-
1.
Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19.
Carfì, A, Bernabei, R, Landi, F
JAMA. 2020;324(6):603-605
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
This short article reports the results of a case series of Italian COVID-19 patients who had been hospitalised for the infection and had recovered (shown by 2 negative PCR tests). The aim was to establish any persistent symptoms and quality of life. 143 patients were included in this study, just over a third were women and age range was 19-84 years (mean 56.5 years). After an average of 2 months after recovery, only 13% reported not having any COVOD-19 related symptoms whilst 32% had 1 or 2 and 55% had 3 or more symptoms. None of the patients had symptoms of acute infection, such as fever. The most common symptoms were fatigue (53%), shortness of breath (43%), joint pain (27%) and chest pain (22%). 44% of patients reported a worsening of quality of life after compared to before the infection. Limitations of the study included lack of information of symptoms prior to COVID-19 infection and symptom severity, small sample size and lack of a control group. The authors note that patients with other types of pneumonia can also have persistent symptoms, and this may therefore not be exclusive to COVID-19.
-
2.
Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection.
Townsend, L, Dyer, AH, Jones, K, Dunne, J, Mooney, A, Gaffney, F, O'Connor, L, Leavy, D, O'Brien, K, Dowds, J, et al
PloS one. 2020;15(11):e0240784
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Tiredness is a common symptom of Covid-19; however, it is unknown if this fatigue persists once recovered. This observational study of 128 recovered Covid-19 patients aimed to determine if fatigue persisted after recovery and whether severity of disease could predict fatigue. The results showed that post Covid-19 fatigue was reported in more than half of the participants and was particularly pronounced in females and in those with depression. Severity of disease did not predict fatigue. It was concluded that fatigue appears to outlast infection and fatigue was independent of disease severity. This study could be used by health care practitioners to understand that fatigue is common even after recovery from Covid-19 infection and women and sufferers of depression are the most susceptible.
Abstract
Fatigue is a common symptom in those presenting with symptomatic COVID-19 infection. However, it is unknown if COVID-19 results in persistent fatigue in those recovered from acute infection. We examined the prevalence of fatigue in individuals recovered from the acute phase of COVID-19 illness using the Chalder Fatigue Score (CFQ-11). We further examined potential predictors of fatigue following COVID-19 infection, evaluating indicators of COVID-19 severity, markers of peripheral immune activation and circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. Of 128 participants (49.5 ± 15 years; 54% female), more than half reported persistent fatigue (67/128; 52.3%) at median of 10 weeks after initial COVID-19 symptoms. There was no association between COVID-19 severity (need for inpatient admission, supplemental oxygen or critical care) and fatigue following COVID-19. Additionally, there was no association between routine laboratory markers of inflammation and cell turnover (leukocyte, neutrophil or lymphocyte counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein) or pro-inflammatory molecules (IL-6 or sCD25) and fatigue post COVID-19. Female gender and those with a pre-existing diagnosis of depression/anxiety were over-represented in those with fatigue. Our findings demonstrate a significant burden of post-viral fatigue in individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection after the acute phase of COVID-19 illness. This study highlights the importance of assessing those recovering from COVID-19 for symptoms of severe fatigue, irrespective of severity of initial illness, and may identify a group worthy of further study and early intervention.
-
3.
Potential Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Therapeutics That Target the Post-Entry Stages of the Viral Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Review.
