-
1.
Adjustable gastric band surgery or medical management in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: three-year results of a randomized trial.
Simonson, DC, Vernon, A, Foster, K, Halperin, F, Patti, ME, Goldfine, AB
Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2019;(12):2052-2059
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few randomized trials have compared surgical versus lifestyle and pharmacologic approaches for type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with mild to moderate obesity. OBJECTIVES This study examined resolution of hyperglycemia (A1C <6.5% and fasting glucose <126 mg/dL) 3 years after randomization to either a laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) or 1-year diabetes and weight management (DWM) program. SETTING University medical center, United States. METHODS Forty T2D patients (mean ± SD: age, 51.3 ±10.0 yr; weight 109.5 ± 15.0 kg; body mass index [BMI] 36.5 ± 3.7 kg/m2; HBA1C 8.2% ± 1.2%) were randomized to LAGB (n = 18) or DWM (n = 22). RESULTS At 3 years, 13% of 16 patients in LAGB and 5% of 17 patients in DWM achieved resolution of hyperglycemia (P = .601), with a modestly greater reduction in antidiabetic medications in the surgical group (P = .054). Reductions from baseline in A1C were sustained at 3 years in LAGB (-.82% [95% CI: -1.62 to -.01], P = .046) compared with DWM (+.23% [95% CI: -.57 to 1.03], P = .567). The surgical group had greater weight loss (-12.0 kg [95% CI: -15.9 to -8.1] versus -4.8 [95% CI: -8.6 to -.9], P = .010). HDL-cholesterol increased more after surgery (P = .003), but changes in triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol, and blood pressure did not differ between treatments. Diabetes- and obesity-specific quality of life improved comparably with both therapies. CONCLUSIONS Achievement of American Diabetes Association targets for glucose, lipids, and blood pressure was similar with both treatment strategies. LAGB leads to greater sustained weight loss and higher HDL cholesterol compared with a DWM program. These findings may help guide patients with T2D and obesity when exploring options for diabetes and weight management.
-
2.
Predictive Value of Gut Peptides in T2D Remission: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Metabolic Gastric Bypass, Sleeve Gastrectomy and Greater Curvature Plication.
Casajoana, A, Pujol, J, Garcia, A, Elvira, J, Virgili, N, de Oca, FJ, Duran, X, Fernández-Veledo, S, Vendrell, J, Vilarrasa, N
Obesity surgery. 2017;(9):2235-2245
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our aim was to determine the predictive value of gut hormone changes for the improvement of type 2 diabetes (T2D) following metabolic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (mRYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and greater curvature plication (GCP) in a randomized controlled trial. Contradictory results have been obtained regarding the role of gastrointestinal hormones (in particular GLP-1) in beneficial metabolic bariatric surgery outcomes. METHODS Forty-five patients with T2D (mean BMI 39.4 ± 1.9 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to mRYGB, SG, or GCP. Anthropometric and biochemical parameters, fasting concentrations of PYY, ghrelin, glucagon, and area under the curve (AUC) of GLP-1 after a standard meal test were determined prior to and at months 1 and 12 after surgery. RESULTS Twelve months after surgery, total weight loss percentage was higher and HbA1c lower in the mRYGB group than in the SG and GCP groups (-35.2 ± 8.1 and 5.1 ± 0.6% vs. -27.8 ± 5.4 and 6.2 ± 0.8% vs. -20.5 ± 6.8 and 6.6 ± 1.3%; p = 0.007 and p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, GLP-1 AUC at months 1 and 12 was greater and T2D remission was higher in mRYGB (80 vs. 53.3 vs. 20%, p < 0.001). Insulin treatment (odds ratio (OR) 0.025, p = 0.018) and the increase in GLP-1 AUC from baseline to month 1 (OR 1.021, p = 0.013) were associated with T2D remission. CONCLUSIONS mRYGB achieves a superior rate of weight loss and T2D remission at month 12. Enhanced GLP-1 secretion 1 month after surgery was a determinant of glucose metabolism improvement. Registration number ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ): NCT14104758.
