-
1.
Clinical hemocompatibility of double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis comparing polyethersulfone and ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer membranes.
Krieter, DH, Jeyaseelan, J, Rüth, M, Lemke, HD, Wanner, C, Drechsler, C
Artificial organs. 2021;(9):1104-1113
Abstract
Activation of the complement system and leukocytes by blood-membrane interactions may further promote arteriosclerosis typically present in patients on lipoprotein apheresis. As clinical data on the hemocompatibility of lipoprotein apheresis are scarce, a controlled clinical study comparing two different types of plasma separation and fractionation membranes used in double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis was urgently needed, as its outcome may influence clinical decision-making. In a prospective, randomized, crossover controlled trial, eight patients on double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis were subjected to one treatment with recent polyethersulfone (PES) plasma separation and fractionation membranes and one control treatment using a set of ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVAL) membranes. White blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PC) counts, complement factor C5a and thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) concentrations were determined in samples drawn at defined times from different sites of the extracorporeal blood and plasma circuit. With a nadir at 25 minutes, WBCs in EVAL decreased to 33.5 ± 10.7% of baseline compared with 63.8 ± 22.0% at 20 minutes in PES (P < .001). The maximum C5a levels in venous blood reentering the patients were measured at 30 minutes, being 30.0 ± 11.2 µg/L with EVAL and 12.3 ± 9.0 µg/L with PES (P < .05). The highest C5a concentrations were found in plasma after the plasma filters (EVAL 56.1 ± 22.0 µg/L at 15 minutes vs PES 23.3 ± 15.2 µg/L at 10 minutes; P < .001). PC did not significantly decrease over time with both membrane types, whereas TAT levels did not rise until the end of the treatment without differences between membranes. Regarding lipoprotein(a) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol removal, both membrane sets performed equally. Compared with EVAL, PES membranes cause less leukocyte and complement system activation, the classical parameters of hemocompatibility of extracorporeal treatment procedures, at identical treatment efficacy. Better hemocompatibility may avoid inflammation-promoting effects through blood-material interactions in patients requiring double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis.
-
2.
Efficacy and safety of coenzyme A versus fenofibrate in patients with hyperlipidemia: a multicenter, double-blind, double-mimic, randomized clinical trial.
Chen, YQ, Zhao, SP, Ye, HJ
Current medical research and opinion. 2020;(6):941-945
Abstract
Background: We investigated the lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of coenzyme A (CoA) versus fenofibrate in Chinese patients with moderate dyslipidemia.Methods: A total of 417 subjects (aged 18-75 years) diagnosed with moderate dyslipidemia (triglyceride 2.3-6.5 mmol/L) from 13 large cardiovascular centers in China were recruited and randomly divided into a fenofibrate group (n = 207), which received 200 mg of fenofibrate orally once daily, and a CoA group (n = 210), which received 400 mg of CoA orally once a day. Blood lipoproteins, liver and renal function, creatine kinase, and blood glucose were measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment.Results: The baseline triglyceride (TG) level in the fenofibrate group and the CoA group was 3.39 ± 0.99 mmol/L and 3.60 ± 1.11 mmol/L, respectively. After treatment for 4 and 8 weeks with fenofibrate, TG was reduced by 31.62% and 33.13%. In the CoA group, TG was reduced by 17.29% and 23.80%. Compared with baseline, total cholesterol (TC) was significantly decreased in both groups after either 4 or 8 weeks of treatment (p < .05). CoA increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) after 4 weeks of treatment, whereas it had no significant effect on HDL-C after 8 weeks of treatment. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was not modified in either group. The incidence of side effects was significantly lower in the CoA group compared with the fenofibrate group (p < .05).Conclusions: Compared with fenofibrate, CoA has less effect on reducing plasma TG levels in subjects with moderate dyslipidemia. However, it has fewer adverse effects.
-
3.
