-
1.
Impact of probiotics on muscle mass, muscle strength and lean mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Prokopidis, K, Giannos, P, Kirwan, R, Ispoglou, T, Galli, F, Witard, OC, Triantafyllidis, KK, Kechagias, KS, Morwani-Mangnani, J, Ticinesi, A, et al
Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. 2023;14(1):30-44
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sarcopenia is a progressive skeletal muscle disorder involving accelerated loss of muscle mass, strength and function. It generally occurs in older age groups but can also be seen in younger people. Multiple factors contribute to the development of the condition. Besides nutritional management strategies, probiotics have recently caught the interest of researchers. As probiotics promote metabolic building activity, aid digestion and absorption and reduce muscle breakdown by favourably managing inflammation, they present great potential for the management of sarcopenia. This systematic review and meta-analysis explored the impact of probiotic supplementation on muscle mass, total lean mass and muscle strength in human adults. The review included 24 studies, with probiotics mainly from the Bifidobacteria or Lactobacilli family. The analysis concluded that probiotic supplementation improved muscle mass in comparison to placebos. It also significantly increased overall muscle strength in 6 randomized controlled trials, which was most obvious in age groups of 50 and above. However, no changes were seen concerning total lean mass. It appeared that longer studies, of >12 weeks or more, showed better outcomes in this review. Furthermore, Bifidobacteria species seemed to exhibit more favourable effects, and the authors also noted the beneficial results were more significant in Asian populations. Further research is needed to understand more about the underlying mechanism, best probiotics strains and the specifics of different demographic groups. This article yields a concise overview of sarcopenia, the nutritional aspects of the disease and how probiotics may be beneficial in disease management, strengthened with data from the review.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This was a well-conducted meta-analysis based on its methodological approach that demonstrated that Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium probiotic supplementation may contribute to improved muscle mass in younger adults and improved muscle strength in older adults.
- Bifidobacterium probiotic supplementation was associated with enhanced muscle mass in younger adults, a potential focus for those considering probiotic supplements.
- The duration of probiotic therapy matters, with longer-term (12 weeks or more) supplementation showing improvements in muscle mass and strength..
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of probiotics on muscle mass, total lean mass and muscle strength in both young and older adults.
Methods
- The search encompassed PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, from inception up to June 2022; studies included spanned a period from 2013 to June 2022.
- The study adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines and included the Risk-of-Bias tool to assess study quality.
- The study focused on changes in muscle mass, total lean mass, and muscle strength.
- Inclusion criteria: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with adult participants (>18 years); interventions involving any probiotics, and a control group receiving either no treatment or a placebo.
Results
- 24 RCTs were included (709 participants), with studies conducted in Europe, USA, and Asia. Intervention durations: ranged from 3 weeks to 12 months.
- Participants included overweight, untrained healthy and resistance-trained individuals, and those with specific conditions like metabolic syndrome and frailty.
- Body composition assessments were conducted using bioelectrical impedance (BIA) and/or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
- Probiotic strains employed in the included studies varied, with Lactobacillus the most common, followed by Bifidobacterium; some combined both. 5 of 24 studies also used additional strains.
- Dosages: ranged from 2 × 10^9 to 11.2 × 10^10 colony-forming units (CFU).
- 4 out of 24 studies used fermented food products like cheese and noodles as sources of probiotics.
- 22 RCTs measured muscle mass and total lean mass; 6 RCTs measured global muscle strength.
- Probiotic supplementation (≥12 weeks) moderately increased muscle mass, with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of 0.42. This significant effect (95% CI: 0.10–0.74, P=0.009) was observed only in younger Asian adults (<50 years) after Bifidobacterium supplementation, based on a meta-analysis of 10 studies.
- Probiotic supplementation (≥12 weeks) significantly increased global muscle strength in older adults (>50 years; SMD: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.33–1.06, P = 0.0002).
- Probiotic supplementation showed no significant impact on lean mass (SMD: -0.03, 95% CI: 0.19 – 0.13, P = 0.69).
Conclusion
Probiotic supplementation, especially Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium may have a positive impact on muscle mass and global strength
Clinical practice applications:
- Consumption of probiotics, mainly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium may contribute to improved muscle strength in older individuals (>50y).
- Consumption of Bifidobacterium strains was associated with improved muscle mass in younger individuals (<50y) in Asian countries, in a low number of studies (k=2).
- Bifidobacterium breve B-3 was associated with an improvement in muscle mass in older overweight individuals, although a causal relationship was not established.
- Probiotics may enhance muscle mass or strength by enhancing protein digestion and amino acid absorption for muscle synthesis and function.
- Considering an individual’s goals, a practitioner could consider probiotic supplementation as a complementary intervention when aiming to enhance muscle mass or strength .
Considerations for future research:
- Future research could focus on pinpointing which specific probiotic strains are most effective for muscle strength or muscle mass to tailor more precise interventions.
- Most studies did not exceed 12 weeks, highlighting the need for long-term research on probiotics sustained muscle impact.
- Future research could investigate the effects of probiotics across diverse demographic groups including different ages, sexes, and ethnic backgrounds to understand the impact in different populations.
- Delving deeper into the mechanisms by which probiotics influence muscle health could lead to targeted probiotic therapies that address specific physiological pathways.
- Finally, future research could explore how probiotics can be combined with other interventions, such as exercise or nutritional modifications, to synergistically improve muscle health and function.
Abstract
Probiotics have shown potential to counteract sarcopenia, although the extent to which they can influence domains of sarcopenia such as muscle mass and strength in humans is unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the impact of probiotic supplementation on muscle mass, total lean mass and muscle strength in human adults. A literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception until June 2022. Eligible RCTs compared the effect of probiotic supplementation versus placebo on muscle and total lean mass and global muscle strength (composite score of all muscle strength outcomes) in adults (>18 years). To evaluate the differences between groups, a meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects inverse-variance model by utilizing standardized mean differences. Twenty-four studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the effects of probiotics on muscle mass, total lean mass and global muscle strength. Our main analysis (k = 10) revealed that muscle mass was improved following probiotics compared with placebo (SMD: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.10-0.74, I2 = 57%, P = 0.009), although no changes were revealed in relation to total lean mass (k = 12; SMD: -0.03, 95% CI: -0.19 - 0.13, I2 = 0%, P = 0.69). Interestingly, a significant increase in global muscle strength was also observed among six RCTs (SMD: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.33-1.06, I2 = 64%, P = 0.0002). Probiotic supplementation enhances both muscle mass and global muscle strength; however, no beneficial effects were observed in total lean mass. Investigating the physiological mechanisms underpinning different ageing groups and elucidating appropriate probiotic strains for optimal gains in muscle mass and strength are warranted.
