-
1.
The efficacy of fermented foods in the treatment and management of diarrhoeal diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Olayanju, A, Mellor, D, Khatri, Y, Pickles, N
Nutrition and health. 2023;29(1):71-83
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
According to World Health Organisation (WHO), diarrhoeal disease is the second leading cause of death among children under the age of 5 in the world. The WHO’s recommendation for the treatment of diarrhoea is oral rehydration solution (ORS), consisting of a solution of clean water, sugar and salt along with a 10-14 day supplemental treatment course of dispersible 20 mg zinc tablets. The aim of this study was to evaluate the available evidence with respect to the efficacy of fermented foods and beverages in comparison with unfermented or heat-treated products, including dairy and cereal products, focussing on the treatment of diarrhoea in infants. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised controlled trials. Results show that administering fermented foods during an episode of diarrhoea in infants under five years of age, may reduce the duration of the disease in comparison to the control groups. There was no clear effect on daily stool frequency, but duration of hospitalisation was reduced following administration of fermented foods. Authors conclude that fermented foods may be helpful in the treatment of diarrhoea in infants up to the age of five. Thus, more good quality trials are required to investigate the complex matrix of fermented food products, other than dairy foods, in the management, particularly treatment of gastrointestinal diseases such as diarrhoea.
Abstract
Background: Diarrhoeal disease is a major cause of global infant mortality, and compromises the ability of many countries with respect to achieving sustainable development goals. The WHO's recommendation of Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) and zinc in the management of this disease, may not be readily available. Consideration and assessment of cultural practices in its management has been an area of increased interest over the last decade. Aim: This study aims to systematically evaluate efficacy of the consumption of traditional fermented foods as functional products for the treatment and management of diarrhoea. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted of electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline and Pubmed) databases with no restrictions on language and publication date for RCTs that investigated the effect of consumption of fermented foods on the treatment of diarrhoea in children under five years of age. Results: Seven RCTs were included. Meta-analysis showed that compared to control, consumption of fermented foods significantly reduced mean duration of diarrhoea, -0.61 days; (95% CI, -1.04, -0.18); length of hospitalization, -0.35 days (95% CI, -0.69, -0.02); but not mean daily frequency of stool -2.00 (95% CI,-7.03, 3.04). Conclusion: Limited available evidence suggests that consumption of fermented foods may help reduce duration and severity of symptoms as a treatment of diarrhoea. More high quality research needs to be undertaken to investigate the efficacy of fermented food as an effective alternative to ORS as a potential WHO recommendation for management of diarrhoeal disease.
-
2.
Effect of an Exclusive Human Milk Diet on the Gut Microbiome in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Embleton, ND, Sproat, T, Uthaya, S, Young, GR, Garg, S, Vasu, V, Masi, AC, Beck, L, Modi, N, Stewart, CJ, et al
JAMA network open. 2023;6(3):e231165
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Receipt of mother’s own breast milk (MOM) is associated with lower rates of neonatal morbidities in preterm infants and improved long-term metabolic and neurocognitive outcomes. However, many experience a shortfall in MOM supply necessitating the use of either bovine formula or pasteurised human milk. The hypothesis of this study was that gut bacterial diversity and proportions of specific bacterial taxa would differ between trial groups as part of the mechanism by which exclusive human milk diets benefits preterm infants. This study was a randomised clinical trial for which preterm infants in the first 72 hours of life (born less than 30 weeks of gestation) were recruited. Infants (n=126) were randomly assigned to standard (control) or exclusive human milk diet (intervention). Results showed that the intervention group had no overall effect on gut microbiome richness or Shannon diversity. Furthermore, Bifidobacterium relative abundance was not associated with an exclusive human milk diet. Authors conclude that their findings show that pasteurized human milk (or products derived from human milk) do not exert a major impact on gut bacteria when used in addition to MOM.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The effect of using an exclusive human milk diet compared with one that uses bovine products in preterm infants is uncertain, but some studies demonstrate lower rates of key neonatal morbidities. A potential mediating pathway is the gut microbiome. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of an exclusive human milk diet on gut bacterial richness, diversity, and proportions of specific taxa in preterm infants from enrollment to 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 neonatal intensive care units in the United Kingdom from 2017 to 2020, microbiome analyses were blind to group. Infants less than 30 weeks' gestation who had only received own mother's milk were recruited before 72 hours of age. