-
1.
Eating in the lockdown during the Covid 19 pandemic; self-reported changes in eating behaviour, and associations with BMI, eating style, coping and health anxiety.
Coulthard, H, Sharps, M, Cunliffe, L, van den Tol, A
Appetite. 2021;161:105082
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in national lockdowns, which resulted in isolation within people’s homes. This cross-sectional survey examined changes in eating patterns and behaviour during lockdown. Of the 620 participants included in the study, eating higher energy density foods was more common in females with a higher BMI and higher health anxiety. Although there was a change in emotional eating behaviours across the sample as a whole, it was not in the expected direction, with many participants reporting a decrease in emotional eating after the implementation of lockdown. There were also increases in fruit and vegetable consumption and home prepared foods. Many of these behavioural responses were influenced by pre-lockdown tendencies. Therefore, it is important to consider these when understanding coping strategies during lockdown, and how to support clients as we come out of lockdown.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- National lockdowns, as seen during the 2020/21 Covid-19 pandemic, impacted eating behaviour and associations with BMI, eating style and health anxiety.
- Given the new nature of this research, it is not clear what impact confounding factors such as food insecurity had on changing eating behaviours.
- Disproportionate risks were seen in certain demographics and in those shielding due to their heightened risk from Covid-19.
- Retrospective and longitudinal studies to monitor the impact of lockdowns on eating behaviour and health anxiety are needed.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
X
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
The role of eating behaviours and psychological responses during lockdown has become an area of interest, particularly with the uncertainty of going into future lockdowns. With Covid-19, and individual’s responses to it, being a relatively new research topic, there is not yet enough evidence for longitudinal outcomes of the findings in these studies. It is also difficult to ascertain the influence of confounding variables prior to the national lockdown, such as food insecurity, not accounted for due to the unpredictable start to the pandemic. There has also been disproportionate risks between certain demographics and their Covid-19 risk, therefore further research on the impact of this on health anxiety and subsequent eating behaviours is required. This highlights a wider need for continued research on the topic.
Clinical practice applications:
Those who had problematic eating behaviours and higher BMI pre lockdown will need to be supported with healthier coping practices if subsequent lockdowns occur, to prevent health related anxiety and consumption of high energy density foods. Furthermore, those who were shielding in their homes were also more likely to show an increase in emotional eating post lockdown. Therefore, clients who spent a large amount of lockdown shielding will need additional support, to develop coping strategies to prevent risk of emotional eating and health anxiety.
Considerations for future research:
Both retrospective and longitudinal studies monitoring the impact of eating behaviours and health anxiety pre and post lockdown are needed. This will help further the evidence base of the potential role of Covid-19 related health anxiety on eating patterns, coping strategies and dietary choices.
Abstract
The global coronavirus pandemic (Covid 19) resulted in national lockdowns where individuals were asked to isolate in their homes to stop the spread of the disease. Using a cross-sectional survey, the current paper aimed to examine self-reported changes in eating patterns and behaviour during the lockdown in the UK, and associations with BMI, demographic variables, eating styles, health anxiety, food insecurity and coping strategies. Participants (N = 620) were recruited online through social media advertising. The results showed that there were self-reported changes to food consumption during the lockdown across the sample. Increases in consumption of HED (high energy density) snack foods during the lockdown was associated with sex, pre-lockdown eating behaviour (emotional eating and uncontrolled eating), and Covid-specific health anxiety. Increases in positive eating practices such as eating more home prepared foods, and fruits and vegetables, were associated with adaptive coping strategies. Higher emotional eating (EE) during the lockdown was associated with a higher BMI, higher pre-lockdown EE and maladaptive coping strategies. Maladaptive coping strategies moderated the relationship between BMI and EE during the lockdown. In particular a higher BMI was associated with higher EE during the lockdown if an individual also had higher maladaptive coping strategies. These findings suggest that changes to eating behaviour may be part of a wider style of maladaptive or adaptive coping, particularly in those with a history of EE or uncontrolled eating. Preparing individuals to adopt more adaptive coping strategies during lockdown situations may be crucial to improving health during subsequent the lockdown events.