Comparative Effectiveness of Inclisiran 100, 300, and 500 mg in a Population with Hyperlipidemia: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Wang, Y, Wang, J, Wang, S
American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions. 2018;(4):271-282
Abstract
BACKGROUND To our knowledge, inclisiran was the first agent composed of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) to be preliminarily used to reduce proatherogenic lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Inclisiran was evaluated in large clinical trials but did not receive government approval. The ability of inclisiran to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) greatly improved its chances of becoming a novel therapeutic option for patients with hyperlipidemia. OBJECTIVE Our goal was to summarize the preliminary effectiveness and safety data for inclisiran. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the OVID EMB Reviews database, and Clinical Trials with the keyword "inclisiran" to find all related randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Five recently published RCTs involving 583 adults aged 18-65 years with hyperlipidemia were included in the analysis. RESULTS Subgroup analysis suggested that inclisiran 100 mg (standard mean difference [SMD] - 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.51 to - 1.66; p < 0.05), 300 mg (SMD - 2.74; 95% CI - 3.61 to - 1.87; p < 0.05), and 500 mg (SMD - 2.21; 95% CI - 2.62 to - 1.80; p < 0.05) significantly (p < 0.05) reduced LDL-C and total cholesterol even though pooled analysis showed no LDL-C-lowering effect (SMD 0.15; 95% CI - 0.34 to 0.04; p = 0.116). Compared with patients receiving placebo, pooled and subgroup analysis of patients receiving inclisiran showed no favorable changes in triglycerides or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p > 0.05). The most commonly reported adverse events were musculoskeletal pain, nasopharyngitis, headache, and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), none of which were significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS To date, inclisiran has been effective in treating hyperlipidemia. Major adverse events were not identified, although other possible adverse events may be discovered with more RCTs and extensive long-term follow-up.
-
4.
Substitution of nevirapine or raltegravir for protease inhibitor vs. rosuvastatin treatment for the management of dyslipidaemia in HIV-infected patients on stable antiretroviral therapy (Nevrast study).
Calza, L, Magistrelli, E, Colangeli, V, Borderi, M, Bussini, L, Bon, I, Re, MC, Viale, P
Infectious diseases (London, England). 2017;(10):737-747
Abstract
OBJECTIVES An observational, prospective, cohort study was performed to compare efficacy and safety of a switch from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) to nevirapine or raltegravir with that of rosuvastatin addition to current antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients with hyperlipidaemia. METHODS All HIV-infected patients receiving a stable PI/r-based antiretroviral regimen, with persistently suppressed viremia, naïve to non-nucleoside analogues and to integrase strand transfer inhibitors, with mixed hyperlipidaemia, and who underwent a switch from PI/r to nevirapine (Group A) or raltegravir (Group B) or who started rosuvastatin at 10 mg daily (group C) with unchanged antiretroviral regimen were enrolled into the study. RESULTS Overall, 136 patients were enrolled: 43 patients were included in the group A, 46 in the group B, and 47 in the group C. The mean age was 46.6 years, and 108 (79.4%) were males. After 48 weeks of follow-up, a significantly greater reduction in the mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level was reported in group C (-28.2%) than in group A (-10.2%; p < .001) and B (-12.4%; p = .021), while a significantly greater reduction in the mean concentration of triglycerides was observed in group A (-31.2%) and B (-35.5%) than in group C (-11.9%; p = .034 and p = .004, respectively). The incidence of adverse events was <10% and comparable across the three groups. CONCLUSION In HIV-positive subjects receiving a PI/r, the initiation of rosuvastatin treatment after 48 weeks yielded a greater decline in LDL cholesterol, while the switch from PI/r to nevirapine or raltegravir led to a greater decline in triglycerides.
-
5.
Evolocumab: A Review in Hyperlipidemia.
Keating, GM
American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions. 2016;(1):67-78
Abstract
Evolocumab (Repatha(®)) is a monoclonal antibody targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) that is administered subcutaneously at a dosage of 140 mg every 2 weeks or 420 mg once monthly. Across 12-week phase III trials in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia, evolocumab was more effective than placebo (treatment difference -54.8 to -76.3%) and/or ezetimibe (treatment difference -36.9 to -47.2%) at reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, including when added to statin therapy, when administered to statin-intolerant patients, when administered as monotherapy, and in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia who were receiving statins with or without other lipid-lowering drugs. Evolocumab also significantly lowered LDL-C levels (treatment difference of ≈30% vs. placebo) in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia when added to statins with or without ezetimibe in a 12-week phase III trial. The efficacy of evolocumab was maintained in the longer term, and it was well tolerated. In conclusion, subcutaneous evolocumab is a valuable new treatment for use in primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, particularly in patients unable to reach LDL-C goals despite treatment with statins with or without other lipid-lowering therapies and in patients who do not tolerate or are not able to receive statins.
-
6.
Impact of Diabetes-Specific Nutritional Formulas versus Oatmeal on Postprandial Glucose, Insulin, GLP-1 and Postprandial Lipidemia.