-
3.
Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic greater curvature plication versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
Grubnik, VV, Ospanov, OB, Namaeva, KA, Medvedev, OV, Kresyun, MS
Surgical endoscopy. 2016;(6):2186-91
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) is a new restrictive bariatric procedure, which has a similar restrictive mechanism like laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) without potential risk of leak. Aim of the study was to compare 2-year outcomes of LSG and LGCP. METHODS Multicenter prospective randomized trial was started in 2010. A total of 54 patients with morbid obesity were allocated either to LGCP group (n = 25) or LSG group (n = 27). Main exclusion criteria were: ASA > III, age > 75 and BMI > 65 kg/m(2). There were 40 women and 12 men, and the mean age was 42.6 ± 6.8 years (range 35-62). Data on the operation time, complications, hospital stay, body mass index loss, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), loss of appetite and improvement in comorbidities were collected during the follow-up examinations. RESULTS All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 92.0 ± 15 min for LSG and 73 ± 19 min for LGCP (p > 0.05). The mean hospital stay was 4.0 ± 1.9 days in the LSG group and 3.8 ± 1.7 days in LGCP group (p > 0.05). One year after surgery, the mean %EWL was 59.5 ± 15.4 % in LSG group and 45.8 ± 17 % in LGCP group (p > 0.05). After 2 years, mean %EWL was 78.9 ± 20 % in the LSG group and 42.4 ± 18 % in the LGCP group (p < 0.01). After 3 years, mean %EWL was 72.8 ± 22 in the LSG group and only 20.5 ± 23.9 in the LGCP group (p < 0.01). Loss of feeling of hunger after 2 years was 25 % in LGCP group and 76.9 % in the LSG group (p < 0.05). The comorbidities including diabetes, sleep apnea and hypertension were markedly improved in the both groups after surgery. CONCLUSION The short-term outcomes demonstrated equal effectiveness of the both procedures, but 2-year follow-up showed that LGCP is worse than LSG as a restrictive procedure for weight loss.
-
4.
Comparative effectiveness of 3 bariatric surgery procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and sleeve gastrectomy.
Lee, JH, Nguyen, QN, Le, QA
Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2016;(5):997-1002
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery is associated with improved co-morbidities, quality of life, and survival in severely obese patients. Common bariatric surgery procedures include Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Currently, literature studying comparative effectiveness on different bariatric surgery procedures in veterans is limited. OBJECTIVES To compare effectiveness of 3 bariatric surgery procedures performed in veterans. SETTING Veterans Affairs Loma Linda Healthcare Systems (VALLHS), Loma Linda, California, United States. METHODS This study was a single-institution, retrospective cohort study. Primary outcome was weight reduction, expressed as kilograms lost, body mass index (BMI) reduction, percentage weight loss (%WL), and percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) after 12 months of bariatric surgery. Secondary outcomes were reduction in number of medications and laboratory markers for obesity-related chronic conditions. Inverse-probability weighting propensity score method was used to balance baseline characteristics among the procedures. RESULTS A total of 162 patients were included in the study. At 12 months, the kilograms lost, BMI reduction, %WL, and %EWL were 40.7±14.5 kg, 13.4±4.1 kg/m(2), 31.5±8.5%, and 41.4±11.6% for RYGB; 24.4±22.1 kg, 7.9±7.3 kg/m(2), 20.2±21.5%, and 26.7±27.6% for SG; and 15.3±15.7 kg, 5.0±5.0 kg/m(2), 12.0±11.7%, and 16.1±15.9% for LAGB, respectively (RYGB versus SG, RYGB versus LAGB, and SG versus LAGB, all P<.01). The reduction in number of medications, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) also showed significant improvement with RYGB. CONCLUSION For the short term, RYGB appears to achieve better weight reduction and management of obesity-associated co-morbid conditions compared with the SG and LAGB procedures in veteran patients. SG could be the next alternative over LAGB for the bariatric surgery procedure in patients who are not candidates for RYGB.
