0
selected
-
1.
Effect of a Parent-Focused eHealth Intervention on Children's Fruit, Vegetable, and Discretionary Food Intake (Food4toddlers): Randomized Controlled Trial.
Røed, M, Medin, AC, Vik, FN, Hillesund, ER, Van Lippevelde, W, Campbell, K, Øverby, NC
Journal of medical Internet research. 2021;23(2):e18311
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diet in childhood tends to reflect that in adolescence and adulthood and so healthy eating habits established during this time may prevent increased weight, non-communicable diseases and even cancer. Healthy diet promotion to parents may be able to ensure that a healthy food environment is established, which will then continue throughout life. This randomised controlled trial of 404 parents aimed to determine the effect of parent-focused healthy food promotion via the internet for 12 months. The results showed that after 6 months that frequency of vegetable intake increased but this was not seen at 12 months. No differences were seen in the frequency of intake of sweet foods at either time point. It was concluded that intervention through a web-based healthy diet programme increased vegetable intake in the short-term, however in the long-term a personalised intervention or reminders may be needed. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand the importance of establishing a healthy diet from a young age and that parental support may be required to do this.
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Western countries, children's diets are often low in fruits and vegetables and high in discretionary foods. Diet in early life tends to track through childhood and youth and even into adulthood. Interventions should, therefore, be delivered in periods when habitual traits are established, as in toddlerhood when children adapt to their family's diet. OBJECTIVE In this study, we assessed the effect of the Food4toddlers eHealth intervention, which aimed to enhance toddlers' diets by shaping their food and eating environment. METHODS The Food4toddlers randomized controlled trial was conducted in Norway in 2017-2018. Parent-child dyads were recruited through social media. In total, 298 parents completed an online questionnaire at baseline (mean child age 10.9 months, SD 1.2). Postintervention questionnaires were completed immediately after the intervention (ie, follow-up 1; mean child age 17.8 months, SD 1.3) and 6 months after the intervention (ie, follow-up 2; mean child age 24.2 months, SD 1.9). The intervention was guided by social cognitive theory, which targets the linked relationship between the person, the behavior, and the environment. The intervention group (148/298, 49.7%) got access to the Food4toddlers website for 6 months from baseline. The website included information on diet and on how to create a healthy food and eating environment as well as activities, recipes, and collaboration opportunities. To assess intervention effects on child diet from baseline to follow-up 1 and from baseline to follow-up 2, we used generalized estimating equations and a time × group interaction term. Between-group differences in changes over time for frequency and variety of fruits and vegetables and frequency of discretionary foods were assessed. RESULTS At follow-up 1, a significant time × group interaction was observed for the frequency of vegetable intake (P=.02). The difference between groups in the change from baseline to follow-up 1 was 0.46 vegetable items per day (95% CI 0.06-0.86) in favor of the intervention group. No other significant between-group differences in dietary changes from baseline to follow-up 1 or follow-up 2 were observed. However, there is a clear time trend showing that the intake of discretionary foods increases by time from less than 1 item per week at baseline to more than 4 items per week at 2 years of age (P<.001), regardless of group. CONCLUSIONS A positive intervention effect was observed for the frequency of vegetable intake at follow-up 1 but not at follow-up 2. No other between-group effects on diet were observed. eHealth interventions of longer duration, including reminders after the main content of the intervention has been delivered, may be needed to obtain long-terms effects, along with tailoring in a digital or a personal form. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 92980420; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN92980420.
-
2.
Effects of the Healthy Children, Healthy Families, Healthy Communities Program for Obesity Prevention among Vulnerable Children: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.
Choo, J, Yang, HM, Jae, SY, Kim, HJ, You, J, Lee, J
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(8)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Childhood obesity is especially pronounced in those from lower socioeconomical backgrounds. The Three-Healthy Programme is a multilevel initiative designed to target obesity in these children. This randomised control trial of 104 socioeconomically vulnerable children and 59 of their parents over 12 weeks aimed to determine the effects of the Three-Healthy Programme on healthy lifestyle behaviours and obesity in children in the public welfare system. The results showed that the Three-Healthy Programme, which targeted child behavioural strategies, parenting strategies and organisational strategies helped to increase a child’s knowledge of healthy lifestyle behaviours, vegetable intake and physical activity. However, there were no improvements in breakfast, fruit, milk, no-sugar beverage and fast-food consumption. This did not translate to improved obesity status. It was concluded that the Three-Healthy Programme may be effective at promoting healthy lifestyles in socioeconomically vulnerable children. The short study duration may be the reason why obesity did not improve, at least one year of intervention may be needed. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand the importance of targeting all influencers for weight loss in children from socioeconomically vulnerable backgrounds.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to examine whether the Healthy Children, Healthy Families, and Healthy Communities Program, consisting of multi-level strategies for obesity prevention tailoring the context of socioeconomically vulnerable children based on an ecological perspective, would be effective on improving their healthy lifestyle behaviors and obesity status. Methods: Participants were 104 children (and 59 parents) enrolled in public welfare systems in Seoul, South Korea. Based on a cluster-randomized controlled trial (no. ISRCTN11347525), eight centers were randomly assigned to intervention (four centers, 49 children, 27 parents) versus control groups (four centers, 55 children, 32 parents). Multi-level interventions of child-, parent-, and center-level strategies were conducted for 12 weeks. Children's healthy lifestyle behaviors and obesity status were assessed as daily recommended levels and body mass index ≥85th percentile, respectively. Parents' parenting behaviors were measured by the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity scale. Results: Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed significant improvements in total composite scores of healthy-lifestyle behaviors-including 60-min of moderate physical activity-but not in obesity status among children. Moreover, the intervention group showed significant improvements in parenting behaviors among parents. Conclusion: The multi-level strategies for obesity prevention based on an ecological perspective may be effective for promoting healthy lifestyles among socioeconomically vulnerable children.
