-
1.
Comparison of norepinephrine, dopamine and dobutamine combined with enteral nutrition in the treatment of elderly patients harboring sepsis.
Zhou, WJ, Cui, JK, Liu, M, Shang, XK, Ding, SS
Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2021;(3):957-961
Abstract
The present study was performed in order to investigate the safety and efficacy of different vasoactive drugs combined with enteral nutrition in terms of treating elderly patients with sepsis. A total of 75 elderly patients with sepsis treated with enteral nutrition in our hospital were randomly divided into three groups: group A (n = 25), group B (n = 25) and group C (n = 25). The three groups were treated with dopamine, dobutamine and norepinephrine respectively. One week after treatment, the therapeutic effects of the three groups were compared, the vascular elastic indexes, hemodynamic indexes and levels of inflammatory factors of the three groups were measured. After treatment, the clinical effective rate of group C was evidently higher than that of group A and group B. The vascular elasticity coefficient and stiffness coefficient in group C were significantly lower than those in group A and group B, and the arterial compliance in group C was significantly higher than that in group A and group B (P < 0.05). The levels of MAP and PVRI in group C were significantly higher than those in group A and B, and the levels of CI, CVP and HR in group C were significantly lower than those in group A and group B (P < 0.05). Norepinephrine elicited greater effects in terms of improving hemodynamic indexes, vascular elasticity and reducing the level of inflammatory factors compared with dopamine and dobutamine in elderly patients harboring sepsis.
-
2.
Clinical Outcomes Associated With Commercial and Homemade Blenderized Tube Feedings: A Literature Review.
Brown, T, Zelig, R, Radler, DR
Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2020;(3):442-453
Abstract
There is emerging evidence in the pediatric population that blenderized tube feeding (BTF) may improve gastrointestinal intolerance; however, not much is known about the impact of BTF on clinical outcomes in adults. This article presents a review of the literature published in the past 10 years that explored the impact of BTF on nutrition status (ie, weight status, body mass index, and upper-arm circumference) and nutrition adequacy in adults. The results indicate that BTF, compared with commercial enteral formula (CEF), may be inadequate in calories, macronutrients, and some micronutrients, given variability in BTF formula composition. As a result, BTF may result in significantly more weight loss than CEF. Thus, BTF may not be appropriate for adult patients who are malnourished or are at risk for malnutrition due to the potential worsening of clinical outcomes.
-
3.
Effects of oral/enteral nutrition alone versus plus pantoprazole on gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients with low risk factor: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Gündoğan, K, Karakoc, E, Teke, T, Zerman, A, Esmaoglu, A, Temel, Ş, Güven, M, Sungur, M
Turkish journal of medical sciences. 2020;(4):776-783
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Critically ill patients are at risk of developing gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding due to stress causing mucosal damage. Aim of the study was to determine the effect of oral/enteral nutrition with or without concomitant pantoprazole on upper GI bleeding in low risk critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study conducted with intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving oral/enteral nutritional support. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups including intervention group (received oral/EN plus pantoprazole) and control group (received only oral/EN). RESULTS A total of 300 patients (intervention group: 152, control group: 148) participated in the study. Overall, 226 (75%) patients were fed by orally and 74 (25%) patients fed by enteral tube feeding. Median duration of nutritional support 4 (range: 2–33) days. Overt upper GI bleeding was noted only in one patient (0.65%) who was in the intervention group. The overall length of ICU stay of 4 (2–105) days, while ICU stay was significantly longer in the intervention group than in the control group (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Our findings seems to indicate that in patients who are at low risk for GI bleeding and under oral/enteral nutritional support, the use of PPIs may not reduce the risk of bleeding, however these results are imprecise because of low event (GI bleeding) rate and limited power.
-
4.
Acute medical stabilisation of adults with anorexia nervosa: experience of a defined interdisciplinary model of care.
