-
1.
Polyphenol Intake in Pregnant Women on Gestational Diabetes Risk and Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Offspring: A Systematic Review.
Salinas-Roca, B, Rubió-Piqué, L, Montull-López, A
Nutrients. 2022;14(18)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In Europe, gestational diabetes affects approximately 10.9% of pregnant women. According to previous research, the cardiometabolic health of the mother and the mother's dietary habits during pregnancy may affect the foetus' neurodevelopment. Taking polyphenol supplements and eating foods rich in polyphenols is beneficial for promoting health across generations. In this systematic review, fourteen studies were included in order to evaluate the effects of polyphenols on gestational diabetes and mental health in the offspring. A higher prevalence of neurodevelopmental diseases in offspring is associated with gestational diabetes. The results of this systematic review revealed that polyphenol intake during pregnancy might have a beneficial effect on improving cardiometabolic health, reducing inflammation, DNA methylation and oxidative stress, thus reducing the risk of developing fetal neurodevelopmental disorders, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder and learning disorders. There is a need for further robust research, as the existing evidence regarding the safety of long-term polyphenol supplementation and its effects on gestational diabetes and fetal neurodevelopment is very limited. In spite of this, healthcare professionals can use the findings of this systematic review to learn more about the positive health benefits of polyphenols in pregnant women.
Abstract
The intake of foods containing polyphenols can have a protective role to avoid comorbidities during pregnancy and, at the same time, promote transgenerational health. This review aims to describe the effect of polyphenol intake through supplements or polyphenol-rich foods during pregnancy on the incidence and evolution of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), as well as the link with the neurodevelopment of the fetus. Using PRISMA procedures, a systematic review was conducted by searching in biomedical databases (PubMed, Cinahl and Scopus) from January to June 2022. Full articles were screened (n = 419) and critically appraised. Fourteen studies were selected and were divided into two different thematic blocks considering (i) the effect of polyphenols in GDM and (ii) the effect of GDM to mental disorders in the offspring. A positive relationship was observed between the intake of polyphenols and the prevention and control of cardiometabolic complications during pregnancy, such as GDM, which could be related to thwarted inflammatory and oxidative processes, as well as neuronal factors. GDM is related to a greater risk of suffering from diseases related to neurodevelopment, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder and learning disorder. Further clinical research on the molecule protective mechanism of polyphenols on pregnant women is required to understand the transgenerational impact on fetal neurodevelopment.
-
2.
Effect of Fructooligosaccharides Supplementation on the Gut Microbiota in Human: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Dou, Y, Yu, X, Luo, Y, Chen, B, Ma, D, Zhu, J
Nutrients. 2022;14(16)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fructooligosaccharide is a prebiotic fibre that undergoes fermentation in the gut, due to which it can cause gas and bloat. Additionally, this prebiotic fibre ferments to produce short-chain fatty acids, which are beneficial for the body. This systematic review and meta-analysis included eight randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of fructooligosaccharide on gut microbial composition. Short-term supplementation with fructooligosaccharide altered the gut’s microbial composition without causing any adverse effects. Bifidobacterium spp. levels were elevated in those who consumed fructooligosaccharide supplements than those who did not. Supplementation with fructooligosaccharide did not significantly change harmful bacteria such as Bacteroides and Enterobacteriaceae levels. In addition, a higher dosage of 7.5–15 g/d of fructooligosaccharide supplementation for a period of more than four weeks was found to be beneficial. Healthcare professionals can use these results to understand better how fructooligosaccharide modulates beneficial gut bacteria such as Bifidobacterium spp. However, there is a need for more robust studies since the number of currently available studies is limited, and the exact health implications of fructooligosaccharide supplementation need to be evaluated further.
