1.
Water versus carbohydrate-electrolyte fluid replacement during loaded marching under heat stress.
Byrne, C, Lim, CL, Chew, SA, Ming, ET
Military medicine. 2005;(8):715-21
Abstract
This study compared the effectiveness of carbohydrate-electrolyte (CHO-E) fluid replacement versus water (WAT) on hydration status, physiological and subjective responses, and exercise performance during a 3 x 60-minute loaded (14 kg) treadmill walk in 35 degrees C ambient temperature and 55% humidity. CHO-E did not affect urine loss, plasma volume change (WAT = -3.0 +/- 1.6% vs. CHO-E = -1.1 +/- 1.6%), dehydration (WAT = 0.4 +/- 0.3% vs. CHO-E = 0.4 +/- 0.3% of body mass), or core body temperature (Tc) and heart rate (HR) responses. Endurance time was greater but not significantly different with CHO-E (WAT = 134 +/- 9 vs. CHO-E = 146 +/- 9 minutes). CHO-E increased the frequency of task completion (WAT = 21% vs. CHO-E = 50%), elevated blood glucose, and reduced perceived exertion. CHO-E offers potential to enhance exercise capacity by elevating blood glucose and thereby preventing hypoglycemia, maintaining high rates of carbohydrate oxidation, and/or preventing central fatigue; but provided no additional benefits with regard to hydration status and physiological function during loaded walking under heat stress.
2.
Rapid cooling techniques in joggers experiencing heat strain.
Clapp, AJ, Bishop, PA, Muir, I, Walker, JL
Journal of science and medicine in sport. 2001;(2):160-7
Abstract
This study examined subjects that exercised on three occasions in a heated environment (WBGT = 39 degrees C] until they experienced heat strain. Since morbidity and mortality due to heat injury increase with the duration of elevated core temperature, it is important that techniques to lower core temperature be evaluated. Following three exercise sessions, subjects underwent each of three core cooling treatments in random order: 1) Torso immersion in cool water, 2) Hands and feet immersion in cool water, and 3) Sit-in-shade with a 1.5mph breeze provided. Subjects (n=5) consistently reached peak rectal temperatures of 38.8 (+/-0.1) degrees C following each exercise bout in the heated environment. Torso immersion produced a significantly (p<0.05) greater rate of decline in rectal temperature (0.25+/-0.10 degrees C/min) than the hands and feet immersion technique (0.16+/-0.05 degrees C/min) and the sit in the shade technique (0.11+/-0.04 degrees C/min). After only 10 minutes of cooling, the differences among cooling techniques were evident. Similar trends were observed for mean heart rate readings, albeit not significant (p>0.05). It was concluded that rectal temperatures can be reduced rapidly through the use of a cool water torso-immersion technique.