3.
Design and rationale of the GAUSS-2 study trial: a double-blind, ezetimibe-controlled phase 3 study of the efficacy and tolerability of evolocumab (AMG 145) in subjects with hypercholesterolemia who are intolerant of statin therapy.
Cho, L, Rocco, M, Colquhoun, D, Sullivan, D, Rosenson, RS, Dent, R, Xue, A, Scott, R, Wasserman, SM, Stroes, E
Clinical cardiology. 2014;(3):131-9
Abstract
Statins effectively lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Most patients tolerate statins well, but approximately 10% to 20% experience side effects (primarily muscle-related) contributing to diminished compliance or discontinuation of statin therapy and subsequent increase in cardiovascular risk. Statin-intolerant patients require more effective therapies for lowering LDL-C. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a compelling target for LDL-C-lowering therapy. Evolocumab (AMG 145) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds PCSK9, inhibiting its interaction with the LDL receptor to preserve LDL-receptor recycling and reduce LDL-C. Phase 2 studies have demonstrated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of subcutaneous evolocumab in diverse populations, including statin-intolerant patients. This article describes the rationale and design of the Goal Achievement After Utilizing an anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin-Intolerant Subjects 2 (GAUSS-2) trial, a randomized, double-blind, ezetimibe-controlled, multicenter phase 3 study to evaluate the effects of 12 weeks of evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks or 420 mg every month in statin-intolerant patients with hypercholesterolemia. Eligible subjects were unable to tolerate effective doses of ≥2 statins because of myalgia, myopathy, myositis, or rhabdomyolysis that resolved with statin discontinuation. The primary objective of the study is to assess the effects of evolocumab on percentage change from baseline in LDL-C. Secondary objectives include evaluation of safety and tolerability, comparison of the effects of evolocumab vs ezetimibe on absolute change from baseline in LDL-C, and percentage changes from baseline in other lipids. Recruitment of approximately 300 subjects was completed in August 2013.
4.
Monotherapy with the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab versus ezetimibe in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of a 24 week, double-blind, randomized Phase 3 trial.
Roth, EM, Taskinen, MR, Ginsberg, HN, Kastelein, JJ, Colhoun, HM, Robinson, JG, Merlet, L, Pordy, R, Baccara-Dinet, MT
International journal of cardiology. 2014;(1):55-61
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficacy and safety of alirocumab were compared with ezetimibe in hypercholesterolemic patients at moderate cardiovascular risk not receiving statins or other lipid-lowering therapy. METHODS In a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study (NCT01644474), patients (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] 100-190 mg/dL, 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular events ≥ 1%-<5% [systemic coronary risk estimation]) were randomized to ezetimibe 10mg/day (n=51) or alirocumab 75 mg subcutaneously (via 1-mL autoinjector) every 2 weeks (Q2W) (n=52), with dose up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W (also 1 mL) at week 12 if week 8 LDL-C was ≥ 70 mg/dL. Primary endpoint was mean LDL-C % change from baseline to 24 weeks, analyzed using all available data (intent-to-treat approach, ITT). Analyses using on-treatment LDL-C values were also conducted. RESULTS Mean (SD) baseline LDL-C levels were 141.1 (27.1) mg/dL (alirocumab) and 138.3 (24.5) mg/dL (ezetimibe). The 24-week treatment period was completed by 85% of alirocumab and 86% of ezetimibe patients. Least squares mean (SE) LDL-C reductions were 47 (3)% with alirocumab versus 16 (3)% with ezetimibe (ITT; p<0.0001) and 54 (2)% versus 17 (2)% (on-treatment; p<0.0001). At week 12, before up-titration, alirocumab 75 mg Q2W reduced LDL-C by 53 (2)% (on-treatment). Injection site reactions were infrequent (<2% and <4% of alirocumab and ezetimibe patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Alirocumab demonstrated significantly greater LDL-C lowering versus ezetimibe after 24 weeks with the lower 75 mg Q2W dose sufficient to provide ≥ 50% LDL-C reduction in the majority of the patients. Adverse events were comparable between groups.
5.