-
2.
Longitudinal Weight Gain and Related Risk Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Adults in the US.
Bhutani, S, vanDellen, MR, Cooper, JA
Nutrients. 2021;13(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The Covid-19 pandemic has altered health behaviours of many individuals resulting in weight gain. This cross-sectional study of 1779 individuals aimed to determine the long-term impact of Covid-19 on health behaviours and weight gain over 5 months. The results showed that most participants (40%) body weight increased alongside increased processed food intake and snacking. 33% of the individuals who gained weight continued to gain weight and 28% maintained their higher weight after lockdown measures were lifted. Take-away meals, processed food intake and stress levels remained high post-lockdown in those who gained weight. It was concluded that lockdown measures may have impacted daily life resulting in weight gain which may perpetuate long-term. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that lockdown measures may have altered eating behaviours resulting in weight gain and that these may need to be uncovered to aid long-term weight loss.
Abstract
Cross-sectional analyses have shown increased obesogenic behaviors and a potential for weight gain during COVID-19 related peak-lockdown (March-May 2020), but longitudinal data are lacking. This study assessed longitudinal changes in body weight and lifestyle behaviors in the US adults during the pandemic. METHODS We used Qualtrics survey to collect self-reported data on body weight, dietary, physical activity, and psychological variables (n = 727) during the peak-lockdown (April/May) and at post-lockdown (September/October). Peak-lockdown weight data were categorized based on the magnitude of weight gained, maintained, or lost, and behavioral differences were examined between categories at two time points. RESULTS Body weight increased (+0.62 kg; p < 0.05) at the post-lockdown period. The body mass index also increased (26.38 ± 5.98 kg/m2 vs. 26.12 ± 5.81 kg/m2; p < 0.01) at the post-lockdown period vs. peak-lockdown period. Close to 40% of participants reported gaining either 1-4 lbs or >5 lbs of body weight during the peak-lockdown, while 18.2% lost weight. Weight-gainers engaged in riskier dietary behaviors such as frequent ultra-processed food intake (p < 0.01) and snacking (p < 0.001), were less active, and reported high stress and less craving control during peak-lockdown. Of those gaining >5 lbs, 33% continued to gain weight after the lockdown eased, while 28% maintain higher body weight. In weight-gainers, takeout meal frequency increased, and high ultra-processed food intake and stress, and low craving control continued to persist after the lockdown eased. CONCLUSION We show that the COVID-19 lockdown periods disrupted weight management among many Americans and that associated health effects are likely to persist.
-
3.
Vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of COVID-19: a living systematic review.