Abstract
Background: Numerous studies have investigated the effects of the supplementation of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) on the number of bacteria in the gut that are good for health, but the results have been inconsistent. Additionally, due to its high fermentability, supplementation of FOS may be associated with adverse gastrointestinal symptoms such as bloating and flatulence. Therefore, we assessed the effects of FOS interventions on the composition of gut microbiota and gastrointestinal symptoms in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Design: All randomized controlled trials published before 10 July 2022 that investigated the effects of FOS supplementation on the human gut microbiota composition and gastrointestinal symptoms and met the selection criteria were included in this study. Using fixed or random-effects models, the means and standard deviations of the differences between the two groups before and after the intervention were combined into weighted mean differences using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Eight studies containing 213 FOS supplements and 175 controls remained in this meta-analysis. Bifidobacterium spp. counts significantly increased during FOS ingestion (0.579, 95% CI: 0.444-0.714) in comparison with that of the control group. Subgroup analysis showed greater variation in Bifidobacterium spp. in adults (0.861, 95% CI: 0.614-1.108) than in infants (0.458, 95% CI: 0.297-0.619). The increase in Bifidobacterium spp. counts were greater in the group with an intervention duration greater than 4 weeks (0.841, 95% CI: 0.436-1.247) than an intervention time less than or equal to four weeks (0.532, 95% CI: 0.370-0.694), and in the group with intervention doses > 5 g (1.116, 95% CI: 0.685-1.546) the counts were higher than those with doses ≤ 5 g (0.521, 95% CI: 0.379-0.663). No differences in effect were found between FOS intervention and comparators in regard to the abundance of other prespecified bacteria or adverse gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to explore the effect of FOS on gut microbiota and to evaluate the adverse effects of FOS intake on the gastrointestinal tract. FOS supplementation could increase the number of colonic Bifidobacterium spp. while higher dose (7.5-15 g/d) and longer duration (>4 weeks) showed more distinct effects and was well tolerated.
-
3.
Nutritional intervention for diabetes mellitus with Alzheimer's disease.
Li, Z, Li, S, Xiao, Y, Zhong, T, Yu, X, Wang, L
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:1046726
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) affects more than 463 million people worldwide. Similarly, the number of deaths related to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has increased by 145%. There are several common risk factors for Type 2 Diabetes and AD, including obesity, insulin resistance, and ageing, as well as common pathological mechanisms, including altered insulin signalling, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, formation of glycated proteins and metabolic syndrome. This review aims to summarize the therapeutic effects of different nutritional therapy strategies on the reduction of DM and AD risk. Controlling blood sugar levels and reducing calorie intake is crucial to preventing diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. The low-carbohydrate, ketogenic, and Mediterranean diets have been found to improve glucose control in people with Type 2 diabetes (T2D). In addition, MIND (Mediterranean-DASH Diet Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay) and a ketogenic diet may improve cognition in AD patients. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium probiotics, and prebiotics, such as inulin, may inhibit the progression of T2D and AD diseases by suppressing inflammation and modulating gut microbes. In addition, vitamins A, C, D, E, B6, B12, folate, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, zinc, magnesium, and polyphenols may improve cognitive decline, homocysteine levels, and insulin resistance in AD and T2D patients. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this review to understand the beneficial effects of dietary strategies and multi-nutrient supplementation on DM and AD. However, further robust studies are required to investigate the risk factors and underlying mechanisms behind DM-combined AD progression.
Abstract
The combined disease burden of diabetes mellitus (DM) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasing, and the two diseases share some common pathological changes. However, the pharmacotherapeutic approach to this clinical complexity is limited to symptomatic rather than disease-arresting, with the possible exception of metformin. Whether nutritional intervention might extend or synergize with these effects of metformin is of interest. In particular, dietary patterns with an emphasis on dietary diversity shown to affect cognitive function are of growing interest in a range of food cultural settings. This paper presents the association between diabetes and AD. In addition, the cross-cultural nutritional intervention programs with the potential to mitigate both insulin resistance (IR) and hyperglycemia, together with cognitive impairment are also reviewed. Both dietary patterns and nutritional supplementation showed the effects of improving glycemic control and reducing cognitive decline in diabetes associated with AD, but the intervention specificity remained controversial. Multi-nutrient supplements combined with diverse diets may have preventive and therapeutic potential for DM combined with AD, at least as related to the B vitamin group and folate-dependent homocysteine (Hcy). The nutritional intervention has promise in the prevention and management of DM and AD comorbidities, and more clinical studies would be of nutritional scientific merit.
-
4.
Bacterial Metabolites of Human Gut Microbiota Correlating with Depression.
Averina, OV, Zorkina, YA, Yunes, RA, Kovtun, AS, Ushakova, VM, Morozova, AY, Kostyuk, GP, Danilenko, VN, Chekhonin, VP
International journal of molecular sciences. 2020;21(23)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is multifactorial disease and it is the most common type of psychiatric disorder. Literature indicates that there are significant differences between the gut microbiota (GM) of patients with depression and healthy controls. The aim of this review was to examine (a) various low-molecular compounds as potential biomarkers of depression in correlation with the metabolism of the GM, and (b) ways to correct the microbiota imbalance. Results show that: - the use of the GM biomarkers, reflecting the neuromodulatory [the process by which nervous activity is regulated through classes of neurotransmitters], immunomodulatory [the process by which the body’s immune system is altered] and antioxidant statuses of the host organism, in the analysis of metagenomic [the study of a collection of genetic material (genomes) from a mixed community of organisms] data from patients with neuropsychiatric diseases, is gaining currency. - diet remains one of the most effective measures that can be taken to restore the microbial balance in the gut and alleviate the symptoms of depression. - a healthy diet during the depression therapy, along with the application of probiotics and psychobiotics, may potentially improve the course of the disease and contribute to the progress of treatment. Authors conclude that further progress in the practical understanding of the role of the GM in depression will greatly depend on correct planning of future metagenomic studies.
