-
1.
Impact of twice- or three-times-weekly maintenance hemodialysis on patient outcomes: A multicenter randomized trial.
Dai, L, Lu, C, Liu, J, Li, S, Jin, H, Chen, F, Xue, Z, Miao, C
Medicine. 2020;(20):e20202
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIM: Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) frequency is associated with survival and complication rates. Achieving the optimal balance between healthcare, quality of life (QOL), and medical costs is challenging. We compared complications, inflammatory status, nutritional status, and QOL between patients with different MHD frequencies. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a multicenter randomized trial of patients treated between May 2011 and August 2017 at 3 tertiary hospitals in Wenzhou. Patients were grouped according to their treatment schedule over 1 year: twice-weekly or 3-times-weekly. Complications, biochemistry parameters, and QOL (KDQOL-SFTM 1.3 scale) were assessed. RESULTS One hundred forty patients were included aged 29 to 68 years (mean age, 50.9 ± 4.3 years). There were no significant differences in infection, heart failure, or cerebral hemorrhage complications between the 2 groups (P = .664). Pre-dialysis hemoglobin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, serum albumin, total cholesterol, triglyceride, calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, and ejection fraction were similar in both groups (P > .05). After 1 year of MHD, both groups exhibited significant improvements in these parameters (all P < .05) with no significant differences between groups. Serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and weekly standard hemodialysis treatment adequacy did not improve after treatment (all P > .05), although a difference in BUN was observed between the 2 groups (P < .001). QOL was superior in the twice-weekly group than in the 3-times-weekly group (all P < .05), except for social support, which was slightly better in the 3-times-weekly group than in the twice-weekly group. CONCLUSIONS Twice- and 3-times-weekly MHD resulted in comparable inflammatory and nutritional clinical outcomes and adverse events. QOL was better for the twice-weekly schedule. Even for patients with economic constraints, twice- or 3-times-weekly MHD should be selected with caution after consideration of BUN levels at baseline.
-
2.
Association of Hepcidin With Anemia Parameters in Incident Dialysis Patients: Differences Between Dialysis Modalities.
Lim, JH, Park, YW, Lee, SH, Do, JY, Kim, SH, Han, S, Jung, HY, Choi, JY, Cho, JH, Kim, CD, et al
Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. 2020;(1):4-16
Abstract
Hepcidin's relationships with other variables are unclear. We evaluated associations of serum hepcidin with clinical parameters in ESRD patients. Ninety-nine incident dialysis patients, including 57 on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 42 on HD, were prospectively followed for 6 months. Serum hepcidin levels significantly increased during initial 6 months of dialysis. In the multivariate regression model, independent predictors of serum hepcidin levels in ESRD patients before maintenance dialysis were interleukin-6, ferritin, phosphate, iron, and aspartate transaminase. Six months after initiating dialysis, serum hepcidin levels were independently predicted by ferritin, total iron binding capacity (TIBC), and aspartate transaminase in all patients, whereas by ferritin and TIBC in PD patients, and ferritin, TIBC, and 24-h urine volume in HD patients. Serum hepcidin levels are differentially associated with anemia parameters in PD compared with HD patients. Urine volume was an independent predictor of hepcidin levels in early HD patients.
-
3.
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for restless legs syndrome in end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Huang, CW, Lee, MJ, Wang, LJ, Lee, PT, Tu, YK, Hsu, CW, Lin, PY
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2020;(9):1609-1618
Abstract
BACKGROUND Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is common in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and impairs health and quality of life significantly. However, the optimal treatment of RLS in ESRD patients is uncertain and less studied compared with idiopathic RLS patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and acceptability of treatments for RLS in ESRD patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by February 2019 in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were reviewed. RLS severity reduction was treated as treatment efficacy, and adverse events were treated as acceptable. Both outcomes were appraised using a random effects model expressed as standardized mean differences and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively, and were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities to obtain a hierarchy of interventions. RESULTS A total of 12 RCTs were included, comprising 9 interventions and 498 participants. All the interventions significantly improved RLS severity without critical side effects compared with placebo. Gabapentin achieved the greatest decrease of RLS severity [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.95, 95% CI 0.81-3.09 (SUCRA 79.3%)], despite its frequent adverse events [SMD = 0.18, 95% CI 0.02-1.50 (19.9%)]. The combination therapy of exercise plus dopamine agonist had better efficacy [SMD = 1.60, 95% CI 0.08-3.12 (59.8%)] and acceptability [SMD = 1.41, 95% CI 0.01-142.53 (63.9%)] compared with that of vitamin C plus vitamin E [SMD = 1.50, 95% CI 0.47-2.54 (56.6%); SMD = 0.32, 95% CI 0.04-2.86 (32.5%)]. CONCLUSIONS This network meta-analysis supports that gabapentin is the most effective treatment for RLS in ESRD patients. Exercise plus dopamine agonist is a favorable combination therapy concerning side effects. Future large RCTs with long-term treatment outcomes are necessary.