Stroehlein, JK, Wallqvist, J, Iannizzi, C, Mikolajewska, A, Metzendorf, MI, Benstoem, C, Meybohm, P, Becker, M, Skoetz, N, Stegemann, M, et al
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2021;5:CD015043
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
This study is part of a series of Cochrane Reviews investigating treatments and therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). COVID-19 is a rapidly spreading infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Therapeutic interventions to treat COVID-19 are being investigated with immense emphasis. Recently, vitamin D supplementation for treatment of COVID-19 gained attention, since studies suggested an association between vitamin D deficiency and risk or prognosis of the disease. The aim of this study was to assess whether vitamin D supplementation is effective and safe for the treatment of COVID-19 This study is a living systematic review of seven records (three randomised controlled studies – 356 adult participants). Results for the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation for participants with COVID-19 are inconclusive. Moreover, inconsistency in the reporting of adverse and serious adverse events impeded evaluation of safety of vitamin D supplementation. Authors conclude that to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of vitamin D supplementation for individuals with COVID-19, more randomised controlled trials are needed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of vitamin D supplementation as a treatment for COVID-19 has been a subject of considerable discussion. A thorough understanding of the current evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 based on randomised controlled trials is required. OBJECTIVES To assess whether vitamin D supplementation is effective and safe for the treatment of COVID-19 in comparison to an active comparator, placebo, or standard of care alone, and to maintain the currency of the evidence, using a living systematic review approach. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, Web of Science and the WHO COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease to identify completed and ongoing studies without language restrictions to 11 March 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We followed standard Cochrane methodology. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating vitamin D supplementation for people with COVID-19, irrespective of disease severity, age, gender or ethnicity. We excluded studies investigating preventive effects, or studies including populations with other coronavirus diseases (severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) or Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We followed standard Cochrane methodology. To assess bias in included studies, we used the Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROB 2) for RCTs. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach for the following prioritised outcome categories: individuals with moderate or severe COVID-19: all-cause mortality, clinical status, quality of life, adverse events, serious adverse events, and for individuals with asymptomatic or mild disease: all-cause mortality, development of severe clinical COVID-19 symptoms, quality of life, adverse events, serious adverse events. MAIN RESULTS We identified three RCTs with 356 participants, of whom 183 received vitamin D. In accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) clinical progression scale, two studies investigated participants with moderate or severe disease, and one study individuals with mild or asymptomatic disease. The control groups consisted of placebo treatment or standard of care alone. Effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation for people with COVID-19 and moderate to severe disease We included two studies with 313 participants. Due to substantial clinical and methodological diversity of both studies, we were not able to pool data. Vitamin D status was unknown in one study, whereas the other study reported data for vitamin D deficient participants. One study administered multiple doses of oral calcifediol at days 1, 3 and 7, whereas the other study gave a single high dose of oral cholecalciferol at baseline. We assessed one study with low risk of bias for effectiveness outcomes, and the other with some concerns about randomisation and selective reporting. All-cause mortality at hospital discharge (313 participants) We found two studies reporting data for this outcome. One study reported no deaths when treated with vitamin D out of 50 participants, compared to two deaths out of 26 participants in the control group (Risk ratio (RR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 2.13). The other study reported nine deaths out of 119 individuals in the vitamin D group, whereas six participants out of 118 died in the placebo group (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.55 to 4.04]. We are very uncertain whether vitamin D has an effect on all-cause mortality at hospital discharge (very low-certainty evidence). Clinical status assessed by the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (237 participants) We found one study reporting data for this outcome. Nine out of 119 participants needed invasive mechanical ventilation when treated with vitamin D, compared to 17 out of 118 participants in the placebo group (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.13). Vitamin D supplementation may decrease need for invasive mechanical ventilation, but the evidence is uncertain (low-certainty evidence). Quality of life We did not find data for quality of life. Safety of vitamin D supplementation for people with COVID-19 and moderate to severe disease We did not include data from one study, because assessment of serious adverse events was not described and we are concerned that data might have been inconsistently measured. This study reported vomiting in one out of 119 participants immediately after vitamin D intake (RR 2.98, 95% CI 0.12 to 72.30). We are very uncertain whether vitamin D supplementation is associated with higher risk for adverse events (very low-certainty). Effectiveness and safety of vitamin D supplementation for people with COVID-19 and asymptomatic or mild disease We found one study including 40 individuals, which did not report our prioritised outcomes, but instead data for viral clearance, inflammatory markers, and vitamin D serum levels. The authors reported no events of hypercalcaemia, but recording and assessment of further adverse events remains unclear. Authors administered oral cholecalciferol in daily doses for at least 14 days, and continued with weekly doses if vitamin D blood levels were > 50 ng/mL. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the benefits and harms of vitamin D supplementation as a treatment of COVID-19. The evidence for the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of COVID-19 is very uncertain. Moreover, we found only limited safety information, and were concerned about consistency in measurement and recording of these outcomes. There was substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity of included studies, mainly because of different supplementation strategies, formulations, vitamin D status of participants, and reported outcomes. There is an urgent need for well-designed and adequately powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with an appropriate randomisation procedure, comparability of study arms and preferably double-blinding. We identified 21 ongoing and three completed studies without published results, which indicates that these needs will be addressed and that our findings are subject to change in the future. Due to the living approach of this work, we will update the review periodically.
