1.
Simple Mobile technology health management tool for people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled feasibility trial.
Röhricht, F, Padmanabhan, R, Binfield, P, Mavji, D, Barlow, S
BMC psychiatry. 2021;21(1):357
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A small percentage of the population experience severe mental illness (SMI) during their lifetime. About a third of these patients develop a more chronic course of their illness, particularly those with chronic psychosis. Mobile health (“m-health”) technology has been increasingly proposed and tested to foster self-management, monitor signs of relapse via self-report, and to improve attendance rate for routine appointments and medication adherence. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and the potential clinical benefits of SMI-specific mobile technology health management tool (‘Florence’) to enhance community care for people with SMI. This study was a randomised-controlled pilot study (n = 65) with two trial arms; control group - received routine community mental health care under the Care Programme Approach (treatment as usual / TAU) and the intervention group - received enhanced community care intervention that uses interactive SMS communication tools in addition to TAU). Results demonstrate that: - it is feasible to implement the intervention within this patient cohort and that the study design can be delivered. - no harmful effects were observed as a result of the trial. - participants in the TAU arm showed enthusiasm to use the intervention as well. - the intervention could be customised to meet individual preferences, as some of the participants felt either quickly fatigued by the frequency of messages or felt that they were too intrusive. Authors conclude that the health technology tool appeared to offer a practicable and acceptable intervention for patients with SMI in managing their condition.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe mental illness (SMI) is associated with care delivery problems because of the high levels of clinical resources needed to address patient's psychosocial impairment and to support inclusion in society. Current routine appointment systems do not adequately foster recovery care and are not systematically capturing information suggestive of urgent care needs. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential clinical benefits of a mobile technology health management tool to enhance community care for people with severe mental illness. METHODS This randomised-controlled feasibility pilot study utilised mixed quantitative (measure on subjective quality of life as primary outcome; questionnaires on self-management skills, medication adherence scale as secondary outcomes) and qualitative (thematic analysis) methodologies. The intervention was a simple interactive technology (Short Message Service - SMS) communication system called 'Florence', and had three components: medication and appointment reminders, daily individually defined wellbeing scores and optionally coded request for additional support. Eligible participants (diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder ≥1 year) were randomised (1:1) to either treatment as usual (TAU, N = 29) or TAU and the technology-assisted intervention (N = 36). RESULTS Preliminary results suggest that the health technology tool appeared to offer a practicable and acceptable intervention for patients with SMI in managing their condition. Recruitment and retention data indicated feasibility, the qualitative analysis identified suggestions for further improvement of the intervention. Patients engaged well and benefited from SMS reminders and from monitoring their individual wellbeing scores; recommendations were made to further personalise the intervention. The care coordinators did not utilise aspects of the intervention per protocol due to a variety of organisational barriers. Quantitative analysis of outcomes (including a patient-reported outcome measure on subjective quality of life, self-efficacy/competence and medication adherence measures) did not identify significant changes between groups over time in favour of the Florence intervention, given high baseline scores. The wellbeing scores, however, were positively correlated with all outcome measures. CONCLUSION It is feasible to conduct an adequately powered full trial to evaluate this intervention. Inclusion criteria should be revised to include patients with a higher level of need and clinicians should receive more in-depth assistance in managing the tools effectively. The preliminary data suggests that this intervention can aid recovery care and individually defined wellbeing scores are highly predictive of a range of recovery outcomes; they could, therefore, guide the allocation of routine care resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN34124141 ; retrospectively registered, date of registration 05/11/2019.
2.
Predictors of completing a primary health care diabetes prevention intervention programme in people at high risk of type 2 diabetes: Experiences of the DE-PLAN project.
Gilis-Januszewska, A, Lindström, J, Barengo, NC, Tuomilehto, J, Schwarz, PE, Wójtowicz, E, Piwońska-Solska, B, Szybiński, Z, Windak, A, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, A
Medicine. 2018;97(5):e9790
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
As the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) begins to grow, the spotlight is on successful, cost-effective lifestyle interventions to help prevent it. Real-life implementation studies in various settings and with various people have shown than lower cost, less intensive interventions can help prevent T2D. The DE-PLAN (Diabetes in Europe: Prevention Using Lifestyle, Physical Activity and Nutritional Intervention) was implemented across 17 European countries, where it aimed to assess its application but also to create a network of trained professionals to deliver T2D prevention. This study aimed to explore the factors associated with completing the programme in primary healthcare in Poland. The study included nine GP practices in Krakow with 262 people at high risk of T2D (according to the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score). The prevention programme included 11 lifestyle counselling sessions, physical activity sessions and motivational phone calls/letters. Measurements including fasting glucose, body mass index and blood pressure were taken at baseline and 1 year after the programme. People who completed the whole programme were less likely to be employed, less likely to have high blood pressure and ate more fruits and vegetables each day. The authors concluded that people who healthier behaviours were more likely to complete the programme, whereas men and people who work were less likely to complete the programme. More strategies are needed to increase completion with these individuals.