-
3.
Does additional support provided through e-mail or SMS in a Web-based Social Marketing program improve children's food consumption? A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rangelov, N, Della Bella, S, Marques-Vidal, P, Suggs, LS
Nutrition journal. 2018;17(1):24
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Nutrition programmes designed for children are often difficult to implement and monitor as parents exert a powerful influence on eating habits. The World Health Organization has started to recommend Social Marketing as a way to promote a healthy diet and other lifestyle behaviours, however it is not currently clear to what extent text or email directed to parents can improve children’s eating behaviour. The aim of this randomised trial was to examine the effect of a Social Marketing healthy nutrition program on children’s food intake, while also considering whether additional support through text or email resulted in additional positive change in 608 children. Families were randomised to one of three groups, where the parent received intervention by Web, Web and email or Web and text, and children’s food consumption was assessed using a food diary. This study showed a Social Marketing tailored program for parents delivered through the Web and complemented with letters directed to children can improve children’s eating behaviours. The additional use of text and email did not significantly improve positive behaviour change.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The FAN Social Marketing program was developed to improve dietary and physical activity habits of families with children in Ticino, Switzerland. The aim of this study was to examine if the effects of the program on children's food intake differed by intervention group. METHODS Effects of the FAN program were tested through a Randomized Controlled Trial. The program lasted 8 weeks, during which participants received tailored communication about nutrition and physical activity. Families were randomly allocated to one of three groups, where the parent received the intervention by the Web (G1), Web + e-mail (G2) or Web + SMS (G3). Children in all groups received tailored print letters by post. Children's food consumption was assessed at baseline and immediate post intervention using a 7-day food diary. Generalized linear mixed models with child as a random effect and with time, treatment group, and the time by treatment interaction as fixed effects were used to test the impact of the intervention. RESULTS Analyses were conducted with a sample of 608 children. After participating in FAN the marginal means of daily consumption of fruit changed from 0.95 to 1.12 in G1, from 0.82 to 0.94 in G2, and from 0.93 to 1.18 in G3. The margins of the daily consumption of sweets decreased in each group (1.67 to 1.56 in G1, 1.71 to 1.49 in G2, and 1.72 to 1.62 in G3). The change in vegetable consumption observed from pre to post intervention in G3 (from 1.13 to 1.21) was significantly different from that observed in G1 (from 1.21 to 1.17). CONCLUSIONS A well-designed Web-based Social Marketing intervention complemented with print letters can help improve children's consumption of water, fruit, soft drinks, and sweets. The use of SMS to support greater behavior change, in addition to Web-based communication, resulted only in a small significant positive change for vegetables, while the use of e-mail in addition to Web did not result in any significant difference. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was retrospectively registered in the ISRCTN registry (ID ISRCTN48730279 ).
-
4.
Eating at food outlets and leisure places and "on the go" is associated with less-healthy food choices than eating at home and in school in children: cross-sectional data from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Program (2008-2014).
Ziauddeen, N, Page, P, Penney, TL, Nicholson, S, Kirk, SF, Almiron-Roig, E
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2018;107(6):992-1003
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Poor diet in childhood and adolescence has been recognised as a risk factor for obesity during adulthood. Public health research has found the food environment to be an important determinant of diet, specifically for this age group, and the major environments are home, school, and food outlets/leisure places. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the types of food consumed in each environment based on data from 4636 children and adolescents in the United Kingdom. This study showed the most common eating location across all age groups was at home, and this was associated with less sugar and takeaway food consumption. Based on these results, the authors conclude that home and school are both important areas to target for public health policy, however also highlight the importance of providing healthier food options for adolescents outside of these environments.
Abstract
Background: Where children eat has been linked to variations in diet quality, including the consumption of low-nutrient, energy-dense food, a recognized risk factor for obesity. Objective: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive analysis of consumption patterns and nutritional intake by eating location in British children with the use of a nationally representative survey. Design: Cross-sectional data from 4636 children (80,075 eating occasions) aged 1.5-18 y from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Program (2008-2014) were analyzed. Eating locations were categorized as home, school, work, leisure places, food outlets, and "on the go." Foods were classified into core (considered important or acceptable within a healthy diet) and noncore (all other foods). Other variables included the percentage of meals eaten at home, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, income, frequency of eating out, takeaway meal consumption, alcohol consumption, and smoking. Results: The main eating location across all age groups was at home (69-79% of eating occasions), with the highest energy intakes. One-third of children from the least-affluent families consumed ≤25% of meals at home. Eating more at home was associated with less sugar and takeaway food consumption. Eating occasions in leisure places, food outlets, and "on the go" combined increased with age, from 5% (1.5-3 y) to 7% (11-18 y), with higher energy intakes from noncore foods in these locations. The school environment was associated with higher intakes of core foods and reduced intakes of noncore foods in children aged 4-10 y who ate school-sourced foods. Conclusions: Home and school eating are associated with better food choices, whereas other locations are associated with poor food choices. Effective, sustained initiatives targeted at behaviors and improving access to healthy foods in leisure centers and food outlets, including food sold to eat "on the go," may improve food choices. Home remains an important target for intervention through family and nutrition education, outreach, and social marketing campaigns. This trial was registered with the ISRTCN registry (https://www.isrctn.com) as ISRCTN17261407.