1.
The Gut Microbiome in Early Life Stress: A Systematic Review.
Agusti, A, Lamers, F, Tamayo, M, Benito-Amat, C, Molina-Mendoza, GV, Penninx, BWJH, Sanz, Y
Nutrients. 2023;15(11)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Children exposed to early life stress (ELS) show alterations in brain development and are at increased risk of developing mental illness. This study aims to clarify whether ELS influences the gut microbiome and whether this can be a predictor for the development of mental disorders. 13 articles were included in this systemic review. 4 looked at pre-natal stress and 9 at post-natal stress. Prenatal stress (via maternal stress) may be associated with an increase in Proteobacteria phylum and with a lower abundance of Bifidobacterium and lactic acid bacteria. In the postnatal group, greater microbiome diversity was related to lower depression and anxiety. In boys scores for adaptive skills were higher in those with good levels of Bifidobacterium. A positive association was found between EA (early adversity) experiences and gastrointestinal symptoms and anxiety. This review demonstrates links between ELS and gut microbiome changes. Further research will be necessary to draw more robust conclusions.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This systematic review consolidated and discussed existing evidence on the link between early life stress (ELS) and changes to the human microbiome
- Exposure to ELS, prenatal or postnatal during childhood and adolescence, may impact mental and physical health.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A systematic review was conducted to consolidate clinical evidence examining the impact of early life stress (ELS) on the human intestinal microbiome.
Method
Thirteen observational studies were included in the review, sourced from Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale (NOS), with most studies scoring seven or eight out of nine stars.
Study designs varied, including prospective prenatal studies, postnatal longitudinal studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies. Four prenatal studies were prospective in design. The other nine postnatal studies included one longitudinal study, five case-control studies, and three cross-sectional studies. All 13 studies were published between 2015 and 2022. Because study designs and outcome assessments varied, the results were presented in a narrative form. Data was extracted by 2 independent authors.
Results
The primary findings from the review were as follows:
- Four longitudinal stress studies indicated that pregnant mothers experiencing psychological stress, increased cortisol levels, HIV, and lack of social support exhibited a lower abundance of beneficial Bifidobacterium and an increased abundance of Enterobacter genus.
- One postnatal stress longitudinal study (n=260) demonstrated lower depression and anxiety and improved internalising behaviour in patients with high microbiome diversity.
- . One postnatal stress case-control study (n=344) showed changes in the microbiome and an abundance of several bacterial taxa in stressed groups, including genera Prevotella, Bacteroides (Bacteroidetes), Coprococcus, Streptococcus, and Escherichia.
- One cross-sectional study of 128 adults without psychiatric conditions revealed that higher stress correlated with increased levels of Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Rhodococcus, Methanobrevibacter, and Roseburia at the genus level, as well as lower Phascolarcto bacterium and Firmicutes at the phylum level.
- One large prospective study (n=446) found infants exposed to higher cumulative stress exhibited an increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria groups and lower Bifidobacterium.
Conclusion:
Due to the inconsistency of study designs and their results this review failed to find consensus microbiome signatures associated with pre- or postnatal stress, or both.
Clinical practice applications:
- Early life stress, and alterations in the gut microbiome, have been linked to mental health conditions
- Maternal prenatal stress may be linked to emotional, behavioural, and cognitive outcomes in infants.
Considerations for future research:
- Future research should standardise questionnaires, to ensure consistency and comparability across studies
- Additionally, future studies should consider using standard procedures and specific species and strain resolution shotgun metagenomics sequencing
- Consideration should be given to the influence of environmental variables (diet, physical activity, etc.) and sex in gut microbiome analysis.
Abstract
Exposure to early life stress (ELS), prenatal or postnatal during childhood and adolescence, can significantly impact mental and physical health. The role of the intestinal microbiome in human health, and particularly mental health, is becoming increasingly evident. This systematic review aims to summarize the clinical data evaluating the effect of ELS on the human intestinal microbiome. The systematic review (CRD42022351092) was performed following PRISMA guidelines, with ELS considered as exposure to psychological stressors prenatally and during early life (childhood and adolescence). Thirteen articles met all inclusion criteria, and all studies reviewed found a link between ELS and the gut microbiome in both prenatal and postnatal periods. However, we failed to find consensus microbiome signatures associated with pre- or postnatal stress, or both. The inconsistency of results is likely attributed to various factors such as different experimental designs, ages examined, questionnaires, timing of sample collection and analysis methods, small population sizes, and the type of stressors. Additional studies using similar stressors and validated stress measures, as well as higher-resolution microbiome analytical approaches, are needed to draw definitive conclusions about the links between stress and the human gut microbiome.