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2019 to September 2021. INTERVENTIONS Exclusive human milk diet using pasteurized human milk for any shortfall in mother's own milk supply and human milk-derived fortifiers (intervention) compared with bovine formula and bovine-derived fortifier (control) until 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. Fortifier commenced less than 48 hours of tolerating 150 mL/kg per day. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Gut microbiome profile including alpha and beta diversity, and presence of specific bacterial taxa. RESULTS Of 126 preterm infants enrolled in the study, 63 were randomized to control (median [IQR] gestation: 27.0 weeks [26.0-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 910 g [704-1054 g]; 32 [51%] male) and 63 were randomized to intervention (median [IQR] gestation: 27.1 weeks [25.7-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 930 g [733-1095 g]; 38 [60%] male); 472 stool samples from 116 infants were analyzed. There were no differences in bacterial richness or Shannon diversity over time, or at 34 weeks between trial groups. The exclusive human milk diet group had reduced relative abundance of Lactobacillus after adjustment for confounders (coefficient estimate, 0.056; P = .03), but not after false discovery rate adjustment. There were no differences in time to full feeds, necrotizing enterocolitis, or other key neonatal morbidities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial in preterm infants using human milk-derived formula and/or fortifier to enable an exclusive human milk diet, there were no effects on overall measures of gut bacterial diversity but there were effects on specific bacterial taxa previously associated with human milk receipt. These findings suggest that the clinical impact of human milk-derived products is not modulated via microbiomic mechanisms. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN trial registry identifier: ISRCTN16799022.
-
3.
Modulating the Gut Microbiome in Multiple Sclerosis Management: A Systematic Review of Current Interventions.
Tsogka, A, Kitsos, DK, Stavrogianni, K, Giannopapas, V, Chasiotis, A, Christouli, N, Tsivgoulis, G, Tzartos, JS, Giannopoulos, S
Journal of clinical medicine. 2023;12(24)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease caused by the altered immune system mistakenly attacking the central nervous system. While genetics play a leading causative role in the manifestation of this disease, other contributing environmental factors can also exist, such as a disruption in the intestinal microbial composition. Previous research has shown that the bidirectional communication between the brain's and gut's health, also known as the gut-brain axis, may contribute to the prognosis of MS. Modulating gut microbial composition can be a therapeutic strategy in MS patients to manage symptoms and prevent disease progression. This systematic review assessed different protocols for modulating gut microbial composition, including dietary modifications, probiotic use, intermittent fasting, and faecal microbial transplantation. The review included thirteen studies that compared the effects of the above gut microbial modulation intervention protocols in MS patients with healthy participants. While different dietary modification strategies improved MS symptoms, probiotic supplementations and intermittent fasting reduced inflammation, and faecal microbial transplantation showed promising positive effects in a few reports. Due to the methodological limitations of the included studies, further robust studies are required to evaluate the beneficial effects of gut microbial modulation strategies in reducing the symptoms of MS patients. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the benefits of gut microbial modulation in MS patients.
Abstract
This review attempted to explore all recent clinical studies that have investigated the clinical and autoimmune impact of gut microbiota interventions in multiple sclerosis (MS), including dietary protocols, probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and intermittent fasting (IF). Methods: Thirteen studies were held between 2011 and 2023 this demonstrated interventions in gut microbiome among patients with MS and their impact the clinical parameters of the disease. These included specialized dietary interventions, the supply of probiotic mixtures, FMT, and IF. Results: Dietary interventions positively affected various aspects of MS, including relapse rates, EDSS disability scores, MS-related fatigue, and metabolic features. Probiotic mixtures showed promising results on MS-related fatigue, EDSS parameters, inflammation; meanwhile, FMT-though a limited number of studies was included-indicated some clinical improvement in similar variables. IF showed reductions in EDSS scores and significant improvement in patients' emotional statuses. Conclusions: In dietary protocols, clinical MS parameters, including relapse rate, EDSS, MFIS, FSS, and MSQoL54 scales, were significantly improved through the application of a specific diet each time. Probiotic nutritional mixtures promote a shift in inflammation towards an anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in patients with MS. The administration of such mixtures affected disability, mood levels, and quality of life among patients with MS. FMT protocols possibly demonstrate a therapeutic effect in some case reports. IF protocols were found to ameliorate EDSS and FAMS scores. All interventional means of gut microbiome modulation provided significant conclusions on several clinical aspects of MS and highlight the complexity in the relationship between MS and the gut microbiome.