-
2.
Efficacy of diet restriction with or without probiotic for treatment of patients with IBS-D: Phase I-II clinical trial.
Zhao, XS, Shi, LJ, Ning, BL, Zhao, ZM, Li, XX, Zhu, MH, Zhang, YB, Fu, J
Immunity, inflammation and disease. 2023;11(5):e857
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional intestinal disorder that can significantly affect quality of life. IBS patients suffer from intermittent abdominal pain/ discomfort, altered bowel habits, and abdominal bloating/distension. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of dietary restriction and probiotic use on IBS‐D patients. This study was a 2 × 2 factorial design, single‐centre, randomised trial. Phase 1 was a 12‐week dietary intervention, with 214 participants randomised to an IgG positive restricted diet (IgG res diet) or a control diet (cold/spicy/fried restricted). In Phase 2, 167 participants were randomised into either an IgG res diet + placebo or an IgG res diet + probiotic for 12 weeks. Symptom Severity Scale (IBS‐D‐SSS) and IgG titer were assessed at the beginning and the end of the study. Results showed that both diets reduced IBS‐D symptom severity scores and decreased immunoglobulin (IgG) antibody titer, although the IgG res diet had a greater impact. IBS symptom scores decreased with the addition of a Bifidobacterium probiotic along with dietary exclusion, however, IgG titers did not change with the probiotic compared to placebo. Authors concluded that diet restriction with appropriate and effective probiotics, provides greater symptom reductions for patients with IBS-D.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
For individuals with IBDS-D:
- Establish IgG intolerances to foods and ensure an elimination diet remains nutritionally balanced
- Consider combining elimination diet with a Bifidobacterium supplement.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional intestinal disorder, affecting 5-20% of the population and diet is likely a major factor in its development as well as in its management. The aim of this study was to compare 3 dietary interventions and the use of a probiotic supplement in patients with IBS-diarrhoea dominant (IBS-D).
Methods
The study was conducted in 2 phases. The first was a 12-week 2 × 2 factorial design, randomised dietary intervention and included 224 patients (214 completed) with IBS-D. The diets were an Eastern/Chinese restriction diet, avoiding cold/raw, spicy and fried foods (CSF), the second avoided common allergens as determined by an IgG test (IgG diet, 14 foods tested), the third a combination of the two, whilst the control group continued their usual (Eastern/Chinese) diet.
The second phase was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the CSF + IgG diet plus placebo with the CSF + IgG diet plus a 2 billion Bifidobacterium adolescentis supplement; this part included 202 patients of whom 169 completed the study.
The primary outcomes under observation were a reduction in IBS-D symptom severity Score (IBS-D-SSS) and IgG antibody titre (TigG).
Results
Phase 1: The IBS-D-SSS improved in all four groups from baseline (p<0.001), with the intervention groups improving significantly more than the control group (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the IgG and the IgG + CSF groups, although the authors considered there to be a synergistic effect. Statistically significant (p<0.001) reductions in TIgG were seen in all interventions, but not the control group.
Part 2: Significant (p<0.001) improvements in IBS-D-SSS were seen with both placebo and Bifidobacterium, although this was greater in the probiotic group (p<0.001). Improvements in TIgG were seen in both groups (p<0.001), with no difference between groups.
Conclusion
The authors concluded that the best intervention for patients with IBD-D is an IgG food elimination diet together with a Bifidobacterium probiotic supplement.
Clinical practice applications:
- Consider an elimination diet based on IgG testing for clients with IBS-D
- Consider combining elimination diet with a Bifidobacterium supplement. The dose used in this study was 4x 0.5 billion capsules of Bifidobacterium adolescentis
- Eliminating cold/raw, spicy and fried food could be an alternative to IgG elimination if the latter is not suitable for the client.
Considerations for future research:
- 45% and 35% of screened patients, respectively in the 2 phases of the study, were IgG negative. Screening for more potential food intolerances may extend the suitability of the approach to more patients
- Only a single strain probiotic was tested. Further research could evaluate other or combinations of Bifidobacteria strains in combination with an IgG elimination diet
- The mechanism(s) by which probiotics may affect symptoms of IBS-D are unknown. Adding stool microbiome analyses may shed further light on the effect of the intervention on the composition and function of the microbiome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Diet is a major contributor to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and is also a powerful tool for treatment of IBS. This study compared two diets and explored the effectiveness of the diets when combined with a probiotic for treatment of IBS-D patients. METHODS Phase I, patients were randomized into groups; control, cold/spicy/fried restricted diet (CSF res diet), IgG positive restricted diet (IgG res diet), and a combination both diets (CSF + IgG res diet). Phase II, patients were randomized into IgG res diet + placebo and IgG res diet + probiotic. Both interventions were 12 weeks in duration. Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-D-SSS) and IgG titer were assessed at the beginning and the end of the study. RESULTS Totals of 214 and 167 patients completed the two parts of the study, respectively. After intervention, IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade were significantly improved compared to baseline, with results similar to the control group. In general, there were decreases in IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade that were significantly different among the groups. There were exceptions; no differences were observed for IBS-D-SSS between the IgG res diet and CSF + IgG res diet, or TIgG grade between the CSF res diet, IgG res diet, and CSF + IgG res diet. However, the CSF res diet and IgG res diet had a synergistic effect that decreased IBS-D-SSS and TIgG titer, with a greater contribution by the IgG res diet. Therefore, we evaluated the IgG res diet with either placebo or probiotic and found that IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade decreased from baseline. There was a significant decrease in IBS-D-SSS with the probiotic but TIgG grade was not significantly different between the IgG diet + placebo and IgG diet + probiotic diet. CONCLUSIONS Both the CSF res diet and IgG res diet improved IBS symptoms and demonstrated synergy, although the IgG res diet had a greater contribution. Further, when intolerant foods cannot be eliminated from a diet, avoiding uncooked, cold, spicy, fried, and alcoholic foods is a superior choice. The IgG res diet combined with Bifidobacteria was the best dietary choice and may function though a non-IgG pathway.