2.
Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum Reduces Perceived Psychological Stress in Healthy Adults: An Exploratory Clinical Trial.
Boehme, M, Rémond-Derbez, N, Lerond, C, Lavalle, L, Keddani, S, Steinmann, M, Rytz, A, Dalile, B, Verbeke, K, Van Oudenhove, L, et al
Nutrients. 2023;15(14)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Psychosocial stress is a common issue and one way in which nutrition may modulate the stress response is via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. This 6-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 45 healthy adults with mild-to-moderate stress evaluated the effects of Bifidobacterium longum (BL) NCC3001 on psychological and physiological markers of stress and the response to an acute stress test. Outcome measures included cortisol awakening response, heart rate, heart rate variability and various questionnaires assessing stress, anxiety, depression, sleep and gastrointestinal symptoms. Compared to placebo, probiotic intake led to a significant decrease in perceived stress and an improvement in subjective sleep after 6 weeks. There was no difference in cortisol awakening response. The subjects in both groups did not experience significant gastrointestinal symptoms and scored low on anxiety and depression at baseline. In response to the acute stress test, cortisol levels were higher in the probiotic than the placebo group, whilst no clear differences were seen in heart rate and heart rate variability. Subjects in the probiotic group had a lower pain experience during the stress test whilst subjects in the placebo group had an increase in positive mood following the test. The authors conclude that these results support their hypothesis that BL NCC3001 may alleviate stress and improve sleep in adults with moderate stress levels.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- There is mounting evidence to suggest that nutritional interventions can influence our stress responses. One of the routes by which nutrition can influence physiological and psychological stress responses involves the microbiota– gut–brain-axis.
- This exploratory trial suggests that supplementation with Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 leads to a beneficial effect on stress relief and improves subjective sleep quality in a healthy adult population reporting moderate levels of psychological stress.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A randomised, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel, double-blind exploratory clinical trial was conducted to investigate the effect Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 on stress-related psychological and physiological parameters and acute stress in healthy adults who typically experience mild-to-moderate-levels of stress.
Method
47 Participants between the ages of 25-65 years old with mild-to-moderate psychological stress received 1x1010 CFU of Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 daily or a placebo for 6 weeks.
Participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HAD-A and HADS-D), the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRA), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire, the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6), the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) and the Visual Analog Scales (VAS, which measures pain intensity) during the clinical study. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-42) questionnaire was also used to depict the progression of the participants through the study.
Faecal samples were taken at baseline and 6 weeks and awakening saliva samples were taken at baseline, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks. At the endpoint, 45/49 (91%) of the subjects completed the study. One participant reported an adverse event and the other withdrew without an explanation. Two participants were excluded from the full analysis.
Results
The primary outcomes were:
- After 6-week of the probiotic intervention, there was a significant decrease in perceived stress in the probiotic group (21.4%) compared to the placebo group (-10.2%), p = 0.017.
- There was a significant improvement in subjective sleep in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.037).
- There was a significant decrease in the positive PANAS change score from the pre-stressor stage in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.01).
- There were lower pain values (VAS) scores from pre-stressor to post-stressor in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.05).
- There was no significant difference between groups in anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS_D) scores.
Conclusion
Oral supplementation with BL NCC3001 may have beneficial effects on stress relief and improves subjective sleep quality in a healthy adult population reporting moderate levels of psychological stress.
Clinical practice applications:
- While the mechanism underlying the correlation between the microbiota and the gut-brain-axis is not fully understood, it is thought to play a critical role in the links between the microbiota, mood, stress, and brain health.
- This exploratory trial additionally supports the potential of specific probiotics being used to reduce perceived stress and improve subjective sleep quality in healthy adults.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger, powered clinical trials are needed to provide further insights into the mechanisms underlying the stress-relieving and sleep-improving effect of Bifidobacterium longum.
- Furthermore, the dosage and duration of the probiotics need further investigation in a larger healthy population.
- Comparative research is needed to help investigate the effect of different probiotic strains on stress relief and sleep quality.
