-
1.
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions of the Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents Elbasvir and Grazoprevir with Pitavastatin, Rosuvastatin, Pravastatin, and Atorvastatin in Healthy Adults.
Caro, L, Prueksaritanont, T, Fandozzi, CM, Feng, HP, Guo, Z, Wolford, D, Panebianco, D, Fraser, IP, Levine, V, Swearingen, D, et al
Clinical drug investigation. 2021;(2):133-147
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many people infected with hepatitis C virus have comorbidities, including hypercholesterolemia, that are treated with statins. In this study, we evaluated the drug-drug interaction potential of the hepatitis C virus inhibitors elbasvir (EBR) and grazoprevir (GZR) with statins. Pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and atorvastatin are substrates of organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B, whereas rosuvastatin and atorvastatin are also breast cancer resistance protein substrates. METHODS Three open-label, phase I clinical trials in healthy adults were conducted with multiple daily doses of oral GZR or EBR/GZR and single oral doses of statins. Trial 1: GZR 200 mg plus pitavastatin 10 mg. Trial 2: Part 1, GZR 200 mg plus rosuvastatin 10 mg, then EBR 50 mg/GZR 200 mg plus rosuvastatin 10 mg; Part 2, EBR 50 mg/GZR 200 mg plus pravastatin 40 mg. Trial 3: EBR 50 mg/GZR 200 mg plus atorvastatin 10 mg. RESULTS Neither GZR nor EBR pharmacokinetics were meaningfully affected by statins. Coadministration of EBR/GZR did not result in clinically relevant changes in the exposure of pitavastatin or pravastatin. However, EBR/GZR increased exposure to rosuvastatin (126%) and atorvastatin (94%). Coadministration of statins plus GZR or EBR/GZR was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Although statins do not appreciably affect EBR or GZR pharmacokinetics, EBR/GZR can impact the pharmacokinetics of certain statins, likely via inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein but not organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B. Coadministration of EBR/GZR with pitavastatin or pravastatin does not require adjustment of either dose of statin, whereas the dose of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin should be decreased when coadministered with EBR/GZR.
-
2.
Randomised clinical trial: safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single and multiple oral doses of tegoprazan (CJ-12420), a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects.
Han, S, Choi, HY, Kim, YH, Nam, JY, Kim, B, Song, GS, Lim, HS, Bae, KS
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2019;(7):751-759
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tegoprazan (CJ-12420) is a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) with therapeutic potential for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by reversibly suppressing gastric H+ /K+ -ATPase. AIMS To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan METHODS A phase I, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in 56 healthy male subjects without Helicobacter pylori infection. In the single ascending dose study, 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg tegoprazan were administered to 32 subjects. In the multiple ascending dose study, 100 and 200 mg tegoprazan were administered every 24 hours to each of the eight subjects for 7 days. In the comparative pharmacodynamics study, 40 mg esomeprazole was administered to eight subjects every 24 hours for 7 days. The assessment included safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics through monitoring of 24-hour gastric pH and pharmacokinetics of tegoprazan in plasma and urine. RESULTS Tegoprazan was generally well tolerated. Most adverse events reported in the study were mild in intensity and resolved without any sequelae. Exposure to tegoprazan increased in a dose-proportional manner. Multiple dosing with tegoprazan showed no accumulation in plasma on day 7. The pharmacodynamic analysis revealed that tegoprazan showed rapid, dose-dependent gastric acid suppression. CONCLUSIONS Tegoprazan was well tolerated and showed rapid and potent gastric acid suppression. This supports the further development of tegoprazan as a treatment for acid-related disorders.
-
3.
SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
Eken, Y, Patel, P, Díaz, T, Jones, MR, Wilson, AK
Journal of computer-aided molecular design. 2018;(10):1097-1115
Abstract
In this effort in the SAMPL6 host-guest binding challenge, a combination of molecular dynamics and quantum mechanical methods were used to blindly predict the host-guest binding free energies of a series of cucurbit[8]uril (CB8), octa-acid (OA), and tetramethyl octa-acid (TEMOA) hosts bound to various guest molecules in aqueous solution. Poses for host-guest systems were generated via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and clustering analyses. The binding free energies for the structures obtained via cluster analyses of MD trajectories were calculated using the MMPBSA method and density functional theory (DFT) with the inclusion of Grimme's dispersion correction, an implicit solvation model to model the aqueous solution, and the resolution-of-the-identity (RI) approximation (MMPBSA, RI-B3PW91-D3, and RI-B3PW91, respectively). Among these three methods tested, the results for OA and TEMOA systems showed MMPBSA and RI-B3PW91-D3 methods can be used to qualitatively rank binding energies of small molecules with an overbinding by 7 and 37 kcal/mol respectively, and RI-B3PW91 gave the poorest quality results, indicating the importance of dispersion correction for the binding free energy calculations. Due to the complexity of the CB8 systems, all of the methods tested show poor correlation with the experimental results. Other quantum mechanical approaches used for the calculation of binding free energies included DFT without the RI approximation, utilizing truncated basis sets to reduce the computational cost (memory, disk space, CPU time), and a corrected dielectric constant to account for ionic strength within the implicit solvation model.
-
4.
The effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared to olmesartan on cardiovascular remodelling in subjects with essential hypertension: the results of a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study.
Schmieder, RE, Wagner, F, Mayr, M, Delles, C, Ott, C, Keicher, C, Hrabak-Paar, M, Heye, T, Aichner, S, Khder, Y, et al
European heart journal. 2017;(44):3308-3317
Abstract
AIMS: Progressive aortic stiffening eventually leads to left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and heart failure if left untreated. Anti-hypertensive agents have been shown to reverse this to some extent. The effects of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696), a dual-action angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), and neprilysin inhibitor, on arterial stiffness and LV remodelling have not been investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS This was a randomized, multi-centre, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel group, study to compare the effects on cardiovascular remodelling of sacubitril/valsartan with those of olmesartan in patients with hypertension and elevated pulse pressure. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were used to assess LV mass and local aortic distensibility, at baseline and at 12 and 52 weeks after initiation of treatment. Central pulse and systolic pressure were determined using a SphymoCor® XCEL device at each time point. A total of 114 patients were included, with 57 in each treatment group. The mean age was 59.8 years, and 67.5% were male. Demographic characteristics did not vary between the two sets of patients. Left ventricular mass index decreased to a greater extent in the sacubitril/valsartan group compared to the olmesartan group from baseline to 12 weeks (-6.36 vs. -2.32 g/m2; P = 0.039) and from baseline to 52 weeks (-6.83 vs. -3.55 g/m2; P = 0.029). These differences remained significant after adjustment for systolic blood pressure (SBP) at follow-up (P = 0.036 and 0.019 at 12 and 52 weeks, respectively) and similar signals (though formally non-significant) were observed after adjusting for changes in SBP (P = 0.0612 and P = 0.0529, respectively). There were no significant differences in local distensibility changes from baseline to 12 or 52 weeks between the two groups; however, there was a larger reduction in central pulse pressure for the sacubitril/valsartan group compared to the olmesartan group (P = 0.010). CONCLUSION Since LV mass change correlates with cardiovascular prognosis, the greater reductions in LV mass indicate valuable advantages of sacubitril/valsartan compared to olmesartan. The finding that LV mass index decrease might be to some extent independent of SBP suggests that the effect of the dual-acting agent may go beyond those due to its BP-lowering ability.
-
5.
Medication-taking behavior in hypertensive patients with a single-tablet, fixed-dose combination in Japan.
Saito, I, Kushiro, T, Matsushita, Y, Sato, Y, Sagawa, K, Tanaka, Y, Tanigawa, M, Okutani, Y
Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993). 2016;(2):131-6
Abstract
Non-persistence rate (defined as not remaining on treatment) in patients taking a renin angiotensin system inhibitor plus calcium channel blocker was studied in three integrated 12-weeks surveys by matching separate drug combination therapy (CT) and fixed-dose combination (FDC). We also investigated medication adherence measured by proportion of days covered by using a claims database. The non-persistence rate was significantly lower in FDC than CT (p = 0.0074). In the database study, the medication adherence was higher in FDC than CT for 3, 6, and 12 months (all p < 0.001). In conclusion, use of single-tablet FDC antihypertensive therapy was associated with better medication-taking behavior.
-
6.
Lipid and blood pressure control for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients: a subanalysis of the OMEGA study.