-
3.
Effect of the probiotic strain, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9, on chronic constipation: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Ma, T, Yang, N, Xie, Y, Li, Y, Xiao, Q, Li, Q, Jin, H, Zheng, L, Sun, Z, Zuo, K, et al
Pharmacological research. 2023;191:106755
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Chronic constipation (CC) is a common gastroenterological problem encountered in clinical practice, and it negatively impacts patients’ quality of life. Growing evidence indicates that the occurrence of CC is closely linked to gut dysbiosis. Several main probiotics have been used to relieve constipation. The main aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the beneficial effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9 (P9) administration on alleviating CC and impact on the host gut microbiota and its metabolites. This study was a 42-day longitudinal double-blind randomised controlled trial which enrolled a total of 181 patients with CC. Subjects were randomly assigned to the probiotic or placebo group. Subjects in P9 group received one sachet of P9 powder per day after meal. Results show that P9 administration significantly improved patients’ defecation frequency. In fact, P9 administration effectively alleviated constipation, and the symptom relief effects were linked to desired changes and interactions with different types of host microbes. Authors conclude that administering P9 could effectively relieve chronic constipation in adults and improve some aspects of their quality of life.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study suggested that P9-associated constipation symptom relief was not attributed to macroscopic changes in the host gut bacteriome and phageome
- However, results supported that taking P9 could alleviate constipation, with the symptom relief effects linked to desired changes and interactions with different types of host microbes, including the gut commensal bacteria (L. plantarum, Ruminococcus_B gnavus, Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp.) and the bacteriophage family, Herelleviridae.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This study investigated the effect of a specific probiotic strain in alleviating Chronic Constipation (CC).
Methods
- The study employed a 42-day randomised control trial (RTC) double-blind, placebo-controlled design, with 163 patients, (mean age =22.68 ±5.66 years for the probiotic group and 21.59 ±4.59 years for the placebo group), diagnosed with CC (Rome IV criteria)
- The male to female ratio was 15–63 and 17–68 in probiotic and placebo groups respectively
- Groups were standardised with no differences observed in baseline age, gender ratio, drug treatment, high-fibre diet and smoking between the two groups (P >0.18)
- Participants were randomly assigned to the probiotic Lactiplantibacillis plantarum P9 (n=78; 2 g per sachet, 1 ×1011 CFU/day) or the placebo (n =85; maltodextrin powder) groups.
Results
Primary outcomes: weekly mean complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs):
- At 28-days CSBM was 28% higher in the P9 group (P=0.039) compared with the placebo group
- At 42-days CSBM remained significantly higher in the P9 group (P=0.026) compared with the placebo group, and increased 2-fold compared with baseline (P <0.05)
- Authors noted that the CSBM benefits were maintained even after 14 days of not taking the supplement.
Secondary outcomes: The effects of P9 supplementation on constipation-related parameters, including the weekly mean frequency of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) demonstrated:
- After 28-days of P9 supplementation, SBMs were 12% higher than the placebo group (P=0.039)
- No differences were observed in the weekly mean stool consistency and straining scores between groups (P>0.05).
Patients’ quality of life and psychological state, using a PAC-QOL questionnaire related to: worries and concerns (WO), physical discomfort, psychosocial discomfort, and satisfaction and found:
- At day 14 WO in the P9 group was 1.22-fold lower than those in the placebo group (P <0.05)
- No differences in the other 3 items between P9 and placebo groups (P >0.05) were observed
- Supplementation resulted in a significant change in relative abundance of the P9 genome (≥0.01%)
- However, no differences were observed in alpha diversity after P9 consumption compared with placebo.
Conclusion
- The results indicated that P9 administration alleviated patients’ constipation symptoms and improved their quality of life but did not impact on gut bacteria or phageome
- Lactiplantibacillis plantarum P9 supplementation impacted several beneficial bacteria species (e.g. (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Ruminococcus_B gnavus), and reduced levels of other bacteria and phage taxa (e.g. Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp., and Herelleviridae) which may be implicated in constipation relief mechanisms.
Clinical practice applications:
- In this study, the use of P9 administration significantly improved patients’ defecation frequency which could have beneficial implications for patients suffering from chronic constipation
- Probiotic effects are known to be strain- and host-specific, and based on this study P9 administration for relief of constipation needs to be taken for at least two weeks to improve aspects of patients’ quality of life and 4 weeks for improvements in constipation.
Considerations for future research:
- Future trials should include factors that impact gut motility and constipation symptoms, such as: a detailed daily diet (dietary composition, fibre content, and water intake) and physical activity scale (intensity and duration), and longer term use of P9 or comparison across strains
- The relatively small study size and short duration of this study, as well as the younger age groups included may be pertinent when considering future research.