-
5.
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus adjustable gastric banding to reduce nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 5-year controlled longitudinal study.
Caiazzo, R, Lassailly, G, Leteurtre, E, Baud, G, Verkindt, H, Raverdy, V, Buob, D, Pigeyre, M, Mathurin, P, Pattou, F
Annals of surgery. 2014;(5):893-8; discussion 898-9
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the long-term benefit of gastric bypass [Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)] versus adjustable gastric banding (AGB) on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in severely obese patients. BACKGROUND NAFLD improves after weight loss surgery, but no histological study has compared the effects of the various bariatric interventions. METHODS Participants consisted of 1236 obese patients (body mass index=48.4±7.6 kg/m), enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study for up to 5 years after RYGB (n=681) or AGB (n=555). Liver biopsy samples were available for 1201 patients (97.2% of those at risk) at baseline, 578 patients (47.2%) at 1 year, and 413 patients (68.9%) at 5 years. RESULTS At baseline, NAFLD was present in 86% patients and categorized as severe [NAFLD activity score (NAS)≥3] in 22% patients. RYGB patients had a higher body mass index (49.8±8.2 vs 46.8±6.5 kg/m, P<0.001) and more severe NAFLD (NAS: 2.0±1.5 vs 1.7±1.4, P=0.004) than AGB patients. Weight loss at 5 years was 25.5%±11.8% after RYGB versus 21.4%±12.7% after AGB (P<0.001). When analyzed with a mixed model, all NAFLD parameters improved after surgery (P<0.001) and improved significantly more after RYGB than after AGB [steatosis (%): 1 year, 7.9±13.7 vs 17.9±21.5, P<0.001/5 years, 8.7±7.1 vs 14.5±20.8, P<0.05; NAS: 1 year, 0.7±1.0 vs 1.1±1.2, P<0.001/5 years, 0.7±1.2 vs 1.0±1.3, P<0.05]. In multivariate analysis, the superiority of RYGB was primarily but not entirely explained by weight loss. CONCLUSIONS The improvement of NAFLD was superior after RYGB than after AGB.
-
6.
Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing banded versus standard laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Zarate, X, Arceo-Olaiz, R, Montalvo Hernandez, J, García-García, E, Pablo Pantoja, J, Herrera, MF
Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2013;(3):395-7
Abstract
BACKGROUND Banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was designed to avoid or diminish weight regain in the long term. In 2008, we published the initial results of a pilot study design to comparatively evaluate surgical morbidity, mortality, and maximum weight loss in patients undergoing banded and unbanded laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The present study analyzes the 5-year results. METHODS A randomized, controlled trial was carried out in 60 morbidly obese patients who underwent LRYGB. Patients were divided in 2 groups. Half of the patients underwent the banded version of the LRYGB, and half underwent the unbanded version. The 5-year excess weight loss (EWL) and loss of body mass index (BMI) were comparatively analyzed. RESULTS There were 58 females and 2 males with a mean preoperative BMI of 47±4.9 kg/m(2). A total of 21 patients with banded LRYGB and 22 with unbanded LRYGB completed 5-year follow-up. One patient died 3 years after surgery from metastatic melanoma. EWL at 5 years was 61.6%±19.6% versus 59.8%±15.9% (P = ns), and loss of BMI was 32.9%±5.2% versus 32.8%±4.3% (P = ns), respectively, for the banded and unbanded group. CONCLUSIONS In this small study, there were no statistical differences in the EWL and the BMI lost at 5 years between the group of patients who underwent banded and unbanded LRYGB.
-
7.
Comparison of results of laparoscopic gastric banding and consecutive intragastric balloon application at 18 months: a clinical prospective study.
