-
1.
Comparing the effects of ketorolac and Paracetamol on postoperative pain relief after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A randomized clinical trial.
Javaherforooshzadeh, F, Abdalbeygi, H, Janatmakan, F, Gholizadeh, B
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery. 2020;(1):80
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pain management after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remains challenging. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the effects of Ketorolac and Paracetamol on postoperative CABG pain relief. METHOD This double-blind randomized clinical trial study was conducted in Ahvaz, Iran, from September 2018-December 2019. Two consecutive groups of 60 patients undergoing elective on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. INTERVENTION The patients were divided into 0.5 mg/kg of ketorolac mg/dl and 10 mg/kg of Paracetamol after surgery for pain management. Primary outcomes were: visual analog pain scale (VAS) at the time point immediately after extubation (baseline) and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h and the total dose of morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes included the hemodynamic variables, weaning time, chest tube derange, in-hospital mortality and myocardial infarction. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22(SPSS, Chicago, IL). The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare demographic data, VAS scores, vital signs, and side effects. Repeated measurements were tested within groups using Friedman's ANOVA and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Values were expressed as means ± standard deviations. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05. RESULTS Compared with baseline scores, there were significant declines in VAS scores in both groups throughout the time sequence (P< 0.05). The statistical VAS score was slightly higher in the Paracetamol group at most time points, except for the time of 6 h. However, at 24 and 48 h, the VAS score in group Paracetamol was significantly higher than in group Ketorolac. There were no significant differences between groups about hemodynamic variables. CONCLUSION The efficacy of ketorolac is comparable to that of Paracetamol in postoperative CABG pain relief. TRIAL REGISTRY IRCT20150216021098N5. Registered at 2019-09-12.
-
2.
Intravenous dexketoprofen versus paracetamol in non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial.
Demirozogul, E, Yilmaz, A, Ozen, M, Turkcuer, I, Seyit, M, Arikan, C
The American journal of emergency medicine. 2019;(12):2136-2142
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although acute musculoskeletal pain has a wide range of causes from tendinitis, muscle spasm, to bone and joint injuries, it is a frequent occurrence in emergency services. Paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics (NSAID) are common used in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. This study sets out to compare the effectiveness of intravenous dexketoprofen and paracetamol in musculoskeletal pain relief. METHODS This prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled study was carried out in a university emergency room. The participating patients were randomized into two groups to receive either 50 mg of dexketoprofen or 1000 mg of paracetamol intravenously by rapid infusion in 150 ml of normal saline. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scala (NRS) was employed for pain measurement at baseline, after 15, after 30 and after 60 mins. RESULTS 200 patients were included in the study, excluding 7342 of them. The mean age of the patients was calculated as 32,6. Paracetamol and dexketoprofen intervention decreases NRS pain scores over time. When compared to all pain locations, the NRS pain score of the patients was found to be statistically more effective in dexketoprofen than in paracetamol (p = 0.001). Paracetamol and dexketoprofen intervention reduces pain VAS scores over time. When the VAS pain score of the patients was compared to all pain locations, dexketoprofen was found to be statistically more effective than paracetamol (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Intravenous dexketoprofen seemed to achieve superior analgesia to intravenous paracetamol when compared with all pain locations in patients with non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain.
-
3.
Comparison of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and diclofenac potassium for pain relief following dental extractions and deep cavity preparations.
