1.
Honey does not adversely impact blood lipids of adult men and women: a randomized cross-over trial.
Al-Tamimi, AM, Petrisko, M, Hong, MY, Rezende, L, Clayton, ZS, Kern, M
Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.). 2020;74:87-95
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Restriction of sugar intake is among the most commonly advocated public health strategies, as it is believed to prevent the development of chronic diseases. Unlike sugar, honey has been shown to have various positive health benefits from increasing antioxidant status to lowering postprandial [after a meal] glycaemia and insulinaemia in healthy subjects when compared to responses of more highly refined sugar mixtures. The aim of this study was to assess responses to both short-term (1 week) and relatively long-term (1 month) ingestion of clover honey consumption versus sucrose on changes in dietary intake and serum lipid concentrations in young to middle-aged adults. This study is a crossover design randomised controlled study for which 40 participants were recruited (male [n = 21] and female [n = 19]) with an age range between 25 and 57 years. Results indicate that consumption of clover honey (1.2 g of carbohydrate per kilogram body weight) for up to 1 month produced modestly positive dietary and triglyceride effects compared to sucrose. - there were no positive lipid effects within the clover honey trial. - compared to sucrose, clover honey consumption resulted in a significantly lower intake of energy, carbohydrate, sugars and fat as well as lower triglycerides concentrations at the end of 4 weeks. Authors conclude that honey produces limited, modest health benefits relative to sucrose. Future studies are needed to investigate the possible mechanisms by which honey influences triglyceride production and/or clearance and the metabolic and hormonal regulators of food intake.
Abstract
Consumption of added sugars in the US is estimated to be approximately 1.5 times recommended levels and has been linked to increased risk for developing chronic diseases. We hypothesized that relative to sugar, honey would reduce energy intake and improve serum lipid profiles. To test this, we assessed the short-term (1-week) and relatively long-term (1-month) effects of honey versus sucrose on changes in dietary intake and serum lipid concentrations. Thirty-seven apparently healthy subjects (21 males; 16 females) aged 24-57 years (BMI = 17.6-37.2 kg/m2) completed two 4-week trials in a randomized, cross-over design separated by ≥4-week washout. During each trial, subjects consumed either clover honey or sucrose providing 1.2 g/kg/day of carbohydrate under free-living conditions with instructions to avoid changing their habitual food intake. Serum triglyceride (TG) concentrations were elevated (P < .05) after 1 week for both trials but only remained elevated (P < .05) at the 4-week time-point during sucrose consumption. The elevation after 1 week during the honey trial was concurrent with a transient increase (P < .05) in body weight. No effects on serum concentrations of insulin, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, or high density lipoprotein-cholesterol were detected for either trial. Subjects consumed significantly less energy (P < .05), carbohydrate (P < .005), sugars (P < .05), and saturated fat (P < .05) during the honey trial. These data suggest that honey may serve as a favorable substitute for sucrose with regard to reduced energy intake, carbohydrate and sugars, without negatively influencing serum lipid concentrations.
2.
Postexercise Glucose-Fructose Coingestion Augments Cycling Capacity During Short-Term and Overnight Recovery From Exhaustive Exercise, Compared With Isocaloric Glucose.
Gray, EA, Green, TA, Betts, JA, Gonzalez, JT
International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism. 2020;30(1):54-61
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Carbohydrate is the dominant energy source during moderate-to-high-intensity exercise. During prolonged exercise, low glycogen availability is inevitable which is associated with the onset of fatigue. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of post-exercise glucose-fructose co-ingestion versus glucose alone on subsequent cycling capacity. This study consists of two randomized, cross-over experiments. Experiment one (double-blind) employed a 4-h recovery (SHORT-EXPERIMENT), whereas, experiment two (single-blind) used a 15-h overnight recovery (OVERNIGHT-EXPERIMENT). Eight trained male cyclists participated in SHORT-EXPERIMENT whereas three female and five male trained cyclists participated in OVERNIGHT-EXPERIMENT. Results demonstrate that post-exercise glucose-fructose co-ingestion, compared to isocaloric glucose alone, augments cycling capacity following short (4-h) and overnight (15-h) recovery periods in trained cyclists. Authors conclude that endurance athletes competing in multi-stage events where recovery time is limited may benefit from consuming fructose alongside glucose in their post-exercise nutritional strategies.