-
4.
Effects of a 2-Week 5000 IU versus 1000 IU Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Recovery of Symptoms in Patients with Mild to Moderate Covid-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sabico, S, Enani, MA, Sheshah, E, Aljohani, NJ, Aldisi, DA, Alotaibi, NH, Alshingetti, N, Alomar, SY, Alnaami, AM, Amer, OE, et al
Nutrients. 2021;13(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A highly contagious virus called SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic. Vitamin D adjuvant therapy has been identified as a promising strategy for reducing the severity of Covid-19 outcomes in the elderly. Also, a low Vitamin D status significantly correlates with Covid-19 severity. This multi-centre randomised, open-label clinical trial evaluated the beneficial effects of 5000 IU versus 1000 IU Vitamin D3 daily supplementation for two weeks on recovery of symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate Covid-19 and suboptimal Vitamin D status. Thirty-six Covid-19 patients received 5000 IU Vitamin D3 daily, and thirty-three Covid-19 patients received 1000 IU Vitamin D3 daily. The 5000 IU Vitamin D3 group was significantly younger and had a significantly lower BMI than the 1000 IU Vitamin D3 group. The 5000 IU Vitamin D3 group showed significant improvements in the severity of the Covid-19 symptoms compared to the 1000 IU Vitamin D3 group. Further robust studies are needed to evaluate the effects of Vitamin D3 supplementation in patients with high BMI, severe Covid-19 symptoms, and prevention of Covid-19. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the effects of different doses of Vitamin D3 supplements in patients with mild-to-moderate Covid-19 symptoms and suboptimal Vitamin D status.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 severity. This multi-center randomized clinical trial aims to determine the effects of 5000 IU versus 1000 IU daily oral vitamin D3 supplementation in the recovery of symptoms and other clinical parameters among mild to moderate COVID-19 patients with sub-optimal vitamin D status. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING A total of 69 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) SARS-CoV-2 positive adults who were hospitalized for mild to moderate COVID-19 disease were allocated to receive once daily for 2 weeks either 5000 IU oral vitamin D3 (n = 36, 21 males; 15 females) or 1000 IU oral vitamin D3 (standard control) (n = 33, 13 males; 20 females). Anthropometrics were measured and blood samples were taken pre- and post-supplementation. Fasting blood glucose, lipids, serum 25(OH)D, and inflammatory markers were measured. COVID-19 symptoms were noted on admission and monitored until full recovery. RESULTS Vitamin D supplementation for 2 weeks caused a significant increase in serum 25(OH)D levels in the 5000 IU group only (adjusted p = 0.003). Within-group comparisons also showed a significant decrease in BMI and IL-6 levels overtime in both groups (p-values < 0.05) but was not clinically significant in between-group comparisons. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the 5000 IU group had a significantly shorter time to recovery (days) than the 1000 IU group in resolving cough, even after adjusting for age, sex, baseline BMI, and D-dimer (6.2 ± 0.8 versus 9.1 ± 0.8; p = 0.039), and ageusia (loss of taste) (11.4 ± 1.0 versus 16.9 ± 1.7; p = 0.035). CONCLUSION A 5000 IU daily oral vitamin D3 supplementation for 2 weeks reduces the time to recovery for cough and gustatory sensory loss among patients with sub-optimal vitamin D status and mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms. The use of 5000 IU vitamin D3 as an adjuvant therapy for COVID-19 patients with suboptimal vitamin D status, even for a short duration, is recommended.
-
5.