Al-Horani, RA, Kar, S
Viruses. 2020;12(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The covid-19 pandemic has required the identification of therapies to prevent infection and limit severity. A previous paper by the same authors reviewed therapies that block the virus in the early stages of its lifecycle. This very large review of over 300 papers aimed to summarise therapeutics which are aimed at blocking the lifecycle of the virus after it has entered the body’s cells. The authors began by reviewing the lifecycle of the covid-19 virus explaining how it enters the body’s cells, replicates inside and then is released to infect new cells. Several antivirals, antimalarials and natural products were then reviewed. Of note, Remdesivir is being trialled in covid-19 patients, with mixed results, however, is being recommended in the US for the treatment of hospitalised covid-19 patients with severe disease. Ribavirin, which is being trialled in combination with other antivirals is also showing promising results in shortening hospitalisation times in covid-19 patients. It was concluded that any stage of the covid-19 lifecycle could be a target for therapeutics and combining therapies is likely to be more successful than monotherapy. This paper could be used by health care professionals to understand the most recent therapeutic research for covid-19.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to challenge health care systems around the world. Scientists and pharmaceutical companies have promptly responded by advancing potential therapeutics into clinical trials at an exponential rate. Initial encouraging results have been realized using remdesivir and dexamethasone. Yet, the research continues so as to identify better clinically relevant therapeutics that act either as prophylactics to prevent the infection or as treatments to limit the severity of COVID-19 and substantially decrease the mortality rate. Previously, we reviewed the potential therapeutics in clinical trials that block the early stage of the viral life cycle. In this review, we summarize potential anti-COVID-19 therapeutics that block/inhibit the post-entry stages of the viral life cycle. The review presents not only the chemical structures and mechanisms of the potential therapeutics under clinical investigation, i.e., listed in clinicaltrials.gov, but it also describes the relevant results of clinical trials. Their anti-inflammatory/immune-modulatory effects are also described. The reviewed therapeutics include small molecules, polypeptides, and monoclonal antibodies. At the molecular level, the therapeutics target viral proteins or processes that facilitate the post-entry stages of the viral infection. Frequent targets are the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and the viral proteases such as papain-like protease (PLpro) and main protease (Mpro). Overall, we aim at presenting up-to-date details of anti-COVID-19 therapeutics so as to catalyze their potential effective use in fighting the pandemic.
-
4.
Harnessing the immune system to overcome cytokine storm and reduce viral load in COVID-19: a review of the phases of illness and therapeutic agents.
Khadke, S, Ahmed, N, Ahmed, N, Ratts, R, Raju, S, Gallogly, M, de Lima, M, Sohail, MR
Virology journal. 2020;17(1):154
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Severe manifestations of COVID-19 infection and mortality are associated with a cytokine storm. This is an excessive inflammatory response to the infection leading to an overproduction of pro-inflammatory signalling molecules, which consequently contributes to tissue and organ damage. This literature review summarised current knowledge, as of June 2020, about virus-associated cytokine storm, virus-host interactions and immunological mechanism, to gain a better understanding of the phenomena observed in COVID-19 infections and devise better treatment strategies. The review briefly outlines the epidemiology of COVID-19, predictors of severity of disease, mode of transmission, testing, viral structure, mechanism of invasion of the host cell, replication and immune invasion and the progression of the four stages of the cytokine storm. The second part of the review discusses antiviral therapeutics of interest with a table summarising drugs, mechanism and available data. This article may be of interest to those who like to delve further into the mechanisms and immune components involved in a cytokine storm and gain an oversight of the pathways targeted by allopathic agents that have been put forward as treatment options.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, previously named 2019-nCov), a novel coronavirus that emerged in China in December 2019 and was declared a global pandemic by World Health Organization by March 11th, 2020. Severe manifestations of COVID-19 are caused by a combination of direct tissue injury by viral replication and associated cytokine storm resulting in progressive organ damage. DISCUSSION We reviewed published literature between January 1st, 2000 and June 30th, 2020, excluding articles focusing on pediatric or obstetric population, with a focus on virus-host interactions and immunological mechanisms responsible for virus associated cytokine release syndrome (CRS). COVID-19 illness encompasses three main phases. In phase 1, SARS-CoV-2 binds with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)2 receptor on alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells, triggering toll like receptor (TLR) mediated nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-ƙB) signaling. It effectively blunts an early (IFN) response allowing unchecked viral replication. Phase 2 is characterized by hypoxia and innate immunity mediated pneumocyte damage as well as capillary leak. Some patients further progress to phase 3 characterized by cytokine storm with worsening respiratory symptoms, persistent fever, and hemodynamic instability. Important cytokines involved in this phase are interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. This is typically followed by a recovery phase with production of antibodies against the virus. We summarize published data regarding virus-host interactions, key immunological mechanisms responsible for virus-associated CRS, and potential opportunities for therapeutic interventions. CONCLUSION Evidence regarding SARS-CoV-2 epidemiology and pathogenesis is rapidly evolving. A better understanding of the pathophysiology and immune system dysregulation associated with CRS and acute respiratory distress syndrome in severe COVID-19 is imperative to identify novel drug targets and other therapeutic interventions.