-
4.
Effect of Fructooligosaccharides Supplementation on the Gut Microbiota in Human: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Dou, Y, Yu, X, Luo, Y, Chen, B, Ma, D, Zhu, J
Nutrients. 2022;14(16)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fructooligosaccharide is a prebiotic fibre that undergoes fermentation in the gut, due to which it can cause gas and bloat. Additionally, this prebiotic fibre ferments to produce short-chain fatty acids, which are beneficial for the body. This systematic review and meta-analysis included eight randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of fructooligosaccharide on gut microbial composition. Short-term supplementation with fructooligosaccharide altered the gut’s microbial composition without causing any adverse effects. Bifidobacterium spp. levels were elevated in those who consumed fructooligosaccharide supplements than those who did not. Supplementation with fructooligosaccharide did not significantly change harmful bacteria such as Bacteroides and Enterobacteriaceae levels. In addition, a higher dosage of 7.5–15 g/d of fructooligosaccharide supplementation for a period of more than four weeks was found to be beneficial. Healthcare professionals can use these results to understand better how fructooligosaccharide modulates beneficial gut bacteria such as Bifidobacterium spp. However, there is a need for more robust studies since the number of currently available studies is limited, and the exact health implications of fructooligosaccharide supplementation need to be evaluated further.
Abstract
Background: Numerous studies have investigated the effects of the supplementation of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) on the number of bacteria in the gut that are good for health, but the results have been inconsistent. Additionally, due to its high fermentability, supplementation of FOS may be associated with adverse gastrointestinal symptoms such as bloating and flatulence. Therefore, we assessed the effects of FOS interventions on the composition of gut microbiota and gastrointestinal symptoms in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Design: All randomized controlled trials published before 10 July 2022 that investigated the effects of FOS supplementation on the human gut microbiota composition and gastrointestinal symptoms and met the selection criteria were included in this study. Using fixed or random-effects models, the means and standard deviations of the differences between the two groups before and after the intervention were combined into weighted mean differences using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Eight studies containing 213 FOS supplements and 175 controls remained in this meta-analysis. Bifidobacterium spp. counts significantly increased during FOS ingestion (0.579, 95% CI: 0.444-0.714) in comparison with that of the control group. Subgroup analysis showed greater variation in Bifidobacterium spp. in adults (0.861, 95% CI: 0.614-1.108) than in infants (0.458, 95% CI: 0.297-0.619). The increase in Bifidobacterium spp. counts were greater in the group with an intervention duration greater than 4 weeks (0.841, 95% CI: 0.436-1.247) than an intervention time less than or equal to four weeks (0.532, 95% CI: 0.370-0.694), and in the group with intervention doses > 5 g (1.116, 95% CI: 0.685-1.546) the counts were higher than those with doses ≤ 5 g (0.521, 95% CI: 0.379-0.663). No differences in effect were found between FOS intervention and comparators in regard to the abundance of other prespecified bacteria or adverse gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to explore the effect of FOS on gut microbiota and to evaluate the adverse effects of FOS intake on the gastrointestinal tract. FOS supplementation could increase the number of colonic Bifidobacterium spp. while higher dose (7.5-15 g/d) and longer duration (>4 weeks) showed more distinct effects and was well tolerated.
-
5.
Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Children: A State-Of-The-Art Review.
Avelar Rodriguez, D, Ryan, PM, Toro Monjaraz, EM, Ramirez Mayans, JA, Quigley, EM
Frontiers in pediatrics. 2019;7:363
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) occurs when microorganisms overpopulate the small intestine and is characterised by gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and flatulence. This review focuses on paediatric SIBO, known to be increasing, with emphasis on the impact on gut microbiota. The gut microbiota is influenced by several factors including genetics, vaginal delivery, exercise and diet. SIBO in children has been studied in the context of stunting, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), obesity, and related to use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This review analysed 149 studies published since 2000 through till May 2019 with the aim of presenting the most up-to-date information. Risk factors included gastric acids and medications which suppress this activity, intestinal motility disturbances leading to bacterial overgrowth, anatomical anomalies where there is an absence of one or more intestinal valves, and poor socioeconomic status and diet. The review concluded that the recommended diagnosis is by methane and hydrogen breath testing and that Gold Standard treatment is antibiotic ‘rifaximin’ at 1,200 mg/d, reduced to 600 mg/d for 1 week in children. Alternative treatments discussed include FODMAP diets and probiotic protocols with best results coming from combining antibiotic and probiotic protocols. It concludes that SIBO in children is heterogenous and poorly understood and that a better diagnostic criteria is necessary in paediatrics.