Abstract
Depression is a global threat to mental health that affects around 264 million people worldwide. Despite the considerable evolution in our understanding of the pathophysiology of depression, no reliable biomarkers that have contributed to objective diagnoses and clinical therapy currently exist. The discovery of the microbiota-gut-brain axis induced scientists to study the role of gut microbiota (GM) in the pathogenesis of depression. Over the last decade, many of studies were conducted in this field. The productions of metabolites and compounds with neuroactive and immunomodulatory properties among mechanisms such as the mediating effects of the GM on the brain, have been identified. This comprehensive review was focused on low molecular weight compounds implicated in depression as potential products of the GM. The other possible mechanisms of GM involvement in depression were presented, as well as changes in the composition of the microbiota of patients with depression. In conclusion, the therapeutic potential of functional foods and psychobiotics in relieving depression were considered. The described biomarkers associated with GM could potentially enhance the diagnostic criteria for depressive disorders in clinical practice and represent a potential future diagnostic tool based on metagenomic technologies for assessing the development of depressive disorders.
-
5.
The role of diet and probiotics in prevention and treatment of bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis in adolescent girls and non-pregnant women.
Mizgier, M, Jarzabek-Bielecka, G, Mruczyk, K, Kedzia, W
Ginekologia polska. 2020;91(7):412-416
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In adolescent girls and non-pregnant women, vaginitis, including fungal infections, is a common problem. Vaginitis clinically manifests as abnormal vaginal discharge, irritation, itching, burning and discomfort, and is especially prevalent with a decrease in immunity. The normal bacterial flora of the vagina and cervix protect against the development of pathogenic strains, while abnormal flora tend to be the most common starting point for the development of infections. The aim of this study was to determine the role of proper diet and probiotics and prebiotics use in relation to therapy and prophylaxis of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and bacterial vaginosis (BV) in non-pregnant women and girls. This review shows that: - An unbalanced diet can be a risk factor for BV. Women tend to be more exposed to BV if they have poor micronutrient status, including vitamins A, E, D, C and beta carotene — indicating a lower fruit and vegetable intake. - Many studies proved that regulated use of probiotics, administered both orally and vaginally, are effective in the prevention and treatment of vaginal infections such as BV and VVC. - To create a positive environment for probiotics, it is important to provide prebiotics that support the development of probiotic strains. Authors conclude that gynaecologists, obstetricians, general practitioners and dieticians should share their findings, and raise awareness among the general population as to the importance of optimal nutrition. Probiotics and prebiotics could be considered to prevent infections of the genital tract, reduce associated disease, and maintain reproductive health.
Abstract
The article raises important issues regarding the use of diet and probiotics in prevention and treatment of vaginitis. Vaginitis is defined as any condition with symptoms of abnormal vaginal discharge. The most common causes of vaginitis are vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis (BV). Vaginitis has been linked to itching, burning, pain, discharge, irritation and also adverse reproductive and obstetric health outcomes. Moreover, microorganisms that build vaginal flora in the state of bacterial vaginosis are a source of cervicitis and endometritis (often in subclinical forms) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) The proper diet and probiotics consumption may influence the composition of the gut microbiota, improve gut integrity, and have an impact on maintaining and recovering the normal vaginal microbiota. Future studies and reviews investigating the role of diet and probiotics in changes to gut and vaginal microbiome need to focus on deciphering the mechanismus of host bacteria interaction in vulvovaginal health.
-
6.
Pain regulation by gut microbiota: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential.
Guo, R, Chen, LH, Xing, C, Liu, T
British journal of anaesthesia. 2019;123(5):637-654
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Acute pain serves to protect us from further tissue damage. Chronic pain is debilitating and significantly reduces the quality of life for affected individuals and their loved ones. The relationship between gut bacteria and various diseases, including chronic pain, is receiving increasing attention. This review article discusses the current understanding of the role of the gut microbiota in pain regulation and what the science says in relation to gut bacteria manipulation and chronic pain. The authors of the review discuss the role of various compounds and metabolites of gut bacteria in relation to inflammation, neuropathic pain, visceral pain and headache. Whilst a lot of the current findings are based on results of rodent studies, the emerging evidence suggests that gut dysbiosis participates in various chronic pain conditions in a number of ways. Therefore, modulation of the gut microbiome through diet and pro- and pre-biotics is warranted for use by Nutrition Practitioners.