Peker, Y, Coskun, H, Bozkurt, S, Cin, N, Atak, T, Genc, H
Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A. 2011;(6):471-5
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is a serious health problem that leads to serious physical and psychological problems. The methods used in treating obesity include diet and behavioral changes, pharmacotherapy, and surgery. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and intragastric balloon (IGB) applications are two of the methods used to treat obesity. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of LAGB with those of two consecutive IGB applications in weight loss management of obese patients. METHODS Thirty-two patients (F/M:24/8) admitted in the study were divided into two groups. In the first group of 16 patients, LAGB was performed, and in the other group two consecutive IGBs were applied. Total weight loss, body mass index (BMI), excess weight loss percent (EWL %), and excess body mass index loss percent (EBMIL %) were recorded at months 6, 12, and 18 for both groups. RESULTS At the end of the 6th month, BMI values of LAGB and IGB groups were 36.0 and 30.6 kg/m(2), EWL % were 32.3% and 39.3%, and EBMIL % were 36.3% and 47.1%, respectively. The results were similar. At the end of 12 months, median BMI was 36.6 kg/m(2) for LAGB and 27.5 kg/m(2) for IGB (P<.05). The EWL % and EBMIL % at the end of the 12th month were 57% and 70%, which is significant in favor of IGB. The last evaluation was made at the 18th month of applications, and the three parameters for two applications were found to be similar. CONCLUSIONS The achieved weight losses at the 6th month were similar for both groups. However, at the 12th month, two consecutive IGB applications were more effective. At the end of the 18th month, the results were again similar. Two consecutive IGB applications may be offered to obese patients who do not feel ready for surgery.
-
8.
A pilot study comparing jejunal pouch and jejunal interposition reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy.
Takagawa, R, Kunisaki, C, Kimura, J, Makino, H, Kosaka, T, Ono, HA, Akiyama, H, Endo, I
Digestive surgery. 2010;(6):502-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The incidence of proximal gastric cancer is increasing, so proximal gastrectomies are often performed to preserve gastric function, but the optimal reconstruction method after surgery remains controversial. We therefore conducted a prospective pilot study comparing reconstructions using jejunal pouch interposition or jejunal interposition. METHODS Thirty-eight patients with early proximal gastric cancer were included in this study. Equal numbers of patients were randomly assigned for reconstruction using jejunal interposition (the IP group) or jejunal pouch interposition (the PO group). Postoperative morbidity and patient symptoms were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Postoperative morbidity was significantly more frequent in the IP than the PO group (p = 0.036). Moreover, the incidence of gastrointestinal complaints was more frequent in the IP group until 6 months after surgery. By contrast, the caloric intake was more favorable in the PO group until 1 year post-surgery. CONCLUSION Short-term and mid-term outcomes were more favorable following jejunal pouch interposition compared with jejunal interposition after proximal gastrectomy.
-
9.
Obesity and its surgical management.
Livingston, EH
American journal of surgery. 2002;(2):103-13
Abstract
Obesity is increasing in epidemic proportions world-wide. Even mild degrees of obesity have adverse health effects and are associated with diminished longevity. For this reason aggressive dietary intervention is recommended. Patients with body mass indices exceeding 40 have medically significant obesity in which the risk of serious health consequences is substantial, with concomitant significant reductions in life expectancy. For these patients, sustained weight loss rarely occurs with dietary intervention. For the appropriately selected patients, surgery is beneficial. Various operations have been proposed for the treatment of obesity, many of which proved to have serious complications precluding their efficacy. A National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel reviewed the indications and types of operations, concluding that the banded gastroplasty and gastric bypass were acceptable operations for treating seriously obese patients. Surgical treatment is associated with sustained weight loss for seriously obese patients who uniformly fail nonsurgical treatment. Following weight loss there is a high cure rate for diabetes and sleep apnea, with significant improvement in other complications of obesity such as hypertension and osteoarthritis.