1.
Cognitive stimulation and psychosocial results in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gómez-Soria, I, Iguacel, I, Cuenca-Zaldívar, JN, Aguilar-Latorre, A, Peralta-Marrupe, P, Latorre, E, Calatayud, E
Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2023;115:105114
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Individuals with dementia and brain function impairment may have difficulty in completing day-to-day tasks. Cognitive stimulation (CS), which involves brain processing activities such as puzzles, word games, and music normally performed in a group setting for around 45 minutes per week, has been shown to be a cost-effective therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 studies aimed to analyse the effect of CS on quality of life (QoL). The results showed that personalised CS was associated with a significantly higher QoL, but had no effect on mood and depression, ability to perform daily activities, or mood and anxiety. Personalised CS improves QoL in older adults with healthy cognitive ageing, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend CS as a therapy for individuals with brain ageing, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia. For those who are also suffering from depression and low mood other strategies should be employed.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cognitive stimulation (CS) is a popular and cost-effective intervention, which applies different types of techniques focused on cognitive skills and can be administered by different professionals. CS can be defined as activities that involve cognitive processing usually conducted in a social context and often in a group. Therefore, CS can improve psychosocial functioning and quality of life (QoL), depression, anxiety and activities of daily living (ADLs) independent of the pharmacological treatment such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of CS on psychosocial outcomes in older adults (aged 65 years or over), with healthy cognitive ageing, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia. METHODS PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were examined from inception to October 2021. A total of 1,997 studies were initially identified in these databases. After discarding studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 30 studies were finally included in the systematic review and the meta-analysis performed with robust variance estimator (RVE) due the inclusion of studies with repeated measurements. The quality assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. RESULTS CS was significantly associated with a higher QoL in participants who received personalized/adapted CS (RVE = 0.11±0.19 [-0.76, 0.99], t(1.86) = 0.6, p = 0.61). . CONCLUSION Personalized/adapted CS seems to improve QoL in older adults.
2.
Exercise as adjunctive treatment for alcohol use disorder: A randomized controlled trial.
Roessler, KK, Bilberg, R, Søgaard Nielsen, A, Jensen, K, Ekstrøm, CT, Sari, S
PloS one. 2017;12(10):e0186076
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Treating alcohol-use disorder (AUD) is challenging and multi-faceted thus many analyses suggest the effectiveness of interventions be low. Recent evidence suggests exercise may be a promising addition to intervention in both reducing consumption as well as the co-morbidities linked with AUD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of physical activity as an adjunct to outpatient alcohol treatment on alcohol consumption in 100 patients. Participants were allocated to one of three arms: treatment, treatment with group exercise or treatment with individual exercise, and alcohol intake was measured at six and 12 months after treatment initiation. This study demonstrated that there is no significant effect of physical activity on alcohol consumption, however moderate physical activity was seen to be protective against excessive drinking following treatment. Based on this study as well as the Health Lifestyle Study, the authors support the need for implementing physically active lifestyles for patients in treatment.
Abstract
AIMS: To examine whether physical activity as an adjunct to outpatient alcohol treatment has an effect on alcohol consumption following participation in an exercise intervention of six months' duration, and at 12 months after treatment initiation. METHODS The study is a randomized controlled study with three arms: Patients allocated to (A) treatment as usual, (B) treatment as usual and supervised group exercise, (C) treatment as usual and individual physical exercise. The primary outcome measure was excessive drinking six months after treatment start and completion of the intervention. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the odds of excessive drinking among the three groups, based on intention-to-treat. Changes in level of physical activity in all three groups were tested by using a generalized linear mixed model. A multiple linear model was used to test if there was an association between amount of performed physical activity and alcohol consumption. RESULTS A total of 175 patients (68.6% male) participated. Response rates were 77.7% at six months and 57.1% at 12 months follow-up. OR 0.99 [95% CI: 0.46; 2.14], p = 0.976 for excessive drinking in the group exercise condition, and 1.02 [95% CI: 0.47; 2.18], p = 0.968 in the individual exercise condition, which, when compared to the control group as reference, did not differ statistically significantly. Participants with moderate level physical activity had lower odds for excessive drinking OR = 0.12 [0.05; 0.31], p<0.001 than participants with low level physical activity. Amount of alcohol consumption in the intervention groups decreased by 4% [95% CI: 0.03; 6.8], p = 0.015 for each increased exercising day. CONCLUSIONS No direct effect of physical exercise on drinking outcome was found. Moderate level physical activity was protective against excessive drinking following treatment. A dose-response effect of exercise on drinking outcome supports the need for implementing physically active lifestyles for patients in treatment for alcohol use disorder.
3.
Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America.
Puhl, RM, Andreyeva, T, Brownell, KD
International journal of obesity (2005). 2008;32(6):992-1000
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Overweight individuals are frequent targets of weight stigmatisation and prejudice. Negative implications include impairments in psychological well-being and physical health. The aim of this study was to document rates and patterns of weight/height discrimination in comparison to other forms of discrimination (based on gender and race) among adults in the United States. Respondents were drawn from a nationally representative sample of community-based English-speaking adults aged 25–74 years in the United States. A total of 2290 individuals (1104 men and 1186 women) were eligible for the study. Results demonstrate greater vulnerability to weight bias among youth at higher levels of obesity, and that women are more vulnerable to weight/height discrimination than men. Authors conclude that the prevalence of weight/height discrimination is high in the United States and it is comparable to rates of racial discrimination.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Limited data are available on the prevalence and patterns of body weight discrimination from representative samples. This study examined experiences of weight/height discrimination in a nationally representative sample of US adults and compared their prevalence and patterns with discrimination experiences based on race and gender. METHOD AND PROCEDURES Data were from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States, a 1995-1996 community-based survey of English-speaking adults aged 25-74 (N=2290). Reported experiences of weight/height discrimination included a variety of institutional settings and interpersonal relationships. Multivariate regression analyses were used to predict weight/height discrimination controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and body weight status. RESULTS The prevalence of weight/height discrimination ranged from 5% among men to 10% among women, but these average percentages obscure the much higher risk of weight discrimination among heavier individuals (40% for adults with body mass index (BMI) of 35 and above). Younger individuals with a higher BMI had a particularly high risk of weight/height discrimination regardless of their race, education and weight status. Women were at greater risk for weight/height discrimination than men, especially women with a BMI of 30-35 who were three times more likely to report weight/height discrimination compared to male peers of a similar weight. DISCUSSION Weight/height discrimination is prevalent in American society and is relatively close to reported rates of racial discrimination, particularly among women. Both institutional forms of weight/height discrimination (for example, in employment settings) and interpersonal mistreatment due to weight/height (for example, being called names) were common, and in some cases were even more prevalent than discrimination due to gender and race.