Abstract
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a heterogenous and poorly understood entity characterised by an excessive growth of select microorganisms within the small intestine. This excessive bacterial biomass, in turn, disrupts host physiology in a myriad of ways, leading to gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal symptoms and complications. SIBO is a common cause of non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms in children, such as chronic abdominal pain, abdominal distention, diarrhoea, and flatulence, amongst others. In addition, it has recently been implicated in the pathophysiology of stunting, a disease that affects millions of children worldwide. Risk factors such as acid-suppressive therapies, alterations in gastrointestinal motility and anatomy, as well as impoverished conditions, have been shown to predispose children to SIBO. SIBO can be diagnosed via culture-dependant or culture-independent approaches. SIBO's epidemiology is limited due to the lack of uniformity and consensus of its diagnostic criteria, as well as the paucity of literature available. Antibiotics remain the first-line treatment option for SIBO, although emerging modalities such as probiotics and diet manipulation could also have a role. Herein, we present a state-of-the-art-review which aims to comprehensively outline the most current information on SIBO in children, with particular emphasis on the gut microbiota.
-
6.
Microbiological and clinical effects of probiotics and antibiotics on nonsurgical treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized placebo- controlled trial with 9-month follow-up.
Morales, A, Gandolfo, A, Bravo, J, Carvajal, P, Silva, N, Godoy, C, Garcia-Sesnich, J, Hoare, A, Diaz, P, Gamonal, J
Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB. 2018;26:e20170075
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Chronic periodontitis is an inflammatory disease affecting the gums caused by the accumulation of dental bacterial plaque. There has been evidence that certain bacteria, like Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, are related to the development of chronic perdontitis. Research has shown that probiotic species such as Lactobacillus rhamnosus inhibit the growth of bacteria that cause gum disease. This parallel-arm, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigated the effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1 or Azithromycin tablets as an addition to non-surgical therapy on clinical and microbiological parameters of chronic periodontitis in healthy subjects. Participants in the intervention group consumed a probiotic sachet containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1 and an antibiotic placebo daily for three months, whereas the placebo group consumed azithromycin 500 mg for five days and a probiotic placebo. At 6 weeks follow-up, both the probiotic group and the antibiotic group demonstrated improvements in clinical and microbiological parameters with a reduction in cultivable microbiota such as Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. The antibiotic group reduced the number of people with chronic periodontitis more effectively than the probiotic group, but there was no significant difference between the two. To identify the most effective probiotic therapy for chronic periodontitis, more robust studies are required. The results of this study can be used by healthcare professionals to learn about the effects of probiotic therapy in patients with chronic periodontitis.
Abstract
The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled and parallel- arm randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1-containing probiotic sachet and azithromycin tablets as an adjunct to nonsurgical therapy in clinical parameters and in presence and levels of Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Forty-seven systemically healthy volunteers with chronic periodontitis were recruited and monitored clinically and microbiologically at baseline for 3, 6 and 9 months after therapy. Subgingival plaque samples were collected from four periodontal sites with clinical attachment level ≥1 mm, probing pocket depth ≥4 mm and bleeding on probing, one site in each quadrant. Samples were cultivated and processed using the PCR technique. Patients received nonsurgical therapy including scaling and root planing (SRP) and were randomly assigned to a probiotic (n=16), antibiotic (n = 16) or placebo (n = 15) group. L. rhamnosus SP1 was taken once a day for 3 months. Azithromycin 500mg was taken once a day for 5 days. All groups showed improvements in clinical and microbiological parameters at all time points evaluated. Probiotic and antibiotic groups showed greater reductions in cultivable microbiota compared with baseline. The placebo group showed greater reduction in number of subjects with P. gingivalis compared with baseline. However, there were no significant differences between groups. The adjunctive use of L. rhamnosus SP1 sachets and azithromycin during initial therapy resulted in similar clinical and microbiological improvements compared with the placebo group.
-
7.
Psoriasis and Microbiota: A Systematic Review.