Abstract
The relationship between gut microbiota and neurological diseases, including chronic pain, has received increasing attention. The gut microbiome is a crucial modulator of visceral pain, whereas recent evidence suggests that gut microbiota may also play a critical role in many other types of chronic pain, including inflammatory pain, headache, neuropathic pain, and opioid tolerance. We present a narrative review of the current understanding on the role of gut microbiota in pain regulation and discuss the possibility of targeting gut microbiota for the management of chronic pain. Numerous signalling molecules derived from gut microbiota, such as by-products of microbiota, metabolites, neurotransmitters, and neuromodulators, act on their receptors and remarkably regulate the peripheral and central sensitisation, which in turn mediate the development of chronic pain. Gut microbiota-derived mediators serve as critical modulators for the induction of peripheral sensitisation, directly or indirectly regulating the excitability of primary nociceptive neurones. In the central nervous system, gut microbiota-derived mediators may regulate neuroinflammation, which involves the activation of cells in the blood-brain barrier, microglia, and infiltrating immune cells, to modulate induction and maintenance of central sensitisation. Thus, we propose that gut microbiota regulates pain in the peripheral and central nervous system, and targeting gut microbiota by diet and pharmabiotic intervention may represent a new therapeutic strategy for the management of chronic pain.
-
7.
Psoriasis and Microbiota: A Systematic Review.
Benhadou, F, Mintoff, D, Schnebert, B, Thio, HB
Diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2018;6(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Psoriasis is an autoimmune inflammatory skin disease that causes red, itchy, flaky and scaly skin. Skin integrity and function are critically dependent on the microbial population on it. Based on this systematic review, the immune system's interaction with microbes on the skin was examined and its relationship to psoriasis. T-cell mediated inflammation is characteristic of psoriasis where interaction between type IV collagen and α1β1 integrin, a collagen receptor, occurs. In psoriatic skin lesions, Firmicutes were predominant, while Actinobacteria were less prevalent. Psoriasis exacerbations are also associated with an exacerbated number of fungi, Malassezia species, in skin lesions. As therapeutic strategies for psoriasis, this systematic review suggests adhering to a gluten-free diet and incorporating prebiotics and probiotics such as Lactobacillus. However, further research is needed to develop specific therapeutic and skin modulation strategies. Health care professionals can benefit from this systematic review by understanding the pathophysiology behind psoriasis and possible therapeutic strategies to consider.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent advances have highlighted the crucial role of microbiota in the pathophysiology of chronic inflammatory diseases as well as its impact on the efficacy of therapeutic agents. Psoriasis is a chronic, multifactorial inflammatory skin disorder, which has a microbiota distinct from healthy, unaffected skin. AIM: Through an extensive review of the literature, we aim to discuss the skin and gut microbiota and redefine their role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS Unfortunately, the direct link between the skin microbiota and the pathogenesis of psoriasis remains to be clearly established. Apart from improving the course of psoriasis, selective modulation of the microbiota may increase the efficacy of medical treatments as well as attenuate their side effects.
-
8.
Crosstalk between the microbiome and epigenome: messages from bugs.
Qin, Y, Wade, PA
Journal of biochemistry. 2018;163(2):105-112
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Trillions of microbes live symbiotically in and on an individual human being, most of them inside the digestive tract and communally known as the gut microbiome. The gut microbiome plays a vital role in the individual host’s health, not only by helping digest food and harvest energy, but also by regulating immune development and influencing gene expression. Diet and factors, such as infections and the use of antibiotics, can alter the balance of the microbiome and lead to various outcomes. This paper reviewed the current understanding of the ways in which the gut microbiome is capable of altering the host’s gene expression through microbial signals, including metabolites, bile acids, inflammation and altered composition. The studies highlighted in the paper show that gut microbes communicate both with local cells in the intestines and with more distant organs, such as the liver and the cardiovascular system. Through this communication, they can regulate the expression of immune cells, cancer cells, enzymes and inflammation-related molecules. The authors concluded that these interactions, or the crosstalk between the microbes and the host, demonstrate a crucial role of the gut microbiome in the host’s response to environmental signals. However, many of the mechanisms are still unclear, so further studies are needed to explain specific microbe-derived signals, affecting host gene expression, and to deepen our understanding of how lifestyle, health status and environmental exposures, such as antibiotics, regulate the microbiome and its influence.