Dose-ranging study with the glucokinase activator AZD1656 as monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Kiyosue, A, Hayashi, N, Komori, H, Leonsson-Zachrisson, M, Johnsson, E
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2013;(10):923-30
Abstract
AIM: To assess the glucose-lowering effects of monotherapy with the glucokinase activator AZD1656 in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study performed in Japan (NCT01152385). Patients (n = 224) were randomized to AZD1656 (40-200, 20-140 or 10-80 mg titrated doses) or placebo. The primary variable was the placebo-corrected change from baseline to 4 months in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Effects on fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and safety were also assessed. RESULTS HbA1c was reduced numerically from baseline by 0.3-0.8% with AZD1656 and by 0.1% with placebo over the first 2 months of treatment, after which effects of AZD1656 started to decline. The changes from baseline to 4 months in HbA1c were not significant for the AZD1656 40-200 mg group versus placebo [mean (95% CI) placebo-corrected change: -0.22 (-0.65, 0.20)%; p = 0.30]. Formal significance testing was not carried out for the other two AZD1656 dose groups. A higher percentage of patients on AZD1656 achieved HbA1c ≤ 7% after 4 months versus placebo, but responder rates were low. Results for FPG reflected those for HbA1c. Cases of hypoglycaemia were rare with AZD1656 (one patient) and no safety concerns were raised. CONCLUSIONS Although initially favourable plasma glucose reductions were observed, there was a loss of effect over time with sustained AZD1656 treatment. The study design did not allow an evaluation of the reasons for this lack of long-term efficacy.
6.
Ezetimibe and regression of carotid atherosclerosis: importance of measuring plaque burden.
Bogiatzi, C, Spence, JD
Stroke. 2012;(4):1153-5
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE There has been recent controversy over failure of ezetimibe to reduce carotid intima-media thickness. Much of this is based on failure to understand important differences among ultrasound phenotypes of atherosclerosis. METHODS We analyzed the effect of adding ezetimibe to the regimen of patients being followed in vascular prevention clinics where measurement of carotid plaque burden (total plaque area) is used to guide therapy. RESULTS There were complete data in 231 patients with total plaque area for 2 years before and 2 years after initiation of ezetimibe. In the 2 years before and after initiation of ezetimibe, total cholesterol decreased significantly before (P<0.0001) and after initiation of ezetimibe (P<0.0001); low-density lipoprotein cholesterol declined significantly before (P<0.0001) and after (P=0.003) initiation of ezetimibe. Triglycerides declined significantly before ezetimibe (P<0.0001) but did not change after addition of ezetimibe (P=0.48). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol did not change significantly before (P=0.87) but declined significantly after ezetimibe (P=0.03). Despite the decline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol before addition of ezetimibe, there was a significant mean increase in within-individual total plaque area in the 2 years before addition of ezetimibe by 6.89±39.57 mm(2) (SD); after addition of ezetimibe, despite the decline in high-density lipoprotein, plaque area decreased by -3.05±SD 38.18 mm(2) SD (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Ezetimibe appears to regress carotid plaque burden. To assess effects of antiatherosclerotic therapies, it is important to measure plaque burden. These findings should be tested in a clinical trial.
7.
Ezetimibe alone and in combination lowers the concentration of small, dense low-density lipoproteins in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Winkler, K, Jacob, S, Müller-Schewe, T, Hoffmann, MM, Konrad, T
Atherosclerosis. 2012;(1):189-93
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The effectiveness of the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe on LDL subfractions and ultimately on the atherosclerotic risk profile remains controversial. We thus determined the concentration of atherogenic small, dense LDL (sdLDL) in patients with type 2 diabetes and an elevated cardiovascular risk profile. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Multicenter, randomized, open-label 6-week study investigating the effect of ezetimibe 10mg (E), simvastatin 20mg (S) and the combination of ezetimibe-/simvastatin 10/20mg (C) on the concentration of sdLDL separated from fresh plasma by gradient ultracentrifugation in patients with type 2 diabetes (NCT01384058). RESULTS Fifty-six patients were screened for sdLDL, 41 were randomized, and 40 patients (12 E, 14 S and 14 C) completed the study. Total and LDL cholesterol fell by 14% (p=0.004) and 15% (p=0.006) with E, 22% (p<0.001) and 32% (p<0.001) with S, and 32% (p<0.001) and 44% (p<0.001) with C, respectively. E reduced the concentration of sdLDL by 20% (p=0.043) whereas S and C reduced sdLDL by 24% (p=0.020) and 33% (p=0.003), respectively, and non-sdLDL by 28% (p=0.004) and 42% (p<0.001), respectively. However, the further drop in sdLDL by adding E to S was not significant. CONCLUSION Ezetimibe alone and in combination with simvastatin reduced the concentration of atherogenic sdLDL in patients with type 2 diabetes.
8.