Mottalib, A, Mohd-Yusof, BN, Shehabeldin, M, Pober, DM, Mitri, J, Hamdy, O
Nutrients. 2016;(7)
Abstract
Diabetes-specific nutritional formulas (DSNFs) are frequently used as part of medical nutrition therapy for patients with diabetes. This study aims to evaluate postprandial (PP) effects of 2 DSNFs; Glucerna (GL) and Ultra Glucose Control (UGC) versus oatmeal (OM) on glucose, insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), free fatty acids (FFA) and triglycerides (TG). After an overnight fast, 22 overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes were given 200 kcal of each of the three meals on three separate days in random order. Blood samples were collected at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 240 min. Glucose area under the curve (AUC0-240) after GL and UGC was lower than OM (p < 0.001 for both). Insulin positive AUC0-120 after UGC was higher than after OM (p = 0.02). GLP-1 AUC0-120 and AUC0-240 after GL and UGC was higher than after OM (p < 0.001 for both). FFA and TG levels were not different between meals. Intake of DSNFs improves PP glucose for 4 h in comparison to oatmeal of similar caloric level. This is achieved by either direct stimulation of insulin secretion or indirectly by stimulating GLP-1 secretion. The difference between their effects is probably related to their unique blends of amino acids, carbohydrates and fat.
-
7.
The chain length of dietary saturated fatty acids affects human postprandial lipemia.
Karupaiah, T, Tan, CH, Chinna, K, Sundram, K
Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 2011;(6):511-21
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Saturated fats increase total cholesterol (TC) and low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and are linked to coronary artery disease risk. The effect of variance in chain length of saturated fatty acids (SFA) on coronary artery disease in human postprandial lipemia is not well elucidated. METHODS A total of 20 healthy volunteers were challenged with 3 test meals, similar in fat content (~31% en) but varying in saturated SFA content and polyunsaturated/saturated fatty acid ratios (P/S). The 3 meals were lauric + myristic acid-rich (LM), P/S 0.19; palmitic acid-rich (POL), P/S 0.31; and stearic acid-rich (STE), P/S 0.22. Blood was sampled at fasted baseline and 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours. Plasma lipids (triacylglycerol [TAG]) and lipoproteins (TC, LDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol [HDL-C]) were evaluated. RESULTS Varying SFA in the test meal significantly impacted postprandial TAG response (p < 0.05). Plasma TAG peaked at 5 hours for STE, 4 hours for POL, and 2 hours for LM test meals. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) for plasma TAG was increased significantly after STE treatment (STE > LM by 32.2%, p = 0.003; STE > POL by 27.9%, p = 0.023) but was not significantly different between POL and LM (POL > LM by 6.0%, p > 0.05). At 2 hours, plasma HDL-C increased significantly after the LM and POL test meals compared with STE (p < 0.05). In comparison to the STE test meal, HDL-C AUC was elevated 14.0% (p = 0.005) and 7.6% (p = 0.023) by the LM and POL test meals, respectively. The TC response was also increased significantly by LM compared with both POL and STE test meals (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Chain length of saturates clearly mediated postmeal plasma TAG and HDL-C changes.
-
8.
Effect of cinnamon on gastric emptying, arterial stiffness, postprandial lipemia, glycemia, and appetite responses to high-fat breakfast.
Markey, O, McClean, CM, Medlow, P, Davison, GW, Trinick, TR, Duly, E, Shafat, A
Cardiovascular diabetology. 2011;:78
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cinnamon has been shown to delay gastric emptying of a high-carbohydrate meal and reduce postprandial glycemia in healthy adults. However, it is dietary fat which is implicated in the etiology and is associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. We aimed to determine the effect of 3 g cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) on GE, postprandial lipemic and glycemic responses, oxidative stress, arterial stiffness, as well as appetite sensations and subsequent food intake following a high-fat meal. METHODS A single-blind randomized crossover study assessed nine healthy, young subjects. GE rate of a high-fat meal supplemented with 3 g cinnamon or placebo was determined using the 13C octanoic acid breath test. Breath, blood samples and subjective appetite ratings were collected in the fasted and during the 360 min postprandial period, followed by an ad libitum buffet meal. Gastric emptying and 1-day fatty acid intake relationships were also examined. RESULTS Cinnamon did not change gastric emptying parameters, postprandial triacylglycerol or glucose concentrations, oxidative stress, arterial function or appetite (p < 0.05). Strong relationships were evident (p < 0.05) between GE Thalf and 1-day palmitoleic acid (r = -0.78), eiconsenoic acid (r = -0.84) and total omega-3 intake (r = -0.72). The ingestion of 3 g cinnamon had no effect on GE, arterial stiffness and oxidative stress following a HF meal. CONCLUSIONS 3 g cinnamon did not alter the postprandial response to a high-fat test meal. We find no evidence to support the use of 3 g cinnamon supplementation for the prevention or treatment of metabolic disease. Dietary fatty acid intake requires consideration in future gastrointestinal studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER at http://www.clinicaltrial.gov: NCT01350284.