Abstract
During short-term recovery, postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion can accelerate total glycogen repletion and augment recovery of running capacity. It is unknown if this advantage translates to cycling, or to a longer (e.g., overnight) recovery. Using two experiments, the present research investigated if postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion augments exercise capacity following 4-hr (short experiment; n = 8) and 15-hr (overnight experiment; n = 8) recoveries from exhaustive exercise in trained cyclists, compared with isocaloric glucose alone. In each experiment, a glycogen depleting exercise protocol was followed by a 4-hr recovery, with ingestion of 1.5 or 1.2 g·kg-1·hr-1 carbohydrate in the short experiment (double blind) and the overnight experiment (single blind), respectively. Treatments were provided in a randomized order using a crossover design. Four or fifteen hours after the glycogen depletion protocol, participants cycled to exhaustion at 70% Wmax or 65% Wmax in the short experiment and the overnight experiment, respectively. In both experiments there was no difference in substrate oxidation or blood glucose and lactate concentrations between treatments during the exercise capacity test (trial effect, p > .05). Nevertheless, cycling capacity was greater in glucose + fructose versus glucose only in the short experiment (28.0 ± 8.4 vs. 22.8 ± 7.3 min, d = 0.65, p = .039) and the overnight experiment (35.9 ± 10.7 vs. 30.6 ± 9.2 min, d = 0.53, p = .026). This is the first study to demonstrate that postexercise glucose-fructose coingestion enhances cycling capacity following short-term (4 hr) and overnight (15 hr) recovery durations. Therefore, if multistage endurance athletes are ingesting glucose for rapid postexercise recovery then fructose containing carbohydrates may be advisable.
3.
Fructose and Sucrose Intake Increase Exogenous Carbohydrate Oxidation during Exercise.
Trommelen, J, Fuchs, CJ, Beelen, M, Lenaerts, K, Jeukendrup, AE, Cermak, NM, van Loon, LJ
Nutrients. 2017;9(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
During prolonged exercise, the metabolic rate and energy requirement increase severalfold. Carbohydrate oxidation provides energy to muscles during exercise. In this randomised cross-over, double-blind study, researchers examined the effects of fructose or sucrose co-ingestion with glucose on exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates during prolonged exercise in ten trained male cyclists. The administration of glucose with fructose or sucrose resulted in fewer gastrointestinal complaints than the administration of glucose alone. Co-ingestion of fructose or sucrose with glucose may enhance gastric absorption of carbohydrates and decrease the accumulation of carbohydrates in the gastrointestinal tract, which may explain lower gastrointestinal complaints among participants. Fructose co-ingestion increased exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rate during prolonged exercise by 35-55% more than glucose. Compared to glucose administration alone, fructose or sucrose co-administration also increased plasma lactate production and oxidation. The study concludes that fructose and sucrose can serve as functional ingredients in sports drinks to provide energy during prolonged exercise. As this study only focused on whole-body exogenous oxidation rates, more research is still needed to identify specific oxidation sites. Nevertheless, this study's findings can help healthcare professionals understand how different types of sugar can provide energy during prolonged exercise.
Abstract
Peak exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates typically reach ~1 g∙min-1 during exercise when ample glucose or glucose polymers are ingested. Fructose co-ingestion has been shown to further increase exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of fructose co-ingestion provided either as a monosaccharide or as part of the disaccharide sucrose on exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates during prolonged exercise in trained cyclists. Ten trained male cyclists (VO2peak: 65 ± 2 mL∙kg-1∙min-1) cycled on four different occasions for 180 min at 50% Wmax during which they consumed a carbohydrate solution providing 1.8 g∙min-1 of glucose (GLU), 1.2 g∙min-1 glucose + 0.6 g∙min-1 fructose (GLU + FRU), 0.6 g∙min-1 glucose + 1.2 g∙min-1 sucrose (GLU + SUC), or water (WAT). Peak exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates did not differ between GLU + FRU and GLU + SUC (1.40 ± 0.06 vs. 1.29 ± 0.07 g∙min-1, respectively, p = 0.999), but were 46% ± 8% higher when compared to GLU (0.96 ± 0.06 g∙min-1: p < 0.05). In line, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates during the latter 120 min of exercise were 46% ± 8% higher in GLU + FRU or GLU + SUC compared with GLU (1.19 ± 0.12, 1.13 ± 0.21, and 0.82 ± 0.16 g∙min-1, respectively, p < 0.05). We conclude that fructose co-ingestion (0.6 g∙min-1) with glucose (1.2 g∙min-1) provided either as a monosaccharide or as sucrose strongly increases exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates during prolonged exercise in trained cyclists.