Teramoto, T, Kawamori, R, Miyazaki, S, Teramukai, S, Sato, Y, Okuda, Y, Shirayama, M
Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2015;(1):62-75
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this analysis was to investigate the relationships between dyslipidemia, achieved blood pressure (BP) values and the lipid levels, as well as the control of four cardiovascular risk factors (BP, low-density lipoprotein: LDL cholesterol, hemoglobin A1c: HbA1c and smoking) and the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), in Japanese patients receiving antihypertensive therapy. METHODS A total of 13,052 patients with no history of CVD were included in this subanalysis of the prospective observational OMEGA study in Japanese hypertensive patients treated with olmesartan. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the relationship with the risk of CVD. RESULTS The incidence of CVD during the 36-month study period was 5.59/1,000 patient-years among the patients with dyslipidemia (n = 6,297) and 5.57/1,000 patient-years among the patients without dyslipidemia (n = 6,755), with no significant differences between the two groups. Higher achieved BP values tended to be associated with an increased CVD risk in both the patients with and without dyslipidemia. In addition, the risk of CVD tended to be higher in the patients with an achieved LDL cholesterol level of ≥ 120 mg/dL than in those with an LDL level of < 120 mg/dL (trend p = 0.0005) and in the patients with an achieved high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of < 60 mg/dL than in those with an HDL level of ≥ 60 mg/dL (trend p = 0.0017). Furthermore, the risk of CVD was higher among the patients with fewer controlled risk factors than among those with control of all four risk factors (trend p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In order to prevent CVD in olmesartan-treated hypertensive patients with no history of CVD, it is important to control both the lipid and BP levels and aim for comprehensive risk factor control.
-
7.
Preferable effects of olmesartan/calcium channel blocker to olmesartan/diuretic on blood pressure variability in very elderly hypertension: COLM study subanalysis.
Rakugi, H, Ogihara, T, Saruta, T, Kawai, T, Saito, I, Teramukai, S, Shimada, K, Katayama, S, Higaki, J, Odawara, M, et al
Journal of hypertension. 2015;(10):2165-72
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of this subanalysis of the COLM trial [NCT00454662] were to compare visit-to-visit variability (VVV) of blood pressure (BP) between age groups and between two treatment combinations, that is, the angiotensin II receptor blocker, olmesartan combined with a calcium channel blocker (CCB), or a diuretic and to investigate the effect of VVV of BP on cardiovascular events in elderly hypertensive patients. METHODS Hypertensive patients ages 65-84 years with a history of and/or risk factors for cardiovascular disease were randomized to receive treatment with olmesartan along with either a CCB or a diuretic for at least 3 years. This subanalysis comprised 4876 patients who had their office BP measured at least three occasions (median nine occasions) during the follow-up period. VVV of BP was defined by several metrics including the within-individual standard deviation of every visit during the follow-up period. RESULTS VVV of SBP was larger in the very elderly group (75-84 years) than in the elderly group (65-74 years). VVV of SBP was smaller in the olmesartan along with CCB group than in the olmesartan along with diuretic group, especially in very elderly patients and also isolated systolic hypertensive patients. The incidence rate of primary endpoint increased along with an increment in the SD of SBP in all of the age and treatment groups. CONCLUSION VVV of SBP may mediate the preferable effect of combination of angiotensin II receptor blocker along with CCB on cardiovascular events in the very elderly and also isolated systolic hypertensive patients.
-
8.
Comparison of two different strategies of treatment with zoledronate in HIV-infected patients with low bone mineral density: single dose versus two doses in 2 years.
Negredo, E, Bonjoch, A, Pérez-Álvarez, N, Ornelas, A, Puig, J, Herrero, C, Estany, C, del Río, L, di Gregorio, S, Echeverría, P, et al
HIV medicine. 2015;(7):441-8
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Given the need for easily managed treatment of osteoporosis in HIV-infected patients, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of zoledronate, by comparing three groups of patients: those with annual administration, those with biennial administration (one dose in 2 years) and a control group with no administration of zoledronate. METHODS We randomized (2:1) 31 patients on antiretroviral therapy with low bone mineral density (BMD) to zoledronate (5 mg administered intravenously; 21 patients) plus diet counselling and to a control group (diet counselling; 10 patients). At week 48, patients treated with zoledronate were randomized again to receive a second dose (two-dose group; n = 12) or to continue with diet counselling only (single-dose group; n = 9). Changes in lumbar spine and hip BMD and bone turnover markers were compared. RESULTS The median percentage change from baseline to week 96 in L1-L4 BMD was -1.74% [interquartile range (IQR) -2.56, 3.60%], 7.90% (IQR 4.20, 16.57%) and 5.22% (IQR 2.02, 7.28%) in the control, two-dose and single-dose groups, respectively (P < 0.01, control vs. two doses; P = 0.02, control vs. single dose; P = 0.18, two doses vs. single dose). Hip BMD changed by a median of 2.12% (IQR -0.12, 3.08%), 5.16% (IQR 3.06, 6.74%) and 4.47% (IQR 1, 5.58%), respectively (P = 0.04, control vs. two doses; P = 0.34, two doses vs. single dose). No differences between the two-dose and single-dose groups were detected in bone markers at week 96. CONCLUSIONS The benefits for BMD of a single dose of zoledronate in 2 years may be comparable to those obtained with two doses of the drug after 96 weeks, although this study is insufficiently powered to exclude a real difference. Future studies should explore whether biennial administration of zoledronate is a useful alternative in the treatment of osteoporosis in HIV-infected patients.