Abstract
It has been shown that real-life implementation studies for the prevention of type 2 diabetes (DM2) performed in different settings and populations can be effective. However, not enough information is available on factors influencing the reach of DM2 prevention programmes. This study examines the predictors of completing an intervention programme targeted at people at high risk of DM2 in Krakow, Poland as part of the DE-PLAN project.A total of 262 middle-aged people, everyday patients of 9 general practitioners' (GP) practices, at high risk of DM2 (Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISK) >14) agreed to participate in the lifestyle intervention to prevent DM2. Intervention consisted of 11 lifestyle counseling sessions, organized physical activity sessions followed by motivational phone calls and letters. Measurements were performed at baseline and 1 year after the initiation of the intervention.Seventy percent of the study participants enrolled completed the core curriculum (n = 184), 22% were men. When compared to noncompleters, completers had a healthier baseline diabetes risk profile (P <.05). People who completed the intervention were less frequently employed versus noncompleters (P = .037), less often had hypertension (P = .043), and more frequently consumed vegetables and fruit daily (P = .055).In multiple logistic regression model, employment reduced the likelihood of completing the intervention 2 times (odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.81). Higher glucose 2 hours after glucose load and hypertension were the independent factors decreasing the chance to participate in the intervention (OR 0.79, 95% 0.69-0.92 and OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-0.99, respectively). Daily consumption of vegetables and fruits increased the likelihood of completing the intervention (OR 1.86, 95% 1.01-3.41).In conclusion, people with healthier behavior and risk profile are more predisposed to complete diabetes prevention interventions. Male, those who work and those with a worse health profile, are less likely to participate and complete interventions. Targeted strategies are needed in real-life diabetes prevention interventions to improve male participation and to reach those who are working as well as people with a higher risk profile.
3.
Being 'fat' in today's world: a qualitative study of the lived experiences of people with obesity in Australia.
Thomas, SL, Hyde, J, Karunaratne, A, Herbert, D, Komesaroff, PA
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy. 2008;11(4):321-30
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The obesity epidemic is one of the most pressing contemporary public health problems. The aim of this study was to develop a picture of both lived experiences of obesity and the impact of socio-cultural factors on obesity. The study adopted a qualitative research design (n=76) . A broad interview schedule was developed by the authors aimed at individuals from a broad range of backgrounds and experiences of obesity. Results indicate that: (a) the experiences of obesity are diverse but there are common themes. (b) people living with obesity have heard the messages but find it difficult to act upon them. (c) interventions should be tailored to address both individual and community needs. (d) there should be a different approach towards obesity interventions. Authors conclude that interventions should respond directly to the social and cultural dimensions of communities and clusters of individuals.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop an in-depth picture of both lived experience of obesity and the impact of socio-cultural factors on people living with obesity. DESIGN Qualitative methodology, utilizing in-depth semi-structured interviews with a community sample of obese adults (body mass index >or=30). Community sampling methods were supplemented with purposive sampling techniques to ensure a diverse range of individuals were included. RESULTS Seventy-six individuals (aged 16-72) were interviewed. Most had struggled with their weight for most of their lives (n=45). Almost all had experienced stigma and discrimination in childhood (n=36), as adolescents (n=41) or as adults (n=72). About half stated that they had been humiliated by health professionals because of their weight. Participants felt an individual responsibility to lose weight, and many tried extreme forms of dieting to do so. Participants described an increasing culture of 'blame' against people living with obesity perpetuated by media and public health messages. Eighty percent said that they hated or disliked the word obesity and would rather be called fat or overweight. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION There are four key conclusions: (i) the experiences of obesity are diverse, but there are common themes, (ii) people living with obesity have heard the messages but find it difficult to act upon them, (iii) interventions should be tailored to address both individual and community needs and (iv) we need to rethink how to approach obesity interventions to ensure that avoid recapitulating damaging social stereotypes and exacerbating social inequalities.