Abstract
Chronic constipation (CC) is a common gastrointestinal condition associated with intestinal inflammation, and the condition considerably impairs patients' quality of life. We conducted a large-scale 42-day randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of probiotics in alleviating CC. 163 patients diagnosed with CC (following Rome IV criteria) were randomly divided into probiotic (n = 78; received Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9 [P9]; 1 ×1011 CFU/day) and placebo (n = 85; received placebo material) groups. Ingesting P9 significantly improved the weekly mean frequency of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) and spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs), while significantly reducing the level of worries and concerns (WO; P < 0.05). Comparing with the placebo group, P9 group was significantly enriched in potentially beneficial bacteria (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Ruminococcus_B gnavus), while depriving of several bacterial and phage taxa (Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp., and Herelleviridae; P < 0.05). Interesting significant correlations were also observed between some clinical parameters and subjects' gut microbiome, including: negative correlation between Oscillospiraceae sp. and SBMs; positive correlation between WO and Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp. Additionally, P9 group had significantly (P < 0.05) more predicted gut microbial bioactive potential involved in the metabolism of amino acids (L-asparagine, L-pipecolinic acid), short-/medium-chain fatty acids (valeric acid and caprylic acid). Furthermore, several metabolites (p-cresol, methylamine, trimethylamine) related to the intestinal barrier and transit decreased significantly after P9 administration (P < 0.05). In short, the constipation relief effect of P9 intervention was accompanied by desirable changes in the fecal metagenome and metabolome. Our findings support the notion of applying probiotics in managing CC.
-
4.
Probiotics fortify intestinal barrier function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Zheng, Y, Zhang, Z, Tang, P, Wu, Y, Zhang, A, Li, D, Wang, CZ, Wan, JY, Yao, H, Yuan, CS
Frontiers in immunology. 2023;14:1143548
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Intestinal barrier function is closely related to the pathogenesis of various immune and inflammatory diseases. The intestinal microbiota plays an essential role in maintaining gut homeostasis and functionality in the presence of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory microbes. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the role of probiotics in contributing to intestinal barrier function, and the related immune function, inflammatory status, and gut microbiota composition. This study was a systematic review of 28 articles (qualitative synthesis), and a meta-analysis of 26 randomised controlled trials. Results showed that probiotics could significantly improve intestinal barrier function according to specific indicators. The meta-analysis also indicated that probiotic supplementation could reduce inflammatory factors. Furthermore, it also demonstrated that probiotics could modulate gut microbiota compositions by elevating the abundances of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. Authors conclude that probiotics could improve intestinal barrier function to some extent, but more high-quality randomised controlled studies are needed to reach a solid conclusion.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
The probiotics Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus may be beneficial for health by addressing imbalances in gut bacteria (dysbiosis), reducing inflammation in the gut and improving the integrity and function of the gut barrier
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Probiotics are microorganisms that are considered beneficial to health. The aim of this study was to assess the role of probiotics in protecting intestinal barrier function as well as their effects on the composition of gut microbiota, inflammatory status, and immune function for reducing the risk of related diseases.
Methods
26 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2005-2021 with a total population of n=1891 (n = 955 Intervention, n = 936 controls)) were included in the meta-analysis. Outcome measures were categorised under indicators relating to intestinal barrier function, inflammatory markers, immune function and microbiota composition. Studies were conducted worldwide with participants being healthcare patients or athletes. Study durations ranged from 3 days to 6 months. Different dosages and forms of probiotics were used. Data was pooled for Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus species.
Results
Gut barrier function in the probiotic groups was improved as measured by transepithelial resistance (TER) mean difference (MD) 5.27 {95% CI, 3.82 to 6.72, p = < 0.00001], lipopolysaccharide (LPS) standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.47 (95% CI, -0.85 to -0.09, p = 0.02), serum zonulin SMD -1.58 (95% CI,-2.49 to -0.66, p = 0.0007), and endotoxin SMD -3.20 (95% CI, -5.41 to - 0.98, p = 0.005).
The inflammatory markers interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) were also improved compared to control groups. Lactobacillus (95% CI p=0.02) and Bifidobacterium (95% CI, p=0.01) enhanced microbial composition, however, Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus species did not. Immune function as measured by Immunoglobulin A (IgA), Immunoglobulin G IgG and Immunoglobulin M (IgM) were not improved.
Conclusion
The findings of this study suggest that intestinal barrier function and microbial composition could be improved using probiotics. They were also found to help alleviate inflammation. Further studies of high quality are however needed to confirm these results.
No conflicts of interest were reported.
Clinical practice applications:
The use of the probiotics Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus may be beneficial for:
- supporting the integrity of gut barrier function
- improving the composition of gut microbiota
- lowering inflammation
Considerations for future research:
High heterogeneity between studies may affect the applicability of the results. Future research development should focus on the following areas:
- testing methods
- study durations
- measuring indicators
- the type and dose of probiotics
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics play a vital role in treating immune and inflammatory diseases by improving intestinal barrier function; however, a comprehensive evaluation is missing. The present study aimed to explore the impact of probiotics on the intestinal barrier and related immune function, inflammation, and microbiota composition. A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted. METHODS Four major databases (PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, CENTRAL, and Embase) were thoroughly searched. Weighted mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), heterogeneity among studies was evaluated utilizing I2 statistic (Chi-Square test), and data were pooled using random effects meta-analyses. RESULTS Meta-analysis of data from a total of 26 RCTs (n = 1891) indicated that probiotics significantly improved gut barrier function measured by levels of TER (MD, 5.27, 95% CI, 3.82 to 6.72, P < 0.00001), serum zonulin (SMD, -1.58, 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.66, P = 0.0007), endotoxin (SMD, -3.20, 95% CI, -5.41 to -0.98, P = 0.005), and LPS (SMD, -0.47, 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.09, P = 0.02). Furthermore, probiotic groups demonstrated better efficacy over control groups in reducing inflammatory factors, including CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6. Probiotics can also modulate the gut microbiota structure by boosting the enrichment of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. CONCLUSION The present work revealed that probiotics could improve intestinal barrier function, and alleviate inflammation and microbial dysbiosis. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted to achieve a more definitive conclusion. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=281822, identifier CRD42021281822.
-
5.
The effects of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on inflammation, oxidative stress, and circulating adiponectin and leptin concentration in subjects with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a GRADE-assessed systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized clinical trials.
