0
selected
-
1.
Probiotic for pathogen-specific Staphylococcus aureus decolonisation in Thailand: a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Piewngam, P, Khongthong, S, Roekngam, N, Theapparat, Y, Sunpaweravong, S, Faroongsarng, D, Otto, M
The Lancet. Microbe. 2023;4(2):e75-e83
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Staphylococcus aureus is a human pathogen that can cause several serious and often fatal infections. Treatment is complicated by widespread antibiotic resistance, such as in methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA). The aim of this study was to analyse whether a regimen of B subtilis (strain MB40) can decrease S aureus colonisation in humans and thereby overcome the problems related to topical decolonisation efforts and the use of antibiotics. This study was a single-centre, phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Individuals with S aureus colonisation were randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention or control group. Results showed that colonisation densities in the intestine were reduced by probiotic treatment. Furthermore, there were no significant effects on the overall composition of the intestinal microbiome. Authors concluded that B subtilis probiotic could be used to reduce S aureus and MRSA colonisation prevalence and thus might have clinical potential to lower infection rates.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decolonisation is considered a valuable means to reduce Staphylococcus aureus infection rates. However, previous topical strategies targeting the nose or skin had little success, and oral antibiotic-based decolonisation is ill advised because of eradication of the microbiota and development of antibiotic resistance. We previously showed that the probiotic Bacillus subtilis significantly diminished S aureus at the main intestinal colonisation site via specific bacterial interaction in mice; in this study, we tested this probiotic approach to control S aureus colonisation in humans. METHODS We did a single-centre, phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in adults from the Songkhla region of Thailand who were colonised by S aureus. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) without history of intestinal disease, antibiotic treatment, or hospital admission within the previous 90 days. Participants were excluded if they were pregnant, breastfeeding, taking probiotics, or had diarrhoea. Participants were allocated (1:1) to groups by computer randomisation in blocks of four, and research coordinators were masked to group allocation. Participants received 250 mg of probiotic B subtilis MB40 or placebo once per day for 30 days and S aureus colonisation was determined after the last dose was received. The primary outcome was colonisation by S aureus (continuous, mean decrease in colony-forming-unit count) in the intestine (by faecal counts) and nares (by nasal swabs) after intervention (30-day regimen of B subtilis probiotic). This trial is registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20210128003. FINDINGS The trial was done between Jan 29 and June 30, 2021, with enrolment taking place from Jan 29 to April 6, 2021. 115 participants were colonised by S aureus, either in the intestine (n=84), nose (n=50), or both (n=19), and were randomly assigned to treatment (n=55) and placebo groups (n=60). Oral probiotic B subtilis resulted in significant reduction of S aureus in stool (96·8%; p<0·0001) and nose (65·4%; p=0·0002). There were no differences in adverse effects or significant microbiome changes between the intervention and placebo groups. INTERPRETATION B subtilis probiotic eliminated more than 95% of the total S aureus colonising the human body without altering the microbiota. This probiotic strategy offers several key advantages over presently used decolonisation strategies for potential use in people with chronic or long-term risk of S aureus infection. Furthermore, by establishing a defining role of the intestinal colonisation site, our findings call for revisiting fundamental notions about S aureus colonisation. FUNDING National Research Council of Thailand and US National Institutes of Health.
-
2.
The effect of gluten in adolescents and young adults with gastrointestinal symptoms: a blinded randomised cross-over trial.
Crawley, C, Savino, N, Halby, C, Sander, SD, Andersen, AN, Arumugam, M, Murray, J, Christensen, R, Husby, S
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2022;55(9):1116-1127
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The gluten-free diet (GFD) has gained increasing popularity among healthy people without coeliac disease or wheat allergy. The main reasons for following a GFD are weight control, the perception that a GFD is healthier, and the presence of symptoms after gluten ingestion. The aim of this study was to address the hypothesis that adding gluten to the diet results in a self-reported worsening of gastrointestinal symptoms (primary outcome) and mental health (key secondary outcomes) in a well-characterised group of adolescents. This study was arranged in two phases; the first phase began with 2 weeks of a GFD, and if the participants responded to the GFD, they proceeded to phase 2. Phase 2 was a double-blinded randomised trial with cross-over and consisted of three periods, each lasting 7 days: (1) a challenge with gluten/placebo, (2) wash-out phase, and (3) the second challenge with placebo/gluten. Results show that it was not possible to detect a difference in symptoms between gluten and placebo at a group level. Furthermore, on an individual level, there was a comparable number of gluten responders and placebo responders, underscoring the insignificant difference between gluten and placebo. Authors conclude that adding gluten to the diet does not induce gastrointestinal symptoms or worsened mental health in adolescents.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The popularity of the gluten-free diet and sales of gluten-free products have increased immensely. AIMS To investigate whether gluten induces gastrointestinal symptoms, measured by self-reported questionnaires, as well as mental health symptoms in adolescents from a population-based cohort. METHODS The eligible participants (n = 273) were recruited from a population-based cohort of 1266 adolescents and had at least four different gastrointestinal symptoms. Phase one (n = 54) was a run-in phase where the participants lived gluten-free for 2 weeks. If they improved they continued to phase 2 (n = 33), a blinded randomised cross-over trial. Participants were blindly randomised either to start with 7 days of gluten, eating two granola bars containing 10 g of gluten or to 7 days on placebo, eating two granola bars without gluten, followed by the reverse and separated by a 7-day washout period. The effects of the intervention on gastrointestinal symptoms and mental health symptoms were assessed. RESULTS In total, 54/273 participants entered the run-in phase and 35 were eligible for randomization. A total of 33 were randomised and 32 completed the trial. The median age was 20.3 (IQR 19.2-20.9) and 32/33 participants were females. Compared with a placebo, gluten did not induce gastrointestinal symptoms. The difference in the average VAS was -0.01 (95% confidence interval -2.07 to 2.05). Nor did we find a difference in the outcomes measuring mental health. CONCLUSION Compared with placebo, adding gluten to the diet did not induce gastrointestinal symptoms or worsened mental health in adolescents recruited from a population-based cohort. The trial registration number is NCT04639921.