Braude, MR, Con, D, Clayton-Chubb, D, Nandurkar, R, Chua, LE, Newnham, ED
Internal medicine journal. 2020;(1):77-85
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) are vulnerable to physiological decompensation and often require inpatient management by an eating disorders unit. AIMS Patients admitted to an Australian tertiary medical centre for medical stabilisation of AN were assessed as part of quality assurance. Analysis included: (i) medical complications during acute inpatient stabilisation; (ii) predictors of refeeding syndrome; (iii) predictors governing length of stay (LOS); and (iv) outcomes pre- and post-implementation of multidisciplinary treatment guidelines. METHODS A retrosepctive analysis of 95 consecutive admissions (60 individual patients) between November 2011 and August 2017 was performed. RESULTS Patients had a median LOS of 9.6 days (interquartile range 5.8-19.7) and a mean weight gain of 1.4 kg (standard deviation 2.9). Medical complications included the following: hypoglycaemia (11.6%) and refeeding electrolyte derangement (26.3%). Advancing age (odds ratio (OR) 1.06 per year, P = 0.019), nasogastric tube requirement (OR 3.4, P = 0.014) and Code Grey(s) (security calls) (OR 7.1, P = 0.010) were associated with refeeding electrolyte derangement. Parameters associated with increased LOS included the following: lower body mass index (P = 0.029), Code Grey(s) (P = 0.029) and tachycardia (P = 0.013). Following multivariate analysis, the post-guidelines implementation group required less intravenous fluid and electrolyte replacement, though had lower rates of refeeding electrolyte derangement (OR 0.33 (0.11-0.99)). CONCLUSION Patients with moderate to severe AN are at risk of dangerous medical complications, and older patients may have heightened predisposition to refeeding electrolyte derangement. Early identification of medically high-risk patients is imperative to implement timely, life-saving interventions.
-
5.
A randomized controlled trial protocol comparing the feeds of fresh versus frozen mother's own milk for preterm infants in the NICU.
Sun, H, Cao, Y, Han, S, Cheng, R, Liu, L, Liu, J, Xia, S, Zhang, J, Li, Z, Cheng, X, et al
Trials. 2020;(1):170
Abstract
BACKGROUND Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the leading cause of death among preterm infants born at < 30 weeks' gestation. The incidence of NEC is reduced when infants are fed human milk. However, in many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), it is standard practice to freeze and/or pasteurize human milk, which deactivates bioactive components that may offer additional protective benefits. Indeed, our pilot study showed that one feed of fresh mother's own milk per day was safe, feasible, and can reduce morbidity in preterm infants. To further evaluate the benefits of fresh human milk in the NICU, a randomized controlled trial is needed. METHODS Our prospective multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial will include infants born at < 30 weeks' gestation and admitted to one of 29 tertiary NICUs in China. Infants in the intervention (fresh human milk) group (n = 1549) will receive at least two feeds of fresh human milk (i.e., within 4 h of expression) per day from the time of enrollment until 32 weeks' corrected age or discharge to home. Infants in the control group (n = 1549) will receive previously frozen human milk following the current standard protocols. Following informed consent, enrolled infants will be randomly allocated to the control or fresh human milk groups. The primary outcome is the composite outcome mortality or NEC ≥ stage 2 at 32 weeks' corrected age, and the secondary outcomes are mortality, NEC ≥ stage 2, NEC needing surgery, late-onset sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), weight gain, change in weight, increase in length, increase in head circumference, time to full enteral feeds, and finally, the number and type of critical incident reports, including feeding errors. DISCUSSION Our double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial aims to examine whether fresh human milk can improve infant outcomes. The results of this study will impact both Chinese and international medical practice and feeding policy for preterm infants. In addition, data from our study will inform changes in health policy in NICUs across China, such that mothers are encouraged to enter the NICU and express fresh milk for their infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; #ChiCTR1900020577; registered January 1, 2019; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=34276.
-
6.
Additional effect of perioperative, compared with preoperative, immunonutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A randomized, controlled trial.
Miyauchi, Y, Furukawa, K, Suzuki, D, Yoshitomi, H, Takayashiki, T, Kuboki, S, Miyazaki, M, Ohtsuka, M
International journal of surgery (London, England). 2019;:69-75
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have reported that perioperative and preoperative immunonutrition reduced infectious complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy; however, it is unclear whether perioperative immunonutrition has additional effects compared with preoperative immunonutrition. The present study evaluated whether perioperative, compared with preoperative, immunonutrition has additional effects on cell-mediated immunity and the infection rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial conducted in our institution. Oral supplementation enriched with arginine, ω-3 fatty acids, and dietary nucleotides was given by enteral infusion to 30 patients before and after surgery (perioperative group); 30 patients received the same enriched formula before surgery and standard enteral nutrition following surgery (preoperative group). The primary endpoint was concanavalin (Con A)- or phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation on postoperative day (POD) 7, which is an index of cell-mediated immunity; the secondary endpoint was the postoperative infection rate. RESULTS There were no significant differences in Con A- or PHA-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation on POD 7 between the groups. There was no significant difference in the postoperative infection rate between the two groups. In the post hoc subgroup analysis, with respect to the effect on the infection rate, a significant interaction was found only between a long operative time and perioperative immunonutrition. CONCLUSIONS There were no additional effects of perioperative, compared with preoperative, immunonutrition on postoperative immunity and infectious complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
-
7.
Randomized controlled trial on efficacy of oligomeric formula (HINE E-GEL®) versus polymeric formula (MEIN®) enteral nutrition after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with gastric tube reconstruction.