-
4.
Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol.
Blankestijn, PJ, Fischer, KI, Barth, C, Cromm, K, Canaud, B, Davenport, A, Grobbee, DE, Hegbrant, J, Roes, KC, Rose, M, et al
BMJ open. 2020;(2):e033228
Abstract
INTRODUCTION End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major public health problem affecting more than 2 million people worldwide. It is one of the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases. Haemodialysis (HD) is the most common therapeutic option but is also associated with a risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and suboptimal quality of life. Over the past decades, haemodiafiltration (HDF) has become available. Although high-dose HDF has shown some promising survival advantage compared to conventional HD, the evidence remains controversial. A Cochrane systematic review found, in low-quality trials, with various convective forms of dialysis, a reduction in cardiovascular, but not all-cause mortality and the effects on non-fatal cardiovascular events and hospitalisation were uncertain. In contrast, an individual patient data analysis suggested that high-dose HDF reduced both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to HD. In view of these discrepant results, a definitive trial is required to determine whether high-dose HDF is preferable to high-flux HD. The comparison of high-dose HDF with high-flux HD (CONVINCE) study will assess the benefits and harms of high-dose HDF versus a conventional high-flux HD in adults with ESKD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This international, prospective, open label, randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 1800 ESKD adults treated with HD in nine European countries. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to high-dose HDF versus continuation of conventional high-flux HD. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 3 years' follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular events, all-cause and infection-related hospitalisations, patient-reported outcomes (eg, health-related quality of life) and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The CONVINCE study will address the question of benefits and harms of high-dose HDF compared to high-flux HD for kidney replacement therapy in patients with ESKD with a focus on survival, patient perspectives and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR 7138).
-
5.
Effect of Sheng Xue Ning Tablets on Renal Anemia in Patients Subject to Maintenance Hemodialysis and Safety Evaluation: A Multi-setting Prospective Randomized Study.
Tang, XJ, Rong, S, Mei, CL, Ni, ZH, Jiang, GR, Yuan, WJ, Wang, NS, Guo, ZY, Ma, J, Yan, HD, et al
Current medical science. 2020;(2):327-331
Abstract
This study compared Sheng Xue Ning (SXN) tablets with ferrous succinate (FS) tablets in terms of their efficacy for the treatment of iron-deficient renal anemia and safety in patients subject to maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). A total of 94 patients undergoing MHD were randomly assigned to an experiment group (receiving oral SXN tablets, SXN group) and a control group (orally given FS tablets, FS group) and followed up for 12 weeks. Erythropoietin (EPO) was used in both groups. The efficacy was assessed by detecting the subsequent changes in hemoglobin (Hb), serum iron (SI), SF and transferrin saturation (TSAT). At the 12th week, Hb and TSAT levels in both groups were significantly increased compared to those in the screening period (P<0.05). However, no significant difference in Hb and TSAT was found between the two groups. The average weekly EPO dosage used was lower in SXN group than in FS group (P<0.05) at the 10th week and the 12th week. Our study showed that SXN tablets can effectively ameliorate renal anemia and keep iron metabolism stable in MHD patients, and its efficacy is virtually close to that of FS tablets. Meanwhile, SXN tablets can reduce the dosage of EPO and have a good safety profile.
-
6.
Comparisons of Three Main Treatments on Renoprotective Effects in Diabetes Mellitus.
Huang, Q, Li, K, Li, M, Xu, G
Iranian journal of kidney diseases. 2019;(1):36-47
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antihypertension, intensive glucose control (IGC), and lipid lowering were the main therapeutic strategies in diabetes mellitus. However, the comparative effects of them on renoprotection remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched the PubMed, EMBase, and Cochrane Library up to May 18, 2017, for studies with comparative interventions on regression, end-stage renal disease and all-cause death in diabetes mellitus. Statistical analysis was done using the Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). The surface under the cumulative ranking area and median rank were calculated to rank the interventions. RESULTS A total of 73 randomized controlled trials with 13 3703 participants were included for the comparisons of 14 interventions. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor plus angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI-ARB) ranked first in regression (odds ratio, 62; 95% confidence interval, 5.2 to > 999); ACEI-ARB also ranked first in end-stage renal disease decline (odds ratio, 0.58, 95% confidence interval, 0.39 - 0.85), followed by IGC hemoglobin A1c less than 6.5% (odds ratio, 0.58, 95% confidence interval, 0.36 - 0.90). The ACEI plus calcium channel blocker reduced all-cause death leaving other interventions insignificant (odds ratio, < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, < 0.001 to 0.30). ). The surface under the cumulative ranking area analyses also matched the result ranks. CONCLUSIONS Compared with antihypertension interventions, IGC including IGC hemoglobin A1c less than 6.5% and lipid lowering, ACEI-ARB showed the best renoprotective effects.