Clinical usefulness of additional treatment with ezetimibe in patients with coronary artery disease on statin therapy. - From the viewpoint of cholesterol metabolism.-.
Okada, K, Kimura, K, Iwahashi, N, Endo, T, Himeno, H, Fukui, K, Kobayashi, S, Shimizu, M, Iwasawa, Y, Morita, Y, et al
Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2011;(10):2496-504
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ezetimibe-plus-statin therapy has been reported to provide greater reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level than statin monotherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between LDL-C lowering effect and baseline cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 171 patients with CAD whose LDL-C level was ≥ 100 mg/dl after treatment with atorvastatin (10mg/day) or rosuvastatin (2.5 mg/day) for 4 weeks were assigned to additionally receive ezetimibe (10mg/day) plus a statin or a double dose of statin for 12 weeks. The decreases in LDL-C (-30.0 ± 15.6 mg/dl vs. -19.2 ± 14.2 mg/dl) and the ratio of campesterol, an absorption marker, to total cholesterol levels (-1.35 ± 0.90 µg/mg vs. 0.33 ± 0.74 µg/mg) were greater in the ezetimibe-plus-statin group (P<0.05, respectively). The decrease in LDL-C level in the ezetimibe-plus-statin group was greatest in patients with baseline levels of higher absorption and lower synthesis markers and smallest in patients with baseline levels of lower absorption and higher synthesis markers (-34.3 ± 15.6 mg/dl vs. -21.5 ± 16.7 mg/dl, P<0.05). The decrease in LDL-C did not differ, irrespective of baseline levels of cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers, in the double-dose statin group, and was similar to that in patients with lower absorption and higher synthesis markers in the ezetimibe-plus-statin group. CONCLUSIONS Ezetimibe-plus-statin therapy may be useful for lowering LDL-C level, irrespective of baseline levels of cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers.
9.
Influence of ezetimibe monotherapy on ischemia-modified albumin levels in hypercholesterolemic patients.
Kotani, K, Caccavello, R, Sakane, N, Miyamoto, M, Gugliucci, A
Pharmacological reports : PR. 2011;(5):1248-51
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) is considered to be a novel biochemical marker for ischemic and atherosclerotic conditions. This study aimed to investigate the influence of ezetimibe monotherapy on circulating IMA levels in hypercholesterolemic patients. A total of 31 patients (mean age 65.7 years) received 10 mg of ezetimibe daily during a 12-week treatment period. The levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and IMA were significantly reduced after ezetimibe treatment. The adjusted regression analyses revealed that the changes in the IMA levels were not significantly correlated with those of the other atherosclerotic risk markers, such as body mass index, blood pressure, glucose and lipid panels. The significant reduction of the IMA levels following ezetimibe treatment, which was independent of the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, suggests that ezetimibe may improve the oxidative stress burden in hypercholesterolemic patients.
10.
Efficacy of ezetimibe as monotherapy or combination therapy in hypercholesterolemic patients with and without diabetes.
Kishimoto, M, Sugiyama, T, Osame, K, Takarabe, D, Okamoto, M, Noda, M
The journal of medical investigation : JMI. 2011;(1-2):86-94
Abstract
Ezetimibe selectively inhibits dietary and biliary cholesterol absorption and reduces serum cholesterol levels when administered alone (monotherapy) and along with common lipid-regulating agents (combination therapy). To evaluate the effect of ezetimibe therapy on the lipid profile, glucose metabolism, and levels of cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers, we administered 10 mg ezetimibe to 50 hypercholesterolemic patients with or without diabetes. The serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol were significantly reduced at 4 and 12 weeks of ezetimibe therapy in diabetic patients of both the monotherapy and combination-therapy groups and in nondiabetic patients of the combination-therapy group. The serum levels of the cholesterol absorption markers were significantly reduced, while those of the cholesterol synthesis markers were significantly increased at 12 weeks of ezetimibe therapy. No significant differences were noted in the values of the parameters of glucose metabolism in all patients. We also investigated the clinical characteristics of patients who exhibited a good response to ezetimibe (ezetimibe responders); however, multivariate regression analysis did not reveal a correlation between ezetimibe efficacy and patient characteristics such as gender, age, BMI, diabetic condition, method of ezetimibe administration, and the initial absolute values of cholesterol absorption/synthesis markers levels. In conclusion, ezetimibe therapy significantly improved the lipid profile without disturbing glucose metabolism. We were unable to identify the specific characteristics of ezetimibe responders among our subjects. However, we may interpret this result as suggesting that ezetimibe can be used in any population to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.