1.
Acute Endothelial Benefits of Fat Restriction over Carbohydrate Restriction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Beyond Carbs and Fats.
Barbosa-Yañez, RL, Dambeck, U, Li, L, Machann, J, Kabisch, S, Pfeiffer, AFH
Nutrients. 2018;10(12)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The control of type 2 diabetes mellitus has become a global challenge. Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes. The aim of the study is to examine and compare the effect of a hypocaloric very low carbohydrate diet versus hypocaloric low-fat diet on vascular function and visceral adipose tissue in type 2 diabetic patients. The study is a randomised parallel group intervention study with adult type 2 diabetes patients with an age range between 42 and 76 years. Results show that both dietary strategies effectively reduced body weight, total adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue and lipid accumulation in the liver. However, participants following the low-fat diet experienced greater vascular function enhancements. Authors conclude that low-fat diet elicited advantageous effects on vascular function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the major cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes patients (T2DM). The causes are embedded in a complex interplay between excess body fat, insulin resistance and serum lipid anomalies. Endothelial homeostasis is strongly affected by this pathogenic network. Even though metabolic changes and weight loss improve vascular endothelial function, the effect of different dietary approaches is still uncertain for type 2 diabetes patients. OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare the acute effects of a hypocaloric very low carbohydrate (VLC) diet versus a hypocaloric low fat (LF) diet on flow mediated dilation (FMD), intrahepatic lipid (IHL) accumulation and visceral adipose tissue as independent risk factors of CVD in T2DM patients. DESIGN 36 T2DM patients (age 63 ± 8 years, 60% females) were randomly assigned to the VLC diet (4⁻10% of total energy intake (E)) or to the LF diet (<30% E) for 3 weeks. Endothelial function was assessed by the flow mediated dilation (FMD) method. Adipose tissue depots and IHL were determined by magnetic resonance. RESULTS Both dietary strategies reduced body weight, body fat content and IHL. Unexpectedly, the LF group experienced significantly greater enhancement of FMD, compared to the VLC group. The FMD showed a positive correlation with protein intake and fat intake in the LF group, while it revealed a negative correlation with protein intake in the VLC diet group. CONCLUSIONS Reduction of total and hepatic adiposity was shown to be successful using either the VLC or LF hypocaloric diets, however, improvements in FMD may be related to the interplay of fat and protein intake.
2.
Changes in Visceral Adiposity, Subcutaneous Adiposity, and Sex Hormones in the Diabetes Prevention Program.
Kim, C, Dabelea, D, Kalyani, RR, Christophi, CA, Bray, GA, Pi-Sunyer, X, Darwin, CH, Yalamanchi, S, Barrett-Connor, E, Golden, SH, et al
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2017;102(9):3381-3389
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
It is not currently known to what extent changes in different types of fat stores (visceral fat that surrounds organs and subcutaneous fat that sits under the surface of the skin) relate to changes in sex hormones. This study was a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial including 555 individuals. It examined whether changes to visceral and subcutaneous fat were associated with changes in sex hormones (DHEA, testosterone, oestrogen and sex hormone binding globulin - SHBG) among overweight individuals with glucose intolerance under the care of a diabetes program. Participants were randomly assigned to an intensive lifestyle modification programme (goals for weight reduction and 150 mins exercise weekly), medication (metformin) or placebo for 12 months. The authors found that among men, reductions in both types of fat were associated with significant increases in total testosterone and SHBG. Among women, reductions in both types of fat were associated with increases in SHBG and associations with estrone differed by menopausal status. No associations were found between changes in fat stores and estradiol or DHEA. The authors conclude that weight loss may affect sex hormone profiles via reductions in visceral and subcutaneous fat. -
Abstract
Context: The degree to which changes in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) relate to corresponding changes in plasma sex steroids is not known. Objective: We examined whether changes in VAT and SAT areas assessed by computed tomography were associated with changes in sex hormones [dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), testosterone, estradiol, estrone, and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG)] among Diabetes Prevention Program participants. Design: Secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Participants: Overweight and glucose-intolerant men (n = 246) and women (n = 309). Interventions: Intensive lifestyle change with goals of weight reduction and 150 min/wk of moderate intensity exercise or metformin administered 850 mg twice a day or placebo. Main Outcome Measures: Associations between changes in VAT, SAT, and sex hormone changes over 1 year. Results: Among men, reductions in VAT and SAT were both independently associated with significant increases in total testosterone and SHBG in fully adjusted models. Among women, reductions in VAT and SAT were both independently associated with increases in SHBG and associations with estrone differed by menopausal status. Associations were similar by race/ethnicity and by randomization arm. No significant associations were observed between change in fat depot with change in estradiol or DHEAS. Conclusions: Among overweight adults with impaired glucose intolerance, reductions in either VAT and SAT were associated with increased total testosterone in men and higher SHBG in men and women. Weight loss may affect sex hormone profiles via reductions in visceral and subcutaneous fat.