Ohkura, Y, Ueno, M, Shindoh, J, Iizuka, T, Udagawa, H
Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. 2019;(5)
Abstract
The efficacy of early enteral nutrition after esophageal cancer surgery has been reported. However, the choice of formula and management of diarrhea are important to achieve the goal of enhanced recovery after surgery. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency of diarrhea/completion rate of enteral nutrition regimen as primary endpoints and the postoperative nutritional status/body composition analysis/operative morbidity as secondary endpoints was compared between the two nutrition groups. Among the 122 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between December 2015 and September 2017, 67 patients who met the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to receive enteral nutrition with either HINE E-GEL® (HINE group; n = 33) or MEIN® (MEIN group; n = 34). The incidence of diarrhea was significantly lower in the HINE group (18.2 % vs. 64.7 %, P < 0.001). The score of Bristol scale of POD 6/7 was significantly lower in the HINE group (P = 0.019/P = 0.006, respectively). The completion rate of enteral nutrition regimen was significantly higher in the HINE group (97.4 % vs. 86.6 %, P = 0.002). The Controlling Nutritional Status scores and total protein levels at 6 months after surgery were significantly better in the HINE group (P = 0.030 and P = 0.023, respectively), indicating improved tendency in nutritional status in the HINE group. However, there were no significant differences in Prognostic Nutritional Index values, blood test results, rapid turnover proteins, body mass index, or body composition between the two groups. HINE E-GEL compared with MEIN may reduce the frequency of diarrhea, enabling patients to adhere to the scheduled enteral nutrition plan. Also, maintenance of nutritional status with HINE E-GEL was comparable or potentially better in some nutrition components to that with MEIN, indicating that HINE E-GEL can be an option for enteral nutrition following esophageal surgery to achieve the goal of successful completion of scheduled enteral nutrition and smooth transition to the normal diet.
-
8.
Securing Orogastic and Nasogastric Tubes in Intubated Patients.
Powers, J
Critical care nurse. 2019;(4):61-63
-
9.
Pediatric enteral nutrition therapy for burn victims: when should it be initiated?
Valentini, M, Seganfredo, FB, Fernandes, SA
Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. 2019;(3):393-402
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the scientific evidence regarding the initiation of enteral nutrition in the pediatric burn population. METHODS This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing early enteral nutrition and late enteral nutrition in individuals aged 1 month to 18 years with burns. The MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the terms "burns", "fires", "child nutrition disorders", "nutritional support" and related terms. RESULTS Three articles that included a total of 781 patients were identified. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the early and late groups (OR = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.46 - 1.15, p = 0.17). Patients who received early enteral nutrition had a 3.69-day reduction in the length of hospital stay (mean difference = -3.69, 95%CI = -4.11 - -3.27, p < 0.00001). There was a higher incidence of diarrhea and vomiting and decreased intestinal permeability in the early group. This group also presented higher a serum insulin concentration and insulin/glucagon ratio as well as lower caloric deficit and weight loss when compared to the control group. CONCLUSION Analysis of the different intragroup variables suggests the importance of starting nutritional support early. Considering the number of pediatric burn patients, there is a need for robust studies with greater scientific impact.
-
10.
The effect of enteral versus parenteral nutrition for critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang, G, Zhang, K, Cui, W, Hong, Y, Zhang, Z
Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2018;:62-92
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To analyze the effect of enteral nutrition compared with parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. SETTING Intensive care unit. PATIENTS 23 trials containing 6478 patients met our inclusion criteria. INTERVENTION A systematical literature search was conducted to identify eligible trials in electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO and Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was mortality, the secondary outcomes were gastrointestinal complications, bloodstream infections, organ failures, length of stay in ICU and hospital. We performed a predefined subgroup analyses to explore the treatment effect by mean age, publication date and disease types. MAIN RESULTS The result showed no significant effect on overall mortality rate (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.81 to 1.18, P = 0.83, I2 = 19%) and organ failure rate (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.01, P = 0.06, I2 = 16%). The use of EN had more beneficial effects with fewer bloodstream infections when compared to PN (OR 0.59, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.82, P = 0.001, I2 = 27%) and this was more noteworthy in the subgroup analysis for critical surgical patients (OR 0.36, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.59, P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). EN was associated with reduction in hospital LOS (MD -0.90, 95%CI -1.63 to -0.17, P = 0.21, I2 = 0%) but had an increase incidence of gastrointestinal complications (OR 2.00, 95%CI 1.76 to 2.27, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION For critically ill patients, the two routes of nutrition support had no different effect on mortality rate. The use of EN could decrease the incidence of bloodstream infections and reduce hospital LOS but was associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal complications.