-
3.
Oral birch pollen immunotherapy with apples: Results of a phase II clinical pilot study.
Nothegger, B, Reider, N, Covaciu, CE, Cova, V, Ahammer, L, Eidelpes, R, Unterhauser, J, Platzgummer, S, Raffeiner, E, Tollinger, M, et al
Immunity, inflammation and disease. 2021;9(2):503-511
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of birch pollen allergy (BPA) has increased in recent years and has led to a rise in birch pollen-related food allergy (prFA). The current immunotherapy approach for BPA is to use birch pollen extract to attenuate the allergic response. While it has been successful for BPA, it has shown little to no effect on prFA, illuminating a current gap in the research. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy by daily apple consumption in developing permanent oral tolerance to apples and simultaneously to birch‐pollen. Sixteen participants consumed apples daily over an eight month period. Various allergy responses were measured during the peak birch pollen season. The results demonstrated continuous consumption of apples by BPA patients with prFA to apples could both improve prFA and birch-pollen induced allergic reactions. Based on these results, the authors conclude that oral immunotherapy with fresh apples is feasible and safe for the treatment of both BPA and birch prFA. As this was a small pilot study, a larger controlled trial is needed to confirm the potential of this treatment option in the clinical setting.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Seventy percent of patients suffering from birch pollen allergy (BPA) develop a pollen-related food allergy (prFA), especially to apples, due to a clinically relevant cross-reactivity between the major allergen in birch Bet v 1 and Mal d 1 in apples. Therefore allergen-specific immunotherapy with fresh apples (AITA) could be a promising natural treatment of both BPA and prFA. OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy by daily apple consumption for patients with BPA and prFA. METHODS A daily defined increasing amount of selected cultivars (Red Moon®, Pink Lady®, Topaz, Golden Delicious) was continuously consumed by 16 patients (12 female; median age; 50; range, 23-68 years), leading to increased intake of allergen over a period of at least 8 months. Specific IgE and IgG4 to Bet v 1 and Mal d 1, conjunctival and oral provocation tests, skin reactivity, and the average daily rhinoconjunctivitis combined symptom and medication score (CSMS) were measured during the peak birch pollen season. RESULTS After 8 months of therapy, patients showed increased tolerance to apples (p < .001) and a decreased skin reactivity to apples. Oral allergy syndrome to other birch prFA than apple also decreased (p < .05). Moreover, daily rhinoconjunctivitis CSMS declined by 34% (p < .001), as did conjunctival reactivity to birch pollen extract by 27% (p < .01), while specific IgG4 to Mal d 1 and Bet v 1 increased (p < .01).
-
4.
Phase I/II multicenter ketogenic diet study for adult superrefractory status epilepticus.
Cervenka, MC, Hocker, S, Koenig, M, Bar, B, Henry-Barron, B, Kossoff, EH, Hartman, AL, Probasco, JC, Benavides, DR, Venkatesan, A, et al
Neurology. 2017;88(10):938-943
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Superrefractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is a neurologic emergency that persists despite anti-seizure medication. The ketogenic diet (KD) has been shown to be successful for treating epilepsy and recent retrospective studies suggest KD may be effective for treating SRSE. The aim of this clinical trial was to investigate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a ketogenic diet on SRSE in adults. After screening, this prospective multi-centre study enrolled 15 participants with SRSE. Participants received a classic ketogenic diet via gastronomy tube. Of the 14 participants whom completed KD treatment SRSE resolved in 11 participants. Five patients ultimately died. This study found KD is feasible in adults with SRSE, and further randomised controlled trials are required to establish comparative safety and efficacy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a ketogenic diet (KD) for superrefractory status epilepticus (SRSE) in adults. METHODS We performed a prospective multicenter study of patients 18 to 80 years of age with SRSE treated with a KD treatment algorithm. The primary outcome measure was significant urine and serum ketone body production as a biomarker of feasibility. Secondary measures included resolution of SRSE, disposition at discharge, KD-related side effects, and long-term outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-four adults were screened for participation at 5 medical centers, and 15 were enrolled and treated with a classic KD via gastrostomy tube for SRSE. Median age was 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 30 years), and 5 (33%) were male. Median number of antiseizure drugs used before KD was 8 (IQR 7), and median duration of SRSE before KD initiation was 10 days (IQR 7 days). KD treatment delays resulted from intravenous propofol use, ileus, and initial care received at a nonparticipating center. All patients achieved ketosis in a median of 2 days (IQR 1 day) on KD. Fourteen patients completed KD treatment, and SRSE resolved in 11 (79%; 73% of all patients enrolled). Side effects included metabolic acidosis, hyperlipidemia, constipation, hypoglycemia, hyponatremia, and weight loss. Five patients (33%) ultimately died. CONCLUSIONS KD is feasible in adults with SRSE and may be safe and effective. Comparative safety and efficacy must be established with randomized placebo-controlled trials. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class IV evidence that in adults with SRSE, a KD is effective in inducing ketosis.