Investigating the Relationship between Vitamin D and Persistent Symptoms Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
Townsend, L, Dyer, AH, McCluskey, P, O'Brien, K, Dowds, J, Laird, E, Bannan, C, Bourke, NM, Ní Cheallaigh, C, Byrne, DG, et al
Nutrients. 2021;13(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Persistence of symptoms following COVID-19 infection is known as long COVID and occurs in up to a third of sufferers and can last for as long as 6 months post infection. Tiredness and reduced capacity to exercise are characteristic of long COVID, however why these symptoms persist in a handful of patients is unknown. Vitamin D deficiency is gaining attention for its potential to improve symptoms of tiredness, however there are few studies examining its relationship with long COVID. This observational study of 149 patients who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 aimed to determine the relationship between symptoms of long COVID, inflammation in the body and vitamin D levels. The results showed that fatigue was common, but there was no association between vitamin D levels and fatigue, inflammation, or capacity to exercise. Interestingly women were more likely to experience fatigue in this study. It was concluded that fatigue and reduced exercise capacity are independent of vitamin D in those who have had COVID-19. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand symptoms of long COVID, and that vitamin D may not be effective for those symptoms.
Abstract
The emergence of persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, known as long COVID, is providing a new challenge to healthcare systems. The cardinal features are fatigue and reduced exercise tolerance. Vitamin D is known to have pleotropic effects far beyond bone health and is associated with immune modulation and autoimmunity. We hypothesize that vitamin D levels are associated with persistent symptoms following COVID-19. Herein, we investigate the relationship between vitamin D and fatigue and reduced exercise tolerance, assessed by the Chalder Fatigue Score, six-minute walk test and modified Borg scale. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationships. A total of 149 patients were recruited at a median of 79 days after COVID-19 illness. The median vitamin D level was 62 nmol/L, with n = 36 (24%) having levels 30-49 nmol/L and n = 14 (9%) with levels <30 nmol/L. Fatigue was common, with n = 86 (58%) meeting the case definition. The median Borg score was 3, while the median distance covered for the walk test was 450 m. No relationship between vitamin D and the measures of ongoing ill-health assessed in the study was found following multivariable regression analysis. These results suggest that persistent fatigue and reduced exercise tolerance following COVID-19 are independent of vitamin D.
-
6.
The Long Haul of COVID-19 Recovery: Immune Rejuvenation versus Immune Support.
Bland, JS
Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.). 2020;19(6):18-22
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Following Covid-19 infection, sufferers have reported various residual symptoms, which have been likened to those experienced by chronic fatigue sufferers and those with Gulf War syndrome. This review paper aimed to assess whether the body has a similar immune response to these diseases during Covid-19, and if so, what therapies could be used. It also reviewed any diet and lifestyle factors that may be affecting the immune response. The paper stated that Covid-19 infection is associated with inflammation, which can damage immune cells and inflammation prior to Covid-19 infection may contribute to severity of the infection. Prior research in seemingly healthy individuals indicates that environment, diet, and lifestyle factors can all contribute to differing “immune identities” and eliminating immune cells which carry the imprint of memories should be a therapy focus in Covid-19 patients. Fasting, diets low in refined sugars and high in omega-3 and plant chemicals were discussed as ways for the body to clear out immune cells. It was concluded that personalising therapy strategies based on an individual’s immune identity to reduce inflammation could ultimately support the immune system. This paper could be used by healthcare professionals to understand the importance of diet and lifestyle changes to reduce inflammation and support the immune system.
Abstract
With the COVID-19 pandemic still affecting communities all over the world and "Long Haul" chronic health issues emerging, it is time for us to look back at past multi-symptom health conditions that required a different approach to their treatment, beyond just managing symptoms. It is important for us to consider how to apply what we have learned about immune rejuvenation and its impact on conditions associated with chronic immune dysfunction. We know more than we ever have before about how to reduce chronic inflammation at its source through the support of selective immune cell autophagy/mitophagy and improved immune cell mitochondrial activity, followed by remodeling of the immune epigenome, and-ultimately-a reset of immune function.