Gazal, G, Al-Samadani, KH
Saudi medical journal. 2017;(3):284-291
Abstract
To compare the effectiveness of different oral analgesics for relieving pain and distress in adults following the extraction of teeth and deep cavity preparations under local anesthesia. Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted between November 2015 and May 2016. One hundred and twenty patients were randomly allocated to 3 groups. Forty patients were in the paracetamol (1 gram) group, 40 in the ibuprofen (400 mg) group and 40 in the diclofenac potassium (50 mg) group. Evaluation of the post extraction and deep cavity preparations pain was made by patients immediately postoperatively, 2, 4 and 6 hours postoperatively on standard 100 mm visual analogue scales (VAS). Furthermore, each patient was observed preoperatively and immediately postoperatively for signs of distress by using a 5 point face scale. Results: There were significant decreases in mean pain VAS scores for diclofenac potassium group compared to paracetamol and ibuprofen groups at 4 hours postoperatively (one-way Analysis of Variance: p=0.0001, p=0.001) and 6 hours postoperatively (p=0.04, p=0.005). Changes in distress scores from the preoperative score to the postoperative score were made using the paired sample t-test. There were significant decreases in distress scores between the preoperative and postoperative scores (p=0.0001). Conclusions: Diclofenac potassium was more effective than paracetamol or ibuprofen for reducing postoperative pain associated with tooth extraction and deep cavity preparation. Patients' distress levels can be alleviated by using preemptive analgesics.
-
4.
Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effects of paracetamol-codeine phosphate and naproxen sodium-codeine phosphate for lumbar disk surgery.
Polat, R, Peker, K, Gülöksüz, ÇT, Ergil, J, Akkaya, T
The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences. 2015;(9):468-72
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compared the efficacy of paracetamol-codeine phosphate and naproxen sodium-codeine phosphate on postoperative pain and tramadol consumption during the first 24 hours after a lumbar disk surgery. After Ethics Committee approval and informed consent had been obtained, 64 patients were allocated into three groups. Patients received oral paracetamol-codeine (300 mg + 30 mg; Group P), naproxen sodium-codeine (550 mg + 30 mg; Group N), or placebo tablets (Group C) 30 minutes prior to induction of anesthesia. Patient-controlled analgesia was supplied postoperatively using tramadol. Pain intensity, tramadol consumption, and side effects were recorded every 1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after surgery. Whole study period pain intensity (visual analogue scale scores) was lower in Group P (p = 0.007) and Group N (p = 0.001), compared with Group C, however, there was no statistically significant difference between Group P and Group N regarding pain intensity (p > 0.05). Tramadol consumption was lower in Group P and Group N, compared with Group C (p < 0.001), and in turn the lowest incidence of tramadol consumption was detected in Group P compared with Group N (p < 0.001) and Group C (p < 0.001). Side effects were similar between the groups. Preemptive administration of paracetamol-codeine and naproxen sodium-codeine combination significantly reduced tramadol consumption and provided more effective analgesia compared with placebo. The paracetamol-codeine combination was superior to naproxen sodium-codeine with regard to tramadol consumption.
-
5.
Comparison of the effects of preemptive acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and meloxicam on pain after separator placement: a randomized clinical trial.
Zarif Najafi, H, Oshagh, M, Salehi, P, Babanouri, N, Torkan, S
Progress in orthodontics. 2015;:34
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to evaluate and compare the effect of pre-procedural administration of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and meloxicam in reducing pain after separator placement. METHODS Three hundred twenty-one patients who needed orthodontic treatment and aged above 15 were randomly assigned to one of the three study groups: group A: 650 mg acetaminophen, group B: 400 mg ibuprofen, and group C: 7.5 mg meloxicam. All subjects received a single dose of medication 1 h prior to separator placement. Using visual analog scale, patients recorded their pain perception during rest, fitting posterior teeth together, and chewing at time intervals of immediately, 2, 6, 24, and 48 h after separator placement. RESULTS There was no significant difference between acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and meloxicam in post-separator placement pain control when administered 1 h before the procedure. In all the groups, at rest, pain level elevated after separator placement and reached its peak at 24 h and then subsided until 48 h. But during chewing and fitting of the posterior teeth, some of the groups reached a peak in pain at 48 h. No significant difference was found in pain experience between males and females. CONCLUSIONS Meloxicam can be used as an effective analgesic in orthodontic pain control considering it has less gastric side effects compared to the conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT2015041821828N1.
-
6.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Versus Intravenous Administration of a Nonnarcotic Analgesia Protocol Following Pediatric Craniosynostosis Corrections on Nausea and Vomiting Rates.
Fearon, JA, Dimas, V, Ditthakasem, K, Herbert, MA
The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2015;(6):1951-3
Abstract
BACKGROUND The authors' center uses a nonnarcotic postoperative regimen following craniosynostosis corrections. Despite opioid avoidance, the authors noted that some children still experienced nausea and vomiting following the oral administration of either acetaminophen or ibuprofen. This study sought to evaluate whether intravenous administration of these medications might reduce nausea and vomiting rates. METHODS A total of 50 children undergoing craniosynostosis corrections were prospectively randomized to a control group given only oral ibuprofen (10 mg/kg) and acetaminophen (15 mg/kg), or a treatment group given only intravenous ketorolac (0.5 mg/kg) and acetaminophen (15 mg/kg). All patients were assessed for postoperative nausea and vomiting by a blinded research nurse. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients randomized to the oral control group, and 22 to the intravenous treatment group. No statistically significant differences were identified between groups, including: age, weight, sex, before history of severe postoperative nausea and vomiting, or procedure. With similar anesthesia times there was significantly more vomiting episodes in the oral group (71% versus 41%). Using a multivariate logistic regression, controlling for age, weight and procedure, the odds ratio for vomiting in the oral control versus intravenous experimental groups was 3.61 (95% CI 1.11-1.76; P = 0.033), and for postoperative nausea was 14.0 (95% CI 1.40-71.69, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS The authors found a significant reduction in nausea and vomiting among children randomized to receive intravenous medications. In addition, the intravenous delivery of medications has the theoretical advantage of insuring an effective full dose delivery. Based on these findings, our standard process is to preferentially manage all children following craniosynostosis corrections with intravenous nonnarcotics.
-
7.
Paracetamol-codeine compared to ketorolac for pain control in the Emergency Department.
Buccelletti, F, Marsiliani, D, Zuccalà, G, Iacomini, P, Proietti, L, Pola, E, Zirio, G, Genitiempo, M, Marrocco, R, Conti, C, et al
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2014;(20):3139-43
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Paracetamol /codeine has shown a strong analgesic activity in several studies conducted among different kind of subjects, including those with trauma. Nevertheless, its efficacy in patients accessing the Emergency Department (ED) for different kind of pain has never been tested. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a cross-sectional, observational, prospective, cohort study. Inclusion criteria were patients > 18 year old presenting to the ED for localized traumatic or inflammatory pain involving only extremities. Numeric scale (NRS) was recorded thirty minutes and two hours after the administration of the analgesic therapy, consisting of 15 mg of ketorolac or 1000 mg/60 mg of paracetamol/ codeine, both orally. RESULTS Two-hundred patients were consecutively enrolled; 87 were treated with paracetamol/codeine and 113 with ketorolac. The combination paracetamol/codeine resulted to be not inferior to ketorolac in non-traumatic pain group and trauma group (p = 0.635 and p = 0.482, respectively). Compared to ketorolac, the combination paracetamol/codeine exerted a significantly higher analgesic activity in patients with fractures and muscular pain (p = 0.044) and was more effective in acute pain (p = 0.002), with a significant effect two hours after the administration (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS Paracetamol/codeine is equivalent to ketorolac in non-traumatic pain and post-traumatic pain, but is superior in acute pain and in patients with fractures and muscular pain. Those results play in favor of the use of the combination paracetamol/codeine in patients accessing the ED for non-traumatic or traumatic pain of the extremities.
-
8.
Effects of acetaminophen and ibuprofen in children with migraine receiving preventive treatment with magnesium.
Gallelli, L, Avenoso, T, Falcone, D, Palleria, C, Peltrone, F, Esposito, M, De Sarro, G, Carotenuto, M, Guidetti, V
Headache. 2014;(2):313-24
Abstract
AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate both the effects of ibuprofen and/or acetaminophen for the acute treatment of primary migraine in children in or out prophylactic treatment with magnesium. METHODS Children ranging from the ages of 5 to 16 years with at least 4 attack/month of primary migraine were eligible for participation the study. A visual analog scale was used to evaluate pain intensity at the moment of admission to the study (start of the study) and every month up to 18 months later (end of the study). RESULTS One hundred sixty children of both sexes aged 5-16 years were enrolled and assigned in 4 groups to receive a treatment with acetaminophen or ibuprofen without or with magnesium. Migraine pain endurance and monthly frequency were similar in the 4 groups. Both acetaminophen and ibuprofen induced a significant decrease in pain intensity (P < .01), without a time-dependent correlation, but did not modify its frequency. Magnesium pretreatment induced a significant decrease in pain intensity (P < .01) without a time-dependent correlation in both acetaminophen- and ibuprofen-treated children and also significantly reduced (P < .01) the pain relief timing during acetaminophen but not during ibuprofen treatment (P < .01). In both acetaminophen and ibuprofen groups, magnesium pretreatment significantly reduced the pain frequency (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Magnesium increased the efficacy of ibuprofen and acetaminophen with not age-related effects.
-
9.
Paracetamol vs dexketoprofen for perineal pain relief after episiotomy or perineal tear.
Akil, A, Api, O, Bektas, Y, Yilmaz, AO, Yalti, S, Unal, O
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2014;(1):25-8
Abstract
A randomised controlled trial was conducted to investigate efficacy of paracetamol and dexketoprofen trometamol for perineal pain relief after perineal repair. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive two doses of either 50 mg of intravenous dexketoprofen trometamol via slow i.v. infusion (Group I, n = 49) or 1,000 mg of paracetamol via intravenous infusion (Group II, n = 46). The main outcome measure was a VAS (visual analogue scale) for pain recorded at 1 h (VAS 1). A total of 82 patients were included in the final analysis (Group I, n = 41; Group II, n = 41). There was no difference among groups in terms of pain scores at the beginning (VAS 0). The pain was decreased in 70% of the patients in Group I and in 62% of the patients in Group II (p = 0.502). Both paracetamol and dexketoprofen are effective in perineal pain relief after episiotomy or perineal tear repair.
-
10.
Comparison of intravenous ketorolac with or without paracetamol in postoperative pain control following ambulatory surgery.
Iorno, V, Landi, L, Di Pasquale, R, Cicenia, S, Moschini, V
Current medical research and opinion. 2013;(12):1685-90
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this randomized, patient-blinded study was to compare efficacy and safety of oral paracetamol plus intra-venous (i.v.) ketorolac with i.v. ketorolac alone after ambulatory uterine evacuation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Women were randomly assigned to receive either oral paracetamol (1 g), in a melt-in-the mouth, without-water formulation plus ketorolac (30 mg i.v. once daily (o.d.)) or ketorolac (30 mg i.v. o.d.) as monotherapy. The mean duration of uterine evacuation was 11 minutes in the paracetamol + ketorolac group and 13 minutes in the ketorolac-only group. Paracetamol was administered 15 minutes before surgery, on discharge from hospital (mean 6 hours after surgery) and in the morning the day after surgery, while ketorolac was administered at the end of the surgical intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The numeric rating scale (NRS) was used by patients to rate their pain on an 11 point scale. RESULTS Overall, 60 women received paracetamol plus ketorolac (group 1) and 60 ketorolac alone (group 2). There were significant differences in pain levels (NRS 0.92 and 2.08; p < 0.01) at T0 (when patients left the operating room 30 minutes after the end of surgery). At T1 (before discharge from hospital but before the next administration of paracetamol) there were no significant differences between NRS scores in the two groups (3.7 vs. 3.5, respectively, p = 0.3453). At T2 (in the morning after surgery; data collected by phone interview), following administration of the next dose of paracetamol, significant differences in pain scores were recorded (1.58 vs. 1.98; p = 0.01). Only a case of dizziness was reported in the paracetamol + ketorolac group, and no other unexpected adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION Despite the small sample size and the monocentric nature of the study being taken into account, this study suggests, for the first time to our knowledge, that oral paracetamol t.i.d. in combination with i.v. ketorolac o.d. is effective and well tolerated in the control of postoperative pain after ambulatory uterine evacuation.