Abstract
Mammals exist in a complicated symbiotic relationship with their gut microbiome, which is postulated to have broad impacts on host health and disease. As omics-based technologies have matured, the potential mechanisms by which the microbiome affects host physiology are being addressed. The gut microbiome, which provides environmental cues, can modify host cell responses to stimuli through alterations in the host epigenome and, ultimately, gene expression. Increasing evidence highlights microbial generation of bioactive compounds that impact the transcriptional machinery in host cells. Here, we review current understanding of the crosstalk between gut microbiota and the host epigenome, including DNA methylation, histone modification and non-coding RNAs. These studies are providing insights into how the host responds to microbial signalling and are predicted to provide information for the application of precision medicine.
-
9.
A Review of Microbiota and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Future in Therapies.
Rodiño-Janeiro, BK, Vicario, M, Alonso-Cotoner, C, Pascua-García, R, Santos, J
Advances in therapy. 2018;35(3):289-310
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gut disorder characterised by abdominal pain and associated changes in bowel habits. Increasing evidence points to altered gut microbiota, dysbiosis, as a predominant factor in IBS development and has therefore become a primary target for therapeutic options in patients with IBS. This review evaluates existing literature on IBS interventions targeting the gut microbiota and suggests future approaches useful for diagnosis, prevention and treatment of IBS. Based on the current literature, this review suggests there is a strong role of dysbiosis in the pathophysiology of IBS. The authors conclude that there are promising therapeutic options available but further evidence is needed from larger controlled studies.
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), one of the most frequent digestive disorders, is characterized by chronic and recurrent abdominal pain and altered bowel habit. The origin seems to be multifactorial and is still not well defined for the different subtypes. Genetic, epigenetic and sex-related modifications of the functioning of the nervous and immune-endocrine supersystems and regulation of brain-gut physiology and bile acid production and absorption are certainly involved. Acquired predisposition may act in conjunction with infectious, toxic, dietary and life event-related factors to enhance epithelial permeability and elicit mucosal microinflammation, immune activation and dysbiosis. Notably, strong evidence supports the role of bacterial, viral and parasitic infections in triggering IBS, and targeting microbiota seems promising in view of the positive response to microbiota-related therapies in some patients. However, the lack of highly predictive diagnostic biomarkers and the complexity and heterogeneity of IBS patients make management difficult and unsatisfactory in many cases, reducing patient health-related quality of life and increasing the sanitary burden. This article reviews specific alterations and interventions targeting the gut microbiota in IBS, including prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, non-absorbable antibiotics, diets, fecal transplantation and other potential future approaches useful for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of IBS.
-
10.
Pregnancy outcomes in women taking probiotics or prebiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jarde, A, Lewis-Mikhael, AM, Moayyedi, P, Stearns, JC, Collins, SM, Beyene, J, McDonald, SD
BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):14
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
It has been suggested that probiotics might help prevent premature birth, but two previous systematic reviews found possible increases in risk. The objective of this meta-analysis was to perform an up-to-date review of the risk of premature birth and other pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women taking probiotics or prebiotics. The authors pooled data from 27 studies, one using prebiotics and the rest probiotics. Taking probiotics or prebiotics during pregnancy did not change the risk of premature birth, or other pregnancy outcomes. The authors concluded that more studies are required to assess the safety and effects of taking probiotics and prebiotics during pregnancy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics are living microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit. It has been speculated that probiotics might help prevent preterm birth, but in two previous systematic reviews possible major increases in this risk have been suggested. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of preterm birth and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women taking probiotics, prebiotics or synbiotics. METHODS We searched six electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science's Core collection and BIOSIS Preview) up to September 2016 and contacted authors for additional data. We included randomized controlled trials in which women with a singleton pregnancy received a probiotic, prebiotic or synbiotic intervention. Two independent reviewers extracted data using a piloted form and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We used random-effects meta-analyses to pool the results. RESULTS We identified 2574 publications, screened 1449 non-duplicate titles and abstracts and read 160 full text articles. The 49 publications that met our inclusion criteria represented 27 studies. No study used synbiotics, one used prebiotics and the rest used probiotics. Being randomized to take probiotics during pregnancy neither increased nor decreased the risk of preterm birth < 34 weeks (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.29-3.64, I2 0%, 1017 women in 5 studies), preterm birth < 37 weeks (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.71-1.63, I2 0%, 2484 women in 11 studies), or most of our secondary outcomes, including gestational diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS We found no evidence that taking probiotics or prebiotics during pregnancy either increases or decreases the risk of preterm birth or other infant and maternal adverse pregnancy outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION We prospectively published the protocol for this study in the PROSPERO database ( CRD42016048129 ).