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancers in nonexperimental studies published through February 25, 2020, and conducted a dose-response meta-analysis. We identified 18 papers covering 10 different study populations: 16 cohort and two case-control studies. Acrylamide intake was associated with a slightly increased risk of ovarian cancer, particularly among never smokers. For endometrial cancer, risk was highest at intermediate levels of exposure, whereas the association was more linear and positive among never smokers. For breast cancer, we found evidence of a null or inverse relation between exposure and risk, particularly among never smokers and postmenopausal women. In a subgroup analysis limited to premenopausal women, breast cancer risk increased linearly with acrylamide intake starting at 20 μg/day of intake. High acrylamide intake was associated with increased risks of ovarian and endometrial cancers in a relatively linear manner, especially among never smokers. Conversely, little association was observed between acrylamide intake and breast cancer risk, with the exception of premenopausal women.