-
7.
Risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in England: a population-based cohort study.
Holman, N, Knighton, P, Kar, P, O'Keefe, J, Curley, M, Weaver, A, Barron, E, Bakhai, C, Khunti, K, Wareham, NJ, et al
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2020;8(10):823-833
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension are the most common chronic conditions predisposing people to severe COVID-19 disease. The aim of this population-based cohort study, using data from 98% of general practices in England, was to investigate the associations between various risk factors, including poor blood sugar control, and COVID-19-related deaths in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Between Feb 16 and May 11, 2020, 1604 people with type 1 diabetes and 36 291 people with type 2 diabetes died from all causes, of which almost 30% had COVID-19 listed on the death certificate, either a primary underlying or secondary cause of death. Male gender, age and being of Black or Asian ethnicity were associated with an increased mortality from COVID-19. Poor blood sugar control, as determined by HbA1C, prior to infection was strongly associated with COVID-19-related death, independent of other risk factors. Obesity (BMI of 30 or over) as well as being underweight were also significantly associated with COVID-19 mortality. The authors discuss that people with diabetes are at increased risk of many serious infections and that high blood glucose levels are known to impair immunity and may amplify the hyperimmune response associated with severe COVID-19.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes has been associated with increased COVID-19-related mortality, but the association between modifiable risk factors, including hyperglycaemia and obesity, and COVID-19-related mortality among people with diabetes is unclear. We assessed associations between risk factors and COVID-19-related mortality in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. METHODS We did a population-based cohort study of people with diagnosed diabetes who were registered with a general practice in England. National population data on people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes collated by the National Diabetes Audit were linked to mortality records collated by the Office for National Statistics from Jan 2, 2017, to May 11, 2020. We identified the weekly number of deaths in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes during the first 19 weeks of 2020 and calculated the percentage change from the mean number of deaths for the corresponding weeks in 2017, 2018, and 2019. The associations between risk factors (including sex, age, ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, HbA1c, renal impairment [from estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)], BMI, tobacco smoking status, and cardiovascular comorbidities) and COVID-19-related mortality (defined as International Classification of Diseases, version 10, code U07.1 or U07.2 as a primary or secondary cause of death) between Feb 16 and May 11, 2020, were investigated by use of Cox proportional hazards models. FINDINGS Weekly death registrations in the first 19 weeks of 2020 exceeded the corresponding 3-year weekly averages for 2017-19 by 672 (50·9%) in people with type 1 diabetes and 16 071 (64·3%) in people with type 2 diabetes. Between Feb 16 and May 11, 2020, among 264 390 people with type 1 diabetes and 2 874 020 people with type 2 diabetes, 1604 people with type 1 diabetes and 36 291 people with type 2 diabetes died from all causes. Of these total deaths, 464 in people with type 1 diabetes and 10 525 in people with type 2 diabetes were defined as COVID-19 related, of which 289 (62·3%) and 5833 (55·4%), respectively, occurred in people with a history of cardiovascular disease or with renal impairment (eGFR <60 mL/min per 1·73 m2). Male sex, older age, renal impairment, non-white ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and previous stroke and heart failure were associated with increased COVID-19-related mortality in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Compared with people with an HbA1c of 48-53 mmol/mol (6·5-7·0%), people with an HbA1c of 86 mmol/mol (10·0%) or higher had increased COVID-19-related mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2·23 [95% CI 1·50-3·30, p<0·0001] in type 1 diabetes and 1·61 [1·47-1·77, p<0·0001] in type 2 diabetes). In addition, in people with type 2 diabetes, COVID-19-related mortality was significantly higher in those with an HbA1c of 59 mmol/mol (7·6%) or higher than in those with an HbA1c of 48-53 mmol/mol (HR 1·22 [95% CI 1·15-1·30, p<0·0001] for 59-74 mmol/mol [7·6-8·9%] and 1·36 [1·24-1·50, p<0·0001] for 75-85 mmol/mol [9·0-9·9%]). The association between BMI and COVID-19-related mortality was U-shaped: in type 1 diabetes, compared with a BMI of 25·0-29·9 kg/m2, a BMI of less than 20·0 kg/m2 had an HR of 2·45 (95% CI 1·60-3·75, p<0·0001) and a BMI of 40·0 kg/m2 or higher had an HR of 2·33 (1·53-3·56, p<0·0001); the corresponding HRs for type 2 diabetes were 2·33 (2·11-2·56, p<0·0001) and 1·60 (1·47-1·75, p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION Deaths in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes rose sharply during the initial COVID-19 pandemic in England. Increased COVID-19-related mortality was associated not only with cardiovascular and renal complications of diabetes but, independently, also with glycaemic control and BMI. FUNDING None.
