-
1.
Comparison of Different Hydration Strategies in Patients with Very Low-Risk Profiles of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy.
Miao, S, Xue, ZK, Zhang, YR, Zhang, H, Che, JJ, Liu, T, Tao, HY, Li, G, Chen, KY
Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2021;:e929115
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hydration remains the mainstay of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) prevention, and new biomarkers of cystatin C (Cys C) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) have been suggested. This study aimed to explore whether hydration is essential in patients with very low-risk profiles of CIN who are undergoing coronary angiography. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 150 patients were enrolled and randomly distributed to 3 groups: the Preventive Group (n=50, saline hydration was given 6 h before the procedure until 12 h after the procedure), the Remedial Group (n=50, saline hydration was given after procedure for 12 h), and the No Hydration (NH) group (n=50, saline was only given during the procedure). Serum creatinine (Cr), Cys C, and urinary NGAL were tested 3 times at different times. RESULTS Six patients were excluded because of Mehran risk score >2. There was no CIN among 144 individuals. At 24 h and at 72 h after the procedure, we found no significant differences in the levels of Cr and Cys C (0.72±0.11 mg/L for the Preventive Group, 0.67±0.14 mg/L for the Remedial Group, and 0.70±0.1 6 mg/L for the NH Group) among the 3 groups. Urinary NGAL also did not differ significantly among the 3 groups at 6 h or at 48 h (6.31±6.60 ng/ml for the Preventive Group, 5.00±5.86 ng/ml for the Remedial Group, and 6.97±6.37 ng/ml for the NH Group) after the procedure. Subgroup analysis in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) showed that there was no significant difference in serum Cr, Cys C, or urinary NGAL at different time points among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS Saline hydration during the perioperative period might be unnecessary in patients with very low-risk profiles of CIN.
-
2.
Standard vs. double dose of intravenous nicorandil in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing elective coronary procedures.
Zeng, Z, Zhang, H, Zhang, P, Li, Y, Fu, N
Coronary artery disease. 2021;(3):256-257
-
3.
Pharmacologic Prophylaxis of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy.
Toso, A, Leoncini, M, Maioli, M, Bellandi, F
Interventional cardiology clinics. 2020;(3):369-383
Abstract
Different pharmacologic agents have been tested in the effort to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in the last two decades. To date, however, no individual drug has received unanimous approval for this aim. Since 2014 statins have been included as preventive treatment in the European guidelines for revascularization procedures in cardiac patients. The present update presents the latest findings in this field focusing on the changing paradigms in the definition and consequently the approach to nephroprotection that considers clinical prognosis as the major issue. We note the current shift from attention to contrast-induced AKI to contrast-associated AKI.
-
4.
Contrast circulation in adult fontan patients using MR Time Resolved Angiography: Application for CT pulmonary angiography.
Duerden, L, Abdullah, H, Lyen, S, Manghat, N, Hamilton, M
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography. 2020;(4):330-334
Abstract
BACKGROUND When patients with Fontan circulation require a computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram (CTPA), there are significant challenges in achieving adequate contrast opacification due to the altered anatomical connections. This study used Time Resolved Angiography with Interleaved Stochastic Trajectories (TWIST) Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) to examine contrast circulation in a cohort of patients with Fontan circulation who were having routine MRI follow up to inform the contrast timing of any subsequent CT. METHODS This is a single centre, cross-sectional, observational, retrospective study. The time to peak (TTP) signal intensity from the MRA was recorded using regions of interest on the aorta, pulmonary arteries, cavae and Fontan conduit. Patients were grouped by ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, indexed stroke volume and cardiac index to examine if these cardiac performance parameters affected the mean TTP. Statistical analysis was performed to find the mean TTP for each of the vessels, which was consequently compared between the different cardiac performance parameters. RESULTS 35 patients were included in the study. Mean TTP contrast enhancement was 31s in the thoracic aorta, 46s in the right pulmonary artery, 41s in the left pulmonary artery and 55s in the Fontan conduit. Cardiac performance shows no statistically significant relationship to the peak contrast enhancement whether measured by ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, stroke volume index or cardiac index. CONCLUSION The mean optimal timing for a single-phase examination of the Fontan circulation, following an upper limb injection, was 55 s following start of contrast injection irrespective of cardiac performance. In TWIST MRA, the IV bolus is 4-5 s duration. A longer bolus is required for CTA, around 20s, suggesting an additional delay will be required. We propose that an optimal single phase CTPA to be protocolled at 70 s following the start of contrast injection, assuming adequate iodinated contrast dose.