-
9.
Brisk walking offsets the increase in postprandial TAG concentrations found when changing to a diet with increased carbohydrate.
Burns, SF, Hardman, AE, Stensel, DJ
The British journal of nutrition. 2009;(12):1787-96
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that 30 min of brisk walking daily would offset the increase in plasma TAG concentrations associated with substituting dietary fat for carbohydrate. Fourteen subjects (six males) aged 57 (sd 5) years underwent three 4 d trials in a counterbalanced order: (i) 4 d on a typical UK diet (40 % energy from fat, 45 % carbohydrate and 15 % protein); (ii) 4 d on an isoenergetic diet but substituting fat for carbohydrate in line with the present recommendations (30 % fat, 55 % carbohydrate and 15 % protein); (iii) 4 d on the same recommended diet with 30 min of brisk walking each day. The food provided for the first 3 d of each trial was isoenergetic with each volunteer's previously determined daily energy intake. On day 4, the subjects consumed breakfast, lunch and an early evening meal, equivalent in total to 90 % of their daily energy intake. Blood samples were collected and substrate utilisation and energy expenditure were determined in the fasted state and for 9 h postprandially. Substrate utilisation differed significantly among trials (P = 0.003); RER was higher on the recommended diet trial than during either of the other two trials (P = 0.012 and 0.021 for the UK diet and recommended diet with walking, respectively). The rise in plasma TAG concentrations over the day was steeper on the recommended diet trial than on the other two trials (trial x time interaction, P = 0.040). The increase in postprandial TAG concentrations associated with substituting dietary fat for carbohydrate was offset by 30 min of brisk walking daily.
-
10.
Economic evaluation of high-dose (80 mg/day) atorvastatin treatment compared with standard-dose (20 mg/day to 40 mg/day) simvastatin treatment in Canada based on the Incremental Decrease in End-Points Through Aggressive Lipid-Lowering (IDEAL) trial.
Wagner, M, Lindgren, P, Merikle, E, Goetghebeur, M, Jönsson, B
The Canadian journal of cardiology. 2009;(11):e362-9
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Incremental Decrease in End-Points Through Aggressive Lipid-Lowering (IDEAL) trial demonstrated incremental cardiovascular benefit of treatment with high-dose atorvastatin (80 mg/ day) versus standard-dose simvastatin (20 mg/day to 40 mg/day) in 8888 patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI) over a median follow-up period of 4.8 years. OBJECTIVES To assess the cost-effectiveness of high-dose atorvastatin versus standard-dose simvastatin treatment in patients with a history of MI from a Canadian societal perspective. METHODS In a within-trial analysis, end point-related events, resources used and productivity losses occurring during the IDEAL trial were aggregated by treatment arm on an intention-to-treat basis to calculate the incremental cost per event avoided. Additionally, quality-adjusted survival was projected using a lifetime Markov model. Transition probabilities, workdays lost, use of study medication and cardiovascular hospitalization rates were based on IDEAL trial data. Hospitalization, study medication and productivity costs were included. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS Compared with standard-dose simvastatin, atorvastatin 80 mg led to 0.099 fewer events per patient and cost savings over 4.8 years of treatment. Over a lifetime horizon, atorvastatin 80 mg led to 0.023 qualityadjusted life years (QALYs) gained per patient at an incremental cost of $26,795/QALY gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio remained below $50,000/QALY in 78% of 1000 simulations. Exclusion of indirect costs resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $38,834/QALY. Results were relatively sensitive to baseline age, but robust with respect to sex, baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, diabetes status and hospitalization costs. CONCLUSION From a Canadian societal perspective, high-dose atorvastatin is cost-effective compared with standard-dose simvastatin in patients with a previous MI.