Naseri, K, Saadati, S, Ghaemi, F, Ashtary-Larky, D, Asbaghi, O, Sadeghi, A, Afrisham, R, de Courten, B
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(2):543-561
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
When acute, inflammation is a necessary function of the immune system allowing the body to recognise and remove foreign stimuli. However, when chronic inflammation occurs, it can contribute to and exacerbate diseases such as type 2 diabetes (T2D). The gut microbiota and the use of probiotics has been shown to modulate processes within the body and decrease chronic inflammation, however research has not consistently shown this and an inverse relationship has been shown in some studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of probiotics and synbiotics on inflammation in individuals with prediabetes and T2D. A total of 32 randomised control trials were included in the meta-analysis and showed that certain, but not all inflammatory markers were reduced. Antioxidants were increased. The effect was especially pronounced in individuals with T2D as opposed to prediabetes. It was concluded that probiotics or synbiotics could be useful for individuals with T2D to reduce inflammation and reduce the risk for other associated diseases such as heart disease.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Probiotic and synbiotic supplementation may significantly reduce inflammation and oxidative stress, potentially lowering the risk of cardiovascular diseases in those with prediabetes and T2DM.
- These supplements may be particularly beneficial for individuals with T2DM and those who are overweight or obese.
- Incorporating probiotics and synbiotics into the diet could be a supportive strategy for improving metabolic health markers.
- The observed benefits vary depending on the type and duration of supplementation, suggesting that consistent, long-term use might be necessary to achieve noticeable health improvements.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review meta-analysis and meta-regression assessed the impact of probiotics and synbiotics on inflammation, antioxidants, oxidative stress, and adipokines in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.
Methodology
The methodology involved searching PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases without date or language restrictions until March 2022. Study quality was evaluated.
- Inclusion criteria: Adults 18+ with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes; interventions with probiotics or synbiotics versus placebo or other treatments; and reporting on inflammatory biomarkers, adipocytokines, and oxidative stress serum biomarkers in RCTs with parallel or cross-over designs.
Results
32 RCTs with 2074 participants were analysed, mostly in Asia (26 studies) and 5 in Europe, Africa, Oceania, and America, over 4 to 24 weeks. Dosages varied, including synbiotic bread with Lactobacillus sporogenes and inulin (1×10^8 CFU, 0.07g/g, thrice daily), 300ml/day fermented milk with L. helveticus, daily synbiotic and probiotic tablets, a probiotic mixture (120g/day), synbiotics (9g, thrice daily), multistrain probiotic yoghurt (300g/day), L. sporogenes-enriched bread (40g, thrice daily), and probiotic honey (2500mg/day). Measurements included CRP (31 RCTs), TNF-α (12 RCTs), GSH (13 RCTs), MDA (12 RCTs), TAC (11 RCTs), and NO levels (8 trials).
Effects of probiotics and synbiotics:
- significantly reduced CRP levels (-0.62 mg/L, 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.44, p < 0.001, 31 RCTs), showing greater efficacy in T2DM than prediabetes, particularly in individuals with overweight.
- TNF-α levels decreased in participants with T2D or overweight (-0.48 pg/mL, 95% CI: -0.81 to -0.15, p = 0.004, 12 RCTs).
- GSH levels significantly rose (69.80, 95% CI: 33.65 to 105.95, p < 0.001, 13 RCTs), independent of trial duration or baseline BMI.
- MDA levels were significantly reduced (-0.51, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.30, p < 0.001, 12 RCTs) in studies lasting ≥12 weeks.
- TAC significantly increased (73.59, 95% CI: 33.24 to 113.95, p < 0.001, 11 RCTs), with more pronounced effects in longer trials and with probiotics.
- NO levels improved significantly (7.49, 95% CI: 3.12 to 11.86, p = 0.001, 9 trials) in individuals with obesity.
- Positive impacts on CRP, TNF-α, MDA, and TAC were more marked in trials ≥12 weeks.
Conclusions
Probiotic or synbiotic intake may benefit those with prediabetes and T2DM, reducing CRP, TNF-α, MDA, and enhancing TAC, GSH, NO levels, especially in T2DM individuals. Effects are stronger in individuals with overweight or obesity.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic and synbiotic supplementation could be recommended to reduce inflammatory biomarkers like CRP and TNF-α, especially in individuals with T2DM.
- The improvements in oxidative stress markers, such as increased TAC and GSH and decreased MDA, support the use of probiotic and synbiotic supplements in managing oxidative stress in T2DM and prediabetes.
- Longer durations (≥12 weeks) of probiotic or synbiotic supplementation may offer a more pronounced effect on antioxidant capacity.
- The findings can guide personalised nutritional recommendations, as for example improvement in inflammation biomarkers and NO were more evident in individuals with T2DM or overweight suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect primarily in these groups. Moreover, markers related to antioxidant capacity were improved in those diagnosed with prediabetes or T2DM irrespective of BMI.
Considerations for future research:
- The beneficial effects on inflammatory and antioxidant/oxidative stress markers suggest a need for larger and longer-term studies to solidify the role of probiotics and synbiotics in benefiting chronic conditions like T2DM and prediabetes.
- There is potential for investigating the specific strains of probiotics that are most effective, considering varying outcomes observed across different studies.
- Research could explore the mechanisms by which probiotics and synbiotics exert their beneficial effects, contributing to a better understanding of gut-health interactions.
- The varying responses based on BMI categories indicate a need for personalised nutrition research to optimise probiotic therapy for individual needs.
- Future studies should consider standardising the dosage and formulation of probiotics to determine the most effective therapeutic doses and combinations.
Abstract
PURPOSE Probiotics or synbiotics consumption have been suggested to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) through a decline in inflammation and oxidative stress, however, the results from studies are conflicting. This study filled this knowledge gap by evaluating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating probiotics or synbiotics intake on adipokines, inflammation, and oxidative stress in patients with prediabetes and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS We systematically did search up to March 2022 in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane library. A random-effect model was applied to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for each outcome. RESULTS A total of 32 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. This intervention led to a significant decrease in levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (WMD - 0.62 mg/l; 95% CI - 0.80, - 0.44; p < 0.001), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (WMD - 0.27 pg/ml; 95% CI - 0.44, - 0.10; p = 0.002) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (WMD - 0.51 µmol/l; 95% CI - 0.73, - 0.30; p < 0.001), and also a significant increase in levels of glutathione (GSH) (WMD 69.80 µmol/l; 95% CI 33.65, 105.95; p < 0.001), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (WMD 73.59 mmol/l; 95% CI 33.24, 113.95; p < 0.001) and nitric oxide (NO) (WMD 7.49 µmol/l; 95% CI 3.12, 11.86; p = 0.001), without significant alterations in interleukin-6 (IL-6) and adipokines levels. CONCLUSION A consumption of probiotics or synbiotics could be a useful intervention to improve cardiometabolic outcomes through a reduced inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with prediabetes and T2DM.
