1.
The impact of diabetes mellitus type 1 on male fertility: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Facondo, P, Di Lodovico, E, Delbarba, A, Anelli, V, Pezzaioli, LC, Filippini, E, Cappelli, C, Corona, G, Ferlin, A
Andrology. 2022;10(3):426-440
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus and male hypogonadism is well known, whereas the impact of type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) on male fertility and testis functions has been less studied. The aim of this study was to systematically review and discuss the available evidence evaluating paternity rate, male gonadal axis, and sperm parameters in men with DM1. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of fourteen studies. Results show: - reduced fertility potential in patients with DM1, as they have a lower number of children compared with unaffected population. In fact, the rate of children is statistically significantly lower among men who had been diagnosed with DM1 at an earlier age, according to a longer duration of the disease. - that men with DM1, compared with controls, have significantly lower normal sperm morphology, progressive motility and a trend toward a reduced semen volume, without difference in total sperm count and concentration. Authors conclude that DM1 might impair reproductive health at different levels, including functional sperm alterations definitively leading to reduced fertility rate in these patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some evidence suggests that diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) could affect male fertility, gonadal axis, semen parameters, and spermatogenesis because of effects of hyperglycemia and insulin deficiency. Anyhow, the exact impact of DM1 on male fertility is unclear. OBJECTIVES To review the studies evaluating paternity rate, male gonadal axis, and semen parameters in men with DM1. MATERIALS AND METHODS A review of relevant literature from January 1980 to December 2020 was performed. Only studies published in English reporting data on fatherhood (rate of children by natural fertility), hormonal and seminal parameters were included. Out of 14 retrieved articles, the eight studies evaluating semen parameters were meta-analyzed. RESULTS The rate of children (four studies) was lower than controls among men affected by DM1, especially in men with a longer duration of disease. The data of gonadal hormonal profile in DM1 men (six studies) are very heterogeneous and a neutral effect of DM1 or a condition of subclinical hypogonadism could not be concluded. Meta-analysis showed that men with DM1 (n = 380), compared with controls (n = 434), have significantly lower normal sperm morphology [-0.36% (-0.66; -0.06), p < 0.05, six studies] and sperm progressive motility [33.62% (-39.13; -28.11), p < 0.001, two studies] and a trend toward a lower seminal volume [-0.51 (-1.03; 0.02), p = 0.06, eight studies], without difference in total sperm count and concentration. Data on scrotal ultrasound and sperm DNA fragmentation are too few. No study evaluated other factors of male infertility, such as transrectal ultrasound, semen infections, sperm auto-antibodies, and retrograde ejaculation. DISCUSSION DM1 might impair male fertility and testis functions (endocrine, spermatogenesis), but definition of its actual impact needs further studies. CONCLUSION Men with DM1 should be evaluated with a complete hormonal, seminal, and ultrasound workup to better define their fertility potential and need for follow up of testis functions.
2.
The association of diabetes-related self-care activities with perceived stress, anxiety, and fatigue: a cross-sectional study.
Zhao, FF, Suhonen, R, Katajisto, J, Leino-Kilpi, H
Patient preference and adherence. 2018;12:1677-1686
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diabetes treatments rely on the individual’s ability to perform diabetes-related self-care activities (DRSCA), which involves tasks such as medication adherence, regulating diet, physical activity, blood glucose monitoring and foot care, however it appears that many individuals do not perform one or all of these tasks. Reasons why have been investigated, but remain insufficient. In this cross-sectional study of 248 individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) DRSCA was investigated in relation to stress, anxiety, and fatigue. The results showed that there was evidence of mid-level performance of DRSCA activities and performing DRSCA activities was likely to reduce stress levels but was not related to anxiety or fatigue. Individuals who had T2D for more than 5 years and women were more likely to have anxiety. Interestingly in contradiction to previous studies, support from outside sources did not affect levels of stress, anxiety and fatigue. It was concluded that improving the level of DRSCA may reduce stress. The fact that the performance of DRSCA was not related to anxiety may be because these activities impose restrictions on patients’ lives. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the performance of DRSCA may reduce stress levels, however as this study was an observational study, direct causal relationships are hard to determine.
Abstract
PURPOSE Many people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) do not sustain sufficient diabetes-related self-care activities (DRSCA) in their daily lives. To provide additional information about the positive influence of DRSCA, this study was conducted to examine whether DRSCA were associated with reduced perceived stress, anxiety, and fatigue among people with T2DM and to explore the level of DRSCA, perceived stress, anxiety, and fatigue and their association with background information. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study was a cross-sectional survey including 251 participants aged 18 years and older recruited from two hospitals in the eastern part of China. The study utilized self-report questionnaires that consisted of background information, DRSCA, perceived stress, anxiety, and fatigue. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted to explore the association of DRSCA with perceived stress, anxiety, and fatigue while adjusting for background information. RESULTS The results indicated that the level of self-care activities, stress, and fatigue was around middle level. The prevalence of anxiety was 19%. A high level of DRSCA was likely to reduce perceived stress but was not linked to anxiety and fatigue. Women were more susceptible to stress and anxiety, and people who had diabetes for >5 years were more likely to have anxiety. The background information included diabetes duration, standardized diabetes education, and high social support, all of which are factors that may influence DRSCA. CONCLUSION The findings suggest that improving the level of DRSCA might effectively reduce perceived stress. The potential benefits of DRSCA can provide both motivational and evaluative data for self-care programs. In addition, the findings show that DRSCA were not linked to anxiety and fatigue, which implies that their positive influence on anxiety and fatigue may be offset by the load of frequent DRSCA. It is suggested that helping patients to make tailored plans to integrate DRSCA into their daily lives is needed. Meanwhile, in the background information, it is suggested that standardized diabetes education and high social support can benefit DRSCA; in improving psychological health, more attention should be paid to women and patients with diabetes duration <5 years.