1.
Impact of changes in physical activity or BMI on risk of heart failure in women - the prospective population study of women in Gothenburg.
Halldin, AK, Lissner, L, Lernfelt, B, Björkelund, C
Scandinavian journal of primary health care. 2020;38(1):56-65
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Heart failure (HF) is a severe and progressive condition with poor prognosis. Obesity is a risk factor for HF. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of change in physical activity or change in body mass index on the risk of later developing HF in women without a previous diagnosis of HF. This study is prospective longitudinal study which includes 1749 healthy women from the Prospective Population Study of Women in Gothenburg. Results indicate that gaining weight in early middle age is more harmful than gaining weight later in life, with regard to the risk of developing HF later in life. Furthermore, reduced risk of future HF in healthy women may be achieved by remaining physically active from young middle age and throughout life or by increasing the level of physical activity. Authors conclude that the role of physical activity in preventing the development of obesity must be taken into account.
Abstract
Objective: To longitudinally evaluate the impact of change in physical activity or change in body mass index (BMI) over time on the risk of developing heart failure (HF) in women without a previous diagnosis of HF.Design and setting: Longitudinal, observational, prospective study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Data on BMI and level of physical activity were collected from examinations 1968-1992 and hospital diagnoses and mortality data were ascertained from 1980 to 2012.Subjects: Data were obtained from 1749 women included in the Prospective Population Study of Women in Gothenburg.Main outcome measures: Hazard ratio (HR) for HF was calculated, using a Cox regression model.Results: Women with stable high physical activity during 1968-1980 and 1980-1992 reduced their risk of subsequent HF compared to the non-active women (for 1968-1980 HR 0.66, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.44-0.99 and for 1980-1992 HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.74). Women with increasing levels of physical activity during 1980-1992 reduced their risk of HF compared to the non-active women (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.72). Increase in BMI from overweight to obesity during 1968-1980 predicted increased risk of developing HF (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.18-3.14).Conclusions: Reduced risk of future HF in healthy women may be achieved by remaining physically active from young middle age and throughout life or by increasing the level of physical activity. This is particularly important for sedentary women in middle age. The role of physical activity in preventing the development of obesity must be taken into account.Key pointsA sedentary lifestyle and obesity are risk factors for developing heart failure (HF) in women.The risk of developing HF may be reduced by increasing the level of activity in sedentary middle-aged women.For younger women, avoiding obesity is most important to reduce the risk of later HF.Primary care has a key role in guiding women towards the most effective lifestyle changes to prevent development of HF.
2.
What is the effect of a Mediterranean compared with a Fast Food meal on the exercise induced adipokine changes? A randomized cross-over clinical trial.
Silva, D, Moreira, R, Beltrão, M, Sokhatska, O, Montanha, T, Pizarro, A, Garcia-Larsen, V, Villegas, R, Delgado, L, Moreira, P, et al
PloS one. 2019;14(4):e0215475
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Unhealthy dietary intake and sedentary behaviour in a genetically susceptible individual have been associated with adipokine dysregulation (adipokines are small proteins secreted by the fat tissue) resulting both in adverse metabolic and immune responses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a Mediterranean (MdM) compared with a Fast Food (FFM) iso-energy meal on the acute exercise-induced adipokine changes. The study is a double-blind randomised crossover clinical trial. Participants (n = 46) were randomly assigned to the intervention order in a double-blinded fashion, stratified by asthma diagnosis. Outcomes were measured blinded to the participant’s allocation order. Results indicate that MdM may blunt the adipsin (an adipokine) immediate response and potentiate its exercise induced increase in comparison with a FFM. MdM slightly attenuated the exercise induced cortisol increase. Authors conclude that their findings highlight the importance of the pre-exercise dietary intake on both the immune and metabolic response to acute exercise.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adipose tissue-derived adipokines are pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in metabolic-related diseases and can be influenced by diet and exercise. We aimed to compare the effect of a Mediterranean (MdM) compared with Fast Food (FFM) meal on the exercise induced adipokines changes. METHODS In a double blinded cross over trial, 46 participants were randomly assigned to one of two standardized iso-energy pre-exercise meals: FFM or MdM-type. Three hours after each meal, participants completed a treadmill exercise test (EC). Serum adiponectin, resistin, PAI-1, lipocalin-2/NGAL and adipsin were determined by Luminex magnetic bead immunoassay. Wilcoxon signed rank test compared changes before/after meal and before/after EC and a linear mixed model evaluated the effect of meals on the adipokine response to exercise, adjusted for confounders. RESULTS Thirty-nine participants (mean age of 25, with a standard deviation of 5 years) completed the trial (56% females). For both interventions, a significant reduction of adipsin after each meal and a significant increase of lipocalin, PAI-1, adipsin and resistin, after exercise was observed. When exercise was preceded by a MdM meal a higher increase in adipsin levels was seen. CONCLUSION Acute exercise induced an increase of circulatory levels of adipsin, resistin, lipocalin and PAI-1, but not adiponectin. A pre-exercise Mediterranean meal potentiated the increase of adipsin after the exercise test, which possibly relates to the immune regulatory role of adipsin. These changes suggest a cross-talk between the immune and metabolic immediate response to exercise and its modulation by the pre-exercise diet composition.