Abstract
Emerging science shows that probiotic intake may impact stress and mental health. We investigated the effect of a 6-week intervention with Bifidobacterium longum (BL) NCC3001 (1 × 1010 CFU/daily) on stress-related psychological and physiological parameters in 45 healthy adults with mild-to-moderate stress using a randomized, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel, double-blind design. The main results showed that supplementation with the probiotic significantly reduced the perceived stress and improved the subjective sleep quality score compared to placebo. Comparing the two groups, momentary subjective assessments concomitant to the Maastricht Acute Stress Test revealed a lower amount of pain experience in the probiotic group and a higher amount of relief at the end of the procedure in the placebo group, reflected by higher scores in the positive affect state. The awakening of the salivary cortisol response was not affected by the intervention, yet the reduction observed in the salivary cortisol stress response post-intervention was higher in the placebo group than the probiotic group. Multivariate analysis further indicated that a reduction in perceived stress correlated with a reduction in anxiety, in depression, and in the cortisol awakening response after the 6-week intervention. This exploratory trial provides promising insights into BL NCC3001 to reduce perceived stress in a healthy population and supports the potential of nutritional solutions including probiotics to improve mental health.
3.
Low FODMAP diet reduces gastrointestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome and clinical response could be predicted by symptom severity: A randomized crossover trial.
Algera, JP, Demir, D, Törnblom, H, Nybacka, S, Simrén, M, Störsrud, S
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2022;41(12):2792-2800
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction, characterised by chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. Currently, many patients follow an exclusion diet where specific food components are eliminated. One of these exclusion diets is a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs). The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of diets with low vs. moderate FODMAP content on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in IBS. This study was a double-blind, randomised, controlled, crossover study which enrolled 31 participants who were randomly assigned to the diet periods. Results showed that the severity of GI symptoms was reduced, and bowel habits were affected in the direction of less frequent and firmer stool by the low FODMAP diet, but not by a diet with moderate amounts of FODMAPs. Authors conclude that assessment of overall IBS severity and predominant bowel habits before the intervention may be helpful for clinicians in their IBS management before considering a trial period with the low FODMAP diet as a treatment option.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
A low (4 g/day) FODMAP diet could provide clinical benefits in the context of an acute strategy for IBS clients with frequent loose stools (IBS-Diarrhoea and/or IBS-Mixed) compared to those with hard and less frequent stools (IBS-Constipation) to improve the severity of GI symptoms, including lower abdominal pain intensity and frequency, bowel habits, daily life interference, and psychological distress.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
The aim of this paper was to investigate the effects of diets with low vs. moderate FODMAP content on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and bowel habits, and to identify possible predictors of clinical response to a low FODMAP diet and FODMAP sensitivity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).
Methods
- This study involved a double-blind, randomised, controlled, crossover trial of 29 participants (18-75 years), mostly female, diagnosed with IBS (Rome IV)
- The primary outcome was to assess the effects of a low (4 g/day) vs. moderate (23 g/day) FODMAP diet on GI symptoms over a 7-day period
- Secondary outcomes involved assessing the effects of low vs. moderate FODMAP diets on i) somatic symptoms, ii) psychological distress, iii) predictors of clinical and IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) sensitivity to FODMAP
- Breakfast was standardised, with prescribed low FODMAP list deviations recorded
- Main dishes and snacks were also provided
- Participants were requested to limit alcohol, caffeine, fatty- and spicy foods, ate regularly, chewed thoroughly and drank enough water
- GI symptoms and bowel habits were recorded during the 7-day screening period, then participants undertook a Lactulose Nutrient Challenge Test (LNCT)
- The first 7-day diet started one day after the LNCT
- A 14-day wash-out period allowed participants to eat and drink as usual, thereafter following the second 7-day diet period as part of the cross over design.