-
5.
Dissecting the interaction between COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus.
Chee, YJ, Tan, SK, Yeoh, E
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2020;11(5):1104-1114
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Several countries have reported higher death rates and more severe cases of covid-19 amongst individuals with chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes. This review of 100 papers aimed to investigate the interconnecting factors which may contribute to poorer prognosis in individuals with covid-19 and type 2 diabetes. Although the evidence suggests that patients with type 2 diabetes have poorer outcomes after contracting covid-19, they are not more susceptible to infection. The paper reported that mechanisms which may increase severity in type 2 diabetics are abnormal immune function, increased susceptibility to inflammation, the increased adherence of the virus to target cells and reduced ability to fight infection. It is important to manage blood sugars when suffering from covid-19. The paper reviewed the use of several medications such as metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4), glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists and insulin in the context of individuals suffering from covid-19, with insulin being the treatment of choice in the acutely ill patient. Current treatments of covid-19 were also reviewed such as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, Lopinavir-ritonavir, IL-6 receptor agonists, type 1 interferon and remdesivir. It was concluded that clinicians should be aware of the risks in patients with type 2 diabetes and covid-19. However as new data is made available, the chronic and long-term implications will become clearer. This study could be used by health care professionals to ensure that patients with type 2 diabetes do everything they can to avoid covid-19 infection and that if contracted these patients are closely monitored for severe disease.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic that is caused by a novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Data from several countries have shown higher morbidity and mortality among individuals with chronic metabolic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus. In this review, we explore the contributing factors for poorer prognosis in these individuals. As a significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 also have diabetes mellitus, this adds another layer of complexity to their management. We explore potential interactions between antidiabetic medications and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors with COVID-19. Suggested recommendations for the use of antidiabetic medications for COVID-19 patients with diabetes mellitus are provided. We also review pertinent clinical considerations in the management of diabetic ketoacidosis in COVID-19 patients. In addition, we aim to increase clinicians' awareness of the metabolic effects of promising drug therapies for COVID-19. Finally, we highlight the importance of timely vaccinations for patients with diabetes mellitus.
-
6.
Viruses belonging to Anelloviridae or Circoviridae as a possible cause of chronic fatigue.
Grinde, B
Journal of translational medicine. 2020;18(1):485
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is often triggered by a virus. This review argues that viruses already present in the body may be the cause of this condition and identifies two groups of viruses the anello and circoviruses as potential causes. The paper explains that both viruses are already present in many individuals, and only become a problem when the immune system is supressed by a secondary infection. When this happens the anello and circoviruses can penetrate the brain resulting in CFS. Therapies that inhibit these viruses are required and recently certain antimalarials have reported to be potential candidates. Further research is required. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to extend research into the role of viruses that are already present within the body on CFS.
Abstract
Chronic fatigue often starts with an acute viral infection-as witnessed in the case of SARS-CoV-2-but indirect consequences of these infections are presumably the actual cause of the condition. As recently reviewed in this journal, the culprit could be a virus already present in the patient. The review covers several types of viruses, but concludes that the question is still open. The focus is on well known, pathogenic viruses for which there are ample diagnostic tools. I argue that there is one lesser-known group of viruses, the related anello- and circoviruses, which ought to be investigated. More or less everyone harbours at least one strain of these viruses in the blood, while not in the spinal fluid. They normally replicate at a low level, but their activity increases in an immune suppressed host; and there are cases where they do reach the brain. The initial infection could facilitate their access to the brain.
-
7.
Will COVID-19 Lead to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome?
Komaroff, AL, Bateman, L
Frontiers in medicine. 2020;7:606824
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In people who have contracted COVID-19, many do not return to full health. Some may develop permanent dysfunction of damaged organs such as the brain, heart and kidney. Others report ongoing lingering symptoms despite tests no longer detecting the virus. This condition is being called ‘long covid.’ Patients post-COVID-19 can develop a post-viral syndrome that is very similar to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue syndrome, (ME/CFS). This short review looks at how common a post covid illness is and what implications this has for the U.S. and globally. The review concludes that the U.S. and the world will see a substantial growth in the number of people with ME/CFS. We can’t predict at this stage how long lasting that will be.