-
6.
The Role of Genetically Engineered Probiotics for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.
Zhang, T, Zhang, J, Duan, L
Nutrients. 2023;15(7)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), largely classified as Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic intestinal inflammatory disorder mediated by genetic, immune, microbial, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to summarise the efficacy of different genetically modified probiotics compared to wild-type probiotics in the treatment of IBD in animal models and patients and to investigate the specific effects and main mechanisms involved. This study was a systematic review of forty-five preclinical studies and one clinical study. Results showed a protective effect of genetically modified organisms (gm) probiotics in colitis. Several protective mechanisms have been identified: reduction of the pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in colonic tissue and plasma, modulation of the activity of oxidative stress in the colon, improvement of intestinal barrier integrity, modulation of the diversity and composition of gut microbiota, and production of favourable metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids, by beneficial bacteria. Authors concluded that gm probiotics are more effective and safer than wild-type probiotics, to facilitate clinical translation.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Conclusions of this review were largely based on mouse models and although treatment using probiotics is generally considered safe in humans, with only minor side-effects (flatulence), practitioners need to be aware that in an IBD population the use of GM formulations might not be completely without risk.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This paper summarises the efficacy of specific genetically modified (GM) probiotic formulations for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) when compared to wild type probiotics. The aim was to ascertain what specific effects and mechanisms such probiotics have on IBD symptomatology.
Methods
- A total of 46 published articles were included; 45 mouse experimental models (induced acute or chronic colitis) (n=15-130) and 1 human IBD population clinical trial (n=10)
- The effect of GM probiotics were compared to placebo and wild-type probiotics in trials including preclinical studies, randomised controlled trials and cohort studies
- Animals received probiotics via gastric gavage (105 - 4 x 1012 CFU) for 3-6 weeks
- The human placebo-uncontrolled trial lasted 7 days and patients received 10 GM capsules of L.lactis (1 x 1010 CFU) twice daily.
Results
- GM probiotics that secrete immunoregulatory cytokines such as IL-10 appear to reduce intestinal damage
- The human trial using GM L.lactis resulted in 5 patients who went into complete clinical remission (CDAI, <150) with 3 patients exhibiting a clinical response (decrease in CDAI, >70). with only minor adverse events (flatulence)
- However, human cytokines that promote intestinal barrier function and epithelial restitution were not enhanced with oral administration of probiotics
- Two studies concluded that GM L.lactis and S.boulardii, that secrete atrial natriuretic peptide, might be the most effective options in supporting colitis
- GM L.casei resulted in faster recovery from weight loss in acute colitis models
- Superoxide dismutase (SOD) producing GM L.fermentum increased SOD activity by almost eightfold compared to the wild type
- GM Lact. fermentum furthermore showed a higher survival rate and lower disease activity index (P <0·05) in colitis models
- GM L.lactis improved gut microbial composition and GM S.cerevisiae improved microbial diversity whilst reducing the Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio
- GM E.coli significantly reduced weight loss, colon shortening plus lower disease activity and histological changes (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Despite the heterogeneity of the trials, GM probiotics appear to play a notable part in ameliorating IBD symptomatology and disease severity when compared to wild-type probiotics. Human efficacy and potential adverse effects require more in-depth trials to ascertain safety and optimal dosages.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotics species used in the trials included S.thermophilus, E.coli, L.lactis, B.ovatus, S.boulardii, L.fermentum, B.longhum, L.casei, L.plantarum, and S.cerevisiae. Wild-types of some of these are already available to use in clinical practice
- Note that oral administration in the human trial showed no significant health outcome, therefore efficacy and safety need to be ascertained on an individual patient level
- Colonisation of beneficial bacteria in the gut of IBD patients might be difficult and any form of supplementation therefore needs to be closely monitored.
Considerations for future research:
- More evidence is needed to demonstrate that GM probiotic formulations result in significantly improved outcomes when compared to wild-types
- Future randomised placebo-controlled trials need to include larger cohorts to determine supplement efficacy
- Longer periods of intervention are needed to confirm efficacy, safety, and tolerance for both Crohn’s Disease and Colitis
- Optimal GM probiotic formulation, doses, and means of application need to be identified.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many preclinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of genetically modified probiotics (gm probiotics) in animal models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). OBJECTIVE This systematic review was performed to investigate the role of gm probiotics in treating IBD and to clarify the involved mechanisms. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Medline were searched from their inception to 18 September 2022 to identify preclinical and clinical studies exploring the efficacy of gm probiotics in IBD animal models or IBD patients. Two independent researchers extracted data from the included studies, and the data were pooled by the type of study; that is, preclinical or clinical. RESULTS Forty-five preclinical studies were included. In these studies, sodium dextran sulfate and trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid were used to induce colitis. Eleven probiotic species have been genetically modified to produce therapeutic substances, including IL-10, antimicrobial peptides, antioxidant enzymes, and short-chain fatty acids, with potential therapeutic properties against colitis. The results showed generally positive effects of gm probiotics in reducing disease activity and ameliorating intestinal damage in IBD models; however, the efficacy of gm probiotics compared to that of wild-type probiotics in many studies was unclear. The main mechanisms identified include modulation of the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota, production of regulatory metabolites by beneficial bacteria, reduction of the pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in colonic tissue and plasma, modulation of oxidative stress activity in the colon, and improvement of intestinal barrier integrity. Moreover, only one clinical trial with 10 patients with Crohn's disease was included, which showed that L. lactis producing IL-10 was safe, and a decrease in disease activity was observed in these patients. CONCLUSIONS Gm probiotics have a certain efficacy in colitis models through several mechanisms. However, given the scarcity of clinical trials, it is important for researchers to pay more attention to gm probiotics that are more effective and safer than wild-type probiotics to facilitate further clinical translation.