Benhadou, F, Mintoff, D, Schnebert, B, Thio, HB
Diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2018;6(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Psoriasis is an autoimmune inflammatory skin disease that causes red, itchy, flaky and scaly skin. Skin integrity and function are critically dependent on the microbial population on it. Based on this systematic review, the immune system's interaction with microbes on the skin was examined and its relationship to psoriasis. T-cell mediated inflammation is characteristic of psoriasis where interaction between type IV collagen and α1β1 integrin, a collagen receptor, occurs. In psoriatic skin lesions, Firmicutes were predominant, while Actinobacteria were less prevalent. Psoriasis exacerbations are also associated with an exacerbated number of fungi, Malassezia species, in skin lesions. As therapeutic strategies for psoriasis, this systematic review suggests adhering to a gluten-free diet and incorporating prebiotics and probiotics such as Lactobacillus. However, further research is needed to develop specific therapeutic and skin modulation strategies. Health care professionals can benefit from this systematic review by understanding the pathophysiology behind psoriasis and possible therapeutic strategies to consider.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent advances have highlighted the crucial role of microbiota in the pathophysiology of chronic inflammatory diseases as well as its impact on the efficacy of therapeutic agents. Psoriasis is a chronic, multifactorial inflammatory skin disorder, which has a microbiota distinct from healthy, unaffected skin. AIM: Through an extensive review of the literature, we aim to discuss the skin and gut microbiota and redefine their role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS Unfortunately, the direct link between the skin microbiota and the pathogenesis of psoriasis remains to be clearly established. Apart from improving the course of psoriasis, selective modulation of the microbiota may increase the efficacy of medical treatments as well as attenuate their side effects.
-
8.
Functional variants in the sucrase-isomaltase gene associate with increased risk of irritable bowel syndrome.
Henström, M, Diekmann, L, Bonfiglio, F, Hadizadeh, F, Kuech, EM, von Köckritz-Blickwede, M, Thingholm, LB, Zheng, T, Assadi, G, Dierks, C, et al
Gut. 2018;67(2):263-270
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Congenital sucrase-isomaltase deficiency (CSID) is a genetic disorder which results in a lower ability to digest certain sugars, resulting in diarrhoea, abdominal pain and bloating, which are also common symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). The objective of this study was to test sucrase-isomaltase (SI) gene variants for their potential relevance in IBS. The researchers looked at genetics in several populations with and without IBS. The researchers found that genetic mutations are associated with a 35% reduction in the activity of the SI enzymes. CSID mutations were almost twice as common in IBS patients than healthy controls. The genetic variant 15Phe was associated with diarrhoea, stool frequency and changes in the gut bacteria. The authors concluded that people with SI gene variants associated with reduced enzyme activity are more at risk of IBS. Genetic screening could help to identify individuals at increased risk of IBS, and may lead to more targeted treatment for some people with IBS.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE IBS is a common gut disorder of uncertain pathogenesis. Among other factors, genetics and certain foods are proposed to contribute. Congenital sucrase-isomaltase deficiency (CSID) is a rare genetic form of disaccharide malabsorption characterised by diarrhoea, abdominal pain and bloating, which are features common to IBS. We tested sucrase-isomaltase (SI) gene variants for their potential relevance in IBS. DESIGN We sequenced SI exons in seven familial cases, and screened four CSID mutations (p.Val557Gly, p.Gly1073Asp, p.Arg1124Ter and p.Phe1745Cys) and a common SI coding polymorphism (p.Val15Phe) in a multicentre cohort of 1887 cases and controls. We studied the effect of the 15Val to 15Phe substitution on SI function in vitro. We analysed p.Val15Phe genotype in relation to IBS status, stool frequency and faecal microbiota composition in 250 individuals from the general population. RESULTS CSID mutations were more common in patients than asymptomatic controls (p=0.074; OR=1.84) and Exome Aggregation Consortium reference sequenced individuals (p=0.020; OR=1.57). 15Phe was detected in 6/7 sequenced familial cases, and increased IBS risk in case-control and population-based cohorts, with best evidence for diarrhoea phenotypes (combined p=0.00012; OR=1.36). In the population-based sample, 15Phe allele dosage correlated with stool frequency (p=0.026) and Parabacteroides faecal microbiota abundance (p=0.0024). The SI protein with 15Phe exhibited 35% reduced enzymatic activity in vitro compared with 15Val (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS SI gene variants coding for disaccharidases with defective or reduced enzymatic activity predispose to IBS. This may help the identification of individuals at risk, and contribute to personalising treatment options in a subset of patients.