-
7.
Randomised trial on clinical performances and biocompatibility of four high-flux hemodialyzers in two mode treatments: hemodialysis vs post dilution hemodiafiltration.
Morena, M, Creput, C, Bouzernidj, M, Rodriguez, A, Chalabi, L, Seigneuric, B, Lauret, C, Bargnoux, AS, Dupuy, AM, Cristol, JP
Scientific reports. 2019;(1):18265
Abstract
This prospective multicenter randomized comparative cross-over trial aimed at evaluating the influence of hemodialysis vs post-dilution hemodiafiltration with high-flux dialyzers in solute clearance and biocompatibility profile. 32 patients were sequentially dialyzed with Leoceed-21HX, Polypure-22S+, Rexsys-27H and VIE-21A. Primary outcome was β2-microglobulin removal. Secondary outcomes were (i) extraction of other uremic solutes (ii) parameters of inflammation and nutrition and (iii) comparative quantification of perdialytic albumin losses (using total 'TDC' vs partial 'PDC' collection of dialysate). Significant increases in removal rates of β2-microglobulin (84.7 ± 0.8 vs 71.6 ± 0.8 mg/L), myoglobin (65.9 ± 1.3 vs 38.6 ± 1.3 µg/L), free immunoglobulin light chains Kappa (74.9 ± 0.8 vs 55.6 ± 0.8 mg/L), β-trace protein (54.8 ± 1.3 vs 26.8 ± 1.4 mg/L) and orosomucoid (11.0 ± 1.1 vs 6.0 ± 1.1 g/L) but not myostatin (14.8 ± 1.5 vs 13.0 ± 1.5 ng/mL) were observed in HDF compared to HD when pooling all dialyzers. Rexsys and VIE-A use in both HD and HDF subgroups was associated to a better removal of middle/large-size molecules compared to Leoceed and Polypure, except β2-microglobulin for Rexsys. Inflammatory parameters were unchanged between dialyzers without any interaction with dialysis modality. Mean dialysate albumin loss was comparable between TDC and PDC (1.855 vs 1.826 g/session for TDC and PDC respectively). In addition, a significant difference in albumin loss was observed between dialyzers with the highest value (4.5 g/session) observed using Rexsys. Use of all dialyzers was associated with good removals of the large spectrum of uremic toxins tested and good biocompatibility profiles, with an additional gain in removal performances with HDF. Larger surface area, thinner wall and resultant very high ultrafiltration coefficient of Rexsys should be taken into account in its clear performance advantages.
-
8.
Comparison of Adequacy of Dialysis between Single-use and Reused Hemodialyzers in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis.
Hamid, A, Dhrolia, MF, Imtiaz, S, Qureshi, R, Ahmad, A
Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP. 2019;(8):720-723
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare adequacy of dialysis between single-use and reused dialyzer in order to ascertain whether reuse of dialyzers provides adequate dialysis and thereby enable provision of effective yet affordable renal replacement therapy in resource-limited countries. STUDY DESIGN Observational cross-sectional study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY Department of Nephrology, The Kidney Centre, Postgraduate Training Institute (TKC-PGTI), Karachi, from December 2017 to February 2018. METHODOLOGY Equal number of patients on thrice weekly hemodialysis with either single-use (group A; n=33) or reuse (group B; n=33) dialyzer for at least six months were reviewed. Both groups were compared for dialysis adequacy measured as urea reduction ratio (URR); as well as adequacy of patient care in terms of anemia, bone-mineral control and nutritional status. Serum hemoglobin and erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) dose were taken as markers for anemia management, serum calcium, phosphate and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) for bone-mineral control and serum albumin as index for nutritional status. RESULTS The mean age of patients in Group A was 51.36 +13.9 years and in Group B was 54.78 +15.4 years. Female to male ratio was 1.75:1. The mean number of dialyzer reused in group B was 47.5±27.8. There was no significant difference between the study groups in terms of URR (p=0.362), hemoglobin (p=0.347), ESA dose (p-=0.556), serum calcium, phosphorus and iPTH (p=0.868, p=0.138 and p=0.323, respectively), and serum albumin (p=0.777). All the parameters were in accordance with KDOQI guidelines. CONCLUSION Reuse of dialyzer does not affect dialysis efficiency. Adequate dialysis therapy can be provided economically through reprocessed dialyzers in at least resource-poor countries.