Results
A low FODMAP intervention (compared to a moderate FODMAP diet); resulted in:
- Reduced overall IBS rating (10 ± 72 vs. 57 ± 108, P=0.04)
- Improved abdominal pain frequency (10 ± 32 vs. 18 ± 29 (P=0.02)
- Improved stool consistency (0.2 ± 1.0 vs. 0.6 ± 1.2, P= 0.01) and frequency (0.1 ± 0.7 vs. 0.4 ± 0.7, P= 0.01)
- Overall, 34% of participants positively responded to the low FODMAP diet, which could be predicted based on higher baseline IBS-SSS scores (P=0.02)
- Participants sensitive to FODMAPs had increased pre- and postprandial ratings of gas, abdominal pain and bloating and higher exhaled methane concentrations compared to non-sensitive participants to FODMAPs
- Authors highlighted a non-significant association between FODMAP sensitivity and GI symptoms during the LNCT, with higher visceral hypersensitivity (45 ± 20, P=0.73) after ingestion of poorly absorbed and fermentable carbohydrates, with no independent predictors identified.
Conclusions
This study showed that a diet low in FODMAPs reduces GI symptoms and positively impacts bowel habits in IBS, compared with a moderate FODMAP diet.
Clinical practice applications:
- While this was a short term study, a low FODMAP diet reduced GI symptoms and affected bowel habits (more firm and less frequent stools) in IBS, compared with a diet containing moderate amounts of FODMAPs
- Knowing the above, an assessment of overall IBS severity and predominant bowel habits before the intervention may be helpful for clinicians working with younger females in their IBS management before considering a trial period with the low FOD-MAP diet as a treatment option.
Considerations for future research:
- Future trials could target a larger sample size with a more representative population, as well as assessing low FODMAP interventions over longer timeframes
- . Additionally, the assessment of biological measures such as microbiota diversity and stability, as well as metabolites (such as short chain fatty acids) could be important to understand mechanistic attributes of low FODMAP diets in IBS.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) can provoke symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to compare the effects of diets with low vs. moderate FODMAP content on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and bowel habits, and to identify possible predictors of clinical response to a low FODMAP diet and FODMAP sensitivity in IBS. METHODS Adult participants with IBS (Rome IV criteria, n = 29) were included and adhered to two 7-day diet periods, with either low (4 g/day) or moderate (23 g/day) amounts of FODMAPs, in this randomized, double-blind, crossover study. The periods were separated by a wash-out period (≥14 days). IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) and a stool diary (Bristol Stool Form) were completed before and after the diet periods. At baseline, severity of GI symptoms and gut microbial fermentation were assessed (every 15 min, 4 h) during the Lactulose Nutrient Challenge Test (LNCT). Clinical response and FODMAP sensitivity were defined by reduction after low FODMAP period, and increase after moderate FODMAP period in IBS-SSS (≥50 points), respectively. RESULTS Severity of GI symptoms (P = 0.04), stool consistency (P = 0.01), and stool frequency (P = 0.01) differed between the interventions, with reduced overall GI symptom severity, abdominal pain intensity and frequency, bowel habits dissatisfaction, and daily life interference (P < 0.05 for all), as well as more firm (P = 0.03) and less frequent (P < 0.01) stools after low FODMAP intervention, but not after moderate FODMAP intervention. A third (34%) responded clinically to the low FODMAP diet, and the response could be predicted by higher IBS-SSS at baseline (P = 0.02). Although modest associations between FODMAP sensitivity (22%) and GI symptoms during LNCT were observed, no independent predictors could be identified. CONCLUSIONS A diet low in FODMAPs reduces GI symptoms and affects bowel habits in IBS, compared with a moderate FODMAP diet. Assessment of IBS severity before the intervention may be used to predict clinical response to a low FODMAP diet. Trial registry (http://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov): Registered under Clinical Trial number NCT05182593.
4.
A Low-FODMAP Diet Provides Benefits for Functional Gastrointestinal Symptoms but Not for Improving Stool Consistency and Mucosal Inflammation in IBD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Peng, Z, Yi, J, Liu, X
Nutrients. 2022;14(10)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The low-FODMAP diet eliminates carbohydrates that cannot be easily digested in order to reduce functional gastrointestinal symptoms associated with irritable bowel disease (IBD). The symptoms of irritable bowel disease include abdominal pain and bloating. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether a low-FODMAP diet can alleviate functional gastrointestinal symptoms in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease. In comparison with a regular diet, a low-FODMAP diet significantly reduced symptoms of bloating, wind, flatulence, abdominal pain, fatigue, and lethargy in patients with IBD. In addition, patients with Crohn's disease have achieved remission or reduced symptoms after following a low-FODMAP diet. Healthcare professionals can use this study to understand better the effects of a low-FODMAP diet on patients with IBD who have functional gastrointestinal symptoms. Further robust studies are, however, required to evaluate the evidence's robustness and identify the mechanism behind the improvement of symptoms.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- LFD use in IBD improved symptoms of bloating, wind or flatulence, borborygmi, abdominal pain, and fatigue or lethargy, but not nausea and vomiting.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy of a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet (LFD) in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (UC)] participants with functional gastrointestinal symptoms (FGSs).