-
8.
Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and human herpesvirus-6 infections in patients with myalgic еncephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.
Shikova, E, Reshkova, V, Kumanova, А, Raleva, S, Alexandrova, D, Capo, N, Murovska, M
Journal of medical virology. 2020
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Several viruses have been associated with the onset of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), however the data has been controversial. The aim of this observational study of 108 individuals was to assess the presence and type of viruses present in patients with ME/CFS. The results showed that Eppstein-Barr virus (EBV) was more prevalent in individuals with ME/CFS compared to those without. It was concluded that a high rate of EBV was present amongst individuals with ME/CFS and in this subset of individuals EBV may have a role in the development of ME/CFS. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that individuals may be at risk of developing ME/CFS following EBV.
Abstract
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a disabling multisystem chronic disease. The etiology and pathogenesis of ME/CFS are unknown. Infections of cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) are suspected as etiological agents for ME/CFS. This study aims to estimate prevalence and type (active/latent) of EBV, CMV, and HHV-6 infections in Bulgarian ME/CFS patients. In the study were included 58 patients with ME/CFS and 50 healthy controls. Virus-specific antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and viral genomic sequences in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMCs) and plasma samples by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We did not observe any significant differences in virus-specific immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M positivity rates between patients with ME/CFS and control group. In ME/CFS plasma samples, EBV DNA was found in 24.1%, CMV DNA in 3.4%, and HHV-6 DNA in 1.7% of samples. EBV DNA was detected in 4%, and CMV and HHV-6 DNA were not found in plasma samples of controls. The frequency of viral genome detection in PBMCs of patients and controls was 74% vs 78% for CMV, 81% vs 84% for EBV, and 82.8% vs 82% for HHV-6. The difference in frequency of EBV active infection in ME/CFS and control group was statistically significant (P = .0027). No ME/CFS and control individuals with active CMV and HHV-6 infection were observed. In conclusion, this study using both serological and PCR-based techniques for distinguishing between active and latent infection showed high rate of active EBV infection among patients with ME/CFS indicating that at least in a subset of cases, EBV is important factor for the development of disease.
-
9.
COVID-19 infection alters kynurenine and fatty acid metabolism, correlating with IL-6 levels and renal status.
Thomas, T, Stefanoni, D, Reisz, JA, Nemkov, T, Bertolone, L, Francis, RO, Hudson, KE, Zimring, JC, Hansen, KC, Hod, EA, et al
JCI insight. 2020;5(14)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There is increasing urgency for the development of Covid-19 therapies. Treatments preventing infection and decreasing the amount of virus in the body have largely been unsuccessful and so the focus has turned to host biological pathways, which may be altered by Covid-19 infection. This observational study of forty-nine Covid-19 positive and negative individuals aimed to determine alterations in the hosts metabolism. The results showed that Covid-19 infection was associated with disrupted host inflammatory and immune pathways. Markers for kidney dysfunction were also increased alongside raised blood sugar levels and fatty acids in the blood. It was concluded that inflammatory markers may be an indicator for disease severity and a target for Covid-19 therapy. Dietary therapy could be used to target blood fatty acid changes brought about by Covid-19 infection. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that inflammation is increased in Covid-19 patients and in lieu of approved therapies, dietary intervention may be of benefit.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDReprogramming of host metabolism supports viral pathogenesis by fueling viral proliferation, by providing, for example, free amino acids and fatty acids as building blocks.METHODSTo investigate metabolic effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, we evaluated serum metabolites of patients with COVID-19 (n = 33; diagnosed by nucleic acid testing), as compared with COVID-19-negative controls (n = 16).RESULTSTargeted and untargeted metabolomics analyses identified altered tryptophan metabolism into the kynurenine pathway, which regulates inflammation and immunity. Indeed, these changes in tryptophan metabolism correlated with interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. Widespread dysregulation of nitrogen metabolism was also seen in infected patients, with altered levels of most amino acids, along with increased markers of oxidant stress (e.g., methionine sulfoxide, cystine), proteolysis, and renal dysfunction (e.g., creatine, creatinine, polyamines). Increased circulating levels of glucose and free fatty acids were also observed, consistent with altered carbon homeostasis. Interestingly, metabolite levels in these pathways correlated with clinical laboratory markers of inflammation (i.e., IL-6 and C-reactive protein) and renal function (i.e., blood urea nitrogen).CONCLUSIONIn conclusion, this initial observational study identified amino acid and fatty acid metabolism as correlates of COVID-19, providing mechanistic insights, potential markers of clinical severity, and potential therapeutic targets.FUNDINGBoettcher Foundation Webb-Waring Biomedical Research Award; National Institute of General and Medical Sciences, NIH; and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH.