-
8.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and obesity. Impact of obesity and its main comorbidities in the evolution of the disease.
Cornejo-Pareja, IM, Gómez-Pérez, AM, Fernández-García, JC, Barahona San Millan, R, Aguilera Luque, A, de Hollanda, A, Jiménez, A, Jimenez-Murcia, S, Munguia, L, Ortega, E, et al
European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association. 2020;28(6):799-815
-
-
-
Plain language summary
The Covid-19 pandemic has caused thousands of deaths worldwide. Being obese is associated with worse outcomes following infection with Covid-19. This review aimed to summarise the data available on the relationship between Covid-19 and obesity, and explored some of the possible reasons for this relationship. The researchers found that obesity is an independent and strong risk factor for severe infection, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and death. The impact of obesity might be of particular relevance in males and in younger individuals. Long‐term complications of Covid‐19 could also be more frequent and severe in obese subjects. There are many potential mechanisms that could explain this relationship. These include the effects of obesity and related diseases such as diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease on the immune system, lung function, vitamin D deficiency and male hormones. The researchers also discussed the possibility of fat cells acting as a possible reservoir for Covid-19 infection. Research into Covid-19 is still at a very early stage and more studies are needed.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is posing a great challenge worldwide. Its rapid progression has caused thousands of deaths worldwide. Although multiple aspects remain to be clarified, some risk factors associated with a worse prognosis have been identified. These include obesity and some of its main complications, such as diabetes and high blood pressure. Furthermore, although the possible long-term complications and psychological effects that may appear in survivors of COVID-19 are not well known yet, there is a concern that those complications may be greater in obese patients. In this manuscript, we review some of the data published so far and the main points that remain to be elucidated are emphasized.
-
9.
Metabolic impact of weight loss induced reduction of adipose ACE-2 - Potential implication in COVID-19 infections?