Methods
A search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang (Chinese) Database up to March 2022. Quality assessment of all included studies was performed.
Results
9 studies (4 randomised controlled trials, 5 non-randomised studies) with a total of 351 participants diagnosed with IBD were included, and compared LFD with a placebo diet or normal diet (ND), overall and individual
LFD Effects of FGS:
- Overall 9 studies: an improvement (0.47, 0.33–0.66, p = 0.0000)
- No difference in the subgroup classified by disease type
- CD and UC: no improvement
Individual improvement:
- Bloating (0.37, 0,24-0,57, p=0.0000); wind or flatulence (0.38, 0,28-0,51, p=0.0000); borborygmi (0.48, 0,26-0,89, p=0.0000), abdominal pain (0.5, 0,37-0,68, p=0.0000), fatigue/lethargy (0.71, 0,61-0,82, p=0.0000)
- No difference in nausea and vomiting (0.54, 0,22-1,32, p=018)
IBS Quality of Life Score:
- 2 studies: reduced Short IBD Questionnaire (SIBDQ) score (11.24, 6.61-15.87, p=0.0000)
Bristol Stool Form Chart:
- 2 studies: normal stool consistency (type 3-4); no difference (5.99, 0.17-216.51, p=0.33)
- 2 other studies: no difference (-0.17, 0.48 - 0.15, p=0.30)
Diseases activity (Harvey-Bradshaw index):
- 2 studies using the Mayo score: no difference (-32, -1,09-0.45, p=0.41)
- 3 studies using BHi score: reduction (-1.09, -1,77-0.42, p=0.002)
Faecal calprotectin:
- 2 studies: no change (-16.03, -36,78-4.73, p=0.13)
Limitations
- Comparison diets were not standardised, suggesting the potential of different dietary habits to bias results..
- Heterogeneity of included studies, and the relatively small sample size of the studies can reduce the reliability of the results.
Conclusion
While the study found inconsistent definition standards for FGS, all the nine studies showed that LFD was associated with an improvement in some symptoms.
Clinical practice applications:
- This study suggests that IBD patients with FGSs may benefit from LFD treatment with the assistance of a healthcare professional.
Considerations for future research:
- This study has shown that LFD can improve FGSs in IBD, but further research with a larger sample size and more comprehensive analysis is warranted to replicate the results.
- The description of the findings and Quality of Life data are a little unclear. The impact on Quality of Life warrants further investigation, as clinicians need to consider the impact of following a restrictive diet on Quality of Life.
Abstract
BACKGROUND A low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet (LFD) is claimed to improve functional gastrointestinal symptoms (FGSs). However, the role of LFD in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with FGSs remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To systematically assess the efficacy of LFD in IBD patients with FGSs. METHODS Six databases were searched from inception to 1 January 2022. Data were synthesized as the relative risk of symptoms improvement and normal stool consistency, mean difference of Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), Short IBD Questionnaire (SIBDQ), IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QoL), Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBi), Mayo score, and fecal calprotectin (FC). Risk of bias was assessed based on study types. A funnel plot and Egger's test were used to analyze publication bias. RESULTS This review screened and included nine eligible studies, including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five before-after studies, involving a total of 446 participants (351 patients with LFD vs. 95 controls). LFD alleviated overall FGSs (RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.33-0.66, p = 0.0000) and obtained higher SIBDQ scores (MD = 11.24, 95% CI 6.61 to 15.87, p = 0.0000) and lower HBi score of Crohn's disease (MD = -1.09, 95% CI -1.77 to -0.42, p = 0.002). However, there were no statistically significant differences in normal stool consistency, BSFS, IBS-QoL, Mayo score of ulcerative colitis, and FC. No publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS LFD provides a benefit in FGSs and QoL but not for improving stool consistency and mucosal inflammation in IBD patients. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to develop the optimal LFD strategy for IBD.