-
9.
CureGN Study Rationale, Design, and Methods: Establishing a Large Prospective Observational Study of Glomerular Disease.
Mariani, LH, Bomback, AS, Canetta, PA, Flessner, MF, Helmuth, M, Hladunewich, MA, Hogan, JJ, Kiryluk, K, Nachman, PH, Nast, CC, et al
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2019;(2):218-229
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES Glomerular diseases, including minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous nephropathy, and immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy, share clinical presentations, yet result from multiple biological mechanisms. Challenges to identifying underlying mechanisms, biomarkers, and new therapies include the rarity of each diagnosis and slow progression, often requiring decades to measure the effectiveness of interventions to prevent end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) or death. STUDY DESIGN Multicenter prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Cure Glomerulonephropathy (CureGN) will enroll 2,400 children and adults with minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous nephropathy, or IgA nephropathy (including IgA vasculitis) and a first diagnostic kidney biopsy within 5 years. Patients with ESKD and those with secondary causes of glomerular disease are excluded. EXPOSURES Clinical data, including medical history, medications, family history, and patient-reported outcomes, are obtained, along with a digital archive of kidney biopsy images and blood and urine specimens at study visits aligned with clinical care 1 to 4 times per year. OUTCOMES Patients are followed up for changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate, disease activity, ESKD, and death and for nonrenal complications of disease and treatment, including infection, malignancy, cardiovascular, and thromboembolic events. ANALYTICAL APPROACH The study design supports multiple longitudinal analyses leveraging the diverse data domains of CureGN and its ancillary program. At 2,400 patients and an average of 2 years' initial follow-up, CureGN has 80% power to detect an HR of 1.4 to 1.9 for proteinuria remission and a mean difference of 2.1 to 3.0mL/min/1.73m2 in estimated glomerular filtration rate per year. LIMITATIONS Current follow-up can only detect large differences in ESKD and death outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Study infrastructure will support a broad range of scientific approaches to identify mechanistically distinct subgroups, identify accurate biomarkers of disease activity and progression, delineate disease-specific treatment targets, and inform future therapeutic trials. CureGN is expected to be among the largest prospective studies of children and adults with glomerular disease, with a broad goal to lessen disease burden and improve outcomes.
-
10.
Differences in Amino Acid Loss Between High-Efficiency Hemodialysis and Postdilution and Predilution Hemodiafiltration Using High Convection Volume Exchange-A New Metabolic Scenario? A Pilot Study.
Murtas, S, Aquilani, R, Deiana, ML, Iadarola, P, Secci, R, Cadeddu, M, Salis, S, Serpi, D, Bolasco, P
Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation. 2019;(2):126-135
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to quantify the loss of total amino acids (TAAs), nonessential amino acids, essential amino acids, and branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) produced by high-efficiency hemodialysis (HEHD), postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDFpost), and predilution hemodiafiltration (HDFpre) using high ultrafiltration volumes; and to define the specific AA losses registered in HEHD, HDFpost, and HDFpre; to identify a potential metabolic and nutritional decline into protein energy wasting; to compare AA analysis of arterial blood samples taken from healthy controls and patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis. DESIGN AND METHODS Identical dialysis monitors, membranes, and dialysate/infusate were used to homogenize extracorporeal body influence. Ten patients were recruited and randomized to receive treatment with HEHD, HDFpost, and HDFpre it was used on-line dialytic water methodologies (OL); patients' AA arterial concentrations were measured at the start and on completion of dialysis; TAA from the dialyzer filter was calculated, and baseline levels were subsequently compared with findings obtained 1 year later. Finally, the results obtained were compared with the data from a study of 8 healthy volunteers conducted using bioimpedance analysis and laboratory blood tests to assess nutritional status. RESULTS A higher convective dose results in a higher weekly loss of TAA, nonessential AAs, essential AAs, and BCAAs (HEHD: 15.7 g; HDFpost-OL: 16.1 g; HDFpre-OL: 16.3 g, P < .01). After 12 months, the same hemodialys patients showed a reduced body and water intracellular mass and reduced phase angle. Arterial concentrations of TAAs and BCAAs were lower than those detected in healthy subjects (P < .01). CONCLUSION The study shows that the AA losses in dialytic liquid are greater after high exchange volume HDF techniques, especially HDFpre. The AA losses are not metabolically compensated, so these increase the derangements of predialytic arterial plasma AA levels. Both AA losses and arterial AA perturbations further worsened body composition already after 12 months of additional dialysis.