-
9.
Crosstalk between the microbiome and epigenome: messages from bugs.
Qin, Y, Wade, PA
Journal of biochemistry. 2018;163(2):105-112
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Trillions of microbes live symbiotically in and on an individual human being, most of them inside the digestive tract and communally known as the gut microbiome. The gut microbiome plays a vital role in the individual host’s health, not only by helping digest food and harvest energy, but also by regulating immune development and influencing gene expression. Diet and factors, such as infections and the use of antibiotics, can alter the balance of the microbiome and lead to various outcomes. This paper reviewed the current understanding of the ways in which the gut microbiome is capable of altering the host’s gene expression through microbial signals, including metabolites, bile acids, inflammation and altered composition. The studies highlighted in the paper show that gut microbes communicate both with local cells in the intestines and with more distant organs, such as the liver and the cardiovascular system. Through this communication, they can regulate the expression of immune cells, cancer cells, enzymes and inflammation-related molecules. The authors concluded that these interactions, or the crosstalk between the microbes and the host, demonstrate a crucial role of the gut microbiome in the host’s response to environmental signals. However, many of the mechanisms are still unclear, so further studies are needed to explain specific microbe-derived signals, affecting host gene expression, and to deepen our understanding of how lifestyle, health status and environmental exposures, such as antibiotics, regulate the microbiome and its influence.
Abstract
Mammals exist in a complicated symbiotic relationship with their gut microbiome, which is postulated to have broad impacts on host health and disease. As omics-based technologies have matured, the potential mechanisms by which the microbiome affects host physiology are being addressed. The gut microbiome, which provides environmental cues, can modify host cell responses to stimuli through alterations in the host epigenome and, ultimately, gene expression. Increasing evidence highlights microbial generation of bioactive compounds that impact the transcriptional machinery in host cells. Here, we review current understanding of the crosstalk between gut microbiota and the host epigenome, including DNA methylation, histone modification and non-coding RNAs. These studies are providing insights into how the host responds to microbial signalling and are predicted to provide information for the application of precision medicine.
-
10.
Effect of a Protein Supplement on the Gut Microbiota of Endurance Athletes: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study.
Moreno-Pérez, D, Bressa, C, Bailén, M, Hamed-Bousdar, S, Naclerio, F, Carmona, M, Pérez, M, González-Soltero, R, Montalvo-Lominchar, MG, Carabaña, C, et al
Nutrients. 2018;10(3)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Protein supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and increase muscle mass. However, their effect on other aspects of health is less well known. Dietary changes can affect gut microbiota balance, with beneficial or harmful consequences for the host. This small pilot study was performed on cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) or maltodextrin (control) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analysed in faecal samples, and oxidative stress markers were measured in blood plasma and urine. Faecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these metabolites of fermentation. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels. Protein supplementation did however increase the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decrease the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. The authors concluded that long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota.
- Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota and whether there is a differential impact between protein from animal and plant sources.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This is a very interesting study that is relevant to athletic populations.
Clinical practice applications:
Potentially there is a role for probiotics / prebiotics when increasing protein intake (particularly of animal origin) to maintain microbiota diversity and prevent ensuing health complications.
Considerations for future research:
Further, larger scale, research is needed to understand whether the same effect of protein supplementation would be seen with plant-based proteins or whether this is unique to animal based protein supplementation. For example, is the hydrolysation of the proteins to account for the largest effect or could a whole food protein, i.e. not hydrolysed, elicit the same effects?
Also, is this effect seen in other sports, e.g. non-endurance. What about the effect under different conditions e.g. energy deficit vs. energy excess?
Abstract
Nutritional supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and physical recovery. Protein supplements fulfill this function by improving performance and increasing muscle mass; however, their effect on other organs or systems is less well known. Diet alterations can induce gut microbiota imbalance, with beneficial or deleterious consequences for the host. To test this, we performed a randomized pilot study in cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) (n = 12) or maltodextrin (control) (n = 12) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed in fecal samples, whereas malondialdehyde levels (oxidative stress marker) were determined in plasma and urine. Fecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these fermentation-derived metabolites. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels; however, it increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decreased the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. Thus, long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.