Li, L, Spranger, L, Soll, D, Beer, F, Brachs, M, Spranger, J, Mai, K
Metabolism: clinical and experimental. 2020;113:154401
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity is now recognised as a risk factor for increased severity of Covid-19 infections. ACE-2 is a protein that has many functions but also allows Covid-19 into cells and is particularly evident in body tissues, which store fat. It is therefore possible that Covid-19 will target fat-storing tissues in the body. This 12-month randomised control weight-loss intervention study of 143 obese individuals aimed to determine ACE-2 expression and whether it could be modified by weight loss. The results showed that ACE-2 was only present in fat storing tissue and not muscle tissue. Interestingly individuals with pre-diabetes or diabetes had the lowest levels of ACE-2. Weight loss resulted in reduced ACE-2 in fat storing tissue, which resulted in an improvement in markers for diabetes. It was concluded that reduction of ACE-2 in fat storing tissues as a result of weight loss can improve markers for diabetes and could impact the severity of Covid-19 infection. Healthcare professionals could use this study to understand how weight loss in patients with obesity could decrease their risk of severe Covid-19 infection.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-2 is a modulator of adipose tissue metabolism. However, human data of adipose ACE-2 is rarely available. Considering that, ACE-2 is believed to be the receptor responsible for cell entry of SARS-CoV-2, a better understanding of its regulation is desirable. We therefore characterized the modulation of subcutaneous adipose ACE-2 mRNA expression during weight loss and the impact of ACE-2 expression on weight loss induced short- and long-term improvements of glucose metabolism. METHODS 143 subjects (age > 18; BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2) were analyzed before and after a standardized 12-week dietary weight reduction program. Afterwards subjects were randomized to a 12-month lifestyle intervention or a control group (Maintain-Adults trial). Insulin sensitivity (IS) was estimated by HOMA-IR (as an estimate of liver IS) and ISIClamp (as an estimate of skeletal muscle IS). ACE-2 mRNA expression (ACE-2AT) was measured in subcutaneous adipose tissue before and after weight loss. RESULTS ACE-2AT was not affected by obesity, but was reduced in insulin resistant subjects. Weight loss resulted in a decline of ACE-2AT (29.0 (20.0-47.9) vs. 21.0 (13.0-31.0); p = 1.6 ∗ 10-7). A smaller reduction of ACE-2 AT (ΔACE-2AT) was associated with a larger improvement of ISIClamp (p = 0.013) during weight reduction over 3 months, but not with the extend of weight loss. The degree of changes in insulin resistance were preserved until month 12 and was also predicted by the weight loss induced degree of ΔACE-2AT (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that subcutaneous adipose ACE-2 expression correlates with insulin sensitivity. Weight loss induced decline of subcutaneous adipose ACE-2 expression might affect short- and long-term improvement of myocellular insulin sensitivity, which might be also relevant in the context of ACE-2 downregulation by SARS-CoV-2. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00850629, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00850629, date of registration: February 25, 2009.
-
10.
The impact of nutrition on COVID-19 susceptibility and long-term consequences.
Butler, MJ, Barrientos, RM
Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2020;87:53-54
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The impacts of Covid-19 are being felt across the world, affecting health, healthcare and economies. Statistics from across the world are showing that the elderly, those with underlying medical conditions and under-represented minority groups are particularly vulnerable to severe complications and have a higher risk of dying of Covid-19. This opinion piece presents arguments for the importance of focusing on diet to support health resilience in general and the immune system in particular, to minimise the impact of this and future viruses. Research is presented on excessive intake of saturated fat leading to chronic activation of the innate immune system (first line, rapid defence against infection), resulting in inflammation, and associated heightened susceptibility to complications of viral infection. The standard western diet (high saturated fat, refined carbohydrates and sugars, low levels of fibre, unsaturated fat and antioxidants) has also been shown to affect the adaptive immune system (second line, delayed defence against infection), depressing its action against infection. The piece also discusses possible long-term, future impacts of those recovered from Covid-19 infection, particularly in relation to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s. The authors call for fresh, healthy wholefoods to be readily available and affordable to everyone in society.
Abstract
While all groups are affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, the elderly, underrepresented minorities, and those with underlying medical conditions are at the greatest risk. The high rate of consumption of diets high in saturated fats, sugars, and refined carbohydrates (collectively called Western diet, WD) worldwide, contribute to the prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes, and could place these populations at an increased risk for severe COVID-19 pathology and mortality. WD consumption activates the innate immune system and impairs adaptive immunity, leading to chronic inflammation and impaired host defense against viruses. Furthermore, peripheral inflammation caused by COVID-19 may have long-term consequences in those that recover, leading to chronic medical conditions such as dementia and neurodegenerative disease, likely through neuroinflammatory mechanisms that can be compounded by an unhealthy diet. Thus, now more than ever, wider access to healthy foods should be a top priority and individuals should be mindful of healthy eating habits to reduce susceptibility to and long-term complications from COVID-19.