-
7.
Comparative analysis of the efficacies of probiotic supplementation and glucose-lowering drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liang, T, Xie, X, Wu, L, Li, L, Yang, L, Gao, H, Deng, Z, Zhang, X, Chen, X, Zhang, J, et al
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:825897
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a serious medical condition often requiring antidiabetic drug management. Although commonly used antidiabetic drugs effectively control glucose levels, their tolerability profiles differ, causing various side effects. Probiotics can be used as single or multi strains to reduce glycaemic and lipid indicators and avoid the negative effects of antidiabetic medications. The study included twenty-five randomised controlled trials, of which fourteen studies assessed the effectiveness of probiotics (single probiotics, multi-strain probiotics, and probiotics with co-supplements), and eleven studies included different antidiabetic drugs such as Thiazolidinedione (TZD), Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP-4i), and Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of probiotic and antidiabetic drugs on glycaemia, lipid profile and blood pressure in T2D patients. Probiotics were less effective than specific antidiabetic drugs in reducing fasting blood sugar levels (FBS), HbA1c levels, and triglycerides. Different probiotic formulations were effective in reducing the HOMA-IR index, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and systolic and diastolic pressure (SBP and DBP). A subgroup analysis showed a greater reduction in FBS, HbA1c, TC, TG, and SBP in obese and elderly participants, those who participated for a longer duration, and those from Eastern origins. Considering the high heterogeneity in baseline study characteristics among the studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, further studies are required to evaluate the effects of probiotics and antidiabetic drugs. However, healthcare professionals can use the study to understand the effect of probiotics and antidiabetic drugs in reducing glycaemic, lipid and hypertension profiles.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Glucose-lowering drugs, except for DPP-4i, reduced FBS and HbA1c more than probiotics; and SGLT-2i induced the greatest decrease in HbA1c
- A BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 showed a significant decrease in FBS and the HOMA-IR index compared with those with lower BMI
- Weight loss induced by glucose-lowering drugs and probiotic supplementation plays an important role in glycaemic control in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This meta-analysis compared the effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs thiazolidinedione [TZD], glucagon-like pep-tide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1 RA], dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors [SGLT-2i]) on various outcome measures in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods
A search was performed on PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and Cochrane Library between January 2015 - April 2021.
Results
25 randomised controlled trials (RCT) were included (2843 participants). 14 RCTs (842 participants) involved the administration of single probiotics, multi-strain probiotics, and probiotics with co-supplements, and 11 RCTs (2001 participants) involved TZD, GLP-1 RA, SGLT-2i, and DPP-4i. Participants in 7 of the studies had T2D, aged ≤ 55 years old. 8 RCTs included participants with a mean BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, and 11 RCTs participants had a mean BMI < 30 kg/m2.
Effects of probiotics:
- Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS): A reduction (−1.42, −0.32 mg/dL, p=0.000)
- Glycated hemaglobin (HbA1c): No reduction (p = 0.000)
- Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR): A decrease (−0.64, −0.31; p = 0.780), regardless of probiotic strain or with a co-supplement
- Insulin: Not significant (p = 0.000). Subgroup analysis: no reduction
- Total Cholesterol (TC): No difference (p = 0.941). Subgroup analysis: reduction from multi-species probiotics (−0.36, −0.01 mg/dL, p = 0.871)
- Triglycerides: Difference (−0.25 mg/dL, p = 0.958)
- LDL-C: No changes (p = 0.189)
- HDL-C: No increase (p = 0.014)
- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP): A decrease (−6.44, −0.08 mmHg, p = 0.044)
- Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): A reduction (−4.53, −0.80 mmHg, p = 0.206).
Effects of glucose-lowering drugs:
- FBS: A decrease (−4.22 mg/dL, −1.24 mg/dL, p = 0.000)
- HbA1c: A decrease (−2.51%, −0.52%, p = 0.000) with TZD, GLP-1 RA, SGLT-2i, and DPP- 4i; a reduction with SGLT-2i (p = 0.003)
- TC: No difference (p = 0.000). Subgroup: no decrease with single species probiotics and probiotics with co-supplements, TZD, GLP-1 RA, and DPP-4i)
- TG: No difference (p = 0.000)
- . HDL-C: No increase (p = 0.000). Subgroup: a decrease with TZDs (−2.37, −0.72 mg/dL). No difference with probiotic strains, or probiotics with co-supplements, GLP-1 RA, and DPP-4i
- LDL-C: No changes (p = 0.000), Subgroups: no difference with probiotic strains, probiotics with co-supplements, TZD, GLP-1 RA, and DPP-4i).
Limitations
Limited number of studies for TZD and SGLT-2i, making results potentially unreliable.
Conclusions
Multi species probiotics are worth considering as an adjunct to glucose-lowering drugs, and for improving lipid profiles and hypertension.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic supplementation reduced the HOMA-IR index
- Multi-species probiotics were associated with reduction in TC and TG levels
- DPP-4i only decreased TG levels
- TZD was associated with decrease in HDL-C, whereas probiotic supplementation was associated with higher decrease in SBP and DBP and that GLP-1 RA increases the risk of hypoglycaemia.
Considerations for future research:
- Semaglutide was associated with an increased risk for hypoglycaemia compared with a placebo, indicating that the safety of semaglutide needs further study
- Dietary and physical activity should be considered in future studies
- Heterogeneity in some indicators may be due to differences in study baseline characteristics,Larger trials needed to support the results of this meta-analysis.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs (thiazolidinedione [TZD], glucagon-like pep-tide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1 RA], dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors [SGLT-2i]) in patients with type 2 diabetes from randomized con-trolled trials (RCTs). The PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched on the treatment effects of probiotics and glucose-lowering drugs on glycemia, lipids, and blood pressure metabolism published between Jan 2015 and April 2021. We performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model. We included 25 RCTs (2,843 participants). Overall, GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i, and TZD significantly reduce fasting blood sugar (FBS) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), whereas GLP-1 RA increased the risk of hypoglycaemia. Multispecies probiotics decrease FBS, total cholesterol (TC), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP). Moreover, subgroup analyses indicated that participants aged >55 years, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, longer duration of intervention, and subjects from Eastern countries, showed significantly higher reduction in FBS and HbA1c, TC, TG and SBP. This meta-analysis revealed that including multiple probiotic rather than glucose-lowering drugs might be more beneficial regarding T2D prevention who suffering from simultaneously hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension.