-
9.
Urinary angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in hypertensive patients may be increased by olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker.
Furuhashi, M, Moniwa, N, Mita, T, Fuseya, T, Ishimura, S, Ohno, K, Shibata, S, Tanaka, M, Watanabe, Y, Akasaka, H, et al
American journal of hypertension. 2015;(1):15-21
Abstract
BACKGROUND Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is highly expressed in the kidney and converts angiotensin (Ang) II to Ang-(1-7), a renoprotective peptide. Urinary ACE2 has been shown to be elevated in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, the effects of antihypertensive agents on urinary ACE2 remain unclear. METHODS Of participants in the Tanno-Sobetsu cohort study in 2011 (n = 617), subjects on no medication (n = 101) and hypertensive patients treated with antihypertensive agents, including the calcium channel blockers amlodipine and long-acting nifedipine; the ACE inhibitor enalapril; and the Ang II receptor blockers losartan, candesartan, valsartan, telmisartan, and olmesartan, for more than 1 year (n = 100) were enrolled, and urinary ACE2 level was measured. RESULTS Glucose and hemoglobin A1c were significantly higher in patients treated with enalapril, telmisartan or olmesartan than in the control subjects. Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) was significantly higher in patients treated with enalapril than in the control subjects. Urinary ACE2 level was higher in the olmesartan-treated group, but not the other treatment groups, than in the control group. Urinary ACE2 level was positively correlated with systolic blood pressure (r = 0.211; P = 0.003), UACR (r = 0.367; P < 0.001), and estimated salt intake (r = 0.260; P < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis after adjustment of age, sex, and the correlated indices showed that the use of olmesartan was an independent predictor of urinary ACE2 level. CONCLUSIONS In contrast with other antihypertensive drugs, olmesartan may uniquely increase urinary ACE2 level, which could potentially offer additional renoprotective effects.
-
10.
Variation of some inflammatory markers in hypertensive patients after 1 year of olmesartan/amlodipine single-pill combination compared with olmesartan or amlodipine monotherapies.
Derosa, G, Cicero, AF, Carbone, A, Querci, F, Fogari, E, D'Angelo, A, Maffioli, P
Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : JASH. 2013;(1):32-9
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a fixed olmesartan/amlodipine combination on blood pressure control, lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, and some inflammatory markers compared with single-drug monotherapy. A total of 276 hypertensive patients were randomly assigned to olmesartan 20 mg, amlodipine 10 mg, or a single pill containing olmesartan/amlodipine combination 20/5 mg for 12 months. We evaluated the following at baseline and after 6 and 12 months: body weight, body mass index, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), lipid profile, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), retinol binding protein-4 (RBP-4), and interleukins 6 and 7 (IL-6 and IL-7). At baseline, and after 6 and 12 months, patients underwent an euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp. The olmesartan/amlodipine combination provided a greater decrease of SBP and DPB compared with amlodipine and olmesartan monotherapies. The olmesartan/amlodipine combination decreased FPG after 12 months compared with amlodipine monotherapy. The combination decreased FPI and homeostasis model assessment index and increased M value both compared with baseline and with olmesartan and amlodipine monotherapies. Olmesartan/amlodipine decreased IL-7, but not IL-6, compared with single drug components. The olmesartan/amlodipine combination is effective and safe in reducing blood pressure and has some additive effects not shown by single drugs, such as an improvement of IL-7.