3.
Comparison of low calorie high protein and low calorie standard protein diet on waist circumference of adults with visceral obesity and weight cycling.
Witjaksono, F, Jutamulia, J, Annisa, NG, Prasetya, SI, Nurwidya, F
BMC research notes. 2018;11(1):674
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity has become one of the world’s biggest health problem. Obese individuals with a history of repeated weight loss and regain (called weight cycling) have a higher risk of developing chronic disease and increased fat mass in every cycle. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of a low calorie high protein diet compared to a low calorie standard protein diet on waist circumference in adults with visceral obesity. The open, randomised clinical trial recruited 61 obese subjects who are older than 20 years of age and had a history of weight cycling. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two diet groups; high protein or standard protein. Results showed that following a low-calorie diet resulted in waist circumference reduction thus reducing visceral fat. However, protein composition in the diet plan did not affect waist circumference reduction. Authors conclude that calorie restricted diets could be suggested in the treatment of visceral obesity. Macronutrient composition can be adjusted to meet the patient’s individual needs.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many individuals with visceral obesity who previously had succeeded in reducing body weight regain and this loss-gain cycle repeats several times which is called as weight cycling. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a low calorie high protein diet (HP) compared to a low calorie standard protein diet (SP) on waist circumference of visceral obese adults with history of weight cycling. RESULTS In this open-randomized clinical trial, participants were asked to follow dietary plan with reduction in daily caloric intake ranging from 500 to 1000 kcal from usual daily amount with minimum daily amount of 1000 kcal for 8 weeks and were divided in two groups: HP group with protein as 22-30% total calorie intake; and SP group with protein as 12-20% total calorie intake. There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) between waist circumference before and after the dietary intervention among both groups. Meanwhile, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean reduction of waist circumference between HP and SP groups (P = 0.073). Taken together, the protein proportion does not significantly affected waist circumference. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03374150, 11 December 2017.
4.
Effect of physical exercise on musculoskeletal pain in multiple body regions among healthcare workers: Secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Jakobsen, MD, Sundstrup, E, Brandt, M, Andersen, LL
Musculoskeletal science & practice. 2018;34:89-96
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Musculoskeletal pain in the neck, shoulder and lower back is the most common and costly work-related health problem. While physical exercise has been shown to be beneficial for back and neck/shoulder pain, only a few studies have evaluated the effects on pain in multiple body regions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of workplace versus home-based physical exercise on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) and musculoskeletal pain intensity in multiple body regions. This study consisted of secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. 200 female healthcare workers from three hospitals were randomised to 10 weeks of: 1) home-based physical exercise (HOME) performed alone during leisure time for 5 × 10 min per week or 2) workplace physical exercise (WORK) performed in groups during working hours for 5 × 10 min per week and up to 5 motivational coaching sessions. PPT (neck, lower back, lower leg) and perceived pain intensity in multiple body regions (feet, knee, hips, lower and upper back, elbow, hand, shoulder, neck, and head) were measured at baseline and 10-week follow-up. In some of the body regions, PPT and pain intensity improved more following WORK than HOME exercises. Significant better improvements were found for PPT in the lower back, and pain intensity in the lower back and feet. HOME did not improve more than WORK for any of the measurements. The authors concluded that physical exercise recommendations for healthcare workers should consider the setting, i.e. performing supervised group-based exercise at work and motivational coaching sessions is more effective than exercising alone at home.
Abstract
BACKGROUND While physical exercise is beneficial for back and neck-shoulder pain, only few intervention studies have evaluated effects on pain in multiple body regions. Furthermore, direct measurement of pain threshold can provide additional information to self-reported pain intensity. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of workplace versus home-based physical exercise on pressure pain threshold (PPT) and musculoskeletal pain intensity in multiple body regions. STUDY DESIGN Secondary analysis of an examiner-blinded, cluster randomized controlled trial with allocation concealment. METHOD Two-hundred female healthcare workers from 18 departments at three hospitals were cluster-randomized to 10 weeks of: 1) home-based physical exercise (HOME) performed alone during leisure time for 5 × 10 min per week or 2) workplace physical exercise (WORK) performed in groups during working hours for 5 × 10 min per week and up to 5 motivational coaching sessions. PPT (neck, lower back, lower leg) and perceived pain intensity in multiple body regions (feet, knee, hips, lower and upper back, elbow, hand, shoulder, neck, and head) were measured at baseline and 10-week follow-up. RESULTS In some of the body regions, PPT and pain intensity improved more following WORK than HOME. Between-group differences at follow-up (WORK vs. HOME) were 41 kPA [95% CI 13-70, effect size (ES): 0.22] for PPT in the lower back, and -0.7 [95% CI -1.0-0.3, ES: 0.26] and -0.6 points [95% CI -0.9--0.2, ES: 0.23] for pain intensity in the lower back and feet, respectively. HOME did not improve more than WORK for any of the measurements. CONCLUSION Physical exercise recommendations for healthcare workers should consider the setting, i.e. performing supervised group-based exercise at work and motivational coaching sessions is more effective than exercising alone at home.