3.
Effect of Two-Year Caloric Restriction on Bone Metabolism and Bone Mineral Density in Non-Obese Younger Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Villareal, DT, Fontana, L, Das, SK, Redman, L, Smith, SR, Saltzman, E, Bales, C, Rochon, J, Pieper, C, Huang, M, et al
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2016;31(1):40-51
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
While there is increasing evidence that caloric restriction (CR) can extend a healthy lifespan in humans, it is not known whether weight loss is linked to reductions in bone mineral density (BMD) in younger adults. The aim of this trial was to assess the effect of prolonged caloric restriction on bone mass density and bone metabolism in 218 healthy adults aged 21 to 40. Participants were randomised to either a 25% caloric restriction or ad libitum diet for two years. The findings of this study showed that the CR group had a larger increase in markers of bone turnover and caused a modest but significant decline in bone mineral density. Based on these findings, the authors suggest that further research is needed to determine whether bone loss increases fracture risk, and whether interventions can prevent bone loss that occurs with CR-induced weight loss.
Abstract
Although caloric restriction (CR) could delay biologic aging in humans, it is unclear if this would occur at the cost of significant bone loss. We evaluated the effect of prolonged CR on bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy younger adults. Two-hundred eighteen non-obese (body mass index [BMI] 25.1 ± 1.7 kg/m(2) ), younger (age 37.9 ± 7.2 years) adults were randomly assigned to 25% CR (CR group, n = 143) or ad libitum (AL group, n = 75) for 2 years. Main outcomes were BMD and markers of bone turnover. Other outcomes included body composition, bone-active hormones, nutrient intake, and physical activity. Body weight (-7.5 ± 0.4 versus 0.1 ± 0.5 kg), fat mass (-5.3 ± 0.3 versus 0.4 ± 0.4 kg), and fat-free mass (-2.2 ± 0.2 versus -0.2 ± 0.2 kg) decreased in the CR group compared with AL (all between group p < 0.001). Compared with AL, the CR group had greater changes in BMD at 24 months: lumbar spine (-0.013 ± 0.003 versus 0.007 ± 0.004 g/cm(2) ; p < 0.001), total hip (-0.017 ± 0.002 versus 0.001 ± 0.003 g/cm(2) ; p < 0.001), and femoral neck (-0.015 ± 0.003 versus -0.005 ± 0.004 g/cm(2) ; p = 0.03). Changes in bone markers were greater at 12 months for C-telopeptide (0.098 ± 0.012 versus 0.025 ± 0.015 μg/L; p < 0.001), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (0.4 ± 0.1 versus 0.2 ± 0.1 U/L; p = 0.004), and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) (-1.4 ± 0.4 versus -0.3 ± 0.5 U/L; p = 0.047) but not procollagen type 1 N-propeptide; at 24 months, only BSAP differed between groups (-1.5 ± 0.4 versus 0.9 ± 0.6 U/L; p = 0.001). The CR group had larger increases in 25-hydroxyvitamin D, cortisol, and adiponectin and decreases in leptin and insulin compared with AL. However, parathyroid hormone and IGF-1 levels did not differ between groups. The CR group also had lower levels of physical activity. Multiple regression analyses revealed that body composition, hormones, nutrients, and physical activity changes explained ∼31% of the variance in BMD and bone marker changes in the CR group. Therefore, bone loss at clinically important sites of osteoporotic fractures represents a potential limitation of prolonged CR for extending life span. Further long-term studies are needed to determine if CR-induced bone loss in healthy adults contributes to fracture risk and if bone loss can be prevented with exercise.