-
8.
Gut feelings: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for depressive symptoms.
Chahwan, B, Kwan, S, Isik, A, van Hemert, S, Burke, C, Roberts, L
Journal of affective disorders. 2019;253:317-326
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is a debilitating psychiatric disorder that is the leading cause of disability world-wide. Multiple causes of depression have been identified, including genetic, neurological, inflammatory, personality, cognitive, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the multispecies probiotic Ecologic® Barrier for reducing symptoms in adults with mild to severe levels of depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups; probiotic and placebo. 71 participants with depressive symptoms were recruited and allocated sequentially over 12 months. Results indicate that all participants across both probiotic and placebo groups exhibited a reduction in depressive symptoms over the time-period of the trial. Thus, the routine involved with daily preparation and consumption of the probiotic and scheduled appointments, as well as involvement in these behaviours with the aim of seeking improvement in depressive symptoms had positive impacts on mood, irrespective of whether the probiotic or placebo was consumed. Authors conclude that their findings offer evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
- The study suggests that probiotics, rather than having a direct effect on depressive symptoms, potentially act on immune system activity, inflammation and gut barrier integrity which contribute to the expression of depression.
- Probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of other therapies, such as CBT.
- This study points to the validity of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
With evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depression, this study set out to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements on depressive symptoms from a sample of 71 participants with depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial conducted over 8 weeks in Australia. Pre and post intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota were compared alongside psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to non-depressed, placebo and probiotic groups. All the clinical trial participants demonstrated an improvement in symptoms – participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one of the metrics for depression.
Clinical practice applications:
This study was small and carried out over a short period of time. While significant results were found, which signify potential considerations for clinical practice, the results from this study do not offer evidence that the probiotics used had a direct effect on depressive symptoms – they suggest that probiotics potentially act on cognitive processes contributing to depression which may include immune system activity, inflammation, and gut barrier integrity. Overall, this study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression. In clinical practice, probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of therapies, such as CBT. Finally, the use of probiotics promotes the concept of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Considerations for future research:
These preliminary results are promising and offer a number of future research and clinical avenues to build upon. The results do however, indicate that a longer trial may be needed to fully assess the effects of probiotics on mood and the mechanisms by which probiotics may be influencing this. The study also suggests that further research using a range of concentrations in a dose response study may be warranted to determine the optimal dose; a greater dose over a longer period may produce detectable changes in microbiota as well as further differences in psychological data.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide; with evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depressive symptoms. We conducted a clinical trial to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements (Winclove's Ecologic® Barrier) on depressive symptoms in a sample of participants with mild to severe depression. METHOD 71 participants were randomly allocated to either probiotic or placebo, which was, consumed daily over eight weeks. Pre- and post-intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota composition were compared. Clinical trial participants were also compared on psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to a non-depressed group (n = 20). RESULTS All clinical trial participants demonstrated improvement in symptoms, suggesting non-specific therapeutic effects associated with weekly monitoring visits. Participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group, particularly in the mild/moderate subgroup. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however, a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one depression metric. LIMITATIONS There was a high attrition rate, which may be attributed to weekly monitoring visits. Additionally, modulation of the gut microbiota may need more specific testing to distinguish subtle changes. CONCLUSIONS While microbiota composition was similar between all groups, probiotics did affect a psychological variable associated with susceptibility to depression. Further research is needed to investigate how probiotics can be utilised to modify mental wellbeing, and whether they can act as an adjunct to existing treatments.
-
9.
Effect of a Protein Supplement on the Gut Microbiota of Endurance Athletes: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study.
Moreno-Pérez, D, Bressa, C, Bailén, M, Hamed-Bousdar, S, Naclerio, F, Carmona, M, Pérez, M, González-Soltero, R, Montalvo-Lominchar, MG, Carabaña, C, et al
Nutrients. 2018;10(3)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Protein supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and increase muscle mass. However, their effect on other aspects of health is less well known. Dietary changes can affect gut microbiota balance, with beneficial or harmful consequences for the host. This small pilot study was performed on cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) or maltodextrin (control) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analysed in faecal samples, and oxidative stress markers were measured in blood plasma and urine. Faecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these metabolites of fermentation. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels. Protein supplementation did however increase the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decrease the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. The authors concluded that long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota.
- Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota and whether there is a differential impact between protein from animal and plant sources.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This is a very interesting study that is relevant to athletic populations.
Clinical practice applications:
Potentially there is a role for probiotics / prebiotics when increasing protein intake (particularly of animal origin) to maintain microbiota diversity and prevent ensuing health complications.
Considerations for future research:
Further, larger scale, research is needed to understand whether the same effect of protein supplementation would be seen with plant-based proteins or whether this is unique to animal based protein supplementation. For example, is the hydrolysation of the proteins to account for the largest effect or could a whole food protein, i.e. not hydrolysed, elicit the same effects?
Also, is this effect seen in other sports, e.g. non-endurance. What about the effect under different conditions e.g. energy deficit vs. energy excess?
Abstract
Nutritional supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and physical recovery. Protein supplements fulfill this function by improving performance and increasing muscle mass; however, their effect on other organs or systems is less well known. Diet alterations can induce gut microbiota imbalance, with beneficial or deleterious consequences for the host. To test this, we performed a randomized pilot study in cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) (n = 12) or maltodextrin (control) (n = 12) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed in fecal samples, whereas malondialdehyde levels (oxidative stress marker) were determined in plasma and urine. Fecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these fermentation-derived metabolites. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels; however, it increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decreased the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. Thus, long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.