1.
Metabolic, hormonal and performance effects of isomaltulose ingestion before prolonged aerobic exercise: a double-blind, randomised, cross-over trial.
Notbohm, HL, Feuerbacher, JF, Papendorf, F, Friese, N, Jacobs, MW, Predel, HG, Zacher, J, Bloch, W, Schumann, M
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2021;18(1):38
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Isomaltulose is a low-glycaemic index carbohydrate that lowers insulin and glucose levels postprandially. The benefits of taking Isomaltulose in an exercise setting are not well studied. This double-blinded, randomised, crossover study evaluated the effects of Isomaltulose intake on metabolic responses, hormonal responses, exercise performance and gastrointestinal disturbances in runners. Twenty-one male recreational endurance runners took part in four separate experimental sessions to compare Isomaltulose to maltodextrin and glucose. Fat and carbohydrate oxidation rates were not different among groups. This might be because the lower dose of Isomaltulose (50g) was used in this trial. Compared to glucose and maltodextrin, isomaltulose lowered metabolic and hormonal responses to exercise. In the study, Isomaltulose, glucose, and maltodextrin did not differ in exercise performance or gastrointestinal disturbances. A higher dose may be needed in order to demonstrate exercise performance, but caution should be exercised since a higher dose may cause gastrointestinal upset. A robust investigation of Isomalulose dose and its effects on glucose, insulin, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptides is required to determine if exercise leads to hypoglycaemia in the clinical population. Healthcare practitioners can use the findings of this study to understand the advantageous effects of 50g Isomaltulose in regulating glucose, insulin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide during aerobic exercise.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isomaltulose has been discussed as a low glycaemic carbohydrate but evidence concerning performance benefits and physiological responses has produced varying results. Therefore, we primarily aimed to investigate the effects of isomaltulose ingestion compared to glucose and maltodextrin on fat and carbohydrate oxidation rates, blood glucose levels and serum hormone concentrations of insulin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). As secondary aims, we assessed running performance and gastrointestinal discomfort. METHODS Twenty-one male recreational endurance runners performed a 70-min constant load trial at 70% maximal running speed (Vmax), followed by a time to exhaustion (TTE) test at 85% Vmax after ingesting either 50 g isomaltulose, maltodextrin or glucose. Fat and carbohydrate oxidation rates were calculated from spiroergometric data. Venous blood samples for measurement of GIP and insulin were drawn before, after the constant load trial and after the TTE. Capillary blood samples for glucose concentrations and subjective feeling of gastrointestinal discomfort were collected every 10 min during the constant load trial. RESULTS No between-condition differences were observed in the area under the curve analysis of fat (p = 0.576) and carbohydrate oxidation rates (p = 0.887). Isomaltulose ingestion led to lower baseline postprandial concentrations of blood glucose compared to maltodextrin (percent change [95% confidence interval], - 16.7% [- 21.8,-11.6], p < 0.001) and glucose (- 11.5% [- 17.3,-5.7], p = 0.001). Similarly, insulin and GIP concentrations were also lower following isomaltulose ingestion compared to maltodextrin (- 40.3% [- 50.5,-30.0], p = 0.001 and - 69.1% [- 74.3,-63.8], p < 0.001, respectively) and glucose (- 32.6% [- 43.9,-21.2], p = 0.012 and - 55.8% [- 70.7,-40.9], p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, glucose fluctuation was lower after isomaltulose ingestion compared to maltodextrin (- 26.0% [- 34.2,-17.8], p < 0.001) and glucose (- 17.4% [- 29.1,-5.6], p < 0.001). However, during and after exercise, no between-condition differences for glucose (p = 0.872), insulin (p = 0.503) and GIP (p = 0.244) were observed. No between-condition differences were found for TTE (p = 0.876) or gastrointestinal discomfort (p = 0.119). CONCLUSION Isomaltulose ingestion led to lower baseline postprandial concentrations of glucose, insulin and GIP compared to maltodextrin and glucose. Consequently, blood glucose fluctuations were lower during treadmill running after isomaltulose ingestion, while no between-condition differences were observed for CHO and fat oxidation rates, treadmill running performance and gastrointestinal discomfort. Further research is required to provide specific guidelines on supplementing isomaltulose in performance and health settings.
2.
Does high-carbohydrate intake lead to increased risk of obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sartorius, K, Sartorius, B, Madiba, TE, Stefan, C
BMJ open. 2018;8(2):e018449
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
As overweight and obesity is rising globally, better understanding its cause is important to help with prevention and management of disease. The objective of this meta-analysis is to investigate the relationship between carbohydrate intake and obesity, particularly at the differences between low and high carbohydrate diets. Based on 22 articles that met the inclusion criteria, a high-carbohydrate diet, or increased proportion of energy intake in the form of carbohydrates, does not increase the risk of being obese. Based on these results, the authors iterate further studies are required to better understand obesity risk with regards different carbohydrate groups including refined versus unrefined carbohydrates.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The present study aimed to test the association between high and low carbohydrate diets and obesity, and second, to test the link between total carbohydrate intake (as a percentage of total energy intake) and obesity. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOME MEASURES We sought MEDLINE, PubMed and Google Scholar for observation studies published between January 1990 and December 2016 assessing an association between obesity and high-carbohydrate intake. Two independent reviewers selected candidate studies, extracted data and assessed study quality. RESULTS The study identified 22 articles that fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria and quantified an association between carbohydrate intake and obesity. The first pooled strata (high-carbohydrate versus low-carbohydrate intake) suggested a weak increased risk of obesity. The second pooled strata (increasing percentage of total carbohydrate intake in daily diet) showed a weak decreased risk of obesity. Both these pooled strata estimates were, however, not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of the current study, it cannot be concluded that a high-carbohydrate diet or increased percentage of total energy intake in the form of carbohydrates increases the odds of obesity. A central limitation of the study was the non-standard classification of dietary intake across the studies, as well as confounders like total energy intake, activity levels, age and gender. Further studies are needed that specifically classify refined versus unrefined carbohydrate intake, as well as studies that investigate the relationship between high fat, high unrefined carbohydrate-sugar diets. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42015023257.