-
10.
Chinese herbal medicine for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xiong, X, Wang, P, Su, K, Cho, WC, Xing, Y
Pharmacological research. 2020;160:105056
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Coronavirus- 2019 (COVID-19) infection, the cause of a global pandemic, can lead to respiratory failure and death. Whilst no specific antiviral drugs or vaccines were available in the early stages of the outbreak, in China Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) had been widely used since the beginning. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy of CHM to conventional Western medicine treatments for COVID-19 infections, involving 2275 patients from 18 trials. The outcome suggested that the use of CHM exhibited many positive effects on the course of the disease, including fever severity, length of hospital stay, cough, fatigue, anti-inflammatory markers and lung imaging, therefore presenting a promising treatment for reducing the severity and duration of the disease, whilst having little to no side effects. The trials included various formulations predominantly based on traditional Chinese herbal medicine, with the therapeutic principles of ‘dispelling cold’, ‘relieving exterior’, ‘dissipating phlegm’, ‘clearing away heat’, ‘invigorating spleen’, and ‘replenishing qi’. In the included trials a total of 100 different herbs were identified. The five most frequently used herbs being Liquorice Root (Glycyrrhiza spp.), Baikal Skullcap Root (Scutellaria baicalensis), Pinellia Rhizome (Pinelliae tematae), Forsythia Fruit (Forsythia suspensa), and Bitter Apricot Seed (Armeniacae amarum). The treatment course ranged from 5 to 15 days and the most common dosage were tea preparations. The authors describe the meta-analysis as one of the larger ones conducted so far and briefly discuss some of the therapeutic effects and mechanisms of the herbs most used. This meta-analysis yields evidence for alternative strategies in the support and management of COVID-19 infections.
Abstract
Currently, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which can lead to severe respiratory failure and death, is now a global pandemic with no specific anti-viral drugs or vaccines. However, It is worth noting that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), especially Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), has been widely applied in mainland China since outbreak, bringing new hope for the prevention and control of COVID-19. A comprehensive literature searching was conducted in 7 electronic databases from their inception up to June 21, 2020 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CHM for COVID-19. Eighteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2275 patients were enrolled. Most of CHMs were originated from classical Chinese herbal formulas. Liquoric Root (Gancao, Radix Glycyrrhizae), Baical Skullcap Root (Huangqin, Radix Scutellariae Baicalensis), Pinellia Rhizome (Banxia, Rhizoma Pinelliae Tematae), Forsythia Fruit (Lianqiao, Fructus Forsythiae Suspensae), and Bitter Apricot Seed (Kuxingren, Semen Armeniacae Amarum) were most frequently used Chinese herbs. The most commonly used dosage formulation was decoction. Our meta-analyses found that comparing CHM group and conventional western medicine group, CHM group has improvements in several clinical parameters including lung CT, clinical cure rate, ranging from mild to critical cases, length of hospital stay, total score of clinical symptoms, fever reduction time, symptom score of fever, number of cough reduction cases, symptom score of cough, number of fatigue reduction cases, symptom score of fatigue, disappearing time of fatigue, TCM syndrome, viral nucleic acid testing, and inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein). Besides, no severe adverse effects was identified by CHM. CHM, especially classical Chinese herbal formulas, could be used as potential candidates for COVID-19 in this battle.