-
5.
Evaluation the Effects of Alpha-tocopherol in Comparison with N-acetylcystein for Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy (CIN) in CKD Patients.
Samadi, K, Naghibi, M, Shabestari, M, Sharifipour, F, Khajeh Dalooee, M, Raeesi, V, Moosavi Nik, S, Samadi, M
Iranian journal of kidney diseases. 2020;(1):26-30
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN), a well-known complication of using radio contrast media, dramatically increases the likelihood of patient morbidity and mortality following coronary angiography. As there is no specific treatment for CIN, prevention could be the best strategy to address this issue. Since now, the only approved preventing strategy was hydration with normal saline while antioxidant agents as a new yet unapproved remedy for this purpose could be applied .The present study was conducted to examine the effect of alpha tocopherol in CIN prevention. METHODS This prospective controlled trial was carried out on 201 patients with chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 60 cc/min) underwent coronary angiography. We assigned three groups of CKD patients: 72 patients who received prophylaxis administration with isotonic saline (Group A), 66 patients with isotonic saline plus N-acetylcysteine (1200mg twice a day) for 2 days (Group B) and 63 patients who received isotonic saline plus daily alpha tocopherol (600 IU once daily from one day before till 2 days after angiography) for 4 days (Group C). The contrast media in all three groups was nonionic iso-osmolal agent, Visipaque. RESULTS Even though CIN didn't developed in any of the three aforementioned groups but there was statistically significant reduction in eGFR from baseline in all three groups (P < .001). Moreover, We found no statistically significant difference in GFR reduction between three studied groups. CONCLUSION Administration of alpha tocopherol has no additive beneficial effect over isotonic saline in CIN prevention in CKD patients.
-
6.
Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure Versus Urine Flow Rate-Guided Hydration in Preventing Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.
Briguori, C, D'Amore, C, De Micco, F, Signore, N, Esposito, G, Visconti, G, Airoldi, F, Signoriello, G, Focaccio, A
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2020;(17):2065-2074
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study compared left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP)-guided and urine flow rate (UFR)-guided hydration. BACKGROUND Tailored hydration regimens improve the prevention of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). METHODS Between July 15, 2015, and June 6, 2019, patients at high risk for CA-AKI scheduled for coronary and peripheral procedures were randomized to 2 groups: 1) normal saline infusion rate adjusted according to the LVEDP (LVEDP-guided group); and 2) hydration controlled by the RenalGuard System in order to reach UFR ≥300 ml/h (UFR-guided group). The primary endpoint was the composite of CA-AKI (i.e., serum creatinine increase ≥25% or ≥0.5 mg/dl at 48 h) and acute pulmonary edema (PE). Major adverse events (all-cause death, renal failure requiring dialysis, PE, and sustained kidney injury) at 1 month were assessed. RESULTS The primary endpoint occurred in 20 of 351 (5.7%) patients in the UFR-guided group and in 36 of 351 (10.3%) patients in the LVEDP-guided group (relative risk [RR]: 0.560; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.390 to 0.790; p = 0.036). CA-AKI and PE rates in the UFR-guided group and LVEDP-guided group were 5.7% and 10.0% (RR: 0.570; 95% CI: 0.300 to 0.960; p = 0.048), and, respectively, 0.3% and 2.0% (RR: 0.070; 95% CI: 0.020 to 1.160; p = 0.069). Three patients in the UFR-guided group experienced complications related to the Foley catheter. Hypokalemia rate was 6.2% in the UFR-guided group and 2.3% in the LVEDP-guided group (p = 0.013). The 1-month major adverse events rate was 7.1% in the UFR-guided group and 12.0% in the LVEDP-guided group (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates that UFR-guided hydration is superior to LVEDP-guided hydration to prevent the composite of CA-AKI and PE.
-
7.
Comparison of double-dose vs. usual dose of nicorandil for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization.
Zeng, Z, Fu, X, Zhang, X, Fu, N
International urology and nephrology. 2019;(11):1999-2004
Abstract
PURPOSE Contrast-associated nephropathy (CIN), the third main reason of the acute kidney injury (AKI) in inpatients, is a potentially severe side effect of angiography and the preventive role of nicorandil on CIN is still controversal. The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the preventive role of different doses of nicorandil on CIN in patients experiencing cardiac catheterization compared with hydration. METHODS We recorded outcomes from 330 patients who were randomly divided to either a double-dose (30 mg/day) nicorandil group or to a usual-dose (15 mg/day) nicorandil group or a control group (hydration only). The primary endpoint of the current research was the occurrence of CIN, which is defined as a relative elevation of SCr level of 25% above the baseline or an absolute increment of SCr of more than 44.2 µmol/L (0.5 mg/dL) within 48 or 72 h after contrast medium exposure. Additional endpoints were the changes in BUN, SCr, Cys-C, eGFR, and CRP level within 48 h after contrast agent exposure and major adverse events occurring during hospitalization and 14 days of follow-up. RESULTS 6 out of 111 patients (5.4%) had contrast-induced nephropathy in the double-dose group and it occured 11 out of 107 patients (10.3%) in the usual-dose group, 16 out of 112 patients (14.3%) in the control group. There was a significant difference in the occurrence of CIN between the double-dose group and the control group at 48 h after taking the radiocontrast medium (p = 0.026) while no such significant difference observed in the usual-dose group and the control group (p = 0.367), the double-dose group and usual-dose group (p = 0.180) as well. CONCLUSIONS Daily peri-procedural usual-dose nicorandil could just relieve contrast-induced renal injury, only double-dose nicorandil was associated with a reduced incidence of CI-AKI compared with hydration.
-
8.
[Impact of rotational coronary angiography in the amount of iodinated contrast and the exposure to ionising radiations in patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis].
Fernández-Rodríguez, D, Anmad Shihadeh, L, Martos-Maine, JL, Couto-Comba, P, Quijada-Fumero, A, Pimienta, R, Grillo-Pérez, JJ, Rodríguez-Esteban, M, Pérez-Hernández, H, Hernández-Afonso, J, et al
Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico. 2018;(4):277-286
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive coronary procedures involve the administration of iodinated contrast and the exposure to ionising radiations, increasing morbidity and mortality. The rotational coronary angiography (RCA) allows acquiring multiple projections with a unique injection of iodinated contrast. To date, there are no meta-analyses specifically comparing RCA and conventional coronary angiography (CCA) in patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures, whether diagnostic or diagnostic and therapeutic. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the impact of RCA on the amount of iodinated contrast and the exposure to ionising radiations during invasive coronary procedures. METHODS A search in PubMed and Ovid databases was conducted to identify studies, including diagnostic and diagnostic and therapeutic studies, comparing RCA and CCA. The manuscripts were evaluated on quality and biases, and were included if they analysed any of the following endpoints: volume of contrast and exposure to ionising radiations measured as dose-area product, and Kerma-air or fluoroscopy time. RESULTS Sixteen studies, with a total of 2,327 patients, were included in the final analysis (1,146 patients underwent RCA and 1,181 patients underwent CCA), with significant differences being detected in volume of contrast (standard difference in means [95% confidence interval] -1.887 [-2.472 to -1.302]; P<.001), dose-area product (-0.726 [-1.034 to -0.418]; P<.001), Kerma-air (-0.842 [-1.104 to -0.581]; P<.001), and fluoroscopy time (0.263 [-0.496 to -0.030]; P=.027). CONCLUSIONS RCA reduces the volume of contrast and the exposure to radiation, evaluated as dose-area product, Kerma-air, and fluoroscopy time, in patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures.
-
9.
Proenkephalin for the early detection of acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease.
Breidthardt, T, Jaeger, C, Christ, A, Klima, T, Mosimann, T, Twerenbold, R, Boeddinghaus, J, Nestelberger, T, Badertscher, P, Struck, J, et al
European journal of clinical investigation. 2018;(10):e12999
Abstract
BACKGROUND The early detection of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an unmet clinical need. Proenkephalin (PENK) might improve the early detection of AKI. METHODS One hundred and eleven hospitalized CKD patients undergoing radiographic contrast procedures were enrolled. PENK was measured in a blinded fashion at baseline (before contrast media administration) and on day 1 (after contrast media administration). The potential of PENK levels to predict contrast-induced AKI was the primary endpoint. RESULTS Baseline creatinine and baseline PENK were similar in AKI and no-AKI patients. In AKI patients, day 1 PENK (198 pmol/L vs 121 pmol/L, P < 0.01) was significantly higher compared to no-AKI patients. The area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of AKI by day 1 PENK was 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.87, similar to serum creatinine: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61-0.95. Delta PENK was significantly higher in AKI compared to no-AKI patients (53 pmol/L vs 1 pmol/L, P < 0.01). The AUC for the prediction of AKI by delta PENK was high (0.92, 95%CI 0.82-1.00) and remained high for creatinine-blind AKI (0.94, 95% CI: 0.87-0.97). CONCLUSION Delta PENK levels improve the early detection of contrast-induced AKI in CKD patients over serial creatinine sampling. Delta PENK accelerates the detection of creatinine-blind AKI by 24 hours.
-
10.
Comparative efficacy of pharmacological interventions for contrast-induced nephropathy prevention after coronary angiography: a network meta-analysis from randomized trials.
Ma, WQ, Zhao, Y, Wang, Y, Han, XQ, Zhu, Y, Liu, NF
International urology and nephrology. 2018;(6):1085-1095
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is the major complication related to contrast media administration in patients after coronary angiography (CAG). However, inconsistent results have been published in the literature regarding the effects of pharmacological drugs on CIN prevention. We conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the relative efficacy of pharmacological interventions for the prevention of CIN. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to July 2017. We included any randomized controlled trials of eleven pharmacological interventions that reported the prevention of CIN. RESULTS We identified 3850 records through database searches, of which 107 studies comprising 21,450 participants were finally identified. Compared with intravenous saline, intravenous saline plus pharmacological drugs including statin [relative risk (RR) 0.57; 95% credibility interval (CrI) 0.39 to 0.83], N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (RR 0.84; 95% CrI, 0.71 to 0.98), vitamin and its analogues (RR 0.66; 95% CrI 0.45 to 0.97), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its analogues (RR 0.46; 95% CrI 0.30 to 0.70), prostaglandin analogues (RR 0.37; 95% CrI 0.18 to 0.76), NAC plus sodium bicarbonate (SB) (RR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.39 to 0.90), and statin plus NAC (RR 0.39; 95% CrI 0.21 to 0.70), have helped to reduce the incidence of CIN in patients after CAG. The top four ranked treatments were statin plus NAC, BNP and its analogues, statin, and vitamin and its analogues, respectively. NAC plus intravenous saline was associated with lower incidence of short-term all-cause mortality than intravenous saline alone (RR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.96; P = 0.03). However, no evidence indicated that any of the pharmacological drugs were associated with a reduced requirement for dialysis and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). CONCLUSIONS Statin plus NAC plus intravenous saline seems to be the most effective treatment for the prevention of CIN in patients after CAG. NAC plus intravenous saline may have a protective role against short-term all-cause mortality. However, none of these drugs has effectively decreased the requirement for dialysis and MACCE.