1.
Effectiveness of Probiotic, Prebiotic, and Synbiotic Supplementation to Improve Perinatal Mental Health in Mothers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Desai, V, Kozyrskyj, AL, Lau, S, Sanni, O, Dennett, L, Walter, J, Ospina, MB
Frontiers in psychiatry. 2021;12:622181
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Maternal mental health problems in the perinatal period are a global public health challenge. As many as one in five women develop depression and/or anxiety in the postpartum period, making them the most common complications of pregnancy and delivery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence on the administration of prebiotic, probiotic, and/or synbiotic supplements during pregnancy to reduce the risk of mental health problems in the perinatal period. This study is a systemic review and meta-analysis of four studies of which three where included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Results indicate limited evidence about the effectiveness of probiotics administered during pregnancy to reduce the risk of maternal mental health disorders and highlighted the lack of evidence on prebiotics and synbiotics supplementation to inform their use for similar purposes. Authors conclude that there is the need for future trials targeting microbiota interventions that test probiotic/prebiotic/synbiotic interventions that redress specific dysbioses in pregnancy gut microbiota that arise from poor mental health.
Abstract
Introduction: There is an emerging interest in modulating the gut microbiota to target the gut-brain axis and improve maternal mental health in the perinatal period. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics supplementation during pregnancy to reduce the risk of maternal mental health problems in the perinatal period. Methods: Electronic biomedical databases and clinical trial registries were searched from database inception through August 2020 to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of probiotic, prebiotic, or synbiotic supplements administered to women during pregnancy on measures of perinatal depression, anxiety, and other mental health outcomes. Study selection, risk of bias appraisal, and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. Pooled mean differences (MD) and odds ratios (pOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated in random-effects meta-analyses for the outcomes of interest in the review. Results: From 3,868 studies identified through the search strategy, three RCTs of low risk of bias involving 713 participants were included, all three testing probiotics. There were no differences between probiotics and control groups in the mean depression scores (MD -0.46; 95% CI -2.16, 1.25) at end of follow-up. Although statistical significance was not achieved, probiotics showed an advantage in the proportion of participants scoring below an established cut-off for depression (pOR 0.68; 95% CI 0.43, 1.07). Compared to placebo, probiotics in pregnancy reduced anxiety symptoms (MD -0.99; 95% CI -1.80, -0.18); however, this advantage was not translated in a reduction in the proportion of participants scoring above an established cut-off for anxiety (pOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.23, 1.85). There were no differences between probiotics and control groups in global mental health scores at end of follow-up (MD 1.09; 95% CI -2.04, 4.22). Conclusion: There is limited but promising evidence about the effectiveness of probiotics during pregnancy to reduce anxiety symptoms and reduce the proportion of women scoring ABOVE a cut-off depression score. There is a lack of RCT evidence supporting prebiotics and synbiotics supplementation for similar purposes in the perinatal period. More research is needed before prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics are recommended to support maternal mental health and well-being in the perinatal period. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42019137158.
2.
The Role of Diet, Eating Behavior, and Nutrition Intervention in Seasonal Affective Disorder: A Systematic Review.
Yang, Y, Zhang, S, Zhang, X, Xu, Y, Cheng, J, Yang, X
Frontiers in psychology. 2020;11:1451
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a mood disorder characterised by annual depression or bipolar disorder in a seasonal pattern. Recent evidence suggests dietary intervention and nutrition status can affect the symptoms in depressed patients, but none have specifically considered depression among SAD patients. The aim of this review was to assess the associations between diet, eating behaviour and nutrition intervention in SAD patients. Eleven studies were included and found vegetarian diet patterns and alcoholism to be associated with higher SAD prevalence. Additionally, SAD patients tend to consume larger dinners, more snacks, and show more cravings for starch-rich foods. Despite these patterns, dietary supplementation or nutrition intervention did not show benefit for SAD symptoms. Overall, the authors conclude there is a lack of evidence to draw conclusions on dietary pattern and nutritional interventions for preventing and managing SAD. The authors suggest further evidence is needed from larger controlled trials and encourage investigation of the role of the B vitamin group, rather than an isolated B12 supplementation.
Abstract
Background: Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a biological and mood disorder with a seasonal pattern. Dietary intervention and nutritional status have been reported to affect SAD severity. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence of associations between SAD and diet, eating behavior, and nutrition intervention. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception up to July 1, 2019. Studies that examined diet and eating behaviors in SAD patients and tests of nutrition interventions for SAD were included. Two independent investigators extracted data based on study designs, participants, outcomes, exposures, and association measures. Results: Eleven studies were included: six studies examined distinctive dietary patterns and eating behaviors in SAD patients and five studies explored the efficacy of nutrition interventions for SAD. Vegetarianism and alcoholism were associated with higher SAD prevalence, but normal alcohol intake was not correlated with SAD severity. Compared with non-clinical subjects, SAD patients tended to consume significantly larger dinners and more evening snacks during weekdays and weekends and exhibit a higher frequency of binge eating, external eating, and emotional eating. Additionally, compared to healthy controls, SAD patients presented more cravings for starch-rich food and food with high fiber. However, neither the ingestion of carbohydrate-loaded meals nor Vitamin D/B12 supplementation showed benefit for SAD. Conclusion: Studies suggest that SAD patients may exhibit distinctive diet preferences and eating behaviors, but no current nutrition intervention has demonstrated efficacy for ameliorating SAD symptoms. Further evidence is needed from randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and longer durations.
3.
The Role of Bacteria and Its Derived Metabolites in Chronic Pain and Depression: Recent Findings and Research Progress.
Li, S, Hua, D, Wang, Q, Yang, L, Wang, X, Luo, A, Yang, C
The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;23(1):26-41
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is closely associated with chronic pain yet the connection between these comorbidities is ambiguous. Recent studies have shown alterations in the gut microbiome may contribute to cognitive dysfunction via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the existing evidence of the role of the gut microbiome in chronic pain and depression and explore potential mechanisms of gut dysbiosis in the development of these conditions. This review found metabolic products from the gut microbiota can mediate neuro-inflammation and neuro-immunity pathways in pain and depression, and that dysbiosis in the gut may contribute to the cause of chronic pain and depression. The authors conclude the metabolic products from the gut bacteria offer new insights to the connection between the gut microbiota and mechanisms of pain and depression, while showing potential as a therapeutic target.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain is frequently comorbid with depression in clinical practice. Recently, alterations in gut microbiota and metabolites derived therefrom have been found to potentially contribute to abnormal behaviors and cognitive dysfunction via the "microbiota-gut-brain" axis. METHODS PubMed was searched and we selected relevant studies before October 1, 2019. The search keyword string included "pain OR chronic pain" AND "gut microbiota OR metabolites"; "depression OR depressive disorder" AND "gut microbiota OR metabolites". We also searched the reference lists of key articles manually. RESULTS This review systematically summarized the recent evidence of gut microbiota and metabolites in chronic pain and depression in animal and human studies. The results showed the pathogenesis and therapeutics of chronic pain and depression might be partially due to gut microbiota dysbiosis. Importantly, bacteria-derived metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids, tryptophan-derived metabolites, and secondary bile acids, offer new insights into the potential linkage between key triggers in gut microbiota and potential mechanisms of depression. CONCLUSION Studying gut microbiota and its metabolites has contributed to the understanding of comorbidity of chronic pain and depression. Consequently, modulating dietary structures or supplementation of specific bacteria may be an available strategy for treating chronic pain and depression.
4.
Altered Composition of Gut Microbiota in Depression: A Systematic Review.
Barandouzi, ZA, Starkweather, AR, Henderson, WA, Gyamfi, A, Cong, XS
Frontiers in psychiatry. 2020;11:541
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The brain-gut microbiome axis has emerged to be a link between gut microbiota pattern and depression, however the mechanism by which gut microbiota modulate depression-like behaviors remains inconclusive. While studies have observed differences in the diversity and abundance of different bacteria taxa, no definitive classifications have been confirmed. The aim of this systematic review was to identify gut microbiota patterns in people with depression compared with healthy controls. According to the nine articles included in this review, conflicting results were found on characteristics of gut microbiota in people with depression compared to healthy controls. Based on these findings, the authors conclude the role of the microbiota in the development or maintenance of depression remains limited, suggesting the likelihood of confounding factors. Further research is recommended to better understand the relationship between gut microbiota pattern and treatment outcomes for people with depression.
Abstract
Cumulative evidence shows a linkage between gut microbiota pattern and depression through the brain-gut microbiome axis. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the alterations of the gut microbiota patterns in people with depression compared to healthy controls. A comprehensive literature search of human studies, published between January 2000 and June 2019, was reviewed. The key words included gastrointestinal microbiome, gut microbiome, microbiota, depression, depressive symptoms, and depressive disorder. The systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Nine articles met the eligibility criteria. Disparities in α-diversity and β-diversity of the microbiota existed in people with depression compared to healthy controls. At the phylum level, there were inconsistencies in the abundance of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria. However, high abundance in Actinobacteria and Fusobacteria phyla were observed in people with depression. On the family level, high abundance of Actinomycineae, Coriobacterineae, Bifidobacteriaceae, Clostridiales incertae sedis XI, Porphyromonadaceae, Clostridiaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Streptococcaceae, Eubacteriaceae, Thermoanaerobacteriaceae, Fusobacteriaceae, Nocardiaceae, Streptomycetaceae, and low abundance of Veillonellaceae, Prevotellaceae, Bacteroidaceae, Sutterellaceae, Oscillospiraceae, Marniabilaceae, and Chitinophagaceae were observed in people with depression. On the genus level, high abundance of Oscillibacter, Blautia, Holdemania, Clostridium XIX, Anaerostipes, Anaerofilum, Streptococcus, Gelria, Turicibacter, Parabacteroides, Eggerthella, Klebsiella, Paraprevotella, Veillonella, Clostridium IV, Erysipelotrichaceae incertae sedis, Eubacterium, Parvimonas, Desulfovibrio, Parasutterella, Actinomyces, Asaccharobacter, Atopobium, Olsenella and low abundance of Coprococcus, Lactobacillus, Escherichia/Shigella, Clostridium XlVa, Dialister, Howardella, Pyramidobacter, and Sutterella were found in people with depression. Alteration of gut microbiome patterns was evident in people with depression. Further evidence is warranted to allow for the translation of microbiome findings toward innovative clinical strategies